Hi Osamu,
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 00:15 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
As I see now, it seems to change all_ALL behavior.
It shouldn't be. Can you please give an example of a change in
behaviour?
cya,
#
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 03:06:17PM +1100, Harshula wrote:
Because all_ALL is confusing and needs to be deprecated.
I agree all_ALL is confusing.
I think all_ALL needs to be deprecated if we find good alternative.
But we should not change all_ALL behavior. (I do not want user to
change their
Osamu :
I have no idea on Ubuntu. I am curious for gnome-language-selector Debian
situation.
For Debian distros when searching at http://packages.debian.org, I do
not see gnome-language-selector or the package language-selector
which carries it in. It has been made only for Ubuntu it
Hi Sethu,
Thanks for the updated response/clarification. I think I now understand
your concerns.
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 07:33 +0530, கா. சேது | K. Sethu wrote:
im-switch package itself writes into the alternatives registry file
/var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-input-all_ALL for inclusion of
Hi Osamu,
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 01:11 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
all_ALL is meant as fallback default as I remember.
Perhaps def_DEF would have been a more appropriate string?
That is still awkward. Why not default.
I prefer default too. Since all_ALL exists, I assumed there was some
Note : I prepared the following response after reading Harshula's bug
first report and Osamu's reply (messages marked #5 and #10
respectively) . I haven't still read fully the next 3 messages
(#15,#22 and #27 yet) which I saw only now.
With Harshula's proposed reversal of order (in first
A correction to my posting #32:
[..]
not writing to or creating anew an alternatives registry
file /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-input-all_ALL.
[..]
It should be xinput-all_ALL and not x-input-all_ALL .
~Sethu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
retitle 513242 im-switch: inconsistent quasi-locale behaviour
thanks
Hi Osamu,
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 22:21 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I kind of see your problem but questions are:
* is this feature?
* does this change cause side effect?
snip
If im-switch is run with ll_CC set to all_ALL
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:16:54AM +1100, Harshula wrote:
retitle 513242 im-switch: inconsistent quasi-locale behaviour
thanks
OK.
snip
all_ALL is meant as fallback default as I remember.
Perhaps def_DEF would have been a more appropriate string?
That is still awkward. Why not
Hi,
I kind of see your problem but questions are:
* is this feature?
* does this change cause side effect?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:16:51AM +1100, Harshula wrote:
Package: im-switch
Version: 1.16
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
K. Sethu brought this inconsistent behaviour to my
Package: im-switch
Version: 1.16
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
K. Sethu brought this inconsistent behaviour to my attention [1].
im-switch(8):
im-switch [-v][-z ll_CC] -s inputmethodname
...
-z ll_CC
11 matches
Mail list logo
