Bug#913909: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#913909: Bug#913909: ceph: FTBFS on i386 and mipsel (regression)

2018-11-19 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi Salvatore Bonaccorso writes: Hi Gaudenz, and hi James, On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:48:14PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: James Page writes: > https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/ceph/tree/debian/patches?h=ubuntu/xenial > I think I hit the same issue in Ubuntu

Bug#913909: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#913909: Bug#913909: ceph: FTBFS on i386 and mipsel (regression)

2018-11-19 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Gaudenz, and hi James, On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:48:14PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > James Page writes: > > https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/ceph/tree/debian/patches?h=ubuntu/xenial > > > > I think I hit the same issue in Ubuntu a while back for which I

Bug#913909: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#913909: Bug#913909: ceph: FTBFS on i386 and mipsel (regression)

2018-11-19 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
James Page writes: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/ceph/tree/debian/patches?h=ubuntu/xenial I think I hit the same issue in Ubuntu a while back for which I picked 3 rocksdb patches - see above URL - 000*.patch. Thanks James. It looks like these patches actually

Bug#913909: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#913909: Bug#913909: ceph: FTBFS on i386 and mipsel (regression)

2018-11-19 Thread James Page
Hi Gaudenz On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 07:51 Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: [...] > I did the same and the build hanged as well. Retrying the hanging > call with all the -O2 arguments removed succeeds. So this seems to > be a bug in GCC with optimizations. I'm unsure on how to proceeed > from here. It's