On Jan 12, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
The module alias has been added in 3.2.29 and 2.6.32.60 (which will go
into stable-proposed-updates soon). Shouldn't this change be made to
kmod in wheezy so it's prepared for a kernel change in jessie?
No objections on my part, I have a
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 17:27 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 12, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
The module alias has been added in 3.2.29 and 2.6.32.60 (which will go
into stable-proposed-updates soon). Shouldn't this change be made to
kmod in wheezy so it's prepared for a
Marco,
The module alias has been added in 3.2.29 and 2.6.32.60 (which will go
into stable-proposed-updates soon). Shouldn't this change be made to
kmod in wheezy so it's prepared for a kernel change in jessie?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Larkinson's Law: All laws are basically false.
Package: kmod
Version: 9-1
It may be too early to call this a bug, but I figured I'd open one
anyway and ensure there's awareness of the potential. With the advent
of individual modules for NFS v2 v3 and v4 clients (see commit
89d77c8fa8) the nfs4 as nfs alias shipped by the kmod Debian package
On Aug 05, Jamie Heilman ja...@audible.transient.net wrote:
If there's a way to take module vermagic into account, or even kernel
version, within the modprobe.d/*.conf files, I suppose that's one
No, and I do not think that this would be desirable.
If no better solution will appear then my
5 matches
Mail list logo
