Previously Goswin Brederlow wrote:
By the way, why is the alternatives for users patch not yet included
in alternatives?
Could you possibly find a list where this question is more offtopic? :)
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wichert Akkerman dijo:
Funky. I'm talking with RedHat now about keeping our two
implementation in sync or perhaps even share code.
There's something I don't get though...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] simula]# alternatives
alternatives version 1.3.4 - Copyright (C) 2001 Red Hat, Inc.
This may be freely
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 02:58, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Goswin Brederlow wrote:
By the way, why is the alternatives for users patch not yet included
in alternatives?
Could you possibly find a list where this question is more offtopic? :)
NTBUGTRAQ?
Or was that sarcasm? I can
Previously Amaya wrote:
Is it a complete rewrite?
Yes, they didn't want to use perl.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jö Fahlke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice. But I just don't see why one would use the alternatives system
for daemons. I mean, only one MTA can be _the MTA_ of the system at
any given time, the users can't use the other MTA anyway.
It's not totally unusual to use different MTAs for incoming
5 matches
Mail list logo
