Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Amaya
Martin Baehr wrote: you can't expect everyone else to keep track of your preference. we would end up with a situation where everyone needs to keep track of everyone elses preference Oh, my! I see a bright future where there's an LDAP entry with this info at db.debian.org and all email clients

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Amaya
Enrico Zini wrote: [SCNR. Visual explanation for people who don't understand Italian: http://images.google.com/images?q=dito%20medio] I think it is highly irresponsible of you to fuel flamewars you started yourself with middle finger imagery. -- .''`. Sometimes the littlest feet leave

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.0911 +0200]: you can't expect everyone else to keep track of your preference. we would end up with a situation where everyone needs to keep track of everyone elses preference Oh, my! I see a bright future where there's an LDAP entry with

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Amaya
martin f krafft wrote: I specifically requested that you do not use IRC parlance in emails that I read. Damn it! Why don't you go outside and do something useful instead of pissing of everyone here? Stop the ad-hominem attacks or I will Cc you! -- .''`. Sometimes the littlest feet leave

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.0922 +0200]: I specifically requested that you do not use IRC parlance in emails that I read. Damn it! Why don't you go outside and do something useful instead of pissing of everyone here? Stop the ad-hominem attacks or I will Cc you!

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060628 13:55]: ...just to see what happens... You can not tell us, voulunteers, what to do! Well, he can. But you should ignore him, and not continue the thread! He as a right to tell us his opinion! Don't censor him! Yours sincerely,

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.0913 +0200]: He as a right to tell us his opinion! Don't censor him! Dude, if you aren't awake enough to spell properly, maybe you shouldn't be using a computer? kthxbye -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote: *plonk* *plink* Damn. I missed. *plink* Missed again. *BLMO* Hrm. Can't see downrange anymore. Don Armstrong -- Fate and Temperament are two words for one and the same concept. -- Novalis [Hermann Hesse

Thanks for playing

2006-06-30 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello, thanks everyone (or not?) for joining in the last thread. I wanted to make the point that asking not to have a flamewar is a good way to start one, and I can see it was somehow successful. That thread is now linked as an example from the DCG:

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Martin Bähr
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 09:13:28AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: Well, he can. But you should ignore him, and not continue the thread! He as a right to tell us his opinion! Don't censor him! freedom of speech is the right to publish your opinion, but not a right to be listened to.

Re: Thanks for playing

2006-06-30 Thread Martin Bähr
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:15:57AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: thanks everyone (or not?) for joining in the last thread. I wanted to make the point that asking not to have a flamewar is a good way to start one, and I can see it was somehow successful. hmm, the problem with that is, that on

Re: Thanks for playing

2006-06-30 Thread Enrico Zini
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:14:17PM +0200, Martin Bähr wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:15:57AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: thanks everyone (or not?) for joining in the last thread. I wanted to make the point that asking not to have a flamewar is a good way to start one, and I can see it was

Re: Thanks for playing

2006-06-30 Thread Martin Baehr
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:47:12PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: Might as well be impossible. How do you stop a flamewar that was started to show that trying to stop a flamewar is a good way to ignite it? :) maybe by using the same technology that started it and apply the motivation for people

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:39:12 -0700, Don wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote: *plonk* *plink* Damn. I missed. *plink* Missed again. *BLMO* Hrm. Can't see downrange anymore. ..try climb up that

Re: Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Erich Schubert
Hello Martin, No, we (since we're said to be the same person) is actually two DD, not one. So stop complaining every day in my precious blog, okay? We is bitching almost as much as the ion author... best regards, Erich Schubert -- erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C

Re: Thanks for playing

2006-06-30 Thread Hubert Chan
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:14:17 +0200, Martin Bähr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ps: i apologize for the off topic mail (there is nothing curious in this one) ^ And is that, in itself, not curious? ps. notice how nobody