After some experimentation I found out that updating libkrb5-3 so that
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libkrb5.so.3 upgrades will stop MariaDB from
crashing.
$ apt install libk5crypto3 libkrb5-3
...
libssl3 amd64 3.0.8-1
libgssapi-krb5-2 amd64 1.20.1-1+b1
libkrb5support0 amd64 1.20.1-1+b1
libkrb5-3
Hi!
I was able to reproduce this with:
apt install mariadb-plugin-gssapi-server mariadb-plugin-gssapi-client
sed s/bullseye/bookworm/g -i /etc/apt/sources.list
apt update
apt-get upgrade
Upgrade only updates mysql-common and mariadb-common:
$ dpkg -l | grep -e mysql -e maria
ii
Le 2023-05-13 22:38, Markus Koschany a écrit :
The question is: If we ship libtomcat9-java in Bookworm and change the
dependency from tomcat9-user to tomcat10-user, will a web application
like
dogtag-pki, which is designed for Tomcat 9, continue to work with
Tomcat 10?
I'm pretty sure it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1034081 8.0-1
Bug #1034081 [src:openbgpd] openbgpd: FTBFS twice in a row: src/bgpd/parse.c
cannot be regenerated
Marked as fixed in versions openbgpd/8.0-1.
Bug #1034081 [src:openbgpd] openbgpd: FTBFS twice in a row: src/bgpd/parse.c
Copying /boot/grub/grub.cfg to /boot/efi/EFI/debian/ to replace the
grub.cfg that was located there does allow for a complete boot. This does
result in having to type in the unlock password a second time which is
different than before.
The contents of the /boot/efi/EFI/debian/grub.cfg was:
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 22:56:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035713: fixed in google-android-installers 1675172738
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035713,
regarding google-android-ndk-r23b-installer: broken symlinks:
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 22:50:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035781: fixed in emacs 1:28.2+1-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035781,
regarding emacs-common: needs Breaks against incompatible elpa packages from
bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 22:50:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1034941: fixed in emacs 1:28.2+1-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034941,
regarding emacs-common: missing Breaks+Replaces for emacs-bin-common when
upgrading from bullseye
to be marked as done.
This
Package: grub-efi-amd64-bin
Version: 2.06-12
Followup-For: Bug #924151
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Upgraded to the latest grub2 packages on 2023-05-02 and then had a power
outage today resulting in a reboot.
grep grub dpkg.log | grep upgrade
2023-05-02 16:44:00
Hi Salvatore,
adding Timo Aaltonen, maintainer of dogtag-pki and tomcatjss, to CC
Am Samstag, dem 13.05.2023 um 20:50 +0200 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 06:27:49PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > I have just pushed the necessary changes to our Git
Followup-For: Bug #1030545
X-Debbugs-Cc: ben...@debian.org, dipak.zo...@ibm.com
Hi Hilko (plus Dipak, fix author on cc for awareness),
Debian kernel package 5.10.179-1 that includes a fix for this has been accepted
into the stable-security (bullseye-security) suite today, and should resolve
this
Hi Markus,
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 06:27:49PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I have just pushed the necessary changes to our Git repository.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/tomcat9/-/commit/adbd0b0711de66b67278b10e258c47c805e9b993
Do we need to have done more here? When Paul asked on
Followup-For: Bug #1030284
I decline to participate further with this bugreport, although others are
welcome to pick up from the patches I've submitted (please don't merge them
as-is; modify them to apply corrections).
James Addison dixit:
>AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: The input did not match the regular
> expression /RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded/. Input:
>
>'Segmentation fault\n'
You removed the subtraction of V8_STACK_RESERVE when mutilating
my patch; this may be related (if
Followup-For: Bug #1030284
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
It does seem to (continue to) function, at least on x86:
~/dygraphs-2.2.0$ NODE_PATH=/usr/share/nodejs
../nodejs-18.13.0+dfsg1/out/Release/node /usr/bin/babeljs --config-file
$PWD/babel.config.json --compact false --source-maps inline
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1034824 in tomcat9 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1034824 [src:tomcat9] tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1034824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034824
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
I have just pushed the necessary changes to our Git repository.
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/tomcat9/-/commit/adbd0b0711de66b67278b10e258c47c805e9b993
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Followup-For: Bug #1030284
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Hmm.. although the build itself succeeded, there was a unit test failure that
appears related to the change:
not ok 3213 sequential/test-fs-stat-sync-overflow
---
duration_ms: 1.111
severity: fail
exitcode: 1
stack: |-
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 14:49:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036024: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #944016,
regarding orangeassassin: depends on no longer available python3-raven
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 14:47:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035929: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #915504,
regarding sbt: Fails to detect version of java
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 14:47:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035929: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #894540,
regarding sbt FTBFS with openjdk-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 14:49:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036024: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026386,
regarding orangeassassin: FTBFS with Python 3.11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 14:34:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035503: fixed in glewlwyd 2.7.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035503,
regarding glewlwyd-common: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not
modified by the user: /etc/glewlwyd/config.json
to
Followup-For: Bug #1030284
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Thanks, Thorsten. I'm currently rebuilding (on x86) from the attached patch,
adapted from yours.
* prefers a one-time repeat division over the clever-but-fragile div-assign
* removes the upperbound check because integer greater-than
Package: squidguard
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
installing squid-openssl
* What exactly did you do (or not
James Addison dixit:
>... to add something like this:
Ouch, by going via a string?! I wouldn’t have thought of that…
> if (!(flags & ProcessInitializationFlags::kNoAdjustResourceLimits)) {
>struct rlimit lim;
>if (getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, ) == 0) {
> char stackSize[32];
32 is
On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 12:15, James Addison wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 11:14, James Addison wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 02:18, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > >
> > > James Addison dixit:
> > >
> > > >I'm going to stay involved with this thread, but I think that it is
> > > >upon
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, 8 May 2023 14:15:17 +0200 "Poenicke, Andreas (TKM)"
wrote:
> Package: libkscreenlocker5
> Version: 5.20.5-1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: patch upstream
> Justification: breaks the whole system
[...]
> Please include the short patch
>
On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 11:14, James Addison wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 02:18, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >
> > James Addison dixit:
> >
> > >I'm going to stay involved with this thread, but I think that it is
> > >upon you to develop or provide further guidance towards a patch if
> > >it's
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 10:20:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1034943: fixed in liblxqt 1.2.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034943,
regarding liblxqt1-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces for liblxqt0-dev when upgrading
from bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 02:18, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> James Addison dixit:
>
> >I'm going to stay involved with this thread, but I think that it is
> >upon you to develop or provide further guidance towards a patch if
> >it's something you'd like to have implemented, Thorsten.
>
> I actually
Package: altos,lprint
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org
Hi,
while Andreas usually files bugs about file conflicts, his tooling seems
to have missed this one. It's quite special. While altos ships
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd/system as a directory containing a
systemd unit,
Package: cadabra2,python3-notebook
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org, debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I noticed a suprising undeclared file conflict. While Andreas' tooling
finds most of these, it missed this one. It's about
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 minor
Bug #1035438 [cl-quicklisp] cl-quicklisp: installation instructions do not work
Severity set to 'minor' from 'grave'
--
1035438: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: severity -1 minor
Dear Michael,
Le mercredi 03 mai 2023 à 09:23 -0400, Michael P. Soulier a écrit :
> Package: cl-quicklisp
> Version: 20150128-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> X-Debbugs-Cc: msoul...@digitaltorque.ca
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I followed
36 matches
Mail list logo
