Bug#951948: Fixed upstream

2021-01-16 Thread Sam Geeraerts
This is due to improper use of setuptools_scm in docs/conf.py. This is fixed [1] in version 0.16.8, along with other build errors. Please consider packaging the new version. [1] https://github.com/pimutils/vdirsyncer/commit/b1214cd693d7a6c6693da3d070e8b9965a84a88e

Bug#723880: bubbros: Package contains sourceless files

2013-09-20 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: bubbros Version: 1.6-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1.2 Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet Dear Maintainer, According to bubbob/levels/README.txt (and the file program) the *.bin files in bubbob/levels are MacBinary files. There appears to be no source for these

Bug#718683: xtv: license information is incorrect

2013-08-04 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: xtv Version: 1.1-13 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.5 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense Dear Maintainer, The debian/copyright file says that xtv falls under the Artistic License. However, xtv.lsm says Copying-policy: GPL. Please fix the copyright file or

Bug#713820: ruby-opengl: Incomplete license information

2013-06-22 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: ruby-opengl Version: 0.60.1+dfsg1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet Dear Maintainer, The debian/copyright file says that the files in examples/NeHe/ are licensed under a free license, but it doesn't specify which

Bug#630893: ax25-apps: Should be removed from main

2012-03-19 Thread Sam Geeraerts
]? Both packages that use your code are under the GPL license, so the 3-clause license is needed. [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ModifiedBSD [2] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OriginalBSD Regards, Sam Geeraerts -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ

Bug#630894: ax25spyd filed for removal

2012-03-06 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Sebastian Muszynski wrote: I will remove the ripdump-Implementation from ax25spyd ASAP. It is possible to cancel the removal request? Hi Sebastian, Do you plan to re-introduce this package with the non-free code removed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#643576: closed by Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org (Bug#643576: fixed in antlr 2.7.7+dfsg-1)

2012-03-04 Thread Sam Geeraerts
It looks like this was fixed for Wheezy, but not for Squeeze. Will the stable release also get a fix? Thanks, Sam Geeraerts -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#659645: sharand: SHA-1 code is doesn't allow modification

2012-02-12 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: sharand Version: 0.0.20040607-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.3 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet File main/sha1.c has this license notice: This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works

Bug#643921: avogadro: Includes non-free data files

2011-09-30 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: avogadro Version: 1.0.1-3+b1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1.6, 2.1.1 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The directory 'testfiles' in the source package contans some files that appear to have a non-free license. methane.g03 has this

Bug#643923: as31: Example code has non-commercial clause

2011-09-30 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: as31 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1.6 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The file examples/paulmon1.asm has the following notice: Please distribute freely -- may not be sold, period. Restricting commercial distribution violates

Bug#643703: asterisk: SHA-1 code is doesn't allow modification

2011-09-28 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze3 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1.3 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet File main/sha1.c has this license notice: * This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to *

Bug#643576: antlr-doc: Examples have non-commercial clause

2011-09-27 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: antlr-doc Version: 2.7.7-16 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1.6 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: libreplanet gnewsense In directory examples/java/unicode.IDENTs there are 2 files, ShowString.java and StreamConverter.java that have this license statement:

Bug#643044: a2ps: Non-commercial license on PostScript files

2011-09-26 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: a2ps Version: 1:4.14-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1.6 Usertags: libreplanet The license notice in afm/MustRead.html says the following: This file and the 35 PostScript(R) AFM files it accompanies may be used, copied, and distributed for any purpose and

Bug#641489: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables

2011-09-19 Thread Sam Geeraerts
I certainly want to help getting this solved, but I don't know what all the appropriate actions are. I also don't know what's involved in the intermediate approach you suggest, but from your explanation I gather that's easier. I'm guessing the next stable point release is not far off, so the

Bug#641489: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables

2011-09-15 Thread Sam Geeraerts
I'm happy those files are deleted upstream (at least in the stable branch). But I think at least these terms make the .exe files undistributable: * publish the software for others to copy; * transfer the software or this agreement to any third party; or AFAIK, that does require that

Bug#641479: alpine: Contains non-free code

2011-09-13 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: alpine Version: 2.00+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1.3 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The file pico/msmem.c contains the following comment: === * This code originally written by Stephen Chung and posted to a

Bug#641489: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables

2011-09-13 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: adolc Version: 2.1.8-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The source package contains the files vcredist_x86.exe and vcredist_x64.exe. The following is an excerpt from eula.rtf contained in those CAB

Bug#631068: License info update

2011-09-03 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Will the file be updated with that information to avoid confusion with its use in other packages and distributions? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#631646: closed by Steve M. Robbins

2011-08-23 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 04:51:52PM +0200, Sam Geeraerts wrote: So we know that the relicensing happend prior to its use by nyquist. (I don't know the specific date, however, which is why I said not sure, above). Does that help? I had a closer look at http

Bug#630893: Ask for relicensing

2011-08-21 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Sebastian Muszynski has sent an e-mail to the copyright holder to ask about relicensing the code. No response so far, afaik. See bug report #630894. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#631646: closed by Steve M. Robbins

2011-08-02 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Will the file be updated with that information to avoid confusion with its use in other packages and distributions? When was the code relicensed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#631646: nyquist: Commercial use of xlisp not allowed

2011-06-25 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: nyquist Version: 2.29-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.6 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The file xlisp/xlbfun.c contains the following license notice: /* Copyright (c) 1985, by David Michael Betz All Rights Reserved

Bug#631068: See also nyquist package

2011-06-25 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Nearly the same file is also used in the nyquist package, see bug #631646. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#630893: See also ax25spyd

2011-06-19 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Note that the same file exists also in ax25spyd. See bug report #630894. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#630894: See also ax25-apps

2011-06-19 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Note that the same file exists also in ax25-apps. See bug report #630893. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#631067: abuse-frabs: Claudio add-on does not allow distribution or commercial use

2011-06-19 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: abuse-frabs Version: 2.11-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.1, 2.1.6 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The license notice in addon/claudio/claudio.lsp does not allow distribution or commercial use. It probably applies to all files in

Bug#631068: audacity: Commercial use of nyquist not allowed

2011-06-19 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: audacity Version: 1.3.12-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.6 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The file lib-src/libnyquist/nyquist/xlisp/xlbfun.c contains the following license notice: /* Copyright (c) 1985, by David Michael Betz All

Bug#630893: ax25-apps: Doesn't allow commercial use or distribution

2011-06-18 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: ax25-apps Version: 0.0.6-16.2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.6 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense The file listen/ripdump.c has the following license notice: * Changes Copyright (c) 1993 Jeff White - N0POY, All Rights Reserved. * Permission granted for

Bug#630894: ax25spyd: Doesn't allow commercial use or distribution

2011-06-18 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: ax25spyd Version: 0.23-8 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.6 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet The file src/ripdump.c has the following license notice: * Changes Copyright (c) 1993 Jeff White - N0POY, All Rights Reserved. * Permission granted

Bug#630897: ace: DDS4 spec doesn't allow modification or commercial distribution

2011-06-18 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Source: ace Version: 5.7.7-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1.6, 2.1.7 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet In ACE+TAO+CIAO-src-5.7.7.tar.bz2 there is document ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/ connectors/dds4ccm/docs/ptc_09-10-26 DDS4CCM v1-0 WCB.pdf,

Bug#630846: axiom: OpenMath C library doesn't allow commercial use

2011-06-17 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: axiom Version: 20100701-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.6 User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org Usertags: libreplanet The file zips/omcv1.4a.tgz/OMCv1.4a/src/copyright says The SOFTWARE is provided for non-commercial use only. Any use or reproduction of any part of

Bug#477060: [Fwd: [Gnewsense-dev] Restatement of AMS-LaTeX license]

2010-05-12 Thread Sam Geeraerts
AMS have updated the license. Is it possible to still get this into Squeeze? Originele bericht Onderwerp: [Gnewsense-dev] Restatement of AMS-LaTeX license Datum: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:34:08 -0400 Van: David M. Jones d...@ams.org Dear Benedikt, et al, Enclosed is a copy of a new

Bug#564474: mesa: glut files have non-DFSG-free license

2010-01-09 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Package: mesa Version: 7.0.3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 Subject: mesa: glut files have non-DFSG-free license Package: mesa Version: 7.0.3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 Some files in mesa have the following license: /* This program is freely distributable without

Bug#564474: mesa: glut files have non-DFSG-free license

2010-01-09 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Julien Cristau schreef: On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 19:25:31 +0100, Sam Geeraerts wrote: A similar issue was reported (and resolved) for glutg3-dev, see Debian bug report #131997. It's not a similar issue, it's the exact same one. So why do you open this exactly? Because the code in Mesa

Bug#477060: [gNewSense-users] Re: unclear licence of AMSLatex (fwd)

2009-10-30 Thread Sam Geeraerts
Benedikt Ahrens schreef: hello, the AMS has decided to publish amslatex under LPPL. see david jones' message on the bottom. this concerns future releases only. is this ok for gns? can we keep the current package even if it isn't covered legally by this license? Thanks for following up on