On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:07:08 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:39:05 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
Ok, in this case the patch, proposed here [1] can be applied.
[...]
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618968#40
Yes, I am afraid this is the only
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:14:06 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 23:34:51 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
2012/11/28 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
Well, it's a single file with a single copyright holder: I don't know,
maybe Aaron Holtzman may be contacted and
Ok, in this case the patch, proposed here [1] can be applied.
Cheers,
Anton
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618968#40
2013/1/13 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
I found out that basically *all* libav binary packages are effectively
under the GNU GPL v2 or later
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:39:05 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
Ok, in this case the patch, proposed here [1] can be applied.
[...]
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618968#40
Yes, I am afraid this is the only short-term solution we have for the
time being... :-(
Bye and thanks
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 23:34:51 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
2012/11/28 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
Well, it's a single file with a single copyright holder: I don't know,
maybe Aaron Holtzman may be contacted and persuaded to re-license the
file under
2012/11/28 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
Well, it's a single file with a single copyright holder: I don't know,
maybe Aaron Holtzman may be contacted and persuaded to re-license the
file under the terms of the GNU LGPL v2.1 ...
It seems, the file libavcodec/x86/idct_mmx.c is
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:06:16 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
[...]
Francesco, could you, please, verify, whether the bug can be
closed?
Hi Anton,
it seems to me that
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/liba/libav/libav_0.8.4-1/libavcodec53.copyright
is no longer consistent with the
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:31:20 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
I think this should be reported to the libav Debian package maintainers.
For the record, I've just reported this bug: its number is #694657
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the
2012/11/28 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
libav-0.8.4/libavcodec/x86/idct_mmx.c
which is licensed under the GNU GPL v2 or later.
Does this file get compiled into a library that is linked with netgen?
Unfortunately yes [1]. It gets compiled into libavcodec.so.53 and possibly
other
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:48:20 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
2012/11/28 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
libav-0.8.4/libavcodec/x86/idct_mmx.c
which is licensed under the GNU GPL v2 or later.
Does this file get compiled into a library that is linked with netgen?
Unfortunately yes
tags 618968 +patch
thanks
Please, consider the following patch, which prevents of
using ffmpeg in netgen build. It will, of course, cut the functionality
of netgen, but will let to stay it in wheezy.
The upload should be done directly to wheezy, because
sid contains the version, which will
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 11:45 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
tags 618968 +patch
thanks
Please, consider the following patch, which prevents of
using ffmpeg in netgen build. It will, of course, cut the functionality
of netgen, but will let to stay it in wheezy.
The upload should be done
Hi Christophe,
sorry, I don't get your point regarding these packages. The patch
completely removes ffmpeg from netgen, so the license issue can
be solved in this case.
Thanks,
Anton
2012/11/27 trophime christophe.troph...@lncmi.cnrs.fr:
Hi,
unless I'm wrong netgen requires the following
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 15:10 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Christophe,
sorry, I don't get your point regarding these packages. The patch
completely removes ffmpeg from netgen, so the license issue can
be solved in this case.
netgen does not use ffmpeg as such. It uses libav libraries!
So
Well, there is a list of files in libav, which are also under
GPL-license [1]. I do not know, whether those files are used
for building.
Anton
[1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/liba/libav/current/copyright
2012/11/27 trophime christophe.troph...@lncmi.cnrs.fr:
libav
--
To
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 15:25 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
Well, there is a list of files in libav, which are also under
GPL-license [1]. I do not know, whether those files are used
for building.
Anton
[1]
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/liba/libav/current/copyright
From libswscale/swscale.h:
/*
* Copyright (C) 2001-2003 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at
*
* This file is part of Libav.
*
* Libav is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 15:59 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
From libswscale/swscale.h:
/*
* Copyright (C) 2001-2003 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at
*
* This file is part of Libav.
*
* Libav is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU
tags 618968 - patch + moreinfo
thanks
Francesco, could you, please, verify, whether the bug can be
closed?
Thanks,
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
