ok so time to notify upstream, please file the corresponding info
in bugzilla.kernel.org saying that it is not a regression
but with the oops output.
lspci might help too.
My report against this bug (#487725) remains unchanged. (Kernel NOT Tainted)
I'm so sorry.
please tell us the upstream
urrgs indeed.
but please can you test out latest upstream linux images 2.6.26-rcX
they install just fine in testing/unstable. see trunk apt lines
- http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
kind regards
Hi, Maks and other Linux' enthusiasts.
I would like to thank you for the suggestion to use the
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:37:32PM +0200, Valentin QUEQUET wrote:
Hi, Maks and other Linux' enthusiasts.
I would like to thank you for the suggestion to use the latest Release
Candidate of (Debian-Packaged-)Linux 2.6.26
(2.6.26~rc7-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11693 by the time of my
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Valentin QUEQUET wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-5
Severity: normal
Hello, all.
While scanning (with SANE) a document from my 'Canon PIXMA MP150'
scanner/printer combo, I stumbled upon a grave problem.
I discovered that my
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-5
Severity: normal
Hello, all.
While scanning (with SANE) a document from my 'Canon PIXMA MP150'
scanner/printer combo, I stumbled upon a grave problem.
I discovered that my configuration - out-of-the-box up-to-date lenny - was
using module
5 matches
Mail list logo
