Bug#322510: watchdog: Modifies conffile in postinst

Package: watchdog Version: 5.2.4-4 Severity: serious The package's postinst may modify /etc/init.d/watchdog upon installation. This is forbidden by the Policy (section 10.7.3): The other way to do it is via the maintainer scripts. In this case, the configuration file must not be

Bug#322525: umfpack depends on packages, beeing removed from unstable

Package: umfpack Severity: serious depends on blas atlas2-base, see #317245 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322529: lvm10: vg_check_consistency_with_pv_and_lv not called correctly

Package: lvm10 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: causes non-serious data loss Function vg_create_dir_and_group_and_nodes() in tools/lib/vg_create_dir_and_group_and_nodes.c has vg_check_consistency_with_pv_and_lv 0, which compares the address of the function instead of the return value

Bug#322089: openldap2: Please switch to libgnutls12

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:11:42AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: Torsten Landschoff: On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:44:42AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: Sigh. This is not supposed to happen... Do you have a build log? Attached. OK, I have looked at the sources. The problem is that

Bug#321621: gcc biarch builds fails on i386

On 05-Aug-09 14:14, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:50:38PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: I could provide a patch to make 'glibc' build the necessary 'libc6-i386' and 'libc6-dev-i386' packages if this approach is welcome. I meant 'libc6-amd64' and 'libc6-dev-amd64',

Bug#322089: openldap2: Please switch to libgnutls12

Hi, Steve Langasek: If necessary, additional hackery can probably be introduced to openldap2's include/ldap_pvt_gnutls.h (#include gnutls/openssl.h, #ifdef any conflicts away, link with -lgnutls-openssl) without too much headache. Ok. Couple of questions: - What is the current

Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability

tags 322467 + experimental stop On 10.08.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.0.2-31 Severity: grave Tags: patch Just a reminder, http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14529/info Martin Pitt gave me the hint, that teTeX from stable is not vulnerable

Processed: Re: Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 322467 + experimental Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability Tags were: security patch Tags added: experimental stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Processed: Re: no longer RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 321435 serious Bug#321435: Unrecoverable error: typecheck in .getdeviceparams on s390 Severity set to `serious'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#321554: marked as done (plucker-desktop: uninstallable due to dependency on libwxgtk2.4-contrib)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321554: fixed in plucker 1.8-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging 322525

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 322525 sid Bug#322525: umfpack depends on packages, beeing removed from unstable There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#318012: revelation is still uninstallable

On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 14:48 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:00:23PM -0400, John McCutchan wrote: Package: revelation Followup-For: Bug #318012 Please mark this bug as unfixed. Indeed, a correction is in order, Revelation can't be installed because

Bug#322531: sound-juicer: Missing dependency

Package: sound-juicer Version: 0.6.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Library dependencies missing $ sound-juicer sound-juicer: error while loading shared libraries: libgnome-media-profiles.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#322535: evolution: Multiple format string vulnerabilities in Evolution

Package: evolution Severity: grave Tags: security Multiple exploitable format string vulnerabilities have been found in Evolution. Please see http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/407789/30/0/threaded for details. 2.3.7 fixes all these issues. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information:

Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability

found 322467 3.0-5 thanks Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.0.2-31 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: can result in disk consumption and ultimately lead to a denial of service condition. Just a reminder,

Bug#309308: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: VLAN Oops fix for 2.6.8

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:04:17AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Horms wrote: below patch has been slurped into the Debian patches for 2.6.8, but the error posted looks like the same error I suffered when hitting this bug. Patch from

Bug#314990: xdm: cannot log in

Doing a little bug work. It looks like you're running unstable. If so, can you still reproduce this bug with the xorg-x11 packages? There've been more than a few changes, and it will probably be easier for the developers to track down the bug with the new source package. Thanks in advance.

Bug#321435: no longer RC

severity 321435 serious quit * Peter Palfrader A workaround has been added to tor so that it does not build those images on s390, making it build again in sarge. Therefore this bug no longer is RC, and I downgrade it to important. That won't help ScummVM from failing to build, I'm afraid.

Processed: Re: Bug#321902: fails to rmmod usbnet

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 321902 +moreinfo Bug#321902: fails to rmmod usbnet There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo tag 321902 +upstream Bug#321902: fails to rmmod usbnet Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: upstream severity 321902 important Bug#321902: fails to rmmod

Bug#321612: marked as done (scummvm/i386: uninstallable, depends on non-existing libflac7)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:52:40 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321612: scummvm/i386: uninstallable, depends on non-existing libflac7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#321902: fails to rmmod usbnet

tags 321902 +wontfix thanks On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:22:39AM +0800, 肖盛文 Faris Xiao wrote: Andres Salomon wrote: On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:54:46PM +0900, Horms wrote: [...] rmmod usbnet The model usbnet can not be removed. Also the process which execute the command can not be

Bug#322541: mmv is unusable bacause of constant hangs / segmentation fault

Package: mmv Version: 1.01b-12.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Under debian-amd64 mmv 1.01b-12.1 constantly segfaults. Even when run without parameters or with --help: $ mmv Segmentation fault Under debian-i386 mmv 1.01b-12.1 does not segfault but hangs on any input.

Bug#322539: yaboot: FTBFS: label at end of compound statement

Package: yaboot Version: 1.3.13-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'yaboot' on powerpc/unstable, I get the following error: gcc -Os -nostdinc -Wall -isystem `gcc -print-file-name=include` -fsigned-char -DVERSION=\1.3.13\ -DTEXTADDR=0x20 -DDEBUG=0 -DMALLOCADDR=0x30

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mpich 1.2.5.3-6.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 253422 + fixed Bug#253422: mpirun is inconvenient on SMP systems There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 306305 + fixed Bug#306305: mpich-bin: doesn't remove alternatives correctly There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 314173 +

Bug#309308: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: VLAN Oops fix for 2.6.8

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:46:12PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:04:17AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Horms wrote: below patch has been slurped into the Debian patches for 2.6.8, but the error posted looks like the same error I suffered when hitting this

Processed: Fixed in NMU of python-crypto 2.0+dp1-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 318055 + fixed Bug#318055: python2.3-crypto is uninstallable Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

-- Initial header --- From : Randolph Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] To : John David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC : [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian-hppa@lists.debian.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date : Wed, 10 Aug 2005

Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: VLAN Oops fix for 2.6.8

tags +pending 309308 tags +patch 309308 thanks On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:42:54AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp Followup-For: Bug #309308 Just noticed this bug in the testing-security list. I don't know if the below patch has been slurped into the

Bug#309308: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: VLAN Oops fix for 2.6.8

Horms wrote: below patch has been slurped into the Debian patches for 2.6.8, but the error posted looks like the same error I suffered when hitting this bug. Patch from http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge/2004-September/000638.html Cut and paste from the web archive, so spacing

Processed: Re: Bug#322500: ifstat doesnt work with libsnmp 5.2.1.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 322500 libsnmp5,ifstat Bug#322500: ifstat doesnt work with libsnmp 5.2.1.2 Bug reassigned from package `ifstat' to `libsnmp5,ifstat'. retitle 322500 libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change Bug#322500: ifstat doesnt work with libsnmp

Bug#322500: ifstat doesnt work with libsnmp 5.2.1.2

reassign 322500 libsnmp5,ifstat retitle 322500 libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change severity 322500 serious thanks Hi Craig, downgrading the libsnmp5 seems to be the best fix for now. But if you need/want the new libsnmp5 then recompiling the pckage will also fix the problem. Details below

Bug#192196: marked as done (xboard: Fails to build with current flex)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 05:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#192196: fixed in xboard 4.2.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#322560: udev installation prevent the installation of other packages

Package: udev Version: 0.065-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software When installing udev, it detects I am not running a 2.6.12 kernel and the installation fails. This prevents the installation of all other packages. Please make the 2.6.12 check a runtime check

Processed: tagging 322448

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 tags 322448 + pending Bug#322448: libapache-request-perl: Apache::Request fails with unresolved dynamic load Tags were: patch Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing

Bug#322560: marked as done (udev installation prevent the installation of other packages)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:00:41 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322560: udev installation prevent the installation of other packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#322564: clamav-daemon: The clamav daemon fails to start

Package: clamav-daemon Version: 0.86.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Upon attempting to start the clamav daemon, an error occurs which causes the start to fail. Following is the error message that is displayed when /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon is run with the start

Bug#322448: libapache-request-perl maintenance

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:31:06AM -0700, ivan wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:47:10AM +0930, Ron wrote: are you actually working on a new upload for this now? Please take a peek at #322448 in that case, if you aren't aware of it already. hi, i am subscribed to the package in the BTS

Bug#309257: Bug #309257: libpano12: patent problems

Le Samedi 6 Août 2005 06:40, Steve Langasek a écrit : Hi Florent, Hi Steve, [...] Well, if the prior art exists which shows the patent is invalid, I'm personally satisfied that we can ship it, but this is actually the purview of the ftp team to decide. Is this bug still being held open

Bug#322564: clamav-daemon: The clamav daemon fails to start

This one time, at band camp, Rick Friedman said: Upon attempting to start the clamav daemon, an error occurs which causes the start to fail. Following is the error message that is displayed when /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon is run with the start parameter: Starting ClamAV daemon: clamd

Bug#322560: udev installation prevent the installation of other packages

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote: When installing udev, it detects I am not running a 2.6.12 kernel and the installation fails. This prevents the installation of all other packages. This only happens when upgrading. My bad. I meant upgrading, yes. Please make the

Bug#322579: FTBFS: documentation files not available

Package: boost Severity: serious Tags: patch Trying to build the latest boost in pbuilder, it fails: cat debian/documentation-files \ | xargs cp --parents --target-directory=debian/libboost-doc/usr/share/doc/libboost-doc/HTML cp: cannot stat `libs/regex/test/regress/index.html?D=A': No such

Bug#322500: Upstream bug

forward 322500 http://net-snmp.sf.net tag + upstream thanks Hi, unfortunately, simply changing the SONAME would make us incompatible with the rest of the world. I reported the bug back upstream and hope they will change the SONAME upstream. Thanks, Jochen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#321815: marked as done (kazehakase: FTBFS: Missing build dependency on libssl-dev?)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321815: fixed in kazehakase 0.2.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#322564: clamav-daemon: The clamav daemon fails to start

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Rick Friedman said: Upon attempting to start the clamav daemon, an error occurs which causes the start to fail. Following is the error message that is displayed when /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon is run

Bug#322564: clamav-daemon: The clamav daemon fails to start

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:43:51AM -0400, Rick Friedman said: Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Rick Friedman said: Starting ClamAV daemon: clamd /sbin/start-stop-daemon: stat --oknodo: no such file or directory (No such file or directory) failed! Well, I see

Processed: [Fwd: Processed: Upstream bug]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 322500 http://net-snmp.sf.net Bug#322500: libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://net-snmp.sf.net. tags 322500 + upstream Bug#322500: libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change

Bug#315004: raidtools2: Ignoring /etc/raidtab breaks upgrade to mdadm

Hello, On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 20:44 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Hi Adam (et al.), Sorry for not responding earlier but I've been travelling and quite busy and completely forgot about this issue. As I said, I don't know what the ideal situation is. The nice thing about the transition

Bug#322560: udev installation prevent the installation of other packages

On Aug 11, Sam Hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No it does not *have* to work this way. I read Jakob Bohm's proposal in #317332 (also backed by Manoj) and it seems to me like the perfect way to fix the problem. Except for the detail that it does not work: the old version of udev could not

Bug#308879: Patches not sufficient

The reason for the breakage is that something in the behaviour of openssl has changed between versions 0.9.7e-3, which is part of Sarge, and 0.9.7g-1 and newer. This leads not only to an infinite loop at startup (which is fixed by at least one of the submitted patches) but also to a problem

Bug#322564: marked as done (clamav-daemon: The clamav daemon fails to start)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:17:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322564: fixed in clamav 0.86.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: fixing sev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 322583 grave Bug#322583: uninstallable due to C++ transition Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#322591: awstats: [CAN-2005-1527] arbitrary command injection

Package: awstats Version: 6.4-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch security Hi! awstats is vulnerable to a command injection flaw in crafted referer URLs. Details are at: http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=290type=vulnerabilities This is CAN-2005-1527, please mention it in the

Bug#318055: python2.3-crypto: please upload NOW

John McCutchan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: python2.3-crypto Followup-For: Bug #318055 Bastian, Please just upload this now. I have had this bug open for almost a month without even a response from the maintainer. That is more than enough time for the maintainer to express interest in

Bug#315671: DSA claims this is fixed in a version of webcalendar that is not in the archive

FYI, from the DSA about this security hole: For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in version 0.9.45-6. But it seems that version was never uploaded. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Processed: Merge!

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 320656 libdjvulibre1 Bug#320656: evince: libdjvulibre.so.14 has gone Bug reassigned from package `djvulibre' to `libdjvulibre1'. merge 320656 320582 Bug#320582: libdjvulibre1: soname of library changed Bug#320656: evince: libdjvulibre.so.14

Bug#321052: NMU diff for several mpich bugs; please ack or nack

Greetings, I'm afraid I'm just back from a couple of weeks out of the country and with very limited email contact. During this time, my packages were (rightfully) rejected from the NEW queue, and the 0-day NMU policy took effect, under which you NMU-ed my packages. I had not foreseen this

Bug#317703: CVE typo

Sorry, I seem to have typoed the assigned CVE for this hole. It's CAN-2005-2347, not CAN-2005-2437. I'm sorry for the confusion and it would be good if you could update your changelog in the next upload. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#322583: uninstallable due to C++ transition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Decklin Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: xmms-scrobbler Version: 0.3.8.1-3 Severity: normal xmms-scrobbler needs to be recompiled against libmusicbrainz4c2. Currently, attempting to install it yields: The following packages have

Processed: Re: Bug#319562: patch done for bug #319562

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 319562 - patch Bug#319562: FTBFS: Labels at the end of compound statements Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#319562: patch done for bug #319562

tags 319562 - patch thanks Hi, Below there's a patch that corrects these problems and some others which came out later. Yeap, fenris builds with the patch fine, but refuses to work: [135]/home/robert/Debian/fenris/fenris ./fenris ./fenris fenris 0.07-m2 (3245, 23496) - program

Bug#322602: postfix: trivial-rewrite crashes with signal 11

Package: postfix Version: 2.2.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Hi, Postfix refuses to send any mail, according to its log: Aug 11 19:34:12 vox postfix/master[3132]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/trivial-rewrite: bad command start up -- throttling Aug 11 19:35:12 vox

Bug#321052: NMU diff for several mpich bugs; please ack or nack

I would suggest emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] or filing a bug against ftp.debian.org, since they handle /new. Justin On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:37:00PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Greetings, I'm afraid I'm just back from a couple of weeks out of the country and with very limited email

Processed: Apache 1.3 also vulnerable?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 316173 -1 Bug#316173: SECURITY: HTTP proxy responses with both Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers (CAN-2005-2088) Bug 316173 cloned as bug 322607. clone 320048 -2 Bug#320048: SECURITY: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl (CAN-2005-1268) Bug

Bug#322604: SECURITY: Vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344?

Package: apache2 Severity: grave Tags: security Hello Apache maintainers, please check if Debian is vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344 and make sure it enters http://www.debian.org/security/crossreferences or the not-vulnerable lists. http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1344

Bug#322541: mmv: it's not a hang, it's waiting for input

Package: mmv Version: 1.01b-12.1 Followup-For: Bug #322541 The hang part the submitter reported when running on i386 is probably because of this: Multiple from -- to pattern pairs may be specified by omitting the pat‐ tern pair on the command line, and entering them on the

Bug#322613: Processed: Apache 1.3 also vulnerable?

Package: apache Severity: critical Tags: security thanks Cloning did not work, so I open a new bug report. Reason was that RedHat/Fedora also updated their 1.3.27 packages so this version might also be vulnerable. clone 320048 -2 Bug#320048: SECURITY: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl

Bug#300094: Enigma 0.92 builds fine with gcc 4.0

Hi, I just tested it, Enigma 0.92 builds without any problem with gcc 4.0. Maybe this bug could/should be closed now ? Regards, Regis -- While a monkey can be a manager, it takes a human to be an engineer Erik Zapletal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321052: NMU diff for several mpich bugs; please ack or nack

Thanks, will do. On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 13:54 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: I would suggest emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] or filing a bug against ftp.debian.org, since they handle /new. Justin On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:37:00PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Greetings, I'm afraid I'm just

Processed: Re: Bug#322604: SECURITY: Vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 322604 2.0.54-3 Bug#322604: SECURITY: Vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344? Bug marked as not found in version 2.0.54-3. merge 307134 322604 Bug number 307134 not found. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#322604: SECURITY: Vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344?

notfound 322604 2.0.54-3 merge 307134 322604 thanks Christian Hammers wrote: Hello Apache maintainers, please check if Debian is vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344 and make sure it enters http://www.debian.org/security/crossreferences or the not-vulnerable lists. You can find a note that this bug

Processed: tagging 318164

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 tags 318164 sid Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition Tags were: patch Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#322616: zoo: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch'

Package: zoo Version: 2.10-14 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'zoo' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean debian/rules:34: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'.

Processed: tagging 322352

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 tags 322352 sarge Bug#322352: pdns and pdns-doc both contain /usr/share/doc-base/pdns (sarge security update version) There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge End of message,

Bug#322616: marked as done (zoo: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch')

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:16:01 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322616: Acknowledgement (zoo: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch') has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#303692: marked as done (sourcenav: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): unrecognized command line option -fwritable-strings)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:17:24 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303692: fixed in sourcenav 5.1.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#76918: Get software cds and download under $15-$99

Adobe+macromedia+OS etc all in CD under $99 http://zrbnl.mt8jpl4f1wmbjnm.acarchformdc.info Experience without learning is better than learning without experience. Not life, but good life, is to be chiefly valued. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#320325: why should security holes be blocked from testing?

This RC bug has the effect of blocking the security fix in the new version in unstable from reaching testing. I think that's remote security holes are generally considered more invonvenient than functionlity decreases, so I suggest downgrading this bug. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description:

Bug#322229: marked as done (ImportError: No module named timeoutsocke)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:17:26 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#39: fixed in spkproxy 1.4.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#321052: NMU diff for several mpich bugs; please ack or nack

* Adam C Powell IV [Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:37:00 -0400]: Greetings, Hi, I'm afraid I'm just back from a couple of weeks out of the country and with very limited email contact. During this time, my packages were (rightfully) rejected from the NEW queue, and the 0-day NMU policy took effect,

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xine-lib 1.0.1-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 288189 + fixed Bug#288189: xine-lib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in increment Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 315986 + fixed Bug#315986: xine-lib: please build against libslang2 Tags were: patch Bug#315868: libxine: please build

Processed: Merge!

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 322600 grave Bug#322600: evince: Application will not start Severity set to `grave'. merge 322600 320582 Bug#320582: libdjvulibre1: soname of library changed Bug#322600: evince: Application will not start Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6

Bug#302608: marked as done (siptoolbox: FTBFS: Build stops with !--error 241 usr/lib/scilab/man/eng/programming/whatis.htm does not exist)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:17:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302608: fixed in siptoolbox 0.3.99rc2alpha3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#318217: marked as done (asterisk-oh323 requires rebuild for new symbol names)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:47:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318217: fixed in asterisk-oh323 0.6.6pre3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#318189: marked as done (asterisk-oh323: chan_oh323.so cannot find symbol and Asterisk crashes)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:47:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318189: fixed in asterisk-oh323 0.6.6pre3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#321052: NMU diff for several mpich bugs; please ack or nack

On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 22:23 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Adam C Powell IV [Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:37:00 -0400]: Greetings, Hi, I'm afraid I'm just back from a couple of weeks out of the country and with very limited email contact. During this time, my packages were (rightfully)

Bug#320234: marked as done (rt2500: warning: libstdc++.so.5, needed by /usr/share/qt3/lib/libqt-mt.so, may conflict with libstdc++.so.6)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:17:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320234: fixed in rt2500 1.1.0+cvs20050710-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#320507: marked as done (rt2500: warning: libstdc++.so.5, needed by /usr/share/qt3/lib/libqt-mt.so, may conflict with libstdc++.so.6)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320507: fixed in rt2400 1.2.2+cvs20050730-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#318791: patch

Hi, Please find attached a patch which should solve the problem. It's untested on a 64bit machine however. Feel free to test and report the result. Thanks, Peter (p2). diff -ruN orig/opencv-0.9.6/tests/cv/src/apyramids.cpp opencv-0.9.6/tests/cv/src/apyramids.cpp ---

Bug#279030: mldonkey-server: debconf configuration is entirely ignored

Hi, On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:51:10PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Sylvain LE GALL wrote: You should have contact me before working on this. I am preparing a release of 2.5.28.1 which should close this bug. Well, you had been talking about a new release for quite some time, so I

Processed: closing 322604

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 close 322604 2.0.54-3 Bug#322604: SECURITY: Vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344? 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version

Processed: Re: testing bug triage

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Trying again now that use of closes/notfound has been clarified to me. close 274225 4:2.6.2-3 Bug#274225: Security patch in latest version affects woody? 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in

Processed: Re: Bug#322300: openhackware: should not try to build on !powerpc environments

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package openhackware Ignoring bugs not assigned to: openhackware severity 322300 normal Bug#322300: FTBFS: as: unrecognized option `-mregnames' Severity set to `normal'. retitle 322300 openhackware: should not try to build on !powerpc environments

Bug#297626: marked as done (nethack: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): non-local variable 'anonymous struct key_macro []' uses anonymous type)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:47:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297626: fixed in nethack 3.4.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#288586: marked as done (sword: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'sword::SWMgr*' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:50:28 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#288586: fixed in sword 1.5.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#322300: openhackware: should not try to build on !powerpc environments

package openhackware severity 322300 normal retitle 322300 openhackware: should not try to build on !powerpc environments thanks On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:22:17AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Package: openhackware Version: 0.4.1-1 Severity: Serious I tried to build openhackware on i386

Bug#317389: marked as done (libsigcx: FTBFS with g++-4.0: no matching function for call to 'pack...')

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:53:00 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#317389: fixed in libsigcx 0.6.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#308711: marked as done (nethack: Dummy package still needed?)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:47:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308711: fixed in nethack 3.4.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#314578: marked as done (ksh: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of '_sfds)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#314578: fixed in ksh 93q+93r-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#322531: sound-juicer: Missing dependency

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 322531 sound-juicer,gnome-media Bug#322531: sound-juicer: Missing dependency Bug reassigned from package `sound-juicer' to `sound-juicer,gnome-media'. severity 322531 important Bug#322531: sound-juicer: Missing dependency Severity set to

Bug#322531: sound-juicer: Missing dependency

reassign 322531 sound-juicer,gnome-media severity 322531 important thanks On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:05:59AM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote: Package: sound-juicer Version: 0.6.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Library dependencies missing $ sound-juicer sound-juicer: error while loading

  1   2   >