Bug#691095: libvigraimpex packaging (symbols) breaks with gcc != 4.7

2013-01-13 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org, 2012-10-21, 14:20: Perhaps old fashioned shlibs might be a better choice than a symbols file. For what it's worth, I agree with you assessment. Before I orphaned the package, I maintained the symbols files, which was doable, but rather tiresome,

Bug#691095: libvigraimpex packaging (symbols) breaks with gcc != 4.7

2012-10-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: libvigraimpex Version: 1.8.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious libvigraimpex in experimental only builds successfully with gcc-4.7. See e.g. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libvigraimpexarch=armelver=1.8.0%2Bdfsg-1stamp=1348959928 --- dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some