Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-31
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: can result in disk consumption and ultimately lead to a denial
of service condition.
Just a reminder,
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14529/info
Ubuntu^1 already fixed the xpdf packages. I guess we're affected
tags 322467 + experimental
stop
On 10.08.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-31
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Just a reminder,
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14529/info
Martin Pitt gave me the hint, that teTeX from stable is not
vulnerable
On 05.01.06 Martin Pitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Martin,
Chris Evans found some more integer overflows in the xpdf code [1]
which affect tetex-bin as well. [1] also has demo exploit PDFs for
patch checking.
See [2] for the Ubuntu debdiff.
This only affects sarge (and woody);
notfound 346086 2.0.2-30sarge4
found 346086 1.0.7+20011202-7.7
stop
On 26.01.06 Martin Pitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [2006-01-23 18:30 +0100]:
Hi all,
On the DSA page Joey states, that the problem is solved for
oldstable too. The .orig.tar.gz contains a patched Stream.cc
On 27.01.06 Martin Pitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [2006-01-27 9:56 +0100]:
Hi,
So, what is that now?
- a security leak, which must be fixed
- rather an inconvenience, which should be fixed?
For CUPS it was a real DoS which must be fixed, but for tetex-bin
it's just
On 10.01.05 Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Package: viewpdf
Version: 0.8.5-5
Severity: serious
The build dependencies on libgnustep-gui0-dev and
gnustep-imagekits-pdf can't be fulfilled.
Actually there is no package viewpdf neither in testing nor in
unstable. There is only a
On 13.01.05 Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 07:15:43PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Hi,
cd `pwd`/debian/tmp/etc/ha.d/resource.d \
ln -s /usr/sbin/ldirectord ldirectord
cd `pwd`/debian/tmp/etc/ ln -s ha.d heartbeat
dh_movefiles --source=debian/tmp
On 17.01.05 Charles Henderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Package: nautilus
Version: 2.9.2-0ubuntu1
Severity: serious
That version does not exist neither in unstable nor in testing.
Strangely, nautilus appears to open a different connection for
every file in a samba directory when browsing
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-26
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
seems to be another overflow in the xpdf library.
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/387583
patch available at the vendor site:
ftp://ftp.foolabs.com/pub/xpdf/xpdf-3.00pl3.patch
Yet I didn't have the time,
tags 291153 + sid
stop
On 19.01.05 Russell Sutherland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I can't install the gnucash package onto an
updated unstable system. The error message is as follows:
# apt-get install gnucash
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
On 04.12.04 Shawn K. Quinn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Package: linux-wlan-ng-modules-2.4.27-1-k7
Version: 2.4.27-2+0.2.0+0.2.1pre21-1
That package does not exist any more. It has been superseded by
linux-wlan-ng-modules-2.4.27-2-k7 to reflect the abi-change in the
kernel:
linux-wlan-ng
On 27.01.05 Robert Waldner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Whilst installing amarok, I encountered the following error:
Unpacking kdelibs-data (from .../kdelibs-data_4%3a3.3.2-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs-data_4%3a3.3.2-1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying
On 09.02.05 Janusz S. Bie? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
A simple upgrade made my tetex installation unsuable because of the
failure to generate a format. I've reinstalled tetex from the
scratch (at least I tried to), but the problem didn't vanished. It
can be ilustrated by the standard
On 09.02.05 Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my
system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But
if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs after decryption
with this message:
gpg: checking the trustdb
gpg: waiting
for a different reason,
described in bug report #165350, which is 2 years and 115 days old.
Please also note that the bug #285198 reported by Hilmar Preusse is
still open.
Well, it just came to my attention by chance.
Well in summary: 10 bugs. That is not that much in comparison to
tetex
On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster wrote:
Eddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW
^^^
This filename differs from the name of the file you sent us (if I
assume you didn't
On 19.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I can't install tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 (from testing) due to the following
error:
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_2.0.2-31_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
On 02.11.05 Joe Drew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
tex-common fails to install because it can't chmod an ls-R file.
/var/lib/texmf exists on my system, but the ls-R file doesn't.
Setting up tex-common (0.9) ...
chmod: cannot access `/var/lib/texmf/ls-R': No such file or directory
dpkg:
On 03.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I can reproduce that bug. But only if I have configured debconf to
ask me the low questions too and selecting var at the first question
(BTW: Selecting cache is said to be the default, but it's
On 09.11.05 Sven Joachim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious
The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc
directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12.7 of the
Policy Manual.
Hmm, we have a line
On 07.11.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was
reproduced by another setup as the orginal file
On 08.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
clone 334613 -1
found -1 3.0-10.1
retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct
severity -1 normal
submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop
I guess you forgot to put [EMAIL PROTECTED] into Bcc. At least I
On 10.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If the user now refuses to replace the local version by that one
from the maint (which is the default) fmtutil now starts creating
formats with the old configuration. --- *bamm*
That's how
On 11.11.05 Eric Valette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Setting up tex-common (0.10) ...
debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog.
Isn't that a message from debconf?
Further the File Debconf/Element/Dialog.pm does not exist in the
unstable distribution, especially not in the package
notfound 334613 3.0-10.1
stop
On 11.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
clone 334613 -1
found -1 3.0-10.1
retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct
severity -1 normal
submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop
--
sigmentation fault
--
To
On 11.11.05 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fre, 11 Nov 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
Setting up tex-common (0.10) ...
debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog.
Isn't that a message from debconf?
Strange. Which version of debconf do you have?
My
On 11.11.05 Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
About manual, initex feature is there forever so manual doesn't
stop to mention initex feature. So this doesn't mean removal of
initex is premature. (even right now, if you call tex with the
name initex, it behaves as such.)
On 12.11.05 Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default
configuration to work around the problem.
--- whizzytexrc 24 Mar 2005 23:19:26 - 1.4
+++ whizzytexrc 12 Nov 2005 03:42:20 -
@@
reassign 297534 debconf
severity 297534 important
merge 297534 247849
stop
On 01.03.05 Christian Frommeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I just uopdated some packages on my Debian/SID machine including tex4ht.
When installing I got a Errormessage:
Entpacke Ersatz für tex4ht ...
Richte
On 18.03.05 Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
As recently discovered the patch, which fixed CAN-2004-0888,
seems to be broken on all 64bit platforms (tested only on ia64
though).[1]
Note that CAN-2005-0206 has been assigned for this issue.
BTW, since you
On 13.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I guess a much better idea is to use the interface provide by
fmtutil if you need additional formats. In the Debian TeX
policy (from tex-common) we mention that. In the Version as of
18th
On 22.11.05 Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
tetex-bin prevented my package from beeing build by the autobuilders.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mysql-dfsg-5.0ver=5.0.16-1arch=hppastamp=1132626014file=logas=raw
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and
On 24.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Followup-For: Bug #334613
Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't
mean eventually #340279?
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
warning: Could not open
On 26.11.05 Roland Stigge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
(see the transcript file for additional information)
Output written on fmfmanps.dvi (40 pages, 115496 bytes).
Transcript written on fmfmanps.log.
mpost fmfsamp1; mpost fmfsamp2; mpost fmfsamp3; mpost fmfsamp4;
This is MetaPost,
notfound 334613 3.0-10.1
stop
On 25.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
pe, 2005-11-25 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti:
Hi,
Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't
mean eventually #340279?
Could be it too.
Let's just say
On 28.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ma, 2005-11-28 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti:
On 25.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Let's just say that a bug titled Does not configure (aleph+omega
failed) doesn't ring a bell, while one titled
On 28.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ma, 2005-11-28 kello 19:22 +0100, Frank Küster kirjoitti:
Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, could you rephrase that?
Simply look at
On 07.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
reopen 332562
stop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11
has caused the
On 08.12.05 Blars Blarson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I had the same problem. My /tmp/tetex.postinst.XX* file attached.
1. Thanks for the debug output.
2. What makes you believe, you're seeing the same bug? In his partial
log one reads:
Error: `pdfetex -ini -jobname=latex
On 08.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Hilmars mail was rejected by your spam filter (and marked as spam
by mine, too - Hilmar do you know why?), here it is again.
The IP range of my E-Mail provider was on the black list last year in
August. Actually I can't find out, if
On 08.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07.12.05 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
According to our analysis, the bug occurred because you kept
woody's configuration files and refused the update to the sarge
On 27.04.05 Richard Lewis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
fmtutil: running `tex -ini -jobname=xmltex -progname=xmltex latex
xmltex.ini' ...
This is TeX, Version 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.4) (INITEX)
---! /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt was written by
On 11.09.05 Sean Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Sean,
i just happened to be browsing around in /usr/share and found the
following in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/seminar/xcomment.sty:
%% Copying of part or all of any file in the xcomment.sty package
%% is allowed under the following
On 13.09.05 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
grep You are not allowed to change this file * -ril | wc -l shows
at least 33 files with such statement.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/texmf$ grep -i You are not allowed to change this
file * -ril|wc -l
30
[EMAIL
On 13.09.05 Sean Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:27:26PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
. And below we find the conditions you quoted. I'll contact Tim
if we can patch the files and replace the lines above by
something like:
see sem-read.me.gz
Dear Timothy, Sebastian and Denis,
The following bug report we got here down in the Debian Bug Tracking
system. I've pointed the submitter to sem-read.me, which clearly
says, that seminar can be distributed under LPPL.
He agreed that we should remove the confusing statement and replace
it by
retitle 327741 copyright statement inside files of seminar package outdated
severity 327741 important
stop
On 14.09.05 Sean Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:05:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
Can't we simply downgrade the bug to importand, change
On 09.05.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
%% IMPORTANT NOTICE:
%%
%% For the copyright see the source file.
%%
%% You are *not* allowed to modify this file.
%%
%% You are *not*
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
So, the last hunk seems not to exist in cupsys_1.1.14-5woody14.
Should we submit a bug against it?
Yes, definitely
Done. #355122
Further I suggest to close the bug now or at least downgrade
On 15.05.05 Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Your package is failing to build in experimental. It
seems to be stuck in an endless loop doing this over and
over again:
eperl -P -o debian/common.functions debian/common.functions.in
eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in
test -e
clone 309185 -1
reassign -1 tetex-base
retitle -1 tetex-base: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop on Linux 2.6
stop
On 16.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
Note that I'm doing this on a 2.6 kernel, which has sub-second
timestamps on
On 18.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
Could you please insert the following lines:
@printf \nDebug\n
@ls -l --time-style=full-iso $(eperl_sourcefiles) \
debian/rules.in debian/rules
@printf /Debug\n\n
after:
# Eperl is simply
On 16.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
Your package is failing to build in experimental. It
seems to be stuck in an endless loop doing this over and
over again:
I've tested the following patch to debian/rules.in, in order to
On 19.09.06 Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing the same errors on my sparc64 (log file looks the same
too).
Relevant log message seems to be:
(/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
! LaTeX must be made using an initex with no format preloaded.
l.78 ... using an
reassign 388407 latex-ucs-doc
stop
On 20.09.06 Samuel Mimram ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
The latest version (0.29) of tex-common fails to be installed here:
Preparing to replace tex-common 0.28 (using .../tex-common_0.29_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tex-common ...
dpkg: error
On 22.07.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preuße [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21.07.06 Frank K?ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
- non-commercial
- renamed copies may not be distributed at all, only fragments,
whatever that is.
There is already a bug open. The
On 22.07.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preuße [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21.07.06 Frank K?ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
- non-commercial
- renamed copies may not be distributed at all, only fragments,
whatever that is.
There is already a bug open.
On 26.07.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[seminar is non-free]
I had a look at that and could wipe out the non-free license
statements. However there are a lot of files (3-4 liners and
lousy hacks), which do not contain any lic
On 18.12.05 Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
When installing a new system (unstable), tasksel, while showing a
progress bar, fails at the end of downloading packages with the
following error:
Can't call method 'description' on an undefined value.
Attached are two screenshots
On 12.01.06 Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi *,
I was about to create a patch for the package, but I discovered
more issues. Most notably, the Makefile in the example directory
fails because it cannot find a file
On 19.10.08 Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
During tests using piuparts of all packages in lenny,
I ran into the following problem:
Setting up texlive-base-bin (2007.dfsg.2-3) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Building format(s) --all.
Package: xulrunner-1.9
Version: 1.9.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Mike,
I'm filing this bug ad grave, as I believ it is grave. Feel free to
downgrade. On my unstable system the pre-inst script fails to run:
Selecting previously deselected package
On 24.11.08 Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:51:47AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Package: xulrunner-1.9
Version: 1.9.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I'm filing this bug ad grave, as I believ
Package: dlocate
Version: 0.94
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
dlocate actually depends on findutils ( 4.2.31-2).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # apt-cache show dlocate
Package: dlocate
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 88
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL
On 22.06.08 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Alexander Heinlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:16:17PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Hi,
So again, what's the content of /usr/share/texmf/ls-R? What's the
output of
ls -l /var/lib/texmf
On 22.05.08 Taco Hoekwater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
Hi Taco,
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that is likely to
cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a
pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and
severity 482303 serious
merge 483133 482303
stop
On 27.05.08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Function `getpwnam' implicitly converted to pointer at
../../../src/texk/kpathsea/tilde.c:103
A full build log can be
On 27.05.08 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Your message dated Tue, 27 May 2008 23:16:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: unmerging, we can close one of them
has caused the Debian Bug report #356853,
regarding Contains files without any
On 24.07.06 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 22.07.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preuße [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21.07.06 Frank K?ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Frank,
- non-commercial
- renamed copies may not be distributed at all, only
On 25.01.07 Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Setting up tetex-base (3.0.dfsg.3-5) ...
debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Dialog
debconf: (Dialog frontend will not work on a dumb terminal, an emacs shell
buffer, or without a controlling terminal.)
debconf: falling back to
On 25.01.07 Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 10:44:51AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Which version of tex-common is installed?
0.43, but in a purge installed state as its postrm failed once with
broken ucf.
...which is probably #408323.
H
Package: tcpreplay
Version: 2.99+3.0.beta11-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
feel free to reassign that bug to libopts25.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ldd /usr/bin/tcpreplay
libopts.so.25 = not found
snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ tcpreplay
tcpreplay: error while
reopen 409056
stop
On 02.02.07 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Noel,
It has been closed by Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED].
tcpreplay (2.99+3.0.beta11-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* rebuilt to built against libopts25
(closes: Bug#409056)
Now it is broken
Package: dwww
Version: 1.10.0
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
error message is simple:
Unpacking replacement iceweasel ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/iceweasel_2.0.0.1+dfsg-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/firefox',
On 22.11.07 Michael Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Norbert
luatex is currently uninstallable in sid because it depends on the
obsoleted libpoppler1 which has been removed from sid.
Are you working on this? I just had a quick look at it: simply
copying the appropriate patch
On 23.11.07 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fr, 23 Nov 2007, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
BTW: luatex has its own kpathsea instead of linking dynamically
against libkpathsea. FAD?
FAD???
Function as designed, i.e. did you simply miss that statically
built/linked kpathsea
On 14.06.07 Amaya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
This is still not working for me. Sorry :(
Setting up gzip (1.3.12-2) ...
install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing
INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file.
No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
On 15.06.07 Amaya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
The postinst script contains only one command: install-info
--quiet /usr/share/info/gzip.info
I changed it to: install-info --quiet /usr/share/info/gzip.info.gz
and it now installs fine.
Looking into install-info
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.7.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
the package is in the moment uninstallable:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # apt-get install python-apt
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package python-apt
On 22.06.07 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hil
The problem shown by the command you pasted is not that python-apt
is uninstallable, but that it is not available on your machine.
Hmm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # grep -v # /etc/apt/sources.list
deb
On 23.06.07 Filipus Klutiero ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Le vendredi 22 juin 2007 11:56, Hilmar Preusse a écrit :
On 22.06.07 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
The problem shown by the command you pasted is not that python-apt
is uninstallable
On 15.09.07 Andreas Putzo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On May 12, Dr. Claudia Neumann wrote:
Hi Claudia,
Package: wwwoffle
Version: 2.9a-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This bug actually keeps wwwoffle from migrating into testing
retitle 423646 generating the WWWOFFLE root CA private key file takes ages
(half an hour)
severity 423646 normal
stop
On 03.01.08 Claudia Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Claudia,
Yes, waiting a long time solved the problem. I don't know any more
how long it took, but it could have been
On 05.05.07 Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
The (probably) problematic message:
/build/user/monotone-0.31/monotone.texi:151: epsf.tex not found,
images will be ignored.
@image
On 25.05.07 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Package fails to configure with TeX Live 2007 installed.
fmtutil.log is attached. Relevant error message:
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/longtable.sty)
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive
On 01.06.07 Bruce MacDonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
After installing the updated package, latex'ing a document that
uses the graphics package results in a complaint that there is no
default driver. This can be fixed by creating
/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/graphics.cfg with the line:
On 11.04.07 Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-30
Severity: serious
I can't install tetex-bin in a fresh sid pbuilder chroot. It fails with
the following error messages:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
Creating config file
On 11.04.07 Florian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Subject: configuration of tetex-base fails
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
updmap-sys: Scanning for LW35 support files
!!! ERROR! The map file `dvips35.map' has not
On 17.04.07 Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Package: albatross
Version: 1.36-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: builddep-tetex-ftbfs
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
epstopdf simplecontext.eps
make[1]: epstopdf: Command not
On 11.09.07 Rafal Czlonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
When I try to install luatex all I get is:
fmtutil: running `luatex -ini -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex tex.ini' ...
This is luaTeX, Version 3.141592-beta-0.11.0-2007090818 (Web2C 7.5.6) (INITEX)
On 11.09.07 Rafal Czlonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Norbert,
Package: luatex
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: grave
According to http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex the latest
version of luatex is 0.10.2. Where did you get the 0.11.0 from? Is
that a versioned snap shot?
H,
--
On 12.09.07 Rafal Czlonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
According to http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex the latest
version of luatex is 0.10.2. Where did you get the 0.11.0 from?
Is that a versioned snap shot?
Debian repository.
Thanks for answering
tags 441836 + pending
stop
On 11.09.07 Rafal Czlonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Preloading the plain format: codes, registers,luatex:
../../../../src/texk/web2c/luatexdir/lua/luanode.c:453: get_node:
Assertion `varmem_sizes[r]0' failed.
I got a response from the luatex people: the case
On 13.09.07 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a response from the luatex people: the case is known, fixed
in the repository and a new shapshot is out probably next week.
Tagging pending.
Will you also prepare the package
Dear Petr,
http://bugs.debian.org/551229
Down here in the Debian bug tracking system we got a report telling
that a specific feature of longtable stops working as soon as the
czech or slovak babel package is used. As the feature works fine,
when using language english I suspect a bug in the
severity 565722 important
stop
On 18.01.10 Linda (lindamarce...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Insufficient error description. Further we don't support every setup.
Could you sent us a
On 13.12.09 Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) wrote:
Hi,
fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/fmtutil.LHrpVsJ9
Please include this file if you report a bug.
Please do so.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 15.12.09 Gerd Sebald (gerd.seb...@gmx.de) wrote:
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2009-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is #560885 and friends. I'll leave that bug here on texlive-base
to make sure we don't get it another time.
fmtutil:
On 01.02.10 Jochen Friedrich (joc...@scram.de) wrote:
Hi Jochen,
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.4.2.1~dfsg-5
Severity: grave
since the last upgrade, about any GETNEXT request makes snmpd crash,
first logging an assertion failure, then stumbling over what looks like
a null pointer dereference
On 17.02.10 Daniel Schepler (dschep...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing this build failure still (or maybe again?) with texlive-extra
version 2009-7, which is supposed to have #562497 fixed:
At least for me the --filter option of epstopdf seems to work again:
hi...@sid:~ $ epstopdf
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
