On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:03 AM Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 22:40 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 10:28 PM Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Anthony,
> > >
> > > A few weeks ago you uploaded a new version of golang-google-protobuf
> > > to
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1050523 in dh-make-golang reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1043070 in dh-make-golang reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1050523 in dh-make-golang reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1064738 in golang-gocloud reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1058784 in golang-github-evanw-esbuild reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Package: fq
Version: 0.3.0-1+b4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs upstream
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: Daniel Milde , Anthony Fok
Hi Daniel (and other fellow Debian Go Packaging Team members),
First of all, thank you for packaging fq
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1052834 in hugo reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #983010 in debiman reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #953224 in golang-github-xanzy-go-gitlab reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1017301 in golang-github-alecthomas-kong reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1016740 in golang-github-cli-go-gh reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: reassign -1 golang-github-getkin-kin-openapi
Control: found -1 golang-github-getkin-kin-openapi/0.97.0-1
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 4:12 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: hugo
> Version: 0.100.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User:
intermittent, and it has happened only once on
the Debian arm64 buildd for 2.2.3+1-2 back in 2018 (see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=guile-2.2=arm64 ;
all other intermittent build errors were due to test-out-of-memory),
and since guile-2.2 has been building fine on all architectures, I am
hereby downgrading the severity from "serious" to "important".
Cheers,
Anthony Fok
ndency.
The good news is that the xonsh FTBFS problem is fixed with the upload
of python3-myst-parser 0.17.2-1 where upstream did this:
- ♻️ REFACTOR: Replace `attrs` by `dataclasses` for configuration (#557)
The 'attr' module is no longer needed, hence no more FTBFS for xonsh!
Special thanks to Emmanuel Arias and Bastian Germann for the upload of
myst-parser 0.17.2-1 which resolves this bug.
I am hereby reassigning this bug to python3-myst-parser, and will
close the bug shortly after.
Cheers,
Anthony Fok
Hi Jérémy,
Thank you for your report!
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 2:39 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Source: golang-github-evanw-esbuild
> Version: 0.14.25-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
past)
>
> your package FTBFS, however a
he gitsome package too and
install its gh as /usr/bin/gh.gitsome and hopefully get its
command-line completion to work with the name change, but that's
unrelated to this particular bug report and to GitHub CLI gh. Let's
keep this package clean and free of the fancy and confusing diversion
stuff.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1011545 in gh reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1008413 in golang-github-google-wire reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1008423 in golang-github-streadway-amqp reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1007733 in golang-github-getkin-kin-openapi reported by you has been fixed
in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1005858 in gh reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi everyone,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 7:09 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/donnemartin/gitsome/issues/177
>
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 23:43:14 +0800 SZ Lin (林上智) wrote:
>
> > The "gitsome" has used "gh" since 2017, and thus would you mind renaming
> > the "gh" in your
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997547 in golang-github-alecaivazis-survey reported by you has been fixed
in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1001734 in golang-github-rogpeppe-go-internal reported by you has been
fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997553 in golang-github-itchyny-go-flags reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997571 in golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i18n.v2 reported by you has been
fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997560 in golang-github-niklasfasching-go-org reported by you has been
fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997567 in golang-github-yuin-goldmark-highlighting reported by you has
been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997562 in golang-github-google-wire reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:42:15 +0100 Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Package: notepadqq
> Version: 2.0.0~beta1-1+b1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When notepadqq is started you
Hi Shengjing,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:42 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> Hi Anthony,
Thanks for writing to me! Sorry for the late reply.
I was going to re-open this with the pseudo header "Control: reopen
-1" to keep this new version out of testing (buster), but then I
decided to study the issue
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #961814 in golang-google-protobuf reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #956762 in autokey reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #976562 in golang-github-montanaflynn-stats reported by you has been fixed
in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 12:27 PM Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> BTW the macro was DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH, as you already know
> G.
Thank you Gianfranco!
Sorry for my delay in getting the fix uploaded.
There is another FTBFS issue with binary-indep (build all), as well as
some Lintian errors and
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973636 in golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i18n.v2 reported by you has been
fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #971165 in golang-github-coreos-gexpect reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #971221 in golang-github-jesseduffield-go-getter reported by you has been
fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973105 in hugo reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
hange hugo to build-depend on golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i18n.v2
6. Ask the FTP Masters to remove golang-gopkg-alecthomas-kingpin.v3
and golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i18n from sid and testing
as neither package would be used by any other packages once
Steps 1 to 5 are completed.
Cheers,
Anthony Fok
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Stuart and Adrian,
Thank you for your reports!
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 10:03 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:09:45PM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> >...
> > guile segfaults as soon as it is started (with or without docs on stdin).
> > The
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #953725 in golang-go.tools reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
(Oops, forgot to send to the bug report too, forwarding...)
-- Forwarded message -
From: Anthony Fok
Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#952759: libsass-python 0.18.0 FTBFS with libsass
3.6.3, please upgrade to 0.19.4
To: Frédéric Bonnard
Hi Fred,
On Mon, Mar 9
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #953360 in golang-github-google-wire reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi François,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 4:51 AM François Mazen wrote:
> Lilypond and Solfege packages will be removed in about 14 days.
> As maintainer of Solfege, this will affect my work.
>
> Do you plan tu upload a new Lilypond package to avoid the automatic
> removal?
>
> If not, I can prepare
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:06 PM Colin Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:40:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > (The d/copyright problem with epydoc should be easy if tedious to fix;
> > I don't understand why it wants epydoc which I thought was obsolete
> >
Hi again!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:47 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 1:35 AM Anthony Fok wrote:
> >
> > Hi Shengjing,
> >
> > Thanks for looking into this too. I'm sorry for not recording my findings
> > here before going
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952173 in dh-golang reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952173 in dh-golang reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
ago.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 08:52 Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:33 PM Anthony Fok wrote:
> [...]
> > + cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4
> > +can't load package: package .: no Go files in
> >
> /home/foka/debian/g
Control: reassign -1 dh-golang
Control: found -1 1.46
Control: affects -1 src:golang-gopkg-gorethink-gorethink.v3
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 6:18 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Source: golang-gopkg-gorethink-gorethink.v3
> Version: 3.0.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags:
as a module.
Also add explicit dependency on python3-lockfile as recommended
by Andrej Shadura. (Closes: #937421, #948831, #949232)
* debian/rules: Change "dh $*" to "dh $@" (Lintian I: no-dh-sequencer)
-- Anthony Fok Sun, 23 Feb 2020 07:34:00 -0700
https://salsa.d
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:18 AM Eric Raymond wrote:
> The reason given for removing cvs-fast-export is, I believe, in error.
> I went to considerable effort to prepare it for Python 2 EOL
> and find it quite annoying that it was removed anyway.
>
> ...
> Thus, cvs-fast-export can use
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 11:30 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Control: tags 946728 + patch
> Control: tags 946728 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for hugo (versioned as 0.59.1-1.1) and uploaded
> it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
>
> cu
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #948001 in dep reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + buster
Hope my Debian BTS Control pseudo-header commands work this time. :-)
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 4:17 PM Anthony Fok wrote:
> severity 918619 important
> tags 918619 + buster
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 12:39 PM Adr
y surprisingly, this error no longer occurs with Go 1.12.
As bullseye (testing) and sid (unstable) have already moved to golang-1.12,
this FTBFS bug is now only confined to Debian 10 "buster" (stable),
thus I think it is appropriate to downgrade this bug's severity from
"serious" to "important" so as not to block testing migration to bullseye.
Cheers,
Anthony Fok
HI Shengjing,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Hi Go team,
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:52:52PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> === RUN TestExecutableDelete
>> --- FAIL: TestExecutableDelete (0.00s)
>> osext_test.go:135: Child returned
>>
Hi Adrian and Shengjing,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 golang-golang-x-sys
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> Source: golang-github-spf13-cobra
>> Version: 0.0~git20170731.0.b26b538-1
>>
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: golang-github-spf13-cobra
> Version: 0.0~git20170314.0.7be4bed-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: buster sid
>
> Some recent change in unstable makes golang-github-spf13-cobra FTBFS:
>
>
Source: golang-golang-x-tools
Version: 1:0.0~git20170629.0.1b3bb8de+ds-1
Tags: confirmed, buster, sid, pending
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: golang-golang-x-tools
> Version: 1:0.0~git20170629.0.1b3bb8de-1
> Severity: serious
>
>
Thank you Adrian and Dr. Tobias.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> control: tag -1 sid
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the bug report. However, hugo still builds fine in a stretch
> chroot, this bug only applies to unstable.
>
> It was triggered by
Control: severity -1 important
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> About a year later, Emilio states that the release team discussed this
> problem and "wouldn't like to release Stretch with guile-1.8 just for
> lilypond's sake":
>
Hello all,
Thank you all for all your effort in trying to keep LilyPond in Debian
9.0 "stretch" (the upcoming "stable") and for trying to migrate to
guile-2.0.
There are several packages, especially Frescobaldi, Denemo, Songwrite,
etc., that rely on LilyPond to work. Being a Debian maintainer
Hello Michael,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Package: hugo
> Version: 0.15+git20160109.147.dd1d655-2
>
> During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using
> cowbuilder
> and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.
>
Source: golang-gocheck
Followup-For: Bug #789991
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Sergio and Martín,
Seeing how that https://launchpad.net/gocheck points the user to
https://github.com/go-check/check, which the golang-check.v1 package
provides as "gopkg.in/check.v1", and
Source: golang-github-miekg-mmark
Followup-For: Bug #802793
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Aaron,
> Automated builds of golang-github-miekg-mmark have been failing due to
> the autobuilders' policy of disregarding alternatives in most cases
> for the sake of
Source: golang-github-spf13-fsync
Followup-For: Bug #802340
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Chris,
Thank you very much for bringing this issue to my attention.
I have forwarded this issue to both the upstream and upstream^2 authors
at
Dear all,
Thank you all for getting unifont 5.1.20080808-2 uploaded! Yes, just
as Paul mentioned, I had been very busy with my work and personal
life, and I would have missed the necessary Replaces: line too; thank
you Robert for catching that. :-)
Cheers,
Anthony
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
70 matches
Mail list logo