On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:32:56AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Jurij Smakov [Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:17:03 +0100]:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:50:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:14:10PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
It appears that pwlib-titan version currently
* Jurij Smakov [Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:17:03 +0100]:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:50:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:14:10PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
It appears that pwlib-titan version currently in unstable got
miscompiled on sparc somehow, that's currently
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:50:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:14:10PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
It appears that pwlib-titan version currently in unstable got
miscompiled on sparc somehow, that's currently causing RC build
failures of gnugk (#478502, note
On Monday 25 August 2008 18:17:03 Jurij Smakov wrote:
Both have built successfully on sparc [0,1] against the binNMU'd
version of libpt-1.11.2 (from pwlib-titan source)
Jurij,
Thanks for your debuging of this. Good news.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi,
It appears that pwlib-titan version currently in unstable got
miscompiled on sparc somehow, that's currently causing RC build
failures of gnugk (#478502, note that this fails on a number of
architectures, so other people should test whether rebuilding
pwlib-titan on failing arches fixes
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:14:10PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
It appears that pwlib-titan version currently in unstable got
miscompiled on sparc somehow, that's currently causing RC build
failures of gnugk (#478502, note that this fails on a number of
architectures, so other people should
6 matches
Mail list logo
