On Friday, 18 November 2016 19:20:15 CET Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 06:10:31AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > On Friday, 18 November 2016 01:09:53 CET Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > What does create the dependency in
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 06:10:31AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Friday, 18 November 2016 01:09:53 CET Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:18:57PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:39:19 CET Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > > That header was created
On Friday, 18 November 2016 01:09:53 CET Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:18:57PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > On Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:39:19 CET Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > That header was created for mod_ssl_ct which provides support for
> > > > certificate
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:18:57PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:39:19 CET Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > That header was created for mod_ssl_ct which provides support for
> > > certificate transparency. It's quite new and likely that nothing else
> > > uses the
On Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:39:19 CET Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > That header was created for mod_ssl_ct which provides support for
> > certificate transparency. It's quite new and likely that nothing else
> > uses the header. It would probably be acceptable to remove the dependency
> > in
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:05:13PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [I have trimmed the cc list a bit]
>
> On Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:36:49 CET Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 03:06:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Stefan Fritsch writes:
> > > >
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:05:13PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>...
> BTW, I am pretty sure that support for enhanced master secret and chacha20
> will appear for openssl 1.0.2 before the release of stretch+1, if only
> because
> redhat needs it for its long support cycles. Back-porting that
Hi,
[I have trimmed the cc list a bit]
On Wednesday, 16 November 2016 20:36:49 CET Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 03:06:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Stefan Fritsch writes:
> > > I must admit that I did not think of php when doing that change, sorry.
> > >
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:26:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:36:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 03:06:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Stefan Fritsch writes:
> > >
> > > > I must admit that I did not think of php when
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:36:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 03:06:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Stefan Fritsch writes:
> >
> > > I must admit that I did not think of php when doing that change, sorry.
> >
> > > On the other hand, shibboleth-sp2
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 03:06:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Stefan Fritsch writes:
>
> > I must admit that I did not think of php when doing that change, sorry.
>
> > On the other hand, shibboleth-sp2 also build-depends on apache2-dev and
> > there
> > have been some
Stefan Fritsch writes:
> I must admit that I did not think of php when doing that change, sorry.
> On the other hand, shibboleth-sp2 also build-depends on apache2-dev and there
> have been some indications that shibboleth won't be switching to openssl 1.1
> for stretch. See
On Monday, 14 November 2016 05:03:45 CET Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Looking at mod_ssl_openssl.h and the comment in #828330,
> > I'd suggest the change below to add a dependency on libssl1.0-dev
> > to apache2-dev.
>
> And that exactly happens meaning that PHP 7.0 can no longer be built
> unless all
13 matches
Mail list logo