On 2021-06-28 00:35, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On zondag 27 juni 2021 22:37:10 CEST Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Let's ask the release team instead. Here my arguments why: nfs-utils
needs a major rehaul, this was not possible to finish in time for
bullseye, so this means nfs-utils is generally in
On zondag 27 juni 2021 22:37:10 CEST Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Let's ask the release team instead. Here my arguments why: nfs-utils
> needs a major rehaul, this was not possible to finish in time for
> bullseye, so this means nfs-utils is generally in not a very good
> shape for
Source: rust-file-diff
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rust-file-diff.html
...
dh_shlibdeps -O--buildsystem=cargo
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library libglib-2.0.so.0 needed by
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 27 juin 2021 23:06:03 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault, le ven. 18 juin 2021 19:27:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Samuel Thibault, le dim. 16 mai 2021 19:03:11 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > Gregor Zattler, le dim. 16 mai 2021 18:50:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > > * Samuel Thibault [13. Mai.
Samuel Thibault, le ven. 18 juin 2021 19:27:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault, le dim. 16 mai 2021 19:03:11 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Gregor Zattler, le dim. 16 mai 2021 18:50:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > * Samuel Thibault [13. Mai. 2021]:
> > > > Kurt Roeckx, le jeu. 19 nov. 2020 20:40:05 +0100, a
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jun 2021 21:03:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#975270: fixed in rdiff-backup 2.0.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #975270,
regarding rdiff-backup: Can't talk to the version from buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi Drew,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:37:14PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 04:46:36PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Package: nfs-common
> > Followup-For: Bug #883194
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
> > Control: severity 883194 serious
> >
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 04:46:36PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: nfs-common
> Followup-For: Bug #883194
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
> Control: severity 883194 serious
> Control: usertag 883194 py2removal
>
> Since removing Python2 is a release goal for bullseye
1565781747 E Could not create download: Info hash already used by
another torrent.
1565781771 C Caught signal: 'Erreur de segmentation.
---DUMP---
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:42:04 UTC
Severity: *grave*
Tags: fixed-upstream, upstream
Found in version curl/7.65.1-1
Fixed in version curl/7.65.3-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # oops
> fixed 990158 15.4-6
Bug #990158 {Done: Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org>} [src:shim]
shim-signed-common: No UEFI boot with error "Could not create MokListXRT"
Marked as fixed in versions shim/15.4-6.
> fixed 990158 15.4-6~deb10u1
Bug
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:shim
Bug #990158 {Done: Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org>} [shim-signed-common]
shim-signed-common: No UEFI boot with error "Could not create MokListXRT"
Bug reassigned from package 'shim-signed-common' to 'src:shim'.
No longer marked as found in
Control: reassign -1 src:shim
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 18:18:51 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
>* In insecure mode, don't abort if we can't create the MokListXRT
> variable. Upstream issue #372. Closes: #989962, #990158
Bug 990158 was assigned to shim-signed. As this is closed by
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 989320 5.22+repack-1
Bug #989320 {Done: Michael Gilbert }
[src:wine-development] libwine-development-dev: libwine-development and
libwine-development-dev both supply libwine.so
Bug #989870 {Done: Michael Gilbert }
[src:wine-development]
On 2021-06-26 sawb...@xsmail.com wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2021 at 15:12, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > I think that assumption is not correct. dpkg will (should) only ask
> > about the confffile if it *was* locally changed, otherwise the files are
> > overwritten without asking.
> I see ...
> The thing is
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jun 2021 14:48:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#990355: fixed in donkey 1.2.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #990355,
regarding [src:donkey] FTBFS with the tmux test runner
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing control commands:
> severity 883194 serious
Bug #883194 [nfs-utils] please convert mountstats and nfsiostat scripts to
Python3
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> usertag 883194 py2removal
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
--
883194:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package feature-check
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'feature-check'
Limit currently set to 'package':'feature-check'
> found 990276 0.1.0-1
Bug #990276 {Done: Peter Pentchev } [feature-check]
[feature-check]
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jun 2021 14:19:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#964357: fixed in alttab 1.5.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #964357,
regarding alttab: fails to start: ***buffer overflow detected ***: alttab
terminated - Aborted
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hey.
On Sun, 2021-06-27 at 14:46 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> To me this looks like CVEs in other products, but which zookeeper
> uses
> as dependency? Is this correct?
Indeed, but I couldn't find that the zookeeper package depends on these
while it does contain:
zookeeper-3.4.13/src$
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 964357 !
Bug #964357 [alttab] alttab: fails to start: ***buffer overflow detected ***:
alttab terminated - Aborted
Owner recorded as Peter Pentchev .
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
[Disclaimer, not the package maintainer, but quickly checked your
report for tracking within the security team]
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 01:50:44PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Source: zookeeper
> Version: 3.4.13-6
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 989799 manpages-l10n 4.9.3-4~bpo10+1
Bug #989799 [psmisc] psmisc: Undeclared file conflict with manpages-de from
buster-backports
Bug reassigned from package 'psmisc' to 'manpages-l10n'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Hello Paul,
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 07:10:47PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 26-06-2021 18:03, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > I fixed it in 4.9.3-4~bpo10.
> >
> > However, I think the BTS does not pick up Closes lines from backports?
>
> I think it does, but the changelog doesn't have an
reassign 989799 manpages-l10n 4.9.3-4~bpo10+1
# This is not yet formally accepted, inform the BTS anyway
fixed 989799 4.10.0-1~bpo10+1
# affects psmisc procps
thanks
This is to ensure this bug is appropriately closed. The changelog
actually should have done it already:
* Rebuild for
25 matches
Mail list logo
