Hello,
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 20:44 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Hi Adam (et al.),
Sorry for not responding earlier but I've been travelling and quite
busy and completely forgot about this issue. As I said, I don't know
what the ideal situation is. The nice thing about the transition
Hi Adam (et al.),
Sorry for not responding earlier but I've been travelling and quite
busy and completely forgot about this issue. As I said, I don't know
what the ideal situation is. The nice thing about the transition
package is that it provides some kind of upgrade path: it depends on
the
Greetings,
First, sorry about the very negative tone of my message. I had meant to
start it with First the good news: thanks for the transitional
raidtools2 package! But with emotions running high and a rush to get
this out at the end of the day, I neglected this important part of the
report.
Hi,
We know that there was no testing cycle for Sarge (badly enough) but we
made a release note for this and you can find it here:
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-mdadm
If we make a patch that does the transition from /etc/raidtab to
mdadm.conf,
* Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-19 20:02]:
The transition from raidtools2 to mdadm breaks all installations with
more than one RAID array
That the transitional raidtools2 package entered sarge just days before
the release (and that sarge had zero testing cycles, unlike potato or
Package: raidtools2
Version: 1.00.4
Severity: grave
Justification: breaks reboot for sites with multiple RAID arrays
Tags: sarge
Greetings,
The transition from raidtools2 to mdadm breaks all installations with
more than one RAID array because /etc/raidtab is ignored during
autodetection. I
6 matches
Mail list logo
