Hi Tormod,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:43:44PM +0200, Tormod Volden wrote:
> This issue is marked as affecting 5.42+dfsg1-1 in buster (and even
> stretch) in our CVE tracker, however the set_cap action was first
> added in 5.44+dfsg1-1.
>
>
Hi Tormod,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:38:34PM +0200, Tormod Volden wrote:
> This issue is marked as affecting 5.42+dfsg1-1 in buster (and even
> stretch) in our CVE tracker, however the openwall report says:
>
> "The issue affects only XScreenSaver version 5.45. Versions 5.44 and
> older, as
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:thunderbird
Bug #989872 [thunderbird-dbgsym] thunderbird-dbgsym: uninstallable cruft
package in buster
Warning: Unknown package 'thunderbird-dbgsym'
Bug reassigned from package 'thunderbird-dbgsym' to 'src:thunderbird'.
No longer marked as found in
Control: reassign -1 src:thunderbird
On Ma, 15 iun 21, 01:41:12, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: thunderbird-dbgsym
> Version: 1:60.9.0-1~deb10u1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> thunderbird-dbgsym is a cruft package still sitting in buster-debug
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:39 AM Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
> control: tags -1 +patch
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:49:18 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Provides is good for fulfilling dependencies, but won't for an upgrade
> > to the renamed package.
>
> Okay, then add transitional dummy package for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was a...@debian.org).
> usertags 936954 piuparts
Usertags were: piuparts.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
> found 986097 8.0.7-1
Bug #986097 [libphp8.0-embed]
Package: cpl-plugin-muse-calib
Version: 2.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the
Package: sane-utils
Version: 1.0.32-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available
during purge, only the essential packages are
Package: openstack-dashboard
Version: 3:19.2.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to remove.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Removing openstack-dashboard (3:19.2.0-3) ...
rm:
Package: syncplay-common,syncplay-server
Version: 1.6.8+repack1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + syncplay
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid',
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + syncplay
Bug #989876 [syncplay-common,syncplay-server] syncplay-common,syncplay-server:
missing Breaks+Replaces: syncplay (<< 1.6.7+repack1-7)
Added indication that 989876 affects syncplay
--
989876:
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + pulseaudio
Bug #989875 [pulseaudio-utils] pulseaudio-utils: missing Breaks+Replaces:
pulseaudio (<< 14.99)
Added indication that 989875 affects pulseaudio
--
989875: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989875
Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: pulseaudio-utils
Version: 14.99.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + pulseaudio
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the
Source: pcp
Version: 5.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
pcp FTBFS everywhere:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pcp=unstable
dh_install -a
Package: thunderbird-dbgsym
Version: 1:60.9.0-1~deb10u1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
thunderbird-dbgsym is a cruft package still sitting in buster-debug
while thunderbird is already at version 1:78.6.0-1~deb10u1 (without a
corresponding -dbgsym package).
Package: libwine-development,libwine-development-dev
Version: 5.22+repack-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
>From the attached log
Package: src:xorg-server
Version: 2:1.20.4-1+deb10u3
Severity: serious
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
the source tarball of xorg-server shipped via bin:pkg
xorg-server-source in Debian buster is in some broken state. The
reason for this is that quilt patches don't get applied before the
On 26/05/2021 15.49, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
This appears to be limited to i386/ 32-bit systems. They're shipped
elsewhere.
No, same on 64-bit:
0m50.1s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib/libmca_common_ofi.so ->
libmca_common_ofi.so.10.0.1
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:49:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944751: fixed in trousers 0.3.14+fixed1-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #944751,
regarding trousers: Migrate to tpm-udev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Dear Hideki,
> I'd prepare tiny patch for this issue as below.
Thanks a lot for the NMU, much appreciated!
All the best
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info
Fujitsu Research + IFMGA Guide + TU Wien + TeX Live + Debian Dev
GPG: 0x860CDC13
Package: thunderbird
Version: 1:78.11.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Since the update to 78.11.0 Thunderbird cannot load various webpages. To
reproduce the error, try to do a search in the Add-ons Manager (type
something in the search box and press
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#980466: fixed in cervisia 4:20.12.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #980466,
regarding cervisia: missing dependency on kinit package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
This issue is marked as affecting 5.42+dfsg1-1 in buster (and even
stretch) in our CVE tracker, however the set_cap action was first
added in 5.44+dfsg1-1.
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-31523
Tormod
This issue is marked as affecting 5.42+dfsg1-1 in buster (and even
stretch) in our CVE tracker, however the openwall report says:
"The issue affects only XScreenSaver version 5.45. Versions 5.44 and
older, as well as 6.00, are not affected."
Tormod
Dear Maintainer,
I can confirm this behavior too, with an gmail account since today.
In the morning before the update, gmail was working. Now it isn't.
This error message in german language is shown:
Die Website versuchte, eine unpassende Sicherheitsstufe auszuhandeln.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 944751 serious
Bug #944751 [src:trousers] trousers: Migrate to tpm-udev
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
944751:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 987441 with 989863
Bug #987441 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: D-I must get ready for
Bullseye
987441 was blocked by: 988786 987568 961056 987368 987377 988826 987788 987449
988951 926539 988787
987441 was not blocking any bugs.
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:33:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986117: fixed in node-yarnpkg 1.22.10+~cs22.25.14-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #986117,
regarding yarnpkg is not compatible with node-proper-lockfile 3.0.0+
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 986975 important
Bug #986975 [src:gdal] gdal: rename gdal-data to gdal3-data and move files to
/usr/share/gdal3
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #989852 [src:xorg-server] xorg-server-source: Cannot build X from provided
source tarball
Added tag(s) patch.
--
989852: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989852
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Beckmann a écrit le 14/06/2021 à 10:18 :
On 08/06/2021 13.05, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Here it is. Now testing upgrades ...
There were some new symbols ... but they appeared independently of my
changes (I built in bullseye, not sid, in case it does matter).
Tests have
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#989344: fixed in ogre-1.12 1.12.10+dfsg2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #989344,
regarding libogre-1.12: package name does not match soname
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:00:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986134: fixed in acorn 8.0.5+ds+~cs19.19.27-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #986134,
regarding acorn: please reintroduce node-acorn as transitional package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 16:41:51 +0200 Paolo Greppi
wrote:
> owner 986117 Paolo Greppi
> tag 986117 pending
Hi Paolo,
Can you upload it?
Thanks
Praveen
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:gemrb
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 05:14:31PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hello,
> is there any progress on this [bug]?
I kinda lost track of it after I handled it in inkscape (since it's not
effectively out of my concerns).
Are there any other affected packages? If so, they probably ought to
tighten
Hi,
just adding my two cents here: the new class3.crt does verify
against the already packaged Class 1 Root. To wit:
$ openssl verify -show_chain -CAfile /usr/share/ca-certificates/CAcert/root_X0F.crt class3.crt
class3.crt: OK
Chain:
depth=0: O = CAcert Inc., OU = http://www.CAcert.org, CN =
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +confirmed +patch
Bug #980466 [cervisia] cervisia: missing dependency on kinit package
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Bug #980466 [cervisia] cervisia: missing dependency on kinit package
Added tag(s) patch.
--
980466:
control: tags -1 +confirmed +patch
Hi,
I'd prepare tiny patch for this issue as below.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index cbd284c..7fde2e5 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cervisia (4:20.12.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ *
Hello Axel,
hello Craig,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:19:17PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Craig Small wrote:
> > reassign -1 manpages-de
>
> Might be the right place indeed, but maybe not in the way you'd
> expect. See below.
Ack. And thank you very much for your analysis and suggestions.
> > >
Hello Craig,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 06:35:19PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 18:04, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> > JFTR: What came to me after sending that mail and what I didn't check
> > so far, is if 4.9.3-4 is fine, but 4.9.3-4~bpo10+1 has those files.
> >
> > Actually in
Hello Craig,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:41:56AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 00:03, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> > So the Breaks and Replaces headers (c.f. #982059) should likely be
> > against "<< 4.9.3-4", not just against "<< 4.9.1-1".
> >
>
> It looks like both the psmisc
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 20:13:59 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXkgVmnDqHM=?=
wrote:
> Just to confirm the issue is still present in bullseye current release.
> I had to add the following lines to apparmor configuration to make it work.
>
> /etc/squid-deb-proxy/** r,
> /var/log/squid-deb-proxy/* rw,
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #989554 [gnome-control-center] Add argyll dependency
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
989554: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989554
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: severity -1 normal
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 21:46:30 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 13:36:17 + Age Bosma wrote:
> > The colour calibration functionality gnome-control-center will
> > happily start the lengthy process of colour testing, only the fail at
> > the end
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #968897 [src:pylint] src:pylint should provide a pylint3 transitional
package
Added tag(s) patch.
--
968897: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968897
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
control: tags -1 +patch
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:49:18 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Provides is good for fulfilling dependencies, but won't for an upgrade
> to the renamed package.
Okay, then add transitional dummy package for it as below.
If anything goes wrong, I'll upload it to delay-5 queue
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 932008 + pending
Bug #932008 [procmeter3] stat-disk.so: undefined symbol: minor
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
932008:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 951647 + pending
Bug #951647 [libmstch-dev] libmstch-dev: Library configuration is misplaced
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
951647:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 964357 + pending
Bug #964357 [alttab] alttab: fails to start: ***buffer overflow detected ***:
alttab terminated - Aborted
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
964357:
Hi,
On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 13:36:17 + Age Bosma wrote:
> The colour calibration functionality gnome-control-center will happily start
> the lengthy process of colour testing, only the fail at the end with the
> error:
>
> "Tools required for calibration are not installed"
>
> This without
Hi,
It looks like we have to ignore test failures on all arches.
Should we do a NMU for bullseye? See attached debdiff.
Best,
Dylan
guile-2.2_2.2.7+1-5.5_NMU.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 988584 important
Bug #988584 [manpages-hu] manpages-hu: Contains undistributable content - All
rights reserved
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Hi Craig and Helge,
Craig Small wrote:
> reassign -1 manpages-de
Might be the right place indeed, but maybe not in the way you'd
expect. See below.
> > JFTR: What came to me after sending that mail and what I didn't check
> > so far, is if 4.9.3-4 is fine, but 4.9.3-4~bpo10+1 has those files.
>
On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 at 21:39:48 -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> After bullseye is released, next time upstream bumps the SONAME
> (presumably 1.12.12?), I think it would be good to seriously consider
> packaging the libraries as libogremain1.12.12, libogreoverlay1.12.12
> and so on.
>
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:gdal 3.2.1+dfsg-1
Bug #986975 [libgdal28] libgdal28: please add Breaks: libgdal20
Bug reassigned from package 'libgdal28' to 'src:gdal'.
No longer marked as found in versions gdal/3.2.1+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #986975
reassign -1 manpages-de
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 18:04, Axel Beckert wrote:
> JFTR: What came to me after sending that mail and what I didn't check
> so far, is if 4.9.3-4 is fine, but 4.9.3-4~bpo10+1 has those files.
>
> Actually in that case, I have no idea how the Breaks/Replaces headers
>
On 08/06/2021 13.05, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Here it is. Now testing upgrades ...
There were some new symbols ... but they appeared independently of my
changes (I built in bullseye, not sid, in case it does matter).
Tests have not shown any problems. And in combination with patched gdal
and
Hi,
Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 00:03, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > So the Breaks and Replaces headers (c.f. #982059) should likely be
> > against "<< 4.9.3-4", not just against "<< 4.9.1-1".
>
> It looks like both the psmisc and procps manpages came back from the dead.
> They were
59 matches
Mail list logo
