Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-07-01 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060630 09:48]: He as a right to tell us his opinion! Don't censor him! Dude, if you aren't awake enough to spell properly, maybe you shouldn't be using a computer? Then I would never be allowed to use a computer any more, and the world have less to lough

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-07-01 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:08:30 +0200, Alexander wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060630 09:48]: He as a right to tell us his opinion! Don't censor him! Dude, if you aren't awake enough to spell properly, maybe you shouldn't be using a computer?

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-07-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.01.2008 +0200]: Then I would never be allowed to use a computer any more, and the world have less to lough about ;) You pacifist attitude makes flamewars no fun. Maybe we should just use you as mitigator whenever things grow hot... --

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Amaya
Martin Baehr wrote: you can't expect everyone else to keep track of your preference. we would end up with a situation where everyone needs to keep track of everyone elses preference Oh, my! I see a bright future where there's an LDAP entry with this info at db.debian.org and all email clients

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Amaya
Enrico Zini wrote: [SCNR. Visual explanation for people who don't understand Italian: http://images.google.com/images?q=dito%20medio] I think it is highly irresponsible of you to fuel flamewars you started yourself with middle finger imagery. -- .''`. Sometimes the littlest feet leave

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.0911 +0200]: you can't expect everyone else to keep track of your preference. we would end up with a situation where everyone needs to keep track of everyone elses preference Oh, my! I see a bright future where there's an LDAP entry with

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Amaya
martin f krafft wrote: I specifically requested that you do not use IRC parlance in emails that I read. Damn it! Why don't you go outside and do something useful instead of pissing of everyone here? Stop the ad-hominem attacks or I will Cc you! -- .''`. Sometimes the littlest feet leave

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.0922 +0200]: I specifically requested that you do not use IRC parlance in emails that I read. Damn it! Why don't you go outside and do something useful instead of pissing of everyone here? Stop the ad-hominem attacks or I will Cc you!

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060628 13:55]: ...just to see what happens... You can not tell us, voulunteers, what to do! Well, he can. But you should ignore him, and not continue the thread! He as a right to tell us his opinion! Don't censor him! Yours sincerely,

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.0913 +0200]: He as a right to tell us his opinion! Don't censor him! Dude, if you aren't awake enough to spell properly, maybe you shouldn't be using a computer? kthxbye -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote: *plonk* *plink* Damn. I missed. *plink* Missed again. *BLMO* Hrm. Can't see downrange anymore. Don Armstrong -- Fate and Temperament are two words for one and the same concept. -- Novalis [Hermann Hesse

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Martin Bähr
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 09:13:28AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: Well, he can. But you should ignore him, and not continue the thread! He as a right to tell us his opinion! Don't censor him! freedom of speech is the right to publish your opinion, but not a right to be listened to.

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:39:12 -0700, Don wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote: *plonk* *plink* Damn. I missed. *plink* Missed again. *BLMO* Hrm. Can't see downrange anymore. ..try climb up that

Re: Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-30 Thread Erich Schubert
Hello Martin, No, we (since we're said to be the same person) is actually two DD, not one. So stop complaining every day in my precious blog, okay? We is bitching almost as much as the ion author... best regards, Erich Schubert -- erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-29 Thread Neil McGovern
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:49:46PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.28.1946 +0200]: [1] Meaning Enrico. Martin is not a DD and not even an NM, so obviously his opinion doesn't count. I am a DD, and you are so unhip I wonder why you bum

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:14:48AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:49:46PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.28.1946 +0200]: [1] Meaning Enrico. Martin is not a DD and not even an NM, so obviously his opinion

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-29 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:50:45AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:14:48AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:49:46PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.28.1946 +0200]: [1] Meaning Enrico.

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-29 Thread Martin Baehr
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 11:04:33AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: You CC-ed me even though it's explicitly against list policy! I should start an expultions proceedure against you! you get what you deserve if you can't even configure your mailcient right. mutt supports a Mail-FollowUp-To: header,

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Thursday 29 June 2006 14:10, Martin Baehr wrote: right. mutt supports a Mail-FollowUp-To: header, which tells recipients that microsoftism! Mail-FollowUp-To: might work in mutt or outlook, but is no standard. use reply-to:!!!1 without regards, holger pgpYzxZrEW9hU.pgp

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-29 Thread Martin Baehr
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 03:59:48PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Thursday 29 June 2006 14:10, Martin Baehr wrote: right. mutt supports a Mail-FollowUp-To: header, which tells recipients that microsoftism! actually, it's from many peoples favourite d. j. bernstein

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Thursday 29 June 2006 16:15, Martin Baehr wrote: ps: fortunately mutt can be told to ignore reply-to that points to lists. So it was you who intentionally decided to ignore the code of conduct of this list and put me in CC: ?!! regards, Holger pgpSJg4m3e3iM.pgp

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-28 Thread Aigars Mahinovs
On 6/28/06, Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...just to see what happens... You can not tell us, voulunteers, what to do! -- Best regards, Aigars Mahinovsmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] #--# | .''`. Debian

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-28 Thread Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:19:22PM +0100, Aigars Mahinovs wrote: On 6/28/06, Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...just to see what happens... You can not tell us, voulunteers, what to do! Well, he can. But you should ignore him, and not continue the thread! -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-28 Thread Martin Bähr
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:19:22PM +0100, Aigars Mahinovs wrote: On 6/28/06, Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...just to see what happens... You can not tell us, voulunteers, what to do! i would be inclined to point out that enrico is merely making a polite request, as is common in the

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:50:06AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: ...just to see what happens... NOTHING is happening! This is all UNREAL! And I am NOT going to follow UP! -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, Ashes to Ashes, stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-28 Thread Neil McGovern
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:21:31PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:50:06AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: ...just to see what happens... NOTHING is happening! This is all UNREAL! And I am NOT going to follow UP! Good, that Enrico bloke is a well known troll. He

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-28 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Martin Bähr [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:19:22PM +0100, Aigars Mahinovs wrote: On 6/28/06, Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...just to see what happens... You can not tell us, voulunteers, what to do! i would be inclined to point out that enrico is merely

Re: Let's not drag this into another flame war please.

2006-06-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.28.1946 +0200]: [1] Meaning Enrico. Martin is not a DD and not even an NM, so obviously his opinion doesn't count. I am a DD, and you are so unhip I wonder why you bum hasn't fallen off yet, you clodhopping klunkerhead. -- Please do not