Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly
Version: 0.10.7-1
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly needs to Provides gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad, in
addition to conflicting with it, so that software that depends upon -bad
will not break.
- --
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly needs to Provides gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad, in
addition to conflicting with it, so that software that depends upon -bad
will not break.
No, this breaks versionned depends; explain what is broken for you and
we will
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly needs to Provides gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad, in
addition to conflicting with it, so that software that depends upon -bad
will not break.
No,
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
However, there is not
way to declare that a package will depend on both good and ugly,
instead of just bad.
Do you mean something like good (= x.y) | bad ( x.y), ugly (= x.y) | bad
( x.y)
That way your package will depend on both good and ugly = some_version, or bad
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Versioned depends is precisely what breaks
No, you're confusing two things.
because the content of
-bad was split between good and ugly, we no longer have a safe way to
figure out which package
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
because the content of
-bad was split between good and ugly, we no longer have a safe way to
figure out which package provides
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Even then, this reorganization forces maintainers of other packages to
version THEIR dependencies, to either get what they need from bad
version, or good = version or bad = version.
Not necessarily, no; we could as well have the
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Even then, this reorganization forces maintainers of other packages to
version THEIR dependencies, to either get what they need from bad
version, or good =
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Yes it does but ugly conflicts with bad, so I currently cannot have
them both installed.
Not in unstable
--
Loïc Minier
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Yes it does but ugly conflicts with bad, so I currently cannot have
them both installed.
Not in unstable
But definitely so in Testing, because the packages are out of
10 matches
Mail list logo
