On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 20:35 +, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> This is turning into a bit of a philosophical question, but why package
> flashable FW in Debian in the first place?
You may as well ask "why package anything for Debian?".
> Runtime loadable FW I entirely agree should be packaged so
Paul,
> I was mainly talking about the devices that can be found in this file:
>
> /lib/udev/rules.d/90-fwupd-devices.rules
>
> Those are a static set of devices not determined at runtime.
> I guess for those, prompting the user to install fwupd is a good idea.
>
On the contrary, I would
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 19:26 +, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> That's a chicken and egg problem unfortunately. This type of information is
> dependent upon the machine that fwupd is running on and can't be determined
> at build time.
I was mainly talking about the devices that can be found in
12:01 AM
> To: bts <sub...@bugs.debian.org>
> Subject: Bug#843215: fwupd: Please announce supported hardware using
> appstream
>
> Package: fwupd
> Severity: wishlist
> User: p...@hungry.com
> Usertags: appstream-modalias
> X-Debbugs-CC: p...@debian.org
>
> Plea
Package: fwupd
Severity: wishlist
User: p...@hungry.com
Usertags: appstream-modalias
X-Debbugs-CC: p...@debian.org
Please announce the supported hardware via AppStream. That will allow
users that are using isenkram to know that they might want to install
fwupd when they plugin a device that can
5 matches
Mail list logo
