Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:49:08 -0600 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
I have somewhat good news for you: I prepared a patch that moves the
trap instruction before everything else, in order to intercept early
SIGINTs too.
[...]
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:29:51 -0600 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:49:08 -0600 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
I have somewhat good news for you: I prepared a patch that moves the
trap instruction before everything else, in order to
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:49:08 -0600 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
I have somewhat good news for you: I prepared a patch that moves the
trap instruction before everything else, in order to intercept early
SIGINTs too.
Good to hear. If you let me know when you push, I can
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:37:46 -0600 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi Jonathan and thanks for your bug report! ;-)
That was fast. :)
It's good to see that it is appreciated! ;-)
Maybe the trap instruction should be moved before everything else:
I have to think
Francesco Poli wrote:
I have somewhat good news for you: I prepared a patch that moves the
trap instruction before everything else, in order to intercept early
SIGINTs too.
Good to hear. If you let me know when you push, I can look it over.
Thanks,
Jonathan
who is happy to get a chance to
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.3
Severity: minor
[...]
Fetched 679KiB in 5s.
^C/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:228:in ``': Interrupt
from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:228
E: dpkg 'pre' action '/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10' returned non-zero
status: 2
E: error performing command
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:58:44 -0600 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.3
Severity: minor
Hi Jonathan and thanks for your bug report! ;-)
[...]
Fetched 679KiB in 5s.
^C/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:228:in ``': Interrupt
from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:228
E:
Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi Jonathan and thanks for your bug report! ;-)
That was fast. :)
Maybe the trap instruction should be moved before everything else:
I have to think about it...
Maybe it is a ruby bug, then (the default signal handler), though that
is harder to say.
And maybe the
8 matches
Mail list logo