Re: Report yourself to the BSA

2003-01-07 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 02:08:27PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote: On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:37:16PM +1100, Rob Weir said: Me too. gnupg 1.2.1-2, 1.4.0-5. Does evolution still have that signature corruption bug? It's not evolution: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun 05 Jan 2003

Re: Report yourself to the BSA

2003-01-07 Thread Thom May
* Rob Weir ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 02:08:27PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote: On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:37:16PM +1100, Rob Weir said: Me too. gnupg 1.2.1-2, 1.4.0-5. Does evolution still have that signature corruption bug? It's not evolution: [--

Re: Report yourself to the BSA

2003-01-07 Thread Shawn McMahon
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:55:05PM +1100, Rob Weir said: Crap, that's not good at all. I'm using mutt+exim and I've never had anyone complain about bad signtaures. Do you think it's an issue on my end or yours? Neither; I think it was a problem on the list server's end that either doesn't

Re: Report yourself to the BSA

2003-01-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:57:21PM -0800, Daniel Dent wrote: Just curious. I'm using 2.4.19 as well, due to several nasty bugs in .20. Pray tell, say more about these .20 bugs... .19 had bugs which made it unusable as an NFS server :(. Oh? What's the NFS killer in .19? -- Nathan Norman -

GPG difficulties, etc. (was Re: Report yourself to the BSA)

2003-01-05 Thread Alexander Hvostov
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 09:12, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: Yes, sorry to be annoying... Apology accepted. ;) gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 4 04:46:48 2003 CET using DSA key ID 758D7ED9 gpg: BAD signature from Alexander

Re: GPG difficulties, etc. (was Re: Report yourself to the BSA)

2003-01-05 Thread Alexander Hvostov
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 05:23, Alexander Hvostov wrote: On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 04:52, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: To summarize: I can verify almost all of my own signatures, especially since the 1.2 release of evolution. There seems to be another problem in your mailer setup.

Re: Report yourself to the BSA

2003-01-05 Thread Daniel Dent
Just curious. I'm using 2.4.19 as well, due to several nasty bugs in .20. Pray tell, say more about these .20 bugs... .19 had bugs which made it unusable as an NFS server :(. -- | Daniel Dent | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | If it ain't broke, tweak it!

Re: Report yourself to the BSA

2003-01-05 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Daniel Dent said: Just curious. I'm using 2.4.19 as well, due to several nasty bugs in .20. Pray tell, say more about these .20 bugs... .19 had bugs which made it unusable as an NFS server :(. Data corruption with ext3 and a particular mode (not ordered, but I

Re: Report yourself to the BSA

2003-01-04 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
Yes, sorry to be annoying... gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 4 04:46:48 2003 CET using DSA key ID 758D7ED9 gpg: BAD signature from Alexander Hvostov (Primary) [EMAIL PROTECTED] You have X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1

Report yourself to the BSA

2003-01-03 Thread Amaya
:-) http://www.modelm.org/bsa.html -- .''`. Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you : :' : when he is in trouble again -- Sad Truths of Life n°7 `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid + 2.4.19 + Ext3) `-www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com