Michael Gilbert wrote:
I don't know if it is possible to ignore a sole binary package or if it
would be necessary to re-upload epiphany to t-p-u without the webkit
package. Frankly, I'd like to avoid the latter.
i think you can ask the release manager to remove specific binary packages.
No,
No, we can only remove source + all related binary packages from testing
and won't do it otherwise as it would be a mess with security updates or
rebuilds...
looks like you're going to have to change the rules script so that the
epiphany-webkit binary package does not get built.
--
To
I don't know if it is possible to ignore a sole binary package or if it
would be necessary to re-upload epiphany to t-p-u without the webkit
package. Frankly, I'd like to avoid the latter.
i think you can ask the release manager to remove specific binary packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
As long as epiphany-browser defaults to epiphany-gecko, few people will
ever notice there's an alternative.
Maybe a notice to the package description could be added, like:
(ephy standard desc)
.
This is the experimental webkit backend version of the browser, for an
stable browsing experience use
Le dimanche 27 juillet 2008 à 18:34 -0400, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
i don't believe that epiphany-webkit is ready to be included in a stable
release yet. yes, it can render webpages, and now even supports plugins,
but there are enough issues, which are not that severe individually, but
Package: epiphany-webkit
Version: 2.22.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
i don't believe that epiphany-webkit is ready to be included in a stable
release yet. yes, it can render webpages, and now even supports plugins,
but there are enough issues, which are not that
6 matches
Mail list logo
