Bug#1069859: atop: Fix atop for 64-bit time_t on arm

2024-05-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 06:12:50PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I am not too fond about the suggested patch since it breaks atop on > systems with 32bit time_t, It does not: promoting the time_t to a long long on all architectures before passing it as an argument to the format string is portable to

Processed: Re: Bug#1069859: atop: Fix atop for 64-bit time_t on arm

2024-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1069859 [atop] atop: Fix atop for 64-bit time_t on arm Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://github.com/Atoptool/atop/issues/306 Bug #1069859 [atop] atop: Fix atop for 64-bit time_t on arm Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#1069859: atop: Fix atop for 64-bit time_t on arm

2024-05-26 Thread Marc Haber
Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Atoptool/atop/issues/306 thanks thanks for spotting and debugging this. On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 02:16:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Although atop currently builds successfully on armhf and armel, it is broken > at runtime

Bug#1069859: atop: Fix atop for 64-bit time_t on arm

2024-04-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: atop Version: 2.10.0-2 Severity: grave Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Hi Marc, Although atop currently builds successfully on armhf and armel, it is broken at runtime because it tries to use a time_t in a format string which