Re: "Bug of the month", or how to get people fixing bugs

2002-08-29 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Thursday 29 August 2002 19:45, Andrew Suffield wrote: > [Obey M-F-T or die] > > Here's the basic idea: turn bug-fixing into a game (a counterbalance > to the huge quantities of time which moon-buggy and frozen-bubble have > taken away from Debian development). > > People register to play, and ea

"Bug of the month", or how to get people fixing bugs

2002-08-29 Thread Andrew Suffield
[Obey M-F-T or die] Here's the basic idea: turn bug-fixing into a game (a counterbalance to the huge quantities of time which moon-buggy and frozen-bubble have taken away from Debian development). People register to play, and each month, all the players are given three randomly selected bugs to t

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread Joe Drew
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 18:34, Robert Millan wrote: > Also since this depends on mpg321 it'd have to be in non-US. Certainly not. mpg321 isn't in non-US now, and probably won't ever be. However, if the time comes that we think it's necessary to move mp3 players to non-*FREE*, I'm going to ask that

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread Joey Hess
> | To clarify, since the beginning of our mp3 licensing program in 1995, > | Thomson has never charged a per unit royalty for freely distributed software > | decoders. For commercially sold decoders – primarily hardware mp3 players – > | the per-unit royalty has always been in place since the beg

Bug#158820: ITP: lpairs -- The classical memory card game

2002-08-29 Thread Nick Hurley
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29 Severity: wishlist * Package name: lpairs Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Michael Speck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://lgames.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : The classical memory card game

Spam mail warning notification! (Attachment Removal)

2002-08-29 Thread virusadm
eManager Notification * The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: Destination mailbox(es): <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Policy: Attachment Removal Attachment file name: SRC.bat - application/octet-stream Action: Replaced with text

×îпÕÔËÔ˼۸ñ=ÉϺ£

2002-08-29 Thread ºãÈÙ¹ú¼Ê»õÔËÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
您好 本邮件为善意邮件,如果对您产生不良影响 我们在这里像您真心的说一声: 对不起! 我司《世聚物流有限公司》是从事国际货运代理和物流的专业公司 ,她是一家合作公司。在国外的股东是《SINGLE LOGISTICS LTD》, 他可以提供我们世界各地的代理供我们使用,使我们可以承接传统的 运输的同时,承接到付货/门到门/和内陆中转/清关的一系列服务 在国内的股东是《恒荣国际货运有限公司》 我们拥有接近100人的专业团队,自己的仓库/拖车和报关行, 我们的空运公司可以承接300-400个空港的货物,价格合理 所以我们可以 为您提供 专业的人才,周到的服务,试试就知道!!!

Re: bugs.debian.org: ChangeLog closes handling should be changed

2002-08-29 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hi .. On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:45:29PM +1000, Brian May wrote: >On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable. >> How to do this? They should be rather be tagged than be closed >> by an upload to unst

Re: RFC: Handling of certificates in Debian

2002-08-29 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:39:37PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Nope. We should do so, and have it added to the ca-certificates package I > think. > > Right now, every TLS-enabled package tries to screw it up in new and > never-before-tried ways. So it is okay if I do the same?

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-29 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi! This tool is great and very useful. However, there is a little bug with some kind of mangling of the version numbers: on "http://qa.debian.org/developer/index.php?package=loadwatch";, loadwatch appears to have 2 different versions in testing and unstable (1.0_1.1alpha1-1 and 1.0+1.1alpha1-1),

Re: Bug#152778: DBS feature request vs dpkg-source v2

2002-08-29 Thread Brian May
tags 152778 wontfix thanks. On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:49:41AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Hey Brian, sorry about the delay in responding. If you're comfortable > that dpkg-source v2 is actually going to see the light in the next 6 > months or so, I wouldn't worry about it. Because it's in > exp

×îпÕÔËÔ˼۸ñ=ÉϺ£

2002-08-29 Thread ºãÈÙ¹ú¼Ê»õÔËÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
您好 本邮件为善意邮件,如果对您产生不良影响 我们在这里像您真心的说一声: 对不起! 我司《世聚物流有限公司》是从事国际货运代理和物流的专业公司 ,她是一家合作公司。在国外的股东是《SINGLE LOGISTICS LTD》, 他可以提供我们世界各地的代理供我们使用,使我们可以承接传统的 运输的同时,承接到付货/门到门/和内陆中转/清关的一系列服务 在国内的股东是《恒荣国际货运有限公司》 我们拥有接近100人的专业团队,自己的仓库/拖车和报关行, 我们的空运公司可以承接300-400个空港的货物,价格合理 所以我们可以 为您提供 专业的人才,周到的服务,试试就知道!!!

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread Fabien Penso
Michael a écrit : > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:31:39PM +0200, Fabien Penso wrote: [...] > can you please post the "company statement" that is refferred here? [...] Here is the rest of the message. Someone got in touch with us for http://linuxfr.org/ and this should be published tomorrow

[VAC] Moving and more

2002-08-29 Thread Joseph Carter
Well all, the rest of this week, I'm moving into my new apartment in Eugene, Oregon. If there are any developers in the area, I'd like to get together somewhere for coffee and keysigning, please email off-list! =) I'll leave galen running here as long as I can, but I won't have time to do much o

Re: RFC: Handling of certificates in Debian

2002-08-29 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > But now I wonder if there is some established procedure for doing > so. I know many users will not have a key signed by verisign or Nope. We should do so, and have it added to the ca-certificates package I think. Right now, every TLS-enabled pack

RFC: Handling of certificates in Debian

2002-08-29 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi *, Now that the LDAP packages support TLS I would like to do the next step: Get a sane debconf interface on first installation to setup the directory and generate the TLS key and certificate. But now I wonder if there is some established procedure for doing so. I know many users will not ha

Re: need advice on library interface

2002-08-29 Thread root
Joshua Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > libsndfile is close to making a 1.0.0 release. As the new maintainer of > the libsndfile Debian package and as an upstream author for software that > uses libsndfile, I'm working with the libsndfile author to iron out all > the remaining issues with h

debbugs: assign someone from a group of willing people to fix a bug

2002-08-29 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Package: debbugs Version: 2.3-4 Severity: wishlist Hi, Ever notived how many bugs there are? How many don't get fixed, get ignored, get forgotten? A lot of bugs are years old and might not even exist anymore. I know (most :) maintainers do their best to fix bugs but sometimes there just isn't en

Bug#158798: ITP: jpilot-backup -- Backup plugin for J-Pilot

2002-08-29 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29 Severity: wishlist * Package name: jpilot-backup Version : 0.42 Upstream Author : Jason Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://jasonday.home.att.net/code/backup/backup.html * License : GPL Description : Backu

Re: Please compile treetool on alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, powerpc and s390

2002-08-29 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > unfortunately treetool is non-free because there is neigther a > > > license nor any upstream author available. > > And what about this: > http://www.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk/R

Re: Please compile treetool on alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, powerpc and s390

2002-08-29 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > unfortunately treetool is non-free because there is neigther a > > license nor any upstream author available. > > Uh, if there's no license we have no business shipping it at all. > >

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread Vince Mulhollon
On 08/29/2002 02:45:01 PM Michael Cardenas wrote: >> can you please post the "company statement" that is refferred here? Per this web page, http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/software.html, it will cost Debian $50K per program or $0.75 per apt-get (?) There is no exception under any circumstanc

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread Craig Dickson
Fabien Penso wrote: > I think you will hear soon than the person who posted that to Slashdot > was wrong and misunderstood the license. > > See the following... > > , > | From: Steve Syatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Subject: mp3 licensing > |

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread Michael Cardenas
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:31:39PM +0200, Fabien Penso wrote: > > , > | From: Steve Syatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Subject: mp3 licensing > | Date: 28 Aug 2002 11:40:10 -0700 > | > | Dear Patrick, > | > | I am the public relations person fo

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Fabien Penso wrote: > > I think you will hear soon than the person who posted that to Slashdot > was wrong and misunderstood the license. i think the PR firm is trying to cover up something. the license page makes no exception for freely distributed decoders. -john

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread Fabien Penso
Craig a écrit : > Furthermore, with the recent announcement of patent royalties from > Frauenhofer, it seems that Debian may need to remove all packages that > are covered by the mp3 patents, at which point an mp3-to-vorbis > converter would either be removed, or would be dependent on softwar

Re: Security notification script

2002-08-29 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:31:34PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > I have written a python script that allows you to compares locally > installed packages with those on security.debian.org. Furthermore it > provides a description of the problem/DSA name if the package is > mentioned in the DSA RDF. >

Re: Bug#158756: ITP: vmailmgr -- Powerful qmail addon package for virtual domain email.

2002-08-29 Thread Ondrej Sury
Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I have packages ready and will upload them ASAP. I also intend to package >> some supporting tools (qmail-autoresponder, oMail-admin etc.) > > Is this the same as vchkpw? Nope. vchkpw is older version of vpopmail, which is almost unpackable because

Re: Bug#158756: ITP: vmailmgr -- Powerful qmail addon package for virtual domain email.

2002-08-29 Thread Matthew Danish
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 06:40:52PM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: > Package: wnpp > Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29 > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: vmailmgr > Version : 0.96.9 > Upstream Author : Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.vmailmgr.org/

Re: Please compile treetool on alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, powerpc and s390

2002-08-29 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > unfortunately treetool is non-free because there is neigther a > > license nor any upstream author available. And what about this: http://www.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk/Registered/Help/treetool/ (2nd link when you search for treetool on goog

Bug#158756: ITP: vmailmgr -- Powerful qmail addon package for virtual domain email.

2002-08-29 Thread Ondrej Sury
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29 Severity: wishlist * Package name: vmailmgr Version : 0.96.9 Upstream Author : Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.vmailmgr.org/ * License : GPL Description : Powerful qmail addon package for

Re: Is this still valid?

2002-08-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:51:19AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > I never saw this get pushed into policy, joeyh just decided to stop > doing it in debhelper. Joey is cutting the Policy Manual's Gordian Knot. That being the conjunction of "policy-is-supposed-to-document-current-practice, not

Re: Please compile treetool on alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, powerpc and s390

2002-08-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > unfortunately treetool is non-free because there is neigther a > license nor any upstream author available. Uh, if there's no license we have no business shipping it at all. Even in non-free. Please ask debian-legal if you need cla

Re: Is this still valid?

2002-08-29 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Thursday 29 August 2002 05:08, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi > > I just wonder if this lintian error is still applicable? > > > Or should I simply ignore it. > > I think that it is due to the /usr/doc /usr/share/doc thing but I'm > not sure. > I never saw this get pushed into policy, joeyh just de

Re: Is lintian stalled? [Re: Is this still valid?]

2002-08-29 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Thursday 29 August 2002 05:14, Jérôme Marant wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:14:12PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > Or should I simply ignore it. > > > > You should, for the time being, until Lintian is fixed. > > It seems that Lintian hasn't been updated for a long time now. > However,

Re: The harden-*flaws packages.

2002-08-29 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:39:35PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:35:13PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > I'm the maintainer of the harden-*flaws packages. The idea is to > > have conflicts with packages that are known to have security holes. > > This is not a big probl

Re: [Mark.Martinec@ijs.si: Re: perl 5.8 breaks amavis]

2002-08-29 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:00:41PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > Looking at the dependency line, yes, that seems to be the case. My > guess is the reporter performed a dist-upgrade and that removed the > libunix-syslog-perl package. Something like that.. My mail was bouncing for about 8

Re: The harden-*flaws packages.

2002-08-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:35:13PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > I'm the maintainer of the harden-*flaws packages. The idea is to > have conflicts with packages that are known to have security holes. > This is not a big problem for unstable (and mostly for testing) > but now woody have become stabl

The harden-*flaws packages.

2002-08-29 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I'm the maintainer of the harden-*flaws packages. The idea is to have conflicts with packages that are known to have security holes. This is not a big problem for unstable (and mostly for testing) but now woody have become stable. So I now ask you what you think. Should I upload updated confli

Re: perl 5.8 breaks autoconf 2.5

2002-08-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:23:06PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:16:53AM +0100, Colin Watson scribbled: > > $ dlocate bytes.pm > > perl-modules: /usr/share/perl/5.8.0/bytes.pm > > $ dpkg -l perl-modules | grep ^ii > > ii perl-modules 5.8.0-8Core Perl

Is lintian stalled? [Re: Is this still valid?]

2002-08-29 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:14:12PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Or should I simply ignore it. > > You should, for the time being, until Lintian is fixed. It seems that Lintian hasn't been updated for a long time now. However, Sean seems to be responsive in the BTS. Sean, are there any pl

Re: Is this still valid?

2002-08-29 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
No. Ignore it. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh

Re: Is this still valid?

2002-08-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:08:53PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi > > I just wonder if this lintian error is still applicable? > > W: harden-tools: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link > W: harden-tools: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link No, for new distros it's not. > Or should I simply ignor

Is this still valid?

2002-08-29 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I just wonder if this lintian error is still applicable? W: harden-tools: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link N: N: The technical committee chose the symlink transition method to move N: from FSSTND to FHS. This transition involves setting the link in the N: postinst script and removing i

Re: [Mark.Martinec@ijs.si: Re: perl 5.8 breaks amavis]

2002-08-29 Thread Hilko Bengen
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I don't have an unstable system handy... > > > > So can anybody tell if if perl 5.8 has Unix::Syslog? > > > > Do I need to add an extra depends or something to amavis? > > Uhm... > > http

Re: perl 5.8 breaks autoconf 2.5

2002-08-29 Thread Marek Habersack
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:16:53AM +0100, Colin Watson scribbled: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:10:41PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > > perl-base contains Data/Dumper.pm, that in turn wants to use bytes.pm > > which used to be in perl-modules for perl 5.6 - it doesn't exists in > > perl-modules

Re: perl 5.8 breaks autoconf 2.5

2002-08-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:10:41PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > perl-base contains Data/Dumper.pm, that in turn wants to use bytes.pm > which used to be in perl-modules for perl 5.6 - it doesn't exists in > perl-modules for 5.8. $ dlocate bytes.pm perl-modules: /usr/share/perl/5.8.0/bytes

perl 5.8 breaks autoconf 2.5

2002-08-29 Thread Marek Habersack
Hello *, perl-base contains Data/Dumper.pm, that in turn wants to use bytes.pm which used to be in perl-modules for perl 5.6 - it doesn't exists in perl-modules for 5.8. Dumper is used by autom4te in autoconf 2.53 - can anybody _please_ fix it? TIA, marek pgpZqS5XXntrp.pgp Description: PGP si

Re: [Mark.Martinec@ijs.si: Re: perl 5.8 breaks amavis]

2002-08-29 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:51:20PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > Unix::Syslog wasn't part of the perl package even for 5.6.1. Looks > > like libunix-syslog-perl need to be recompiled for 5.8. > > I take it that my package is OK then because it depends on > libunix-syslog-perl? Looking at

Re: [Mark.Martinec@ijs.si: Re: perl 5.8 breaks amavis]

2002-08-29 Thread Brian May
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:34:04AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > Uhm... > > http://makeashorterlink.com/?N240364A1 > > Unix::Syslog wasn't part of the perl package even for 5.6.1. Looks > like libunix-syslog-perl need to be recompiled for 5.8. I take it that my package is OK then beca

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Robert Millan wrote: > > > * Package name: oggasm > > Upstream: Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://oggasm.sourceforge.net/ > > * License : GPL > > Description : MP3 to Ogg converter > > > > I'm n

Re: [Mark.Martinec@ijs.si: Re: perl 5.8 breaks amavis]

2002-08-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:34:04AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > >> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't have an unstable system handy... > > > > So can anybody tell if if perl 5.8 has Unix::Syslog? > > > > Do I need to add an extra depends or something to amavis? > > Uh

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

2002-08-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:34:35AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: wnpp > Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29 > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: oggasm > Upstream: Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://oggasm.sourceforge.net/ > * License : G

Re: [Mark.Martinec@ijs.si: Re: perl 5.8 breaks amavis]

2002-08-29 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't have an unstable system handy... > > So can anybody tell if if perl 5.8 has Unix::Syslog? > > Do I need to add an extra depends or something to amavis? Uhm... http://makeashorterlink.com/?N240364A1 Unix::Syslog wasn't part of the perl

Please compile treetool on alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, powerpc and s390

2002-08-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hello, unfortunately treetool is non-free because there is neigther a license nor any upstream author available. However, several people showed interest in treetool and so I wan care for this package. It had a bug on alpha architecture on it which is removed from the BTS because it was fixed in

[Mark.Martinec@ijs.si: Re: perl 5.8 breaks amavis]

2002-08-29 Thread Brian May
I don't have an unstable system handy... So can anybody tell if if perl 5.8 has Unix::Syslog? Do I need to add an extra depends or something to amavis? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Begin Message --- | CCed to Mark, the author. Thanks Brian. | > I discovered the hard way that perl 5.8 br

Re: bugs.debian.org: ChangeLog closes handling should be changed

2002-08-29 Thread Brian May
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable. > How to do this? They should be rather be tagged than be closed > by an upload to unstable. Not unconditionally, of course. The version > of the bugreport s

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-29 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 17:20]: > > http://qa.debian.org/developer/ > > If you want to have it hosted there, you should really > a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards >for web pages (i.e. hav

Using tftp

2002-08-29 Thread River Y . Liu
Hi all, I am trying to install Debian through TFTP because I can't afford the IBM docking station. I set all the things up. But my computer tell me "TFTP too many packages". I guess the TFTP image has problem. I tried to use program "bc" to translate the tftp image to "client-ip-in-hexcient-archit

Re: Migration to /usr/share/doc

2002-08-29 Thread Oliver Elphick
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 23:11, Giorgio Mandolfo wrote: ... > I am trying not to use exclusively the simbolic link to /usr/share/doc/ > but to look directly to the new folder. Well, I there is a (very) > simple and boring fact: the completion locks because there is > /usr/share/doc-base/ too. > I

Re: fpm - password manager

2002-08-29 Thread Mario Vukelic
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 00:34, Brian May wrote: > * There is an important bug against fpm, where it can currupt user > data, if the user does certain operations in a particular order. > Bug #158016. Actually it's #144895, #158016 is "~/.gpasman not imported on first run"