Bug#1068063: sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)

2024-05-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/04/24 at 10:04 -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > 1. --- 0x2 != 0x1 > >src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c:2505: error: Failure! > > > >assert_int_equal(test_ctx->result->count, 1); > > > > apparently there are 2 results returned while expected just one. > > This is

Bug#1068063: sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)

2024-04-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:59:51 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI wrote: Source: sssd Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Control: found -1 2.9.4-1.1 X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org Dear Maintainer, sssd fails to build on armel, armhf. Though test suite failure was already reported, but target version is

Bug#1068063: sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)

2024-03-30 Thread Kentaro HAYASHI
Source: sssd Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Control: found -1 2.9.4-1.1 X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org Dear Maintainer, sssd fails to build on armel, armhf. Though test suite failure was already reported, but target version is 1.11.5.1-1, not 2.x branch. so I've filed as a new bug to raise