On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:18 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 1:06 PM, Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did DJB stop developing and supporting it too?
Dunno, I'd ask about that on the qmail list.
Or did he just get tired of people complaining about his license?
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:19 -0400, Shawn McMahon wrote:
In the US, not only does doctor mean a medical professional with an MD
degree and anybody with a Ph.D. degree, but also a Doctor of Divinity
degree (which is the equivalent of a Bachelor's degree in anything else)
and even the Juris
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 16:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 01:11:26PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
While I accept our users do things like run non-free software, I
do not see this as beig beneficial to our users -- but then, I don't
try to hinder
Have you actually used public/mass transit lately, during rush hour,
to get from one side of a city to the other, day after day, leaving and
arriving _reliably_ within predictable time frames? For extra spice,
add in winter. To really get your blood boiling, make it a Canadian
winter.
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 10:12 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
not alphabets, but since they are short, you
are correct that they are easily sorted with normal radix methods.
That's why I didn't mention them. The question was about names, which
are pretty much always written with Kanji in
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 10:38 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Additionally, the Japanese really use four alphabets: Hiragana (for
Japanese words or syllables that don't have a kanji character), Katakana
(for loan words or to place emphasis), Kanji, and our latin alphabet for
loan words that
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And it's also worth noting that the people interested in the transition
filed bugs with patches for all but a few of them, which involved a
massive amount of work. I suppose it's possible people interested in
the python transition could do the same
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Thomas Bushnell BSG [Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:39:57 -0700]:
For those keeping score at home, notice that doing the much larger
task of upgrading GCC's version is apparently easier than python's.
And shutting the^W^Wbitting one's tongue apparently more
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
Actually, since the very same person sent the GCC 4.1 announcement,
and is the maintainer of python-defaults...
Since the python team have decided to leave the rest of us in the
dark, all I can do
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't remember seeing any posts from you about the progress of the
transition testing. Have you gotten very far with it? How much of the
python using archive have you rebuilt and/or tested? I am sure python
people and the general devel readers would
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The compilers from GCC 4.1 provide now the default compiler for etch
for Ada, C, C++, Objc, ObjC++, Fortran95 and for the Java language.
The packages are currently in the incoming queue and will hit the
archive on Wed. June 7. Compilers for Fortran77
A Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
work hard to this end).
Yes, that would be really cool. Do we have any temporal engineers in
Debian who can get to work on this right away?
Actually, now that I think of it, we don't need
Sylvain Sauvage [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If it would, etch should have been released by now. As it isn't the case,
that means, either:
1. we won't have the technology (sad);
2. or noboby will use it to go back in time to release Etch earlier.
Ah, or time is not correctly modeled by a single
Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 03 March 2006 01:22, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
But how about putting the feature back in the configurator widget? It
shouldn't be buried.
You're using gnome and ask to add a feature to its most holy UI?
No. I'm asking gnome
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jens Peter Secher wrote:
Shouldn't that be
Windows is like a prostitute. Sure it's got a nice make up,
but you have all kinds of vira after spending some time with it.
No, it shouldn't be, or the Latin scholars will take revenge on you.
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jens Peter Secher wrote:
Shouldn't that be
Windows is like a prostitute. Sure it's got a nice make up,
but you have all kinds of vira after spending some time with it.
No, it shouldn't be, or the Latin scholars will take revenge on you.
16 matches
Mail list logo
