Bug#1061376: marked as done (pam-python ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:49:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061376: fixed in pam-python 1.1.0~git20220701.1d4e111-0.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061376, regarding pam-python ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1062821: ola: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi Lucas, On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 02:39:49PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Source: ola > Version: 0.10.9.nojsmin-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch pending sid trixie > Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: time-t > > NOTICE: these changes

Bug#1062570: libpng1.6: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: found -1 1.6.40-3 On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 11:05:46 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: control: affects -1 1.6.40-3 G. On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 23:12:06 + Steve Langasek wrote: > Source: libpng1.6 > Version: 1.6.42-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch pending > Justification: library ABI

Processed: Re: libpng1.6: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 1.6.40-3 Bug #1062570 [src:libpng1.6] libpng1.6: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Marked as found in versions libpng1.6/1.6.40-3. -- 1062570: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1063275: marked as done (r-bioc-rhtslib: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:23:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1063275: fixed in r-bioc-rhtslib 2.4.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1063275, regarding r-bioc-rhtslib: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1061341: Fwd: Bug#1061341: cyrus-common: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-02-06 Thread Yadd
On 2/7/24 06:31, ellie timoney wrote: Hi Xavier, On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, at 9:59 AM, ellie timoney wrote: On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, at 3:53 PM, Yadd wrote: yes there are other errors because some .h require unavailable .h like config.h Ooh interesting, I'll have a look I'm still working on this,

Processed: severity of 1062817 is important

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1062817 important Bug #1062817 [firmware-amd-graphics] firmware-amd-graphics: Invalid UVD handle causes the graphics driver to crash Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#1058286: marked as done (ncrack: FTBFS: configure: error: *** zlib too old - check config.log ***)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 03:39:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1058286: fixed in ncrack 0.7+debian-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1058286, regarding ncrack: FTBFS: configure: error: *** zlib too old - check config.log *** to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1063329: libselinux1t64: breaks system in upgrade from unstable

2024-02-06 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:42:33 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:34:07AM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote: > > Providing two APIs makes me quite uneasy due to having core components > > that would behave differently from the rest of the distribution. It > > sounds like

Bug#1061750: marked as done (python-cliapp ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 02:36:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061750: fixed in python-cliapp 1.20180812.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061750, regarding python-cliapp ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: ttconv doesn't run any tests during the build and as autopkg test

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1061853 [src:ttconv] ttconv fails its autopkg tests with Python 3.12 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1061853: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1061736: marked as done (aubio ftbfs with Python 3.12 as the default)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:05:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061736: fixed in aubio 0.4.9-4.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061736, regarding aubio ftbfs with Python 3.12 as the default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1060173: marked as done (ruby-hiredis FTBFS with hiredis 1.2.0-6)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 22:08:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1060173: fixed in ruby-hiredis 0.6.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1060173, regarding ruby-hiredis FTBFS with hiredis 1.2.0-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1058315: marked as done (python-sure: FTBFS: ERROR: Failure: ImportError (cannot import name 'assert_equals' from 'nose.tools' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nose/tools/__init__.py)))

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 7 Feb 2024 01:04:23 +0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1058315: python3-nose: from nose.tools import assert_equals, assert_raises FAILS has caused the Debian Bug report #1058315, regarding python-sure: FTBFS: ERROR: Failure: ImportError (cannot import name

Bug#1063365: src:python-cryptography: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: librust-pyo3-0.19-dev

2024-02-06 Thread Sandro Tosi
Jeremy, please have a look, thanks On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:39 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > > Source: python-cryptography > Version: 41.0.7-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid trixie > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: edos-uninstallable > > Dear maintainer(s), > > Dose [1] is reporting a

Processed: Bug#1060173 marked as pending in ruby-hiredis

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1060173 [src:ruby-hiredis] ruby-hiredis FTBFS with hiredis 1.2.0-6 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1060173: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060173 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1060173: marked as pending in ruby-hiredis

2024-02-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1060173 in ruby-hiredis reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: src:syncthing: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new Build-Depends not migrating

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.27.2~ds4-1 Bug #1063366 [src:syncthing] src:syncthing: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new Build-Depends not migrating Marked as fixed in versions syncthing/1.27.2~ds4-1. Bug #1063366 [src:syncthing] src:syncthing: fails to migrate to testing

Bug#1063366: src:syncthing: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new Build-Depends not migrating

2024-02-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: syncthing Version: 1.19.2~ds1-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.27.2~ds4-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than

Bug#1063365: src:python-cryptography: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: librust-pyo3-0.19-dev

2024-02-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-cryptography Version: 41.0.7-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Dear maintainer(s), Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't

Processed: nvidia-graphics-drivers: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:linux Bug #1063363 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux Added indication that 1063363 affects src:linux -- 1063363: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063363 Debian

Bug#1063363: nvidia-graphics-drivers: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux

2024-02-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers Version: 525.147.05-5 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:linux Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of

Processed: nvidia-cuda-samples: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:linux Bug #1063364 [src:nvidia-cuda-samples] nvidia-cuda-samples: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux Added indication that 1063364 affects src:linux -- 1063364: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063364 Debian Bug

Bug#1063364: nvidia-cuda-samples: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux

2024-02-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: nvidia-cuda-samples Version: 12.1~dfsg-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:linux Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of

Processed: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:linux Bug #1063362 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla] nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux Added indication that 1063362 affects src:linux -- 1063362:

Bug#1063362: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux

2024-02-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla Version: 525.147.05-5 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:linux Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of

Processed: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:linux Bug #1063361 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470] nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux Added indication that 1063361 affects src:linux -- 1063361:

Bug#1063361: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: autopkgtest needs update for new version of linux

2024-02-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 Version: 470.223.02-3 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:linux Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of

Bug#1063359: gdb-mingw-w64: FTBFS on arm64 due to arch-specific build flag: -mbranch-protection=standard

2024-02-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: gdb-mingw-w64 Version: 13 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: sid trixie ftbfs patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 Hi, arm64 now has an architecture-specific flag among the default build flags:

Bug#1061902: consolekit2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Mark Hindley
Whilst I am not an expert on this transition or the abi-compliance-checker, a quick look at the logs[1] suggests this is a tool configuration issue and src:consolekit2 may not require t64 migration. Can you clarify? Thanks Mark [1]

Bug#1061902: consolekit2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Mark Hindley
Michael, On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:24:19AM +, mwhud...@debian.org wrote: > Source: consolekit2 > Version: 1.2.6-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch pending > Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: time-t This patch appears to be broken and

Bug#1063170: nettle: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-02-05 Niels Möller wrote: > Graham Inggs writes: >> we have identified nettle as a source package shipping runtime >> libraries whose ABI either is affected by the change in size of >> time_t, or could not be analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and >> therefore to be on the safe side

Bug#1062802: marked as done (libpam0t64: file loss during upgrade due to /usr-move DEP17)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 17:08:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1062802: fixed in pam 1.5.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1062802, regarding libpam0t64: file loss during upgrade due to /usr-move DEP17 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1062356: marked as done (adios2: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): times out on big host)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 15:35:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1062356: fixed in adios2 2.9.2+dfsg1-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #1062356, regarding adios2: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): times out on big host to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1063329: libselinux1t64: breaks system in upgrade from unstable

2024-02-06 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:34:07AM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote: > Providing two APIs makes me quite uneasy due to having core components > that would behave differently from the rest of the distribution. It > sounds like something that will come back to bite for a long time. Can you elaborate?

Processed: block 1058317 with 1063345

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1058317 with 1063345 Bug #1058317 [src:celery] celery: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13 1058317 was not blocked by any bugs. 1058317 was not blocking any bugs.

Bug#1061972: gap: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:07:38PM +0100, Lukas Märdian wrote: > thanks for the heads-up! > The same debdiff should apply to the version in unstable (4.12.1). > We'll make sure to NMU the version from unstable. > > Waiting for libgap.so.9 would also be an option, if timing works out. Fortunately

Bug#1044055: marked as done (mirtop: test failure with pandas 2.0)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:52:03 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re-opening was wrong! has caused the Debian Bug report #1044055, regarding mirtop: test failure with pandas 2.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed: Reopen

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1044055 {Done: Nilesh Patra } [src:mirtop] mirtop: test failure with pandas 2.0 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer

Bug#1044055: Reopen

2024-02-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: reopen -1 The issue is not closed by latest upload -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1062356: adios2: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): times out on big host

2024-02-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios2 Followup-For: Bug #1062356 The flakey test is adios2-mpi-examples. debian/tests is building and running them manually, and running on only 3 processors (mpirun -n 3) So the problem can't be overload of the machine. I'll just skip insituGlobalArraysReaderNxN_mpi. For reference,

Processed: fix bug metadata

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # More affected packages discovered for meson bug > affects 1060838 + src:libdex src:parlatype Bug #1060838 [meson] meson: should use the host gobject-introspection-1.0.pc for looking up g-ir-scanner Added indication that 1060838 affects

Bug#1063265: Bug#1061645: poco: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Bastian On 2024-02-06 12:34:32 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > Please use the latest experimental QA upload for the 64-bit time_t transition > instead of uploading your NMU. > The other planned transition is documented in #1061645. > All library package names are SO-bumped,

Bug#1062356: adios2: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): times out on big host

2024-02-06 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: adios2 Followup-For: Bug #1062356 Can't be quite as simple as just the host machine. https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/a/adios2/41403641/log.gz completed in 9 minutes, while https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/a/adios2/41496866/log.gz failed with

Bug#1063265: poco: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Bastian Germann
Hi Lucas, Please use the latest experimental QA upload for the 64-bit time_t transition instead of uploading your NMU. The other planned transition is documented in #1061645. All library package names are SO-bumped, which should be enough to fulfill your intended change. This is a cross-posting

Processed: Updating bug ownership

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 1060933 Nick Morrott Bug #1060933 {Done: Nick Morrott } [src:valinor] valinor: FTBFS: AssertionError: 1 != 0 Owner recorded as Nick Morrott . > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1060933:

Bug#1062969: doomsday: launching doomsday (2.3.1+ds1-1+b2) causes segfault in libsdl2-2.0-0 (2.30.0+dfsg-1)

2024-02-06 Thread Yves Le Berre
Output from gdb (first try with doomsday-dbgsym, doomsday-common-dbgsym, libsdl2-2.0-0-dbgsym) can be found in attachment. Tell me to install more debug packages. ylb doomsday_gdb_output.txt.7z Description: application/7z-compressed

Bug#1061866: adns: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Ian Jackson
Steve Langasek writes ("Bug#1061866: adns: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition"): > Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to update > strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name. Please find > attached a fixed patch. Hi. Thanks for this project. I

Bug#1063333: cardpeek: Built version of cardpeek in Sid use lua5.3 and breaks lua's scripts. Need lua5.2 only.

2024-02-06 Thread Davius
Package: cardpeek Version: 0.8.4-pacstall2 Severity: grave Tags: newcomer Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: xdav...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Installed

Bug#1062969: doomsday: launching doomsday (2.3.1+ds1-1+b2) causes segfault in libsdl2-2.0-0 (2.30.0+dfsg-1)

2024-02-06 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 at 10:20:46 +0100, Yves Le Berre wrote: > I am not familiarized with building debian debug packages. > do doomsday and libsdl2 packages need to be rebuilt or do they exist > somewhere ? Their detached debug symbols should already be provided in Debian, so you don't need to

Processed: tagging 1062484, tagging 1063053

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1062484 - pending Bug #1062484 [src:libnma] libnma: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Removed tag(s) pending. > tags 1063053 - pending Bug #1063053 [src:volume-key] volume-key: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Removed tag(s)

Bug#1063329: libselinux1t64: breaks system in upgrade from unstable

2024-02-06 Thread Adrien Nader
Hi Helmut, Thanks for identifying and raising this issue. After Graham mentioned this to me, I also looked at the reports and came to the same conclusion: the change is actually LFS due to ino_t in matchpathcon_filespec_add(). Providing two APIs makes me quite uneasy due to having core

Bug#1063298: xrootd: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Mattias Ellert
Hi! The proposed change is incomplete, and the build failed on some architectures. You need to update debian/rules due to the changes package names: Line 31 must change from N = -Nlibxrdec1 to N = -Nlibxrdec1t64 Regards, Mattias (package maintainer) signature.asc Description:

Processed: tags 1063261 -pending

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1063261 -pending Bug #1063261 {Done: Luca Boccassi } [src:xdp-tools] xdp-tools: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Removed tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#1062567: libpg-query: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-06 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Steve Langasek > If you as maintainer want to close this bug report (indicating that no > transition is required) or un-tag it 'pending' (indicating that a transition > may be required but the patch is not ready to upload), and accept any > fallout if it turns out this is incorrect, that will

Bug#1063323: libiw30t64: file loss due to /usr-move (DEP17)

2024-02-06 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 07:42:49AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I'm attaching a patch for your convenience. I consider that libiw30 is > not as central as other packages and hence propose employing Conflicts > here. Conflicts allow removing the protective diversion in trixie's > postinst rather

Processed: libselinux1t64: /usr-move caused file loss (DEP17)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + libselinux1 Bug #1063328 [libselinux1t64] libselinux1t64: /usr-move caused file loss (DEP17) Added indication that 1063328 affects libselinux1 -- 1063328: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063328 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1063329: libselinux1t64: breaks system in upgrade from unstable

2024-02-06 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: libselinux1t64 Version: 3.5-2.1~exp1 Severity: grave X-Debbugs-Cc: vor...@debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org Hi, I was looking into performing an upgrade test of libselinux1 with piuparts and that didn't go well. I spare you the piuparts stuff and go into crafting a minimal

Bug#1063328: libselinux1t64: /usr-move caused file loss (DEP17)

2024-02-06 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: libselinux1t64 Version: 3.5-2.1~exp1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: dep17p1 Control: affects -1 + libselinux1 X-Debbugs-Cc: vor...@debian.org Hi, The time64 bump for libselinux1 also causes a /usr-move file loss. Since it is essential, we cannot use

Bug#1062969: doomsday: launching doomsday (2.3.1+ds1-1+b2) causes segfault in libsdl2-2.0-0 (2.30.0+dfsg-1)

2024-02-06 Thread Yves Le Berre
Sorry, your answer on Sun, 4 Feb 2024 12:31:35 + was marked 'spam' by my provider, so i didn't notice it until now. Here are some informations about my environment : System:   Host: jupiter Kernel: 6.6.13-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64   Desktop: Xfce v: 4.18.1 Distro: Debian GNU/Linux

Bug#1061531: marked as done (sugar: Stop using webkit2gtk 4.0)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 09:25:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061531: fixed in sugar 0.121-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061531, regarding sugar: Stop using webkit2gtk 4.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed (with 1 error): ukwm: undeclared dependency on libqt5-ukui-style1

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Control: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign 1051425 ukui-session-manager 3.22.0.2-1 Bug #1051425 [src:ukwm] ukwm: undeclared dependency on libqt5-ukui-style1 Bug reassigned from package 'src:ukwm' to

Bug#1051425: ukwm: undeclared dependency on libqt5-ukui-style1

2024-02-06 Thread handsome_feng
Control: reassign 1051425 ukui-session-manager 3.22.0.2-1 Hi, The bug was present in ukui-session-manager version 3.22.0.2-1 but has been resolved in the recently uploaded version 4.0.0.0-1. thanks.

Bug#1063322: marked as done (libmapcache-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmapcache.so)

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:50:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1063322: fixed in mapcache 1.14.0-3~exp2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1063322, regarding libmapcache-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmapcache.so to be marked as done.

Processed: tags 1053865 + patch pending

2024-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1053865 + patch pending Bug #1053865 [src:prody] prody: incompatible with python3-biopython > 1.79 Added tag(s) patch and pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1053865: