Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 32 minor
Bug#32: cacti: location of log files and RRD data violates FHS
Severity set to `minor'.
tags 32 confirmed
Bug#32: cacti: location of log files and RRD data violates FHS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
severity 32 minor
tags 32 confirmed
thanks
hi jamie,
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:57:33AM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
Ah, my apologies. They are. It wasn't evident from the UI though.
Do you plan to change the interface to point to the FHS locations?
the problem is it's not just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfound 366682 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-13
Bug#366682: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow
Bug marked as not found in version 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-13.
notfound 366682 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-2.sarge.1
Bug#366682: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow
Bug marked as not found
Package: libexscalibar1-doc
Version: 1.0.4-4
Severity: serious
One of the manpages seems to have been copied into libexscalibar1-doc
by accident:
Unpacking libexscalibar1-doc (from .../libexscalibar1-doc_1.0.4-4_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 366803
Bug#366803: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
found 366682 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-13
On 5/11/06, Martin Kittel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just a quick update of the situation:
Upstream is still using Word documents as the basis for the HTML docs. I
have asked about the possibility of a license exemption but am not
expecting an answer anytime soon.
Which still makes it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
tags 362217 - patch
Bug#362217: udev: init.d/lirc checks /dev/lirc0 before udev allocates it
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 365157 + fixed
Bug#365157: multi-aterm: FTBFS with new X packages: xpm not found in /usr/X11R6
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
hey security team and nagios team,
as reported to us in the bts, the debian nagios packages are vulnerable
to arbitrary code execution via not properly checking the Content-Length
header from client requests.
here are the affected versions afaict:
stable:
nagios-mysql
Package: firefox-locale-ca
Version: 1.5.0.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Debian Developer,
The new version of firefox-locale-ca in sid (1.5.0.3-1), cat not
be installed, due to an error in the versioned dependence on firefox. It
depends on
firefox versions:
Hi,
i wonder what's the status of this bugreport. It's from August last
year, so has anybody just forgotten to close it?
Regards,
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Le mardi 04 avril 2006 à 12:48 +0200, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
Package: and
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
| simona:~# ps xauf | grep and | grep -v grep
| simona:~# [ -f /var/run/and.pid ] || echo 'does not exist'
| does not exist
| simona:~# /etc/init.d/and start
| Starting
forwarded 360713
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1486365group_id=2939atid=102939
thanks bts
I also forwarded this bug upstream in case Patrick can do something
quickly about it.
Hope it helps
--
Jérôme Warnier
FLOSS Consultant
http://beeznest.net
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 12:32:27 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fails to install, no /var/lib/nfs/state
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: xmcd
Version: 2.6-17.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Symptoms: /usr/sbin/xmcdconfig creates directories world-writeable
below /var/lib/cddb and /var/lib/xmcd/discog
Risk: unprivileged users (including any subverted PHP-script
severity #366776 important
# the package is not completely unuseable for everyone - it has
# migrated to testing!
thanks
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:49:52AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
I had an old version of aide and upgraded to this one and got the
following erorr messages
# aideinit
Package: trac
Version: 0.9.5-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
for dir in debian/patches ; do \
rm -f $dir/*.log ; \
done
rm trac/__init__.pyc
rm: cannot remove `trac/__init__.pyc': No such file or directory
make: *** [clean] Error 1
--
Daniel Schepler
Package: postgresql-7.4
Version: 1:7.4.12-3
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
cc -g -Wall -O2 -Wl,--as-needed -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations pgtclAppInit.o
-L../../../src/interfaces/libpgtcl -lpgtcl -L../../../src/interfaces/libpq -lpq
Package: asclassic
Version: 1.1b-28.2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
(cd /tmp/buildd/asclassic-1.1b/debian/asclassic/usr/lib/asclassic ; ln -s
/etc/X11/asclassic/system.steprc .)
mv /tmp/buildd/asclassic-1.1b/debian/asclassic/usr/X11R6/man/man1/asclassic.1x
Package: ascdc
Version: 0.3-12
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
fakeroot debian/rules binary
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs
make install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/ascdc
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/ascdc-0.3'
+ mkdir -p
Package: fvwm1
Version: 1.24r-49
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Dlinux -D__i386__
-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L-D_POSIX_SOURCE
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
I believe that the right dependency is libglu1-xorg-dev.
Roberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 365163 patch
Bug#365163: pload: FTBFS with new X packages: Cannot find -lXaw
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:10:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 11:46:45AM +0530, Toufeeq Hussain wrote:
On 5/6/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 06:42:11PM +0530, Toufeeq Hussain wrote:
Ok. And do you still have font files
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 345872 + fixed
Bug#345872: kwin-baghira: Sidebar not buildable on kde3.5
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
tag 356583 + fixed
Bug#356583: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 345872 serious
Bug#345872: kwin-baghira: Sidebar not buildable on kde3.5
Severity set to `serious'.
thank you bts
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: fvwm1
Version: 1.24r-49
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
[...]
The X11/bitmaps/gray file is now in xbitmaps.
Thanks. I'll try to fix that soon.
Cheers,
Phil.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2sarge7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Firefox crashes when it is opening some images.
For exemple, it can't opening this file :
http://jmtrivial.info/images/panorama.jpg
bye,
arno
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Package: evolution-exchange
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Attempting to connect to a server running Exchange 2003 fails. Account
setup via Evolution gets as far as the Server Type screen, but when
Exchange is selected, the Forward button remains greyed
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.33-6sarge1
Severity: grave
When upgrading apache (or dpkg-reconfiguring it), ServerName directive
is set to some value (defaults to `localhost'). Before upgrade the
configuration was perfectly valid, with ServerName taken from hostname
apache is running on. After
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 366837 important
Bug#366837: mozilla-firefox: firefox crashes when it is opening some kind
Severity set to `important'.
tag 366837 moreinfo fixed-upstream
Bug#366837: mozilla-firefox: firefox crashes when it is opening some kind
There were
severity 366837 important
tag 366837 moreinfo fixed-upstream
thanks
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Arnaud wrote:
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2sarge7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Firefox crashes when it is opening some images.
For
sean finney wrote:
hey security team and nagios team,
as reported to us in the bts, the debian nagios packages are vulnerable
to arbitrary code execution via not properly checking the Content-Length
header from client requests.
here are the affected versions afaict:
stable:
Package: phpldapadmin
Version: 0.9.8.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The left HTML pane, tree.php returns 500 - Internal Server Error in Lighty,
and running
on the command line I see the following:
...
server_info.php?server_id=0info/a | a title=Import entries from
Your message dated Fri, 12 May 2006 01:23:19 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300827: soap4r: builds old version of libsoap-ruby1.8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 09:32:46 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#366733: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Il giorno ven, 12/05/2006 alle 00.25 +0800, Steven McCoy ha scritto:
Package: phpldapadmin
Version: 0.9.8.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The left HTML pane, tree.php returns 500 - Internal Server Error in Lighty,
and running
on the command line I see the
hey joey,
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:46:16PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
- crafting a simple user-agent that can illustrate the vulnerability
by sending a negative or 0 value for content length to a nagios cgi
(it doesn't have to actually inject any shell code or anything, just
PoC
Hi!
I got a sponsor a bit faster than expected.
Here is the patch.
/Sune
diff -u baghira-0.7a/debian/control baghira-0.7a/debian/control
--- baghira-0.7a/debian/control
+++ baghira-0.7a/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 365260 + fixed
Bug#365260: pixmap: uninstallable due to Xorg 7.0 transition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 11:02:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#350290: fixed in grande 0.6-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 11:02:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#366825: fixed in pyblosxom 1.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 11:02:23 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#366561: fixed in libdvdplay 1.0.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 11:02:33 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#366296: fixed in nullmailer 1:1.02-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 366504 +fixed-in-experimental
thanks
* Tom Parker wrote:
Preparing to replace vim-runtime 1:6.4-007+1 (using
.../vim-runtime_1%3a6.4+7.0g01-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement vim-runtime ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-runtime_1%3a6.4+7.0g01-1_all.deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 366504 +fixed-in-experimental
Bug#366504: vim-runtime: Overwrites /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent in vim-common
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: raggle
Version: 0.4.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Raggle fail to launch. When I try to run I get the following error:
$raggle
Raggle: Loading config...
Raggle: Loading feed list...
Raggle: Loading theme...
/usr/bin/raggle:4221:in `init': uninitialized
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:51:39AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
OK. I don't know if the Type1 fonts are the ones that your system is
looking for, but we should be able to figure that out as soon as
xserver-xorg 1:7.0.18 is available in unstable. The maintainer said he was
going to upload
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 366865 grave
Bug#366865: evolution start loads processor at 100%
Severity set to `grave'.
reassign 366865 libnm-glib0
Bug#366865: evolution start loads processor at 100%
Bug reassigned from package `evolution' to `libnm-glib0'.
quit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 35
Bug#35: udev: fails sarge - etch upgrades
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
reopen 349354
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
severity 35 serious
Bug#35:
as upgrades work out if you touch that special conf file
i would propose to check against a version range in which
the sarge release falls and allow those an smooth upgrade
without running kernel check.
of course with a big warning that the user should reboot soonest.
regards
--
maks
--
To
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 23:16:49 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#363030: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Sune Vuorela wrote:
severity 345872 serious
thank you bts
A large chunk of the package is silently not build due to buggy auto* rules
in
upstream.
I have just returned home, and a new release (in cooperation with
upstream) is on its way (should hit NEW anytime soon).
I'd appreciate it
Sune Vuorela wrote:
Hi!
I got a sponsor a bit faster than expected.
Of course. John is trying to screw me.
Here is the patch.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 366682 important
Bug#366682: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow
Severity set to `important'.
severity 366683 important
Bug#366683: CVE-2006-2162: Buffer overflow in nagios
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
severity 366682 important
severity 366683 important
thanks
Hi,
the Ubuntu guys already found out that Apache 2 doesn't accept
requests with negative content length and I just checked that Apache
1.3 doesn't either. I guess this makes this a quite low impact
vulnerability.
as reported to us
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 14:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361139: fixed in acidbase 1.2.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On May 11, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as upgrades work out if you touch that special conf file
i would propose to check against a version range in which
the sarge release falls and allow those an smooth upgrade
without running kernel check.
of course with a big warning that
Package: couriergraph
Version: 0.24-2
Severity: grave
The recent upload to unstable declares a versioned dependency on
librrds-perl (= 1.1) which cannot be satisfied in Sid (or Etch=.
The changelog for this version lists
* Incompatibility with rrdtool1.2 has to wait until next version
but
So my question from Monday is still there. Perhaps following the
suggestion in the bug log will solve the problem?
The bug has now been blocking gnucash from entering testing for three
months...
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:02:37AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 11, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as upgrades work out if you touch that special conf file
i would propose to check against a version range in which
the sarge release falls and allow those an smooth upgrade
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:09:40PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Kurt Roeckx writes:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 06:23:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
- gij/gcj 4.1 will become the default on all architectures, dropping
gcj-4.0 from the archives. Mostly independent, handled by Michael
Hi,
I only read your message now, for whatever reason I did not notice it
previously.
So, I updated my new version, ready for upload. Please review it, and
sponsor the upload for me.
The source is available here: http://apt.bxlug.be/sarge/sources (don't
let the sarge fool you in this ULR: it
On May 12, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This does not work, because if for some reason the user were not ready
to upgrade the kernel then the would have already been upgraded and
would not start again at the next reboot. Is this what you really want?
do you propose
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:09:36PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
# the package is not completely unuseable for everyone - it has
# migrated to testing!
? I used the unstable one.
Can you show me the first 40 lines of your
/var/lib/aide/aide.conf.autogenerated?
# head -n 40
Hi cthere lovely,
This kind of opportunitay comes ones in a life. I don't want
to miss it. Do you? I am coming to your place in few days
and I though may be we cabbn meet each other. If you don't mind
I can send you my picture. I am a girl.
You can correspond with me using my email [EMAIL
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-16
Severity: grave
tetex-bin will not configure.
http://bugs.debian.org/346326 seems related, but it appears the
problem there was that the user had modified the configuration file.
I originally got this error after I upgraded May 6; to be sure I'm
starting clean
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So my question from Monday is still there. Perhaps following the
suggestion in the bug log will solve the problem?
Here's where things stand:
- I tried building the package in merulo's unstable chroot. That
worked fine. Since the chroot
Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have NFI why this doesn't build on the buildd, but I can build
this by hand on my system as long as the old guile-1.6-libs package
isn't installed at the time.
e.g.
/tmp/guile/guile-1.6-1.6.7$ sudo apt-get install guile-1.6-libs
[blah]
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- I tried building the package in merulo's unstable chroot. That
worked fine. Since the chroot doesn't have slib installed, and
neither did the buildd (according to the log), slib's not likely
to be the problem.
So the suggestion in the
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 19:16:31 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#303862: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 19:16:31 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#358762: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 281957 + fixed
Bug#281957: Create a bacula-console-tray package
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
tag 303456 + fixed
Bug#303456: bacula: error in the online help
Tags were: pending upstream patch
Tags added: fixed
tag 303862 + fixed
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 19:16:31 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#343762: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 19:16:31 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#343762: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 19:16:31 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#358762: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 19:16:31 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#303862: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 11 May 2006 19:16:31 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337250: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 366865 366010
Bug#366010: missing or old dbus causes evolution to use 100% CPU and spew error
messages
Bug#366865: evolution start loads processor at 100%
Merged 366010 366865.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So the suggestion in the bug log was to actually *require* slib, not
conflict with the old version.
Right, but since a by-hand build on merulo in the unstable chroot
succeeded, and the buildd build failed, both without slib installed, I
don't think
* Antono Vasiljev wrote:
Hi. Sorry for flood. But I've understand the reason of crush. It
fails only in Xfce. And It works great in other wm's and without X.
Which terminal emulator are you using?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
81 matches
Mail list logo
