--On Thursday, May 5, 2022 3:54 PM +0300 Adrian Bunk
wrote:
Source: openldap
Version: 2.5.11+dfsg-1
Severity: seriou
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: Philipp Kern
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openldap=amd64=2.
5.12%2Bdfsg-1=1651720566=0
. and then
update-rc.d slapd defaults
[18:09] paco11 and nothing else
You would of course need to use the configure options most relevant to you.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Architect - Server
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
to get the recent fixes to
slapo-memberof around replication that are going into OpenLDAP 2.4.37:
Fixed slapo-memberof to not replicate internal ops (ITS#7710)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Architect - Server
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source
for security reasons.
In addition, you may wish to read the OpenLDAP changelog while your
packages are building:
http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html
Regards,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Architect - Server
Zimbra Software, LLC
Zimbra :: the leader
, and it should be avoided at all cost.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Architect - Server
Zimbra Software, LLC
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
of the
packagers, then backport a newer version.
Either way, you're picking a fight where there isn't one, and you have the
ability to resolve the issue for all your users.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Architect - Server
Zimbra Software, LLC
Zimbra :: the leader in open
99% or more of their code, including the source
files. Thus a fix to the back-bdb location is generally a fix to both
backends.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source
my patch.
As noted in the follow up, this fix needs to be *tested* by someone who is
affected. Not just grabbed and applied.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging
, this is not a debian specific openldap bug.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
Heimdal code, since it'll be years before it's released. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=7247) on this issue. That
would be the correct place for this to be fixed.
What version of Heimdal was Debian using previously? What version of
Heimdal is Debian using that you encountered this error against?
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member
--On Monday, April 16, 2012 10:17 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Monday, April 16, 2012 3:27 PM +0200 Mattias Ellert
mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se wrote:
Hi!
No other suggestion put forward. I will do a bin NMU in a few days
unless there are other solutions
-rwm, which very few people do.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
of the package.
Personally, I'm hoping Debian will dump back-bdb/back-hdb entirely once
back-mdb is stable. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
was resynchronized and all is OK now.
But the package in unstable is still unusable.
The version of BDB that OpenLDAP is built against must be used. Your other
fix would have been to simply rebuild the OpenLDAP package against the
version of BDB in unstable.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr
--On Monday, December 12, 2011 1:29 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Sunday, December 11, 2011 12:14 PM +0100 stor...@club-internet.fr
jp.po...@izzop.net wrote:
Package: slapd
Version: 2.4.25-4+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I think that the openldap
, and thus it refuses to start.
The correct behavior on Debian's part is to export the database(s) prior to
updating the BDB library via slapcat, and then reimport it via slapadd post
upgrade. OpenLDAP is working as designed.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra
--On Monday, December 12, 2011 10:54 PM +0100 Julien Cristau
jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 13:35:50 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
OpenLDAP was compiled using 5.1.25, and the libs were updated to
5.1.29. OpenLDAP *must* be recompiled against 5.1.29 as well
release after the numerous issue reports that were filtered
back to the project.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
environment that is causing
the problem to show up.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
to do
a slapcat/slapadd of the database (I assume that's already being done), but
before that, it is critical to completely checkpoint the database via
db_recover (one of the steps taken above).
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra
--On August 19, 2010 10:41:51 PM +0200 Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:55 -0700
Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
What version was being migrated from (i.e., what version of BDB was
openldap linked against?). If it was prior to BDB 4.8
until that is finished. If I have a 128GB
BDB cachesize, slapd will take a lot longer to start than if it is 8GB.
etc.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
the
first time. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
it, I think?
Noted in the upstream ITS:
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=6534
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
--On Thursday, April 29, 2010 12:58 PM +0200 Cyril Brulebois
k...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com (28/04/2010):
TIOCNOTTY is defined in a system header file. If the build is
failing on this elif, it sounds like you have a missing system
header while doing
--On Monday, April 26, 2010 8:10 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Monday, April 26, 2010 12:57 PM +0200 Cyril Brulebois
k...@debian.org wrote:
Source: openldap
Version: 2.4.21-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
--On Saturday, October 31, 2009 9:13 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
Also, if Debian's still supporting anything based on OL 2.3, I have a
clean patch for this issue for it as well.
2.3 patch attached if needed.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software
--On Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:58 PM +0100 Giuseppe Iuculano
iucul...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Also, if Debian's still supporting anything based on OL 2.3, I have a
clean patch for this issue for it as well.
Could you send the patch for OL 2.3 please?
Sent
server seems not particularly simple to do. I.e., this
requires someone to set up an LDAP server with a bad cert, and then
intercept someone elses ldap client traffic to that server.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra
--On Saturday, October 31, 2009 8:47 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Saturday, October 31, 2009 10:57 AM +0100 Giuseppe Iuculano
iucul...@debian.org wrote:
Package: openldap
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
This was fixed in OpenLDAP 2.4.18 (Just to note
--On Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:42 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Thursday, April 03, 2008 4:42 PM -0300 Fernando Augusto Medeiros
Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: slapd
Version: 2.4.7-6.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I would
--On Friday, April 04, 2008 11:01 AM -0300 Fernando Augusto Medeiros Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your promptness!
Is there release date for this?
When it is ready. :)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Monday, March 17, 2008 9:48 AM +0100 Mathieu PARENT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--On Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:40 PM +0100 Mathieu Parent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: slapd
Version: 2.4.7-5
--On Monday, March 17, 2008 10:13 AM +0100 Mathieu PARENT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you have the upstream bug # ?
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=5407
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open
--On Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:40 PM +0100 Mathieu Parent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: slapd
Version: 2.4.7-5
Severity: critical
What's your slapd.conf file?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open
doesn't match the hostname being
connected to, since this subverts the SSL security model.)
OpenLDAP compiled with OpenSSL behaves the same way. i.e, the cn in the
cert must match the servername (or the fields on subjectAltName, etc).
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
(are those replaced now?).
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://www.OpenLDAP.org/its/index.cgi?findid=5341
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
--On Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:33 PM +0100 T.A. van Roermund
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Have you verified whether or not you can connect using LDAPS via the
command line tools? (ldapsearch, ldapwhoami, etc).
Yes I did:
$ ldapsearch -H ldaps://localhost
, no
matter which cipher suite was selected.
Have you verified whether or not you can connect using LDAPS via the
command line tools? (ldapsearch, ldapwhoami, etc).
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open
advise reading the GnuTLS
documentation and picking something appropriate.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
--On Monday, September 03, 2007 11:23 AM +0200 Thomas Sesselmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upstream bug#5119.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-db-devel/2007-March/001161.h
tml
but no bug report was generated as a result of that thread as far as I
am aware.
In the interest of making me less confused, I am presently going to make
a new bug that is explicitly about vendor patch #5.
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.2.29. Other versions
may also be affected.
Can you supply actual details? This statement isn't very useful without
them.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
--On Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:56 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:53 PM +0100 Stefan Fritsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you supply actual details? This statement isn't very useful
without them.
Ups. Of course:
http
WARRANTIES OF
## MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
What it says, is that you cannot modify or remove the license, at least the
way I read it.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key
now.
Is it possible to reproduce in 2.3.24? Or just the rather old 2.2.x
version?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
advise opening an ITS
with OpenLDAP at:
http://www.openldap.org/its/
I would include the URL to the bug in debian, since it has the gdb
backtrace and other information contained in it.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
QA Engineer
http://www.openldap.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
--On Sunday, June 04, 2006 7:36 PM -0700 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:28:14PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:42:57AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
OK, the problem doesn't show up at -O0, which supports the theory
other issues.
It was pulled in 2.2.25:
OpenLDAP 2.2.25 Release
Removed broken libldap fast synchronous search result processing
(ITS#3612)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah
--On Friday, May 13, 2005 5:06 PM -0700 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Quanah,
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:51:14PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
To answer your first question, the 64 bit patch was in response to:
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Build?id=3691
I'm curious
58 matches
Mail list logo
