Hi,
On 04/24/2012 10:45 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Could you describe the problem in more detail? Under what
circumstances does the idmapper provoke allocation failures, and how
effectively do the patches avoid trouble?
We have two big NFSv4 file servers that also automount from each other
Hi,
On 04/24/2012 11:16 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:35:13 -0700
Greg KHgre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
Debian.
I've noticed Fedora has
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:20:44 +0200
Rik Theys rik.th...@esat.kuleuven.be wrote:
Hi,
On 04/24/2012 11:16 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:35:13 -0700
Greg KHgre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
I'm
Hi,
I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
Debian.
I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches
that reduce the footprint of the nfs4 id mapper which should prevent
this (or seriously limit the chance).
NFSv4: Further reduce the footprint of the
Hi Rik,
Rik Theys wrote:
NFSv4: Further reduce the footprint of the idmapper
commit 685f50f9188ac1e8244d0340a9d6ea36b6136cec
NFSv4: Reduce the footprint of the idmapper
commit d073e9b541e1ac3f52d72c3a153855d9a9ee3278
[...]
Have these patches made it into the 3.3 and/or 3.4-rc kernels?
git
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
Debian.
I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches
that reduce the footprint of the nfs4 id mapper which should prevent
this (or
clone 657078 -1
retitle 657078 nfs: page allocation failure in nfs_idmap_new
severity 657078 important
tags 657078 + upstream patch
quit
Rik Theys wrote:
I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
Debian.
I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:35:13 -0700
Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on
Debian.
I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches
8 matches
Mail list logo