-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:36:45 +0200
Source: ocaml
Binary: ocaml-base ocaml ocaml-source ocaml-native-compilers
Architecture: m68k
Version: 3.06-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:18:17 +0200
Source: libprpc-perl
Binary: libprpc-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.1005-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Hammers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:01:06 +0200
Source: libgnomecanvas
Binary: libgnomecanvas2-dev libgnomecanvas2-common libgnomecanvas2-0
Architecture: m68k all
Version: 2.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 22:47:22 +0200
Source: libstorable-perl
Binary: libstorable-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.00-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 13:12:18 +0200
Source: pavuk
Binary: pavuk
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.9pl28-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Petr Cech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA
FOREIGN REMITTANCE DEPT.
TINUBU SQUARE, LAGOS NIGERIA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
23TH OF August 2002
ATTN:PRESIDENT/CEO
STRICTLY PRIVATE BUSINESS PROPOSAL
I am MR.Johnson S. Abu, the bills and exchange Director at the
ForeignRemittance Department of the
As I have told in another thread, I am currently rebuilding all packages
depending on c++ on s390. All packages have been touched now. The results are:
406 packages have been built successfully
222 packages depend on other packages built with gcc-3.2
90 on qt libraries
12 on
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:08:19AM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
This is a problem when using make-kpkg because it can't find the
architecture. dpkg complains about i386-none not being in it's mapping
table.
By using HOSTCC=gcc make-kpkg it works fine.
kernel-package version
TrMelodi, Kýrýk linkli çalýþmayan ve birtek mp3 ü indirirken bile insanlarý
kahreden sözde mp3 sitelerine alternatif
olarak sizler için özenle hazýrlanmýþtýr. Her yaþtan her kesimden müziksevere
hitap edebilmek için tasarlanmýþ 13 GB
lýk dev Mp3 listesiyle sýnýfýnda rakipsiz olacak þekilde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can anyone advise why packages aren't getting though into testing?
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:30, Cron Daemon wrote:
* hpoj (0.8-11 to 0.90-1)
+ Maintainer: Mark Purcell
+ 13 days old (needed 10 days)
Can anyone advise why packages aren't getting though into testing?
+ Depends: hpoj glibc
Dependencies.
glibc is holding them back.
Greetings,
Erich
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 08:27:15PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
Can anyone advise why packages aren't getting though into testing?
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:30, Cron Daemon wrote:
* hpoj (0.8-11 to 0.90-1)
+ Maintainer: Mark Purcell
+ 13 days old (needed 10 days)
I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
can be found at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/
Please send packaging problems with the packages to debian-python.
When preparing
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libmpeg2
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Aaron Holtzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others
* URL : http://libmpeg2.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : free library
When I run command vrms in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers. How about you? I like to
listen to music modules made under Amiga and many of those modules are
distributed in Aminet as LHA-archives. Sometimes I use DOS and its
software may be
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:20:08PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Andreas Tille
| So I would suggest when the organizers of Debconf2 and some people from
| Skandinavia would agree to organize a conference those to parties should
| find an agreement where to meet in 2003 and where in 2004.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:10:58PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
As far as I can tell there is no way to pass --force-confmiss to dpkg
when using apt-get. Perhaps this is the only real omission.
Fortunately it is still possible and legal to run dpkg directly.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
can be found at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/
Please send
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
can be found at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/
Please send
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:53:38AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
PDF-viewers recently can handle CMap files to display
mutibyte characters (CJK, for example).
As far as I know, there are ghostscript(gs-cjk or cmap-adobe-japan1),
xpdf(xpdf-japanese, for example) and dvipdfm-cjk which
provide
I heard that 2Gb is the limit. If so I would have
to create distinct swap partitions if I wanted to
have more than 2Gb swap? Just wondering...
-walter
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:26:00PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
can be found at
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:26:00PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Any reason to keep 2.1 ?
It would make the transition somewhat easier for NMUs, as you
would only have to update the dependencies.
Tschööö, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · GPG key ID 32EC6F3E
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Walter Tautz wrote:
I heard that 2Gb is the limit.
Used to be the case. Dunno if it still applies to 2.4 kernels through...
If so I would have to create distinct swap partitions if I wanted to
have more than 2Gb swap? Just wondering...
Yes. (I used to do this with the
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 12:21:41AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
I would say yes. We need 2.1 in sarge at least, so that each generation of
Debian still has support for the previous generation's standard python.
Why? If you're upgrading then you can always leave the 2.1 packages
installed
On 22 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
Do you suggest your proposed change should only be activated for the png
library?
The proposed change is activated for everything that is compiled with
the -Blocal linker option.
Then you have to deal with consistency issues. They do not exist for
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:33:10PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
can be found at
Then you have to deal with consistency issues. They do not exist for
self-contained libraries that act locally only like png, but they may
arise with libraries that interact with the outer world, e.g. any that
makes use of networking. For example using different versions of the X11
library
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:26:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
Andreas Tille wrote:
In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every
program which has a user interface.
I vote that you get to write the menu file for
So, where is that public-domain software for extracting ZOO-files?
Somebody must find it and then create Debian-package of it. IMHO
creating new ZOO-archives is not very important for us.
IIRC, the ZOO extracters were Ooz and Looz.
Le mercredi 21 août 2002 à 13:28:30, Brian May a écrit:
Hello,
Hi,
I have just being playing around with apt-proxy, and noticed something
weird. Every time I run apt-get, it wants to upgrade the packages it
just upgraded 5 seconds ago (it only happens on this computer, too):
[..]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: unzoo
Version : 4.4
Upstream Author : Martin Schoenert
* URL :
http://archives.math.utk.edu/software/multi-platform/gap/util/
* License : Public Domain
Description : zoo
After the little discussion 2 weeks ago about the packaging of dock
apps, I come with a proposal.
Granularity is good. Until now, all dock apps have been packaged
separately to achieve best granularity. However, this is growing to an
impressive number of packages, which both bloats the archive
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +19:26:12 EEST (UTC +0300),
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed some keys:
So, where is that public-domain software for extracting ZOO-files?
Somebody must find it and then create Debian-package of it. IMHO
creating new ZOO-archives is not very important for us.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 08:03:59PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
After the little discussion 2 weeks ago about the packaging of dock
apps, I come with a proposal.
The proposed packages include many of the dockapps already in the
archive. Of course, if the current maintainer of a dockapp
On Friday 23 August 2002 11:03 am, Josselin Mouette wrote:
After the little discussion 2 weeks ago about the packaging of dock
apps, I come with a proposal.
Granularity is good. Until now, all dock apps have been packaged
separately to achieve best granularity. However, this is growing to an
Dear sir,
Iam one of the undergradute international student from Nepal, but now I am
studying Aeronautics in Florida Tech, USA with 20% scholarship.Still I am
not able to afford the cost.
Iam looking for the sponsor who can help me at this situation. So that I can
fully concentrate on my
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
When I run command vrms in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers.
While not the best team in their league, I think you'll find that even
the Packers aren't so bad that they
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +16:01:15 EEST (UTC +0300),
Juhapekka Tolvanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed some keys:
Wow! wotsit.org have some docs about archive file formats, too:
http://www.wotsit.org/search.asp?s=archive
http://www.wotsit.org/search.asp?page=2s=archive
Docs about format of LHA or LZH
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
When I run command vrms in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers. How about you? I like to
There may be patent issues. I'd check with the authors of the archivers.
Additionally reading the
Thank you for your interest in Liggett Vector Brands Inc. We have
received your email and will review all resumes. Only those candidates
whose qualifications meet our current hiring requirements will be
contacted. Please do not contact us for further confirmation or to
check status.
Gerhard,
I would be cautious about installing a gcc-3.2-built glibc
unless you first purge your system of all binaries that
were built with gcc 3.1. Jakub Jelinek said he was uncertain
if s390/s390x was an arch that would require a libgcc-compat
be added to glibc. If a libgcc-compat is
Hi Sean!
You wrote:
Asking maintainers to give up their packages so you can bundle them
just seems wrong. Why not just make your bundles be meta packages?
Because people keep complaining about ITP's of packages they consider
crap and that are bloating the Packages files, according to those
On Friday 23 August 2002 01:12 pm, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Sean!
You wrote:
Asking maintainers to give up their packages so you can bundle them
just seems wrong. Why not just make your bundles be meta packages?
Because people keep complaining about ITP's of packages they consider
crap
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
[snip]
I've been working on an interface to several archive formats. Currently, I
have .ar, .cpio(binary and compat) and .tar(sysv, gnu, posix). I've used it
to make a .deb with pure java code, and then install it with dpkg.
I'm currently adding
Le ven 23/08/2002 à 22:31, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry a écrit :
And as I told Josselin when he started this -- so what. Let the old school
group complain all they want. I have always enjoyed that Debian's developers
are also its users and largely we are user driven. If I want to package
On Friday 23 August 2002 03:05 pm, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Second, there is the famous... TADA ! Packages file size !
While this shouldn't be a limit for what we package, we can't increase
its size indefinitely. This one of the reasons why the gnome applets
were put in a single package. I
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Or
remove all of the Java packages since we still don't have a free Java
implementation.
kaffe/gcj.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 12:05:50AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Second, there is the famous... TADA ! Packages file size !
While this shouldn't be a limit for what we package, we can't increase
its size indefinitely. This one of the reasons why the gnome applets
were put in a single
Mark Brown writes:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 12:21:41AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
I would say yes. We need 2.1 in sarge at least, so that each generation of
Debian still has support for the previous generation's standard python.
Why? If you're upgrading then you can always leave the
Anthony Towns writes:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:33:10PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary
Le sam 24/08/2002 à 00:40, Jesus Climent a écrit :
The main difference is that gnome-applets does not contain 30 clocks, 20
network status applets, 35 battery status applets... while OTOH your
package system will end up in a complete set of clocks... to use 1 or
not at the end.
gnome-applets
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
ACE:
http://www.winace.com/
They provide some statically linked Linux-binary for unpacking
ACE-archives. If that file-format is not very secret, somebody might be
able to create free unpacking-software for ACE-files. But
El jue, 22-08-2002 a las 12:47, Roland Bauerschmidt escribió:
...
How about moving postfix to priority important and exim to optional? :)
LDAP support in postfix is already split off into a separate package.
...
I planned to start an elaborate proposal for the mailing-subsystem,
however
html
head
meta http-equiv=content-language content=zh-cn
meta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html; charset=gb2312
meta name=generator content=Microsoft FrontPage 5.0
meta name=progid content=frontpage.editor.document
title/title
/head
body
div align=center
table border=0 width=735
On Fri, 2002-08-23 at 19:20, Josselin Mouette wrote:
gnome-applets contains 5 clocks, I'm proposing 7.
This was a bug; it's been fixed in GNOME 2.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:13:47PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Now, apps often want libsasl2. ldap uses libsasl1. nss segfaults. It is
the same libdb2/libdb3 hell we had a while back.
This sounds very similar to breakage that can occur when with
MIT vs Heimdal libraries.
eg. if
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
It is not very bad thing if we can't create archives in formats like
ACE, ARJ, LHA or RAR with free software. But it is more important to
Ideally, amavis needs access for all archive formats so it can check
for viruses in
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:06:50 + (UTC), Juhapekka Tolvanen [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
How about contacting authors of AmigaOS-versions of LHA?
http://lha.warped.com/index.html
I was going to point out that the (de)compression routines had been
written in M68K assembly, but according to
On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:13:47PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Now, apps often want libsasl2. ldap uses libsasl1. nss segfaults. It is
the same libdb2/libdb3 hell we had a while back.
This sounds very similar to breakage that can occur
1+1
30M asp cgi,php +ACCESS , 250/
100M asp cgi,php +ACCESS , 350/
200N asp cgi,php +ACCESS ,, 600/
1+1
( http://www.cnserver.com/webmaster/eje-form.htm
http://www.cnserver.net http://www.cnserver.com
El jue, 22-08-2002 a las 22:59, Eric Van Buggenhaut escribió:
pegatinas, mecheros, condones, etc.
¡Moskis!, ¡el software libre es cada vez más divertido! ;-P
--
Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ingeniero Industrial - YACO S.L.
Albareda 24, 41001
Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez dijo:
¡Moskis!, ¡el software libre es cada vez más divertido! ;-P
Siempre que los susodichos no sean GPL :-)))
--
.''`. Life is WYGIWYD: What You Get Is What You Deserve
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (2.4.18 + Ext3)
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:59:40PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
Hola a todos,
Estoy (modestamente) ayudando a la organización de este evento y se
esta planeando la idea de tener un stand Debian durante los 3 días que
dura la concentración. ¿Algunos estaríais interesados en venir montar
También hay panfletos. Para el kit movil mirad
http://www.debian.org/events/ sobre todo 'material' y 'checklist'
y no olvidar los logos para mobiles ;)
http://www.debian.org/events/materials/cellular/
saludos
--
Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org
Powered by Outblaze
El Vie 23 Ago 2002 16:49, sTone heAd escribió:
También hay panfletos. Para el kit movil mirad
http://www.debian.org/events/ sobre todo 'material' y 'checklist'
y no olvidar los logos para mobiles ;)
http://www.debian.org/events/materials/cellular/
saludos
y como se puede meter el
67 matches
Mail list logo
