e2-2.0.beta-3 uploaded

1995-12-10 Thread Bill Mitchell
This is another update of the beta-test next-generation elvis vi clone. The author has asked that this not yet be made widely available. Please put it in project/private/BETA. Interested debian maintainers are invited to download it and provide feedback to the author. Date: 09 Dec 95 18:14 UT

Re: ncurses available on ftp.pixar.com

1995-12-10 Thread roro
On Sat, 9 Dec 1995, Bill Mitchell wrote: On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, roro wrote: And how to elegantly get rid of the huge /usr/lib/terminfo database w/o installing and purging? Good point. This sounds like a serious user-upgrade issue. This looks like a dpkg-guru question. On second

Re: ncurses-1.9.8a ELF release

1995-12-10 Thread David Engel
Having said all that, there's the .changes file for 1.9.8a: Hi Mike, I got your latest packages from ftp.pixar.com. All in all, things look good. Here are my initial findings. The -dev package provides virtual ncurses-dev package but it also needs to conflict with it. The symlinks for

Re: symlink in /usr/include (fwd)

1995-12-10 Thread Chris Fearnley
'Ian Murdock wrote:' How about installing the kernel headers directly in /usr/include, rather than linking them into /usr/src? I always assumed this was standard kernel practice. Apparently, I was wrong. Are there any opinions on the subject? The only problem I see would be if I upgrade my

Re: bumping the version number

1995-12-10 Thread Alvar Bray
It seems like this will cause the mirrors carrying 1.0 to download the whole tree again. If we're going to do that, perhaps we should have the debian-development (or whatever) be the directory tree and debian-1.whatever be a symlink to it. That way, the next bump of the version number

Re: ncurses available on ftp.pixar.com

1995-12-10 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sat, 9 Dec 1995, Matthew Bailey wrote: There is NO problem with uploads. The fact that I receive 10-5 mails a day to ftpadmin about corrupt files in private/project/Incoming made me opt for this method. This should be for INCOMING use only. the files will be available as soon as the ftp

Re: ncurses available on ftp.pixar.com

1995-12-10 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, roro wrote: Minor doc-bug in ncurses-1.9.8a/debian.README: ncurses21 should read ncurses3.0 Blast, I thought I had parameterized that _everywhere_. Oh, well. It's fixed. I hope ncurses3.0 will be a stabile ABI, since a lot of packages depends on it. That's why I

Re: ncurses available on ftp.pixar.com

1995-12-10 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, roro wrote: ncurses-base-1.9.8a-1.deb should have a debian.preinst to kill the link etc/terminfo - ../usr/lib/terminfo provided by base-0.93.6. Or it is intended that these fall into /usr/lib/terminfo? No, it isn't. They are supposed to be totally disconnected. Thanks

Re: ncurses-1.9.8a ELF release

1995-12-10 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, David Engel wrote: The -dev package provides virtual ncurses-dev package but it also needs to conflict with it. Oops. You told me that. Done. The symlinks for lib*.so are in the runtime package. They should be in the -dev package. Makes sense. Done. The shared

Re: Infomagic and 1.0

1995-12-10 Thread Ian Murdock
On Sat, 9 Dec 1995, Matthew Bailey wrote: Bill: I will fix the upload permission as soon as I talk to Ian M. he seems to be all but off the face of the earth. I'm here--what do you need to talk to me about?

Re: ncurses available on ftp.pixar.com

1995-12-10 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Stephen Early wrote: I think ncurses wins an award for most packages from one source archive. ...soon to be trumped by X, which is currently generating 24 packages from one source archive. Forgot about that one --- the whole group come from just the one source package,

Re: ncurses available on ftp.pixar.com

1995-12-10 Thread Matthew Bailey
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: I apologize for my gaffe. Obviously I should pay better attention to my mail, since it seems I glossed over the announcement of the change in policy. You didn't miss any mail, I had mailed Ian M. to tell him about this but I just got 5

Re: Infomagic and 1.0

1995-12-10 Thread Matthew Bailey
On Sat, 9 Dec 1995, Ian Murdock wrote: On Sat, 9 Dec 1995, Matthew Bailey wrote: Bill: I will fix the upload permission as soon as I talk to Ian M. he seems to be all but off the face of the earth. I'm here--what do you need to talk to me about? Well everything has been on the list

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-10 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Fernando Alegre writes: On Fri, 8 Dec 1995, Bruce Perens wrote: We can't put stuff like this where just anybody can download it any longer. Especially, we can't do that and call it 1.0. This isn't entirely Infomagic's fault, in my opinion. I suggested some time ago to call the directories:

Re: symlink in /usr/include (fwd)

1995-12-10 Thread James A. Robinson
How about installing the kernel headers directly in /usr/include, rather than linking them into /usr/src? I always assumed this was standard kernel practice. Apparently, I was wrong. Are there any opinions on the subject? I doubt it would affect a lot of people. But putting the includes

Downloading from US sites

1995-12-10 Thread Siggy Brentrup
Hi all, finally I have got my network connection up to speed with accepable transfer rates when connected to european sites and I'm trying hard to download David's work from ftp.ods.com, but at about 100 cps this is a pain in the ... With current phone rates that's 3.35DM/MB and will be as high

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-10 Thread Bill Mitchell
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Richard Kettlewell wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 1995, Bruce Perens wrote: We can't put stuff like this where just anybody can download it any longer. Especially, we can't do that and call it 1.0. This isn't entirely Infomagic's fault, in my opinion. [...] As I understand it,

Re: symlink in /usr/include (fwd)

1995-12-10 Thread Bill Mitchell
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Chris Fearnley wrote: 'Ian Murdock wrote:' How about installing the kernel headers directly in /usr/include, rather than linking them into /usr/src? I always assumed this was standard kernel practice. Apparently, I was wrong. Are there any opinions on the subject?

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-10 Thread Richard Kettlewell
It seems to me that a solution might be to put our real directory trees in a hidden subdirectory with a neutral name, to name those trees neutrally, and then to have meaningfully named (and easily changed) symlinks pointing to them: Something like: /debian/.hidden/debian-tree1/ # full 0.093

Re: Downloading from US sites

1995-12-10 Thread Bill Mitchell
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Matthew Bailey wrote: If you want an OUTGOING then someone will have to create one by manually moving the files from Incoming over to OUTGOING. Sounds reasonable to me. Files get uploaded to Incoming, and then either moved directly or (my preference) moved into a

upgrading to ncurses-1.9.8a (and subsequent)

1995-12-10 Thread Bill Mitchell
Is the procedure for upgrading an ncurses installation inherited from 0.93R6 to ncurses-1.9.8a intuative and correct for non debian-developers? (note -- I'm using dpkg-1.0.5). Package installation succeeded without my removing ncurses-runtime or ncurses-developer. How are users to users know

Re: ncurses-1.9.8a ELF release

1995-12-10 Thread David Engel
There is no symlink for libcurses.so. There should be one in the -dev package. OK. Jeff Noxon mentioned that a link for libtermcap.so might also be in order---thoughts? I have been told that this is undesirable for some autoconfed programs with emacs being the most notable example. I

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-10 Thread Bill Mitchell
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Richard Kettlewell wrote: That's essentially identical to what I was proposing with just two practical differences: (1) it uses numbers rather than names and (2) it goes to more effort to hide things. May be. I'm afraid I too-hurriedly deleted the message with your

Bug#1996: ncurses terminal defs and infocmp

1995-12-10 Thread Bill Mitchell
PACKAGE: ncurses VERSION: 1.9.8a-1 root:ae-493# infocmp linux infocmp: couldn't open terminfo file /usr/lib/terminfo/l/linux. root:ae-493# infocmp xterm infocmp: couldn't open terminfo file /usr/lib/terminfo/x/xterm. root:ae-493# ls /usr/lib/terminfo-l ls: /usr/lib/terminfo-l: No such file or

Bug#1997: ncurses linux terminal definition for kbs

1995-12-10 Thread Bill Mitchell
PACKAGE: ncurses VERSION: 1.9.8a-1 An attempt to use the kbs capability in a linux VC failed. My BS key produces ^?, not ^H, and the compiled-in linux terminal definition seems to have kbs set ti ^H (infocmp linux doesn't work, so I can't check, but ctrl-h acts like the BS key should). IMO, the

Re: ncurses-1.9.8a ELF release

1995-12-10 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, David Engel wrote: I have been told that this is undesirable for some autoconfed programs with emacs being the most notable example. I don't remember all of the details but it has to do with forcing autoconf to use the curses/termlib interface to ncurses instead of the

Re: ncurses-1.9.8a ELF release

1995-12-10 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Chris Fearnley wrote: It doesn't make sense to me. I thought that the runtime package would include all of the shared libraries that other programs might need. It does. Isn't that what lib*.so provide, the shared libraries? And the symlinks are used by ld.so, no? On a

Bug#1998: xypic-3.2-3 requires nonexistant packages.

1995-12-10 Thread osiris
Package: xypic Version: 3.2-3 Trying to configure xypic on a debian-1.0 (i.e. ALPHA) system fails due to dependencies on texbin, mfbin, and mflib packages newer than the ones currently available. These seem to be the currently available (development) packages: texbin-3.1415-4.deb

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-10 Thread Alvar Bray
Richard0.93R6 - Highgate RichardHighgate/ [contains 0.93R6] RichardHolborn/[contains what will be 1.0] Richard and after the release: Richard0.93R6 - Highgate RichardHighgate/ [contains 0.93R6] Richard

newest ncurses

1995-12-10 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
I'm now uploading ncurses-1.9.8a-2 co. It is also available for ftp from lot49.med.miami.edu:/pub/linux/ until it gets cleared at ftp.debian.org. Please don't release any packages that depend on this for a couple of days at least. Anyone who's seeing problems with the current package, please

Just FYI

1995-12-10 Thread Matthew Bailey
I have just created an Outgoing directory which has everything from the Incoming directory in it. These files are downloadable the files that go into incoming are still set 0660. I will move files into the Outgoing directory when I see a medium/urgent tag in the change file. Or a developer

Re: ncurses-1.9.8a ELF release

1995-12-10 Thread David Engel
The symlinks for lib*.so are in the runtime package. They should be in the -dev package. Makes sense. Done. It doesn't make sense to me. I thought that the runtime package would include all of the shared libraries that other programs might need. Isn't that what lib*.so provide, the

Re: debian-1.0 availability

1995-12-10 Thread Michael K. Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Robert Leslie writes: Robert I don't know about other mirrors, but AFAICT tsx-11.mit.edu Robert doesn't even carry the 0.93R6 release any more. It only offers Robert debian-1.0. It's getting jucier by the minute: This domain has a local wuarchive mirror.

Re: Downloading from US sites

1995-12-10 Thread Siggy Brentrup
Matt == Matthew Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Matt I am sorry to be an ass here but you have to understand Matt these views. I am doing what is best for the University by Matt not allowing for illegal software to be downloaded. The point isn't downloading illegal software for

Bug#2000: hello not elf

1995-12-10 Thread David H. Silber
Package: hello version: 1.3-4 Since ``hello'' is our reference package, it would be nice if the version under the 1.? hierarchy had an ELF exacutable. It would also allow one to use the package to confirm that a system is ready for elf executables before replacing something essential. --

Re: symlink in /usr/include (fwd)

1995-12-10 Thread Bruce Perens
The symbolic link makes life slightly easier for those of us who need to maintain multiple kernel versions. However, I don't feel strongly about it and I'm not the kernel maintainer any longer. Thanks Bruce -- Visit the Toy Story Web Page! http://www.toystory.com

most binary packages for one source

1995-12-10 Thread Bruce Perens
Wouldn't that honor go to X11? Bruce -- Visit the Toy Story Web Page! http://www.toystory.com

Re: bumping the version number

1995-12-10 Thread Bruce Perens
Making the parent directory unreadable caused mirror programs to not mirror that directory. They might mirror the symlink, but it won't do much good. Bruce -- Visit the Toy Story Web Page! http://www.toystory.com

Re: solving some of our FTP problems

1995-12-10 Thread Bdale Garbee
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: : I think we should arrive at a happy medium - uploads : are verified against their .changes file and moved into an accessable : area that is not their final resting place. Ian can then move them, with : the confidence that their integrity has been checked,

illegal uploads

1995-12-10 Thread Bruce Perens
Matt, I think we can fight the juarez folks by making an automatic mechanism to verify uploads against the .changes file and move them into a visible area. If we want to verify the ID of the uploader we can have them PGP-sign the .changes file. I think Ian wants to be the one to move the file

Re: Downloading from US sites

1995-12-10 Thread Bruce Perens
I personally don't have any objection to the software being distributed from other sites as long as it has words like ALPHA-TEST in its pathname. Bruce -- Visit the Toy Story Web Page! http://www.toystory.com

Re: bumping the version number

1995-12-10 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995, Bruce Perens wrote: Making the parent directory unreadable caused mirror programs to not mirror that directory. They might mirror the symlink, but it won't do much good. Although they could mirror if they had a special userid/password (as I believe has been set up)---they

Re: 1.0 on Infomagic CD

1995-12-10 Thread Richard Kettlewell
That's essentially identical to what I was proposing with just two practical differences: (1) it uses numbers rather than names and (2) it goes to more effort to hide things. May be. I'm afraid I too-hurriedly deleted the message with your suggestion, and can't go back to re-read it to see if I

Bug#2001: Incorrect ownership of audio device files

1995-12-10 Thread Owen S. Dunn
Package: base Version: 0.93.6 The base package creates a group `audio' with GID 29 in /etc/group, yet the following audio-related device files are set to be owned by group 55, which is unmentioned in /etc/group : /dev/mixer /dev/midi00 /dev/sequencer /dev/dsp /dev/audio /dev/sndstat /dev/mixer1

ftp.pixar.com Incoming closed

1995-12-10 Thread Bruce Perens
I have removed the Incoming directory from ftp.pixar.com . The files there still exist in ftp://ftp.pixar.com/pub/bruce/Debian . I'll delete them after about 1 week. Thanks Bruce -- Visit the Toy Story Web Page! http://www.toystory.com

Bug#2002: Missing manpages

1995-12-10 Thread Owen S. Dunn
Package: diff Version: 2.7 Revision: 5 This package provides no man pages for any of diff, diff3, sdiff, or cmp. Owen -- Caius College, Cambridge CB2 1TA, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://myrddin.chu.cam.ac.uk/users/osd1000/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] `I wish it didn't

Bug#2003: xon uses `hostname' rather than `hostname -f'

1995-12-10 Thread Owen S. Dunn
Package: xbase Version: 3.1.2 The xon in this package tries to use `hostname' to obtain your machine's FQDN, rather than `hostname -f'. The following diff shows the difference (usr/local/bin/xon is my fixed version): tacitus:~$ diff /usr/X11/bin/xon /usr/local/bin/xon 4a5,6 # Fixed 06/12/95

Package Verification

1995-12-10 Thread brian (b.c.) white
I'd like to suggest another field to be automatically added to the Packages files that exist at the top of each hierarchy in the distribution. I'd like to see a Checksum: field that can be used to verify the correct download of these packages. I think including both an 'md5sum' and a (filesize)

Bug#2004: /etc/init.d/nas doesn't work.

1995-12-10 Thread Owen S. Dunn
Package: nas Version: 1.2p2 Revision: 1 The script /etc/init.d/nas to start and stop the Network Audio System doesn't work, merely providing usage messages... tacitus:/etc/init.d# nas start Usage: /etc/init.d/nas {start|stop} tacitus:/etc/init.d# nas stop Usage: /etc/init.d/nas {start|stop}

Re: solving some of our FTP problems

1995-12-10 Thread Dirk . Eddelbuettel
Bdale Garbee writes: Bdale This solves the problem, since Pending wouldn't allow uploads, and Bdale only things that look like packages with changes files for which all Bdale the pieces look intact would be copied. Scripting this doesn't seem Bdale hard, either... wake up once in a

Re: bumping the version number

1995-12-10 Thread Dirk . Eddelbuettel
Michael Alan Dorman writes: Michael Although they could mirror if they had a special userid/password Michael (as I believe has been set up)---they would just have to do it in Michael multiple parts... As the maintainer of the mirror package, I am happy to confirm that you do not need an

Bug#2002: Missing manpages

1995-12-10 Thread Bill Mitchell
On Mon, 11 Dec 1995, Owen S. Dunn wrote: Package: diff Version: 2.7 Revision: 5 This package provides no man pages for any of diff, diff3, sdiff, or cmp. Too true. It comes with info pages, which are not at all the same thing. I think the current custom is to leave bug reports about

Re: bumping the version number

1995-12-10 Thread Matthew Bailey
On Sun, 10 Dec 1995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there is interest I can post my ftp.debian.org file for mirror. -- Dirk Eddelb|ttel http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/~edd I prefer that they use the extra accounts instead of a single file that will do all the

Bug#2002: Missing manpages

1995-12-10 Thread Jeff Noxon
On Mon, 11 Dec 1995, Owen S. Dunn wrote: Package: diff Version: 2.7 Revision: 5 This package provides no man pages for any of diff, diff3, sdiff, or cmp. Too true. It comes with info pages, which are not at all the same thing. I think the current custom is to leave bug reports