Re: ITW/P: freecati

1999-10-03 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:22:11PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: For the unfamiliar, CATI programs are used to to conduct surveys over the telephone (although they can also be used in other contexts). Think of an installation wizard with a modem dialer and database backend, and you've got the

ITP: screem

1999-10-03 Thread Kevin Bullock
I've packaged up a nice HTML editor for GNOME (similar in interface to Allaire's HomeSite) called SCREEM (see http://www.screem.org/). It will take me a little longer before it's fully baked (I deleted the debianized source directory before I'd re-run dpkg-source -b on it, so I need to rewrite the

Re: ITW/P: freecati

1999-10-03 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Oct 03, Craig Sanders wrote: On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:22:11PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: For the unfamiliar, CATI programs are used to to conduct surveys over the telephone (although they can also be used in other contexts). Think of an installation wizard with a modem dialer and

Re: ITW/P: freecati

1999-10-03 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Oct 02, Chris Lawrence wrote: On Oct 03, Craig Sanders wrote: On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:22:11PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: For the unfamiliar, CATI programs are used to to conduct surveys over the telephone (although they can also be used in other contexts). Think of an

Debian membership (with a twist)

1999-10-03 Thread Yves Arrouye
Hi, I know this has been a topic recently, but I really wonder how long it takes to get a membership. Is it something that can be estimated at least? I didn't receive any reply to the email I sent to the new maintainers alias, not even one automatic one giving an idea of the timeframe. Now, what

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-03 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
[ RSA is no longer included. ] [ IDEA is no longer included. ] IDEA was the only part of ssh that made it non-free, prohibiting commercial use. Wrong, RSA makes it non-free, and so does their license. Wrong, RSA makes it non-us. I can freely use RSA here.

Re: daemon configuration

1999-10-03 Thread Rick
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Colin Walters wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 10:49:58AM -0700, David Bristel wrote: Did you consider his point, though? Why would you install a service if you don't want it to run? ones you want. A possible solution would be a daemon flag to go on a package,

xplanet project - volunteers sought

1999-10-03 Thread Randolph Chung
Have you all seen the nice developers' map at http://www.debian.org/devel/developers.loc ? Here's your chance to help make it better! The map is generated by xplanet. However, we have a few slight problems 1) xplanet doesn't build well on slink (well, xplanet does, but it depends on things

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-03 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 08:54:48AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: PS: the RSA patent expires in 2001 (or is it 2002?), anyway. 20 September 2000. -- Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux developer GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3

security related mutt release

1999-10-03 Thread Marco d'Itri
There is a mutt release in incoming which should go in potato ASAP but has been rejected because my DSA key is not in the keyring (I don't know why, I sent it...). Please someone add the key (www.linux.it/~md/md-gpg.asc) and move back the .changes or either do a NMU with the source and the diff in

Re: ITP: screem

1999-10-03 Thread Frederic CELLA
already package by Mickael Dorman and it's in INCOMING. bst regards. Frederic.

Re: Debian membership (with a twist)

1999-10-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 04:46:25AM +, Yves Arrouye écrivait: Now, what is funny is that I was a member of Debian until 1997, when I left France. If you look at the list of packages that are orphaned and that Debian QA wants an owner for, there are two I authored, and would get back

RE: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-03 Thread Terry Katz
Why not implement a system similar to that in Irix ( and a few other sysv style systems ), and use a 'chkconfig' type setup.. Irix implements it with a config directory (/etc/config), which contains files with the same name as the init script or app, and contains a single word .. 'on' or 'off' ..

Re: daemon configuration

1999-10-03 Thread Michael Stone
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Rick wrote: I'm uncertain whether this is a good idea or not. I have helped many people install redhat linux and, frankly, the daemon enable screen confuses them. They don't know what all these things are or which ones they may need. If this gets

Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-03 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* Terry == Terry Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Terry so, you can issue: Terry chkconfig postgresql on Terry /etc/init.d/postgresql start Terry chkconfig postgresql off I don't know if I understand you correctly, but does this mean, that the question whether a init.d script would start the

Re: BTS: How are the bug reports organized?

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 07:36:28PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: Consider if we have bugs 0-199 and you take the first digit. You end up with 10 bugs in each bucket except bucket '1' which has 110. Put that on a broader scale and account for expired bugs and you see the trouble. Why not base

Re: Debian recommended software

1999-10-03 Thread Alexander Koch
On Sat, 2 October 1999 15:13:12 +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote: exim has its own filter facility, that is easier to understand and use by new users. Yep. And what is needed by procmail is the following: Transport-wise: |local_delivery: | driver = pipe | command=/usr/bin/procmail |

Debian recommended software

1999-10-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Edward Betts writes: It is the same for other things like list server. I used berolist to start with, and it is terrible. Then I tried smartlist, and it was great. The problem is there are so many to look at. don't know the two, mailman is another (for the user easy to use) alternative.

Re: bash package removing /bin/sh on upgrade

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 08:36:01AM -0400, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: yea...I just did an update today and something decided to remove /bin/sh during the upgrade...and didn't put it back before it was needed... so if something hoses for you just recreate it by linking it to like bash...

Re: bash package removing /bin/sh on upgrade

1999-10-03 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:44:25AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 12:30:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: Just having /bin/sh included in the .deb is Good Enough -- diversions work as designed. Good Enough is not good enough (TM). *shrug* Name a case where it fails.

Re: slink - potato

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 08:56:23AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: The idea is that when you upgrade the package like telnetd, there may be new shlib dependencies, etc. which means that you should stop spawning new daemons until it is configured. Of course, this may not happen for every release, but

Re: Debian recommended software

1999-10-03 Thread Edward Betts
Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Transport-wise: |local_delivery: | driver = pipe | command=/usr/bin/procmail | umask=0022 (This can be enhanced with a required_files = ~/:~/.procmailrc or any such things (needing the procmail binary itself, the other transport (the old

Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
Hello, I was just poking around on my system and found a script I wrote back when kernel 2.2 was released. It was an experiment to see if I could easily handle registration and deregistration of binary formats (with binfmt_misc) -- it just occured to me that Debian might be interested in it,

Re: bash package removing /bin/sh on upgrade

1999-10-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:44:25AM -0400, Raul Miller was heard to say: A wonderfuly horrible hack has occurred to me, by the way: A cron job which runs every minute: /bin/sh -c exit || /sbin/rebuild-bin-sh Hmm. There's a bit of a problem here: aren't cronjobs executed with /bin/sh? :)

Re: Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
Oops. On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 10:06:02AM -0400, Daniel Burrows was heard to say: test -e /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc || exit 0 That maybe should be test -d ... (although the above works even on ash) Daniel -- Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped. --

Re: daemon configuration

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Rick wrote: I'm uncertain whether this is a good idea or not. I have helped many people install redhat linux and, frankly, the daemon enable screen confuses them. They don't know what all these things are or which ones they may need. If this gets

Re: bash package removing /bin/sh on upgrade

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 10:07:03AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:44:25AM -0400, Raul Miller was heard to say: A wonderfuly horrible hack has occurred to me, by the way: A cron job which runs every minute: /bin/sh -c exit || /sbin/rebuild-bin-sh Hmm. There's a

Re: How not to be a nice person (Was: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality)

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 08:06:10PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: i show no regard for those who demonstrate they are fools. i show contempt for those who demonstrate that they are annoying fools. guess which category you fall into. Ok, try this on for size: How many network services do you get

Re: How not to be a nice person (Was: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality)

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 03:53:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: In any case, I fail to see how pressing `_' in dselect before any unnecessary daemons are installed could possibly be less secure than saying No, I don't want services activated by default and then installing them anyway. How long

Re: bash package removing /bin/sh on upgrade

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:44:25AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 12:30:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: Just having /bin/sh included in the .deb is Good Enough -- diversions work as designed. Good Enough is not good enough (TM). On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:55:54PM

Re: Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 10:06:02AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: [ as I understand it, a security 'breach' could only occur with this system if a user had execute permissions but *not* read permissions on a file that wasn't of a normal executable format; in other words: rwx--x--x

Re: Debian recommended software

1999-10-03 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 01:00:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: procmail is used by many users, because they can install it on their own and do not have to rely on a specific MTA and the documentation is far better for procmail than for exim's MDA features. Really? I find the exim filter

Re: bash package removing /bin/sh on upgrade

1999-10-03 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:28:31AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:55:54PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: *shrug* Name a case where it fails. You don't remember the problems when libreadline broke? Yes, I do. That's not related to bash, it's related to having bash implicitly

Re: Debian membership (with a twist)

1999-10-03 Thread Yves Arrouye
Did you explain this to new-maintainer ? Do you still have your old PGP key ? I did explain that. Since nobody answered, I have no idea if it's been received (except for my mail not bouncing, that is). I don't have my old PGP key. In fact, if you look at the keyservers, you'll see that I've

Re: Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:30:04AM -0400, Raul Miller was heard to say: On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 10:06:02AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: [ as I understand it, a security 'breach' could only occur with this system if a user had execute permissions but *not* read permissions on a file that

Re: SSH never free

1999-10-03 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 11:57:07PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 08:54:48AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: PS: the RSA patent expires in 2001 (or is it 2002?), anyway. 20 September 2000. Does anyone know when the LZW patent expires? -- Bob Nielsen

Re: Debian membership (with a twist)

1999-10-03 Thread Stephen R. Gore
Yves Arrouye wrote: be really fast, and Debian won't loose great people that want to volunteer. You can even track who approved whom and prevent people w/ bad judgment to approve other ones, etc... I am sure there are ways to move the approval time from months to days. ---end quoted text---

Re: ITP: screem

1999-10-03 Thread Kevin Bullock
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Frederic CELLA wrote: already package by Mickael Dorman and it's in INCOMING So it is. Thanks. I did contact the author, but hadn't received a reply yet. Perhaps the New Maintainers' Guide Sec. 2.1 should be changed to read check in Incoming and maybe ask in #debian before

Re: corel linux demo

1999-10-03 Thread Anderson MacKay
Ech, I'm a bit behind on my -devel reading. I hope this question hasn't been answered down in another thread. :) On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 06:49:15AM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote: I understood wine as being a library that intercepted win32 calls and redirected those calls into the correct X or

Re: Debian membership (with a twist)

1999-10-03 Thread Steve Willer
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Yves Arrouye wrote: Debian has some big advantages over any other distribution I know of that make me want to contribute to Debian rather than another one. But months for getting a membership, isn't that risking that new volunteers will turn to Mandrake or Stampede for

RE: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-03 Thread Rick
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Terry Katz wrote: Why not implement a system similar to that in Irix ( and a few other sysv style systems ), and use a 'chkconfig' type setup.. Irix implements it with a config directory (/etc/config), which contains files with the same name as the init script or app,

RE: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality

1999-10-03 Thread Terry Katz
Looking back on it .. I guess the chkconfig idea wasn't as good as I was originally thinking .. Irix has been the main OS at my company until recently when I started moving the apps over to high end Linux boxes, and have gotten used to the chkconfig setup .. (which serves more purposes than just

Re: Debian membership (with a twist)

1999-10-03 Thread Decklin Foster
Steve Willer writes: Yes, this is exactly the problem, and it's a big reason why I installed FreeBSD over Debian last night. I had hoped that the new school year would bring some energy to this project, but it's still the same old bickering, the same lack of forward movement, and

doom source GPL'd

1999-10-03 Thread Joey Hess
It looks like the doom source is now under the GPL. (http://www.doomworld.com/). This clears up the previous licencing problems that were keeping it out of debian. It will still be fit only for contrib for now, since it needs non-free WAD files. Who's going to mackage it? -- see shy jo

runlevel solution

1999-10-03 Thread Colin Walters
Why don't we have, by default, all daemons which grab ports run in runlevel 3? We could keep runlevel 2 as the default, which would become the workstation (i.e. no services) runlevel, and 3 would be the all installed daemons start runlevel. That way, the default configuration upon installation

Re: doom source GPL'd

1999-10-03 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 12:41:51PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: It looks like the doom source is now under the GPL. (http://www.doomworld.com/). This clears up the previous licencing problems that were keeping it out of debian. It will still be fit only for contrib for now, since it needs non-free

Re: corel linux demo

1999-10-03 Thread Kenneth Scharf
Actually I hadn't thought of the fact that you could link a windows program agains winelib to create a native linux executable, but it makes perfect sense. Corel might still need a few ifdef's to work around known problems in wine's implementation of the win32 api, but it would be quite do-able.

Re: doom source GPL'd

1999-10-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 12:41:51PM -0700, Joey Hess was heard to say: It looks like the doom source is now under the GPL. (http://www.doomworld.com/). This clears up the previous licencing problems that were keeping it out of debian. It will still be fit only for contrib for now, since it

Re: doom source GPL'd

1999-10-03 Thread Joey Hess
Joseph Carter wrote: Joe Drew has lxdoom and I have agreed to sponsor his packages as soon as I'm caught up with school again. Ok, he might want to look at my old lxdoom package, which has several patches in it. (ftp://kitenet.net/pub/code/debian/) What about the music server? -- see shy jo

Re: doom source GPL'd

1999-10-03 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 01:33:29PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: Joe Drew has lxdoom and I have agreed to sponsor his packages as soon as I'm caught up with school again. Ok, he might want to look at my old lxdoom package, which has several patches in it. (ftp://kitenet.net/pub/code/debian/)

Re: doom source GPL'd

1999-10-03 Thread Joey Hess
Joseph Carter wrote: I'm hoping to convince the lxdoom and dosdoom people to throw it and the sound server away. They suck and are evil. Would be better to write sound support directly these days (and is now actually reasonable to do. I even have soundfonts that make Timidity Not Suck---I'm

Re: xplanet project - volunteers sought

1999-10-03 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 11:55:10PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: Have you all seen the nice developers' map at http://www.debian.org/devel/developers.loc ? Here's your chance to help make it better! The map is generated by xplanet. However, we have a few slight problems 1) xplanet

Re: doom source GPL'd

1999-10-03 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 01:48:35PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: Yeah, we'll package the evil music server in the meantime. = I did a *lot* of hacking on the music server, making doom communicate with it via a pipe and other things and got it working really well. It is evil though, it has to

Re: ITW/P: freecati

1999-10-03 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 10:50:06PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: On Oct 03, Craig Sanders wrote: IMO, this is morally akin to writing free software specifically to make spamming cheaper and easier. No, it isn't. Survey research is an important part of the social sciences. it may be an

Re: Debian membership (with a twist)

1999-10-03 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 01:26:37PM -0400, Steve Willer wrote: Yes, this is exactly the problem, and it's a big reason why I installed FreeBSD over Debian last night. I had hoped that the new school year would Just us on debian-bsd, then? It's a bit dead presently but it was pretty lively a few

Re: slink - potato

1999-10-03 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:57:12AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: As far as I know, leaving inetd accepting connections would, worst case, fail -- which is no different from having the service disabled. In other words, I don't see that disabling the daemon solves anything useful. I think the