就是觉得 stable 的 security 更新太缓慢了
On 12/14/07, Thomas Iverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
我用stable的
On Dec 14, 2007 12:14 AM, d-_-j [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
想问一下大家都用DEBIAN哪个版本的居多?
stable、testing还是unstable
--
d-_-j
--
Keep It Simple Stupid
--
lish
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:17:26PM +0800, li sh wrote:
就是觉得 stable 的 security 更新太缓慢了
怎么说?哪个 package 没有及时进行安全更新了?
Ming
2007.12.15
不是这个意思,我表达的有岐义。用 cn99 的源,速度是几百k,但是那个 security.debian.org
速度几k不到,经常会中断。上次装了 stable,在source.list 里面就是用 security.debian.org
,我想cn99 可以进行安全更新不。
On 12/16/07, Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:17:26PM +0800, li sh wrote:
就是觉得 stable 的 security 更新太缓慢了
怎么说?哪个 package
cn99经过apt-spy在我这是最快的,不过它的更新比较慢啊
听网友说交大的一个源比较新些,有哪位朋友用的话发下地址,谢谢
On Dec 16, 2007 1:31 PM, li sh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
不是这个意思,我表达的有岐义。用 cn99 的源,速度是几百k,但是那个 security.debian.org
速度几k不到,经常会中断。上次装了 stable,在source.list 里面就是用 security.debian.org
,我想cn99 可以进行安全更新不。
On 12/16/07, Ming Hua [EMAIL
On 12/16/07, Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:17:26PM +0800, li sh wrote:
就是觉得 stable 的 security 更新太缓慢了
怎么说?哪个 package 没有及时进行安全更新了?
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 01:31:02PM +0800, li sh wrote:
不是这个意思,我表达的有岐义。用 cn99 的源,速度是几百k,但是那个
security.debian.org
tags 303460 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my hbf-kanji48 1.0+20050405-0.1 NMU.
try `dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hbf-kanji48/hbf-kanji48_1.0+20050405-0.1.dsc'
to download the new version.
because hbf-kanji48 is marked as LowNMU[1], so did some extra
6 matches
Mail list logo