Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-12 Thread David Baron
On Monday 11 August 2014 17:17:30 Marco d'Itri wrote: On Aug 11, David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il wrote: But if sysvinit is still operational, I can place a fallback boot item with init= for that and try that first. If OK, no problem to upgrade the rest and be done. Please just upgrade.

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread David Baron
Package: udev Version: 208-7 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Module use to auto-load as of 2.04.14 Workaround is simple enough: manually or rc.local modprobe snd-seq --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 Debian

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 11, David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il wrote: Workaround is simple enough: manually or rc.local modprobe snd-seq I am not sure if this driver can and/or should be autoloaded. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread David Baron
On Monday 11 August 2014 11:55:11 Marco d'Itri wrote: On Aug 11, David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il wrote: Workaround is simple enough: manually or rc.local modprobe snd-seq I am not sure if this driver can and/or should be autoloaded. Maybe not, but it always was before. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 11.08.2014 11:50, schrieb David Baron: Package: udev Version: 208-7 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Module use to auto-load as of 2.04.14 Workaround is simple enough: manually or rc.local modprobe snd-seq Have you rebooted after the upgrade to 208-7?

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread David Baron
On Monday 11 August 2014 12:28:39 Michael Biebl wrote: Am 11.08.2014 11:50, schrieb David Baron: Package: udev Version: 208-7 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Module use to auto-load as of 2.04.14 Workaround is simple enough: manually or rc.local

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 11.08.2014 12:58, schrieb David Baron: On Monday 11 August 2014 12:28:39 Michael Biebl wrote: Am 11.08.2014 11:50, schrieb David Baron: Package: udev Version: 208-7 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Module use to auto-load as of 2.04.14 Workaround is

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 11.08.2014 15:10, schrieb David Baron: On Monday 11 August 2014 14:13:23 you wrote: Am 11.08.2014 12:58, schrieb David Baron: On Monday 11 August 2014 12:28:39 Michael Biebl wrote: Am 11.08.2014 11:50, schrieb David Baron: Package: udev Version: 208-7 Severity: normal --- Please enter

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 11.08.2014 15:16, schrieb Michael Biebl: Oh, you shouldn't probably mix systemd 204 with udev 208. The creation of static device nodes was moved out of udev. Under systemd this is now handled by /lib/systemd/system/kmod-static-nodes.service (which is shipped in the systemd package),

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread David Baron
On Monday 11 August 2014 15:16:47 Michael Biebl wrote: Am 11.08.2014 15:10, schrieb David Baron: On Monday 11 August 2014 14:13:23 you wrote: Am 11.08.2014 12:58, schrieb David Baron: On Monday 11 August 2014 12:28:39 Michael Biebl wrote: Am 11.08.2014 11:50, schrieb David Baron:

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 11, David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il wrote: But if sysvinit is still operational, I can place a fallback boot item with init= for that and try that first. If OK, no problem to upgrade the rest and be done. Please just upgrade. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#757777: [udev] Fails to Load Also snd-seq

2014-08-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 11.08.2014 17:13, schrieb David Baron: The udev got upgraded by accident. I was avoid that as well. I have been asking and not getting good replies about how safe going to the 207-8 systemd packages is. By whom? Pretty please don't believe everything that is written on the debian-user