Hi Bart,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
You wrote on 671436:
Now working with Dmitry Smirnov on RFS #671701
will work together on this package in the future.
Please remove this package from mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/autofs5
I did it
Hi William,
You wrote on 671436:
Now working with Dmitry Smirnov on RFS #671701
will work together on this package in the future.
Please remove this package from mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/autofs5
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Since you're on board with us may I suggest that you'll close your RFS
bug yourself?
done.
--
William
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 06.05.2012 10:16, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:24:10 Michael Tokarev wrote:
And note that whole 5.0.6-allow-for-kernel-packet-size-change.patch
is NOT NEEDED, it should be reverted upstream. *SIGH*, we spent
a ton of time and emails discussing this matter, please find
the
On 09.05.2012 22:42, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
I'm checking the package now, it all appears to be quite good (as I
already mentioned initially).
I'm verifying now whenever the transition works correctly. Did you test
this place? Is it possible to downgrade back to current version (and
Hello,
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
I'm very much interested in this package myself, and
wanted to do some packaging as well, but got distracted
by other things, and especially by the famous 32/64bit
user=kernel space interface issues we found
Dear William,
Since you're on board with us may I suggest that you'll close your RFS
bug yourself?
(I'm a bit overwhelmed with work at the moment)
Michael, I set up package repository at collab-maint:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/autofs.git
All the best,
Dmitry.
On 9
On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:24:10 Michael Tokarev wrote:
And note that whole 5.0.6-allow-for-kernel-packet-size-change.patch
is NOT NEEDED, it should be reverted upstream. *SIGH*, we spent
a ton of time and emails discussing this matter, please find
the recent LWN feature article about it (a good
On 06.05.2012 09:45, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
++p = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(my_utsname.release, .));
++q = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, .));
++r = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, .));
++return KERNEL_VERSION(p, q, r);
++}
This will break with 2-number
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package autofs
* Package name: autofs
Version : 5.0.6-1
Upstream Author : Transmeta corporation
* URL : http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v5/
* License
On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package autofs
* Package name: autofs
Version : 5.0.6-1
Hello Dmitry.
I'm very much interested in this package myself, and
wanted
On 06.05.2012 09:01, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package autofs
* Package name: autofs
Version : 5.0.6-1
There's one more issue with the
On 06.05.2012 09:21, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 06.05.2012 09:01, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package autofs
* Package name: autofs
Version
Hi Michael,
Thank you for quick reply.
On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:01:42 Michael Tokarev wrote:
I'm very much interested in this package myself, and
wanted to do some packaging as well, but got distracted
by other things, and especially by the famous 32/64bit
user=kernel space interface issues we
There's one more issue with the new package. I already
told Ian about it, but apparently he ignored it. This
new code being added as a patch to debian package,
originally from upstream author:
++static inline unsigned int linux_version_code(void)
++{
++struct utsname my_utsname;
15 matches
Mail list logo
