Bug#810122: xul-ext-firegestures: Firegestures no longer recognizes any gestures

2016-01-06 Thread Gard Spreemann
Package: xul-ext-firegestures Version: 1.10-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, After a recent Iceweasel upgrade from 38.5.0esr-1 to 43.0.2-1+b1, the Fireguestures extension no longer does anything. The standard swipe guestures seem to be recognized, but

Bug#875036: How does this affect the Qt 5 binaries?

2019-08-20 Thread Gard Spreemann
I maintain a package (src:gudhi) that build-depends on libqglviewer-dev-qt5 and depends on libqglviewer2-qt5. As a relatively fresh DM, I haven't experienced depending on a to-be-removed package yet, so I'm a bit confused. Are *all* binaries built from src:libqglviewer to be removed? If yes, why

Bug#941544: NMU upload

2019-12-16 Thread Gard Spreemann
Hello all, As part of my DD process I have been tasked with preparing an NMU for an existing bug. I ended up preparing one for this bug, using Steve's debdiff. If I don't hear back from anyone within three days, my AM will upload this NMU in DELAYED/7. Best, Gard signature.asc Description:

Bug#959364: PR with patch

2020-05-05 Thread Gard Spreemann
.-file_operations-dtype-is-change.patch (2020-05-05 09:26:30 +0200) Gard Spreemann (1): Add patch 0004-fix-for-5.6-kernels.-file_operations-dtype-is-change.patch .../0004-fix-for-5.6-kernels.-file_operations-dtype-is-change.patch

Bug#959364: PR with patch

2020-05-05 Thread Gard Spreemann
Oops, I was a bit careless. Let me clarify: the patch in my PR is not from the actual upstream for the package, but rather from the fork [1] linked to by Thomas Koch in #959729 [2]. [1] https://github.com/teleshoes/acpi_call [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959729#10

Bug#972009: gudhi ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version

2020-10-14 Thread Gard Spreemann
Matthias Klose writes: > Package: src:gudhi > Version: 3.3.0+dfsg-1 > Severity: important > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: python3.9 > > seem to be a packaging error Indeed! Thanks for reporting. I think I know what's wrong, and will get to it soon.

Bug#957367: Unable to reproduce with ipe/7.2.17-2 and gcc-10/10.1.0-6

2020-07-23 Thread Gard Spreemann
I've am unable to reproduce this bug with ipe/7.2.17-2 and gcc-10/10.1.0-6. The package currently builds fine for me with those versions.

Bug#978191: gudhi: FTBFS: Tangential_complex.h:957:40: error: no type named ‘Power_center_d’ in ‘Gudhi::tangential_complex::Tangential_complex, CGAL::Dynamic

2020-12-29 Thread Gard Spreemann
Thank you for reporting this. It also revealed an upstream bug, which has been forwarded. I'm uploading a fix now. Best, Gard

Bug#980917: libpmix-dev fails to upgrade from 3.2.2~rc1-1 to 4.0.0-4

2021-01-24 Thread Gard Spreemann
Package: libpmix-dev X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@nonempty.org Version: 4.0.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.6 Dear Maintainer, Upgrading libpmix-dev from 3.2.2~rc1-1 to 4.0.0-4 fails with dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-xYYyH5/070-libpmix-dev_4.0.0-4_amd64.deb

Bug#949767: arrayfire update fails in configure step

2021-04-26 Thread Gard Spreemann
Andreas Tille writes: > Hi, > > I personally have no interest in arrayfire but I realised that the > Debian packaged version depends clblas (and is the only remaining > package that needs cblas and I would like to see it removed from Debian > due to bug #949767) Hi, FWIW: It seems that

Bug#949767: arrayfire update fails in configure step

2021-04-28 Thread Gard Spreemann
Andreas Tille writes: > Hi Aaron, > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:14:10PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: >> Please try adding a build dependency on libclfft-dev and replacing >> src/backend/opencl/CMakeLists.txt's inclusion of build_clFFT with a call >> to >> >> find_package(clFFT) >> >> >

Bug#949767: arrayfire update fails in configure step

2021-04-28 Thread Gard Spreemann
Gard Spreemann writes: > Andreas Tille writes: > >> Hi Aaron, >> >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:14:10PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: >>> Please try adding a build dependency on libclfft-dev and replacing >>> src/backend/opencl/CMakeLists.

Bug#949767: arrayfire update fails in configure step

2021-04-28 Thread Gard Spreemann
Gard Spreemann writes: > Gard Spreemann writes: > >> Andreas Tille writes: >> >>> Hi Aaron, >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:14:10PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: >>>> Please try adding a build dependency on libclfft-dev and rep

Bug#987360: Help needed?

2021-08-17 Thread Gard Spreemann
I'm sad to see that we shipped Bullseye without an essential component of Sway. Is there anything I can do to assist in getting this bug fixed, perhaps for a potential future bullseye-packports package? -- Gard signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1002879: python3-pot: ships /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/benchmarks/*.py

2021-12-31 Thread Gard Spreemann
Andreas Beckmann writes: > Package: python3-pot > Version: 0.8.1+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > python3-pot ships python scripts with generic names at a generic > location, causing file conflicts with packages doing the same

Bug#984270: Fix uploaded to salsa

2021-11-21 Thread Gard Spreemann
I believe Salsa commit ba393a45 [1] fixes this bug. However, other build problems relating to the shipped symbols prevent me from uploading the fixed version. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/deeplearning-team/onednn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#984270: Bug persists on arm64

2021-11-24 Thread Gard Spreemann
Reopening because the patch did not properly fix the issue on arm64. The patch has been updated in 5efbe42a on Salsa. -- Gard signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#987360: swaylock: Occassional unlock without password entered

2022-04-11 Thread Gard Spreemann
X-Debbugs-CC: d...@jones.dk,pe...@riseup.net Hi all. Jonas Smedegaard writes: > Hi Pelle, > > You reported this issue for swaylock 1.5-2. > > Do you still experience same isue with swaylock 1.6-1 now in Debian > unstable? I cannot answer for Pelle, but I was also experiencing this bug back

Bug#987360: swaylock: Occassional unlock without password entered

2022-04-12 Thread Gard Spreemann
X-Debbugs-CC: pe...@riseup.net Pelle writes: >>I cannot answer for Pelle, but I was also experiencing this bug back >>when it was reported. FWIW: I'm unable to reproduce it with 1.6-1. That >>being said, triggering the bug does seem somewhat stochastic, so I can't >>rule out that a bunch more

Bug#1006543: NMU

2022-04-07 Thread Gard Spreemann
/changelog 2022-04-07 09:15:36.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +imv (4.3.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * d/patches: add 0002-Fix-segfault-with-latest-wlroots.patch to fix +segfault with newer wlroots (Closes: #1006543) + + -- Gard Spreemann Thu, 07 Apr 2022

Bug#1006543: Patch

2022-04-06 Thread Gard Spreemann
I've made an MR on Salsa with a patch that I have verified fixes the bug[1]. Although, as has been mentioned, the best thing is probably just to package upstream's 4.3.1. But since this bug has been around for a while, I will do an NMU to DELAYED/5 with the fix from the MR if I don't hear back in

Bug#1003165: Is march=native used for anything but probing the compiler?

2022-07-28 Thread Gard Spreemann
Hi, > I admit I'm not sure at what point / what tool might inject this > string and I'm also not sure whether the option -march=native is > really used in the amd64 case. From my (very limited!) understanding, this is just setuptools(?) trying out various compiler options. The actual C compiler

Bug#1027466: python-cmaes: flaky autopkgtest: Unreliable test timings

2023-01-01 Thread Gard Spreemann
Paul Gevers writes: > I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed > that it regularly fails on some architectures, particularly on s390x, > but not exclusively there. Yesterday I triggered 5 or 6 reference runs > on every architecture and 6/6 failed on s390x and 1/5

Bug#1022308:

2022-11-11 Thread Gard Spreemann
Hi, I have verified that adding libglu1-mesa-dev to the build-deps makes the package again build successfully. -- Gard signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1031706: optuna: test_create_new_trial randomly fails on s390x

2023-02-21 Thread Gard Spreemann
"Rebecca N. Palmer" writes: > test_create_new_trial (both parts) sometimes fails on s390x, failing > the autopkgtest. > > It might make sense to remove this package on s390x, if it isn't > reasonable to actually fix this. Thanks for the report! I've brought this to upstream's attention [1],

Bug#1039001: Tests disabled

2023-11-23 Thread Gard Spreemann
Source: hera Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-2 Followup-For: Bug #1039001 Control: severity 1039001 wishlist Uploading catch2 v3 also made hera FTBFS (#1054686), and it is not clear whether the catch2 package will provide backwards-compatible headers (#1055237). Since updating hera is not entirely trivial,

Bug#1068647: python-pot: autopkgtest regression on i386 with NumPy 1.26.4

2024-04-12 Thread Gard Spreemann
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/PythonOT/POT/issues/618 Thanks for the bug report. This seems like a simple case of a missing floating point tolerance in upstream's test. It's easy to patch, but I've sent a reproducible example upstream [1] as they're likely to have better insight into

Bug#1062932: Error building nvidia-kernel-dkms while installing nvidia-driver package

2024-04-04 Thread Gard Spreemann
On 4 April 2024 02:52:29 CEST, David Landry wrote: >Good evening, > >The bug involving compiling/installing nvidia-kernel-dkms is still present. >The result of the bug is that following a reboot after the erroneous >installation noted below, my display drivers get completely disabled,

Bug#1070201: Matching upstream bug report

2024-06-07 Thread Gard Spreemann
Hi, I believe this is upstream's issue 27506 [1]. Given the bug's nature, I suggest that perhaps it should be temporarily worked around by disabling the failing test. [1] https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/27506 Best, Gard signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1070201: Small reproducing example

2024-06-07 Thread Gard Spreemann
The following code based on the failing test reproduces the issue on an i386 porterbox: *** from sklearn.tree import ( DecisionTreeClassifier, export_graphviz, ) import pdb X = [[-2, -1], [-1, -1], [-1, -2], [1, 1], [1, 2], [2, 1]] y2 = [[-1, 1], [-1, 1], [-1, 1], [1, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3]]

Bug#1070201: Perhaps alignment-related?

2024-06-07 Thread Gard Spreemann
It seems that any `Tree` attribute that uses `self._get_node_ndarray()` to get a *floating point* ndarray suffers from this weird behavior when negating. Examples include `weighted_n_node_samples` and `threshold`. However, attributes that use the same function to get *integer* ndarrays don't.