Report about packages that need work for Aug 30, 2002
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 61
Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 18
Total number of orphaned packages: 127
Number of packages orphaned this week: 12
The number in parenthesis after each package name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:31:31 +0200
Source: cwi-gpp-boot
Binary: cwi-gpp-boot
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.2.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien LEMOINE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:42:33 +0200
Source: cwi-pt-support
Binary: cwi-pt-support-dev cwi-pt-support
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:55:50 +0200
Source: cwi-sdf-support
Binary: cwi-sdf-support
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien LEMOINE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:36:30 +0200
Source: cwi-sc-boot
Binary: cwi-sc-boot
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.8-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:46:28 +0200
Source: cwi-srts
Binary: cwi-srts-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.8-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:04:18 +1000
Source: vide
Binary: vide
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.24-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 22:20:14 -0600
Source: dump
Binary: dump
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.4b31-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:53:28 -0400
Source: wmressel
Binary: wmressel
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mike Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 06:45:19 +0900
Source: multi-gnome-terminal
Binary: multi-gnome-terminal-doc multi-gnome-terminal
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.5.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 08:11:32 +0200
Source: xpad
Binary: xpad
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Søren Boll Overgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:27:49 +0200
Source: x2vnc
Binary: x2vnc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 00:36:25 +0200
Source: gcc-3.0
Binary: gcc-3.0-sparc64 gcc-3.0-soft-float libstdc++3 libgcc1 gobjc-3.0
gcc-3.0-base libffi2-dev fastjar cpp-3.0-doc protoize cpp-3.0 g++-3.0 libobjc1
libstdc++3-dev g77-3.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:42:39 +0200
Source: centericq
Binary: centericq-fribidi centericq centericq-common
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 29 August 2002 19:45, Andrew Suffield wrote:
[Obey M-F-T or die]
Here's the basic idea: turn bug-fixing into a game (a counterbalance
to the huge quantities of time which moon-buggy and frozen-bubble have
taken away from Debian development).
People register to play, and each
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Also once you have this more fully fleshed out perhaps announcing this on some
place like DebianPlanet would be a good idea. We have plenty of users who
have time to fix a bug or two but not become full time devels. Or is this
meant as a
Joey a écrit :
| To clarify, since the beginning of our mp3 licensing program in 1995,
| Thomson has never charged a per unit royalty for freely distributed
software
| decoders. For commercially sold decoders primarily hardware mp3
players
| the per-unit royalty has always
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Package: debbugs
It would be bugs.debian.org. You don't file a bug against smartlist or
qmail if you want a new mailinglist either. Please reassign.
What to do?
I would like to propose a setup similar to the one used to translate
package
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 0
Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 0
Total number of orphaned packages: 0
Number of packages orphaned this week: 0
Maybe you could run the script on satie rather than auric?
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mairix
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Richard Curnow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.rc0.org.uk/mairix
* License : GPL
Description : indexing and searching email
Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mairix
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Richard Curnow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.rc0.org.uk/mairix
* License : GPL
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:31:34PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
I have written a python script that allows you to compares locally
installed packages with those on security.debian.org. Furthermore it
provides a description of the problem/DSA name if the package is
mentioned in the DSA RDF.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
* URL : http://www.rc0.org.uk/mairix
Sounds cool. Is it us-ascii only or does it support latin1/latin9?
And directly connected to this question: does it decode
quoted-printable before indexing?
I don't see any
Hi,
I have been waiting all along for someone to post this, but nobody
does, so...
As usual Heise got it right:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/vza-28.08.02-000/ (German).
Essentially, the relevant change to the MP3 license was already made
1.5 years ago, but apparently nobody noticed until
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:42:48PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
I have been waiting all along for someone to post this, but nobody
does, so...
As usual Heise got it right:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/vza-28.08.02-000/ (German).
I posted the other story (with Thomson official
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: backuppc
Version : 1.5.0
Upstream Author : Craig BarrattName [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/backuppc/
* License : GPL
Description : A
On 08/30/2002 06:42:48 AM Richard Atterer wrote:
As usual Heise got it right:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/vza-28.08.02-000/ (German).
Or, for you English speakers,
http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/data/jk-28.08.02-008/
Redhat seems to be going to use a common look for their desktops (GNOME
as well as KDE) in their new beta featuring a new icon set.
Check out the screenshots at
http://www.gnomedesktop.org/article.php?sid=616mode=order=0
I like them and i think they are impressive...
It's one of the things
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:43:32PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
I don't have a real opinion, but i do thing that looks begin to matter
for linux apps and desktops...
I agree with you. I think that the default Distribution theme really
matters; RH and MDK have very nice default desktop
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:44:03PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 18:34, Robert Millan wrote:
Also since this depends on mpg321 it'd have to be in non-US.
Certainly not. mpg321 isn't in non-US now, and probably won't ever be.
currently non-US is the only place where it can be
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 10:16, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:44:03PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 18:34, Robert Millan wrote:
Also since this depends on mpg321 it'd have to be in non-US.
Certainly not. mpg321 isn't in non-US now, and probably won't ever
Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apart from the question if KDE and GNOME2 should be made to look
similar (KDE developers were pretty angry at RedHats step), should we
try to make a Debian look default? (Provided that someone does
Debian Themes...)
By all means, anything that
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 10:31:23AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 10:16, Robert Millan wrote:
currently non-US is the only place where it can be without breaking law.
This is incorrect: mp3 patents exist in non-US places too, like Germany.
we definitely need an mp3 decoder in
On Friday 30 August 2030 06:50, Jérôme Marant wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:43:32PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
I don't have a real opinion, but i do thing that looks begin to matter
for linux apps and desktops...
I agree with you. I think that the default Distribution theme really
that reddish tone? Please no; it's a very nice color, but I don't
think people want to look at it for more than 5 seconds at a time.
why? In my windowmaker I'm using default debian-theme, and I like
it very much :-)
--
Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sounds like a Windows problem, try calling
Kevin Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
* URL : http://www.rc0.org.uk/mairix
Sounds cool. Is it us-ascii only or does it support latin1/latin9?
And directly connected to this question: does it decode
Jérôme Marant wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:43:32PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
I don't have a real opinion, but i do thing that looks begin to matter
for linux apps and desktops...
I agree with you. I think that the default Distribution theme really
matters; RH and MDK have very nice
No, seriously, it would be less confusing for novice users. More
experienced ones already know how to change themes and perhaps make
everything look consistent, but it's a considerable ammount of work.
Especially since KDE asks at the beginning which style they want to use
anyway... If we
Provided we *ONLY* muck with things like colors, icons, and root images this
should be fine. Actually changing code like RH did to remove the About box
would not be good.
I never look at about boxes anyway, so why remove them? ;)
This has nothing to do with common look, and all Interface
Mateusz Papiernik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
why? In my windowmaker I'm using default debian-theme, and I like it
very much :-)
But AFAIR in the Window Maker theme it's used for the active (?) title
bar. That's a very good use because it's the one element in the
desktop which your are
On Friday 30 August 2002 09:03, Yenar Calentaure wrote:
Please, please, please, do not change the default without asking user
first. Debian users tend to know what they want.
And the clueful user almost never uses the default anyways. But even if they
do want to we just provide an option in
But AFAIR in the Window Maker theme it's used for the active (?) title
bar. That's a very good use because it's the one element in the
desktop which your are using, but you don't actually look at the title
bar, you look at the window's content.
yes - you're right. Never mind :-) I
On Friday 30 August 2002 08:05, Erich Schubert wrote:
Provided we *ONLY* muck with things like colors, icons, and root images
this should be fine. Actually changing code like RH did to remove the
About box would not be good.
I never look at about boxes anyway, so why remove them? ;)
This
On themes.freshmeat.net there are a few Debian themes, some nice
backgrounds etc.
For example this one could go for a futuristic aqua-like look
(GnuBubbles for GTK2 for example?)
http://themes.freshmeat.net/screenshots/28071/
And sunshineinabag.co.uk already has a Debian GDM2 login screen
Hello!
Is there any plans for the graphical installer? I know,
it isn't needed, but I think it would be nice step for
beginners - for example automatically search and install
modules for ethernet/whatever - or easy configuration
for printer :-P Of course I'm not a beginner :-P
--
Mati ([EMAIL
And sunshineinabag.co.uk already has a Debian GDM2 login screen
http://sunshineinabag.co.uk/
which (when one replace the ridiculous apples ;) could be a nice default
for gdm2 (when it gets packaged, i can't await it ;)
It's nice, but I think that this white color is too absorbing,
maybe some
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
Hello!
Is there any plans for the graphical installer? I know,
it isn't needed, but I think it would be nice step for
beginners - for example automatically search and install
modules for ethernet/whatever - or easy configuration
for printer
Have a look at PGI: http://hackers.progeny.com/pgi/
It's very nice! I like GTK wizard look very much - so why
it isn't integrated with unofficial Sid images? Have You got
any other plans ? Or maybe you want to use text installer
for ever?
--
Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sounds like a Windows
On 08/30/2002 08:43:32 AM Erich Schubert wrote:
It's one of the things Apple proved: desktop and apps that look smooth
do make their users feel comfortable with them ;)
No, they proved if you do not give users a choice of nothing or Apple's
theme the users prefer to use their theme rather than
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:02:46PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
(But i HATE that druid of KDE... why do i have to select the language
and keyboard again? my admin already configured these...)
Because some admins, unlike the rest of us, thinks users want's to have
software in their local
If I like the look of ratpoison, and someone themes it to look like W95,
I'm not going to like it when I'm surprised with Debian's themed version.
so maybe debconf should ask (when installing windowmanager) which theme
do you like - original from wm, or this debian theme ?
--
Mati
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:26:03PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
Because some admins, unlike the rest of us, thinks users want's to have
s/want's/wants
software in their local language and use local keyboard layout, then we
indeed want's to have our software in english and us keyboard layout
Hello!
Problem: apt is removing some packages when started from dselect within
prior notice inside dselect.
(this might be related to bug#151662, #157210, but I am
not sure it is the same currently -- maybe discussion makes
it more clear to me, I can tighten up my report and send it
to the
On Friday 30 August 2002 08:29, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
Have a look at PGI: http://hackers.progeny.com/pgi/
It's very nice! I like GTK wizard look very much - so why
it isn't integrated with unofficial Sid images? Have You got
any other plans ? Or maybe you want to use text installer
for
On Friday 30 August 2002 08:29, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
The problem is, I experiment with and chose window managers by going to the
website and look at the pretty screenshots.
If I like the screenshot, then it's a quick apt-get install somethingwm. I
expect to get what I saw on upstream's
On 08/30/2002 10:34:18 AM Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
If I like the look of ratpoison, and someone themes it to look like
W95,
I'm not going to like it when I'm surprised with Debian's themed
version.
so maybe debconf should ask (when installing windowmanager) which theme
do you like -
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 16:16, Erich Schubert wrote:
And sunshineinabag.co.uk already has a Debian GDM2 login screen
http://sunshineinabag.co.uk/
which (when one replace the ridiculous apples ;) could be a nice default
for gdm2 (when it gets packaged, i can't await it ;)
The Debian color
However, a quick look at the file reveals that the debian logo is
actually a large jpeg. If someone could find a vector source of the
Debian logo (I'm sure there is one somewhere) which could be converted
it's on debian.org site - I'll find it within seconds :-)
--
Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
However, a quick look at the file reveals that the debian logo is
actually a large jpeg. If someone could find a vector source of the
look at it:
http://gnuart.onshore.com/svg/openVertColor.svg
p.s. http://www.debian.org/logos (EPS)
--
Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sounds like a Windows problem,
On approximately Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:22:50PM +0200, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
Hello!
Is there any plans for the graphical installer? I know,
it isn't needed, but I think it would be nice step for
beginners - for example automatically search and install
modules for ethernet/whatever - or
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:22:50 +0200
Mateusz Papiernik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
beginners - for example automatically search and install
modules for ethernet/whatever - or easy configuration
for printer :-P Of course I'm not a beginner :-P
Being able to automatically search and install modules
Le ven 30/08/2002 à 17:37, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry a écrit :
On Friday 30 August 2002 08:29, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
Have a look at PGI: http://hackers.progeny.com/pgi/
It's very nice! I like GTK wizard look very much - so why
it isn't integrated with unofficial Sid images? Have You got
On Friday 30 August 2002 08:57, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le ven 30/08/2002 à 17:37, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry a écrit :
On Friday 30 August 2002 08:29, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
Have a look at PGI: http://hackers.progeny.com/pgi/
It's very nice! I like GTK wizard look very much - so why
it
Being able to automatically search and install modules or having easy
configuration for printers, has nothing to do with using a graphical
interface or not.
sorry - I meant not that. I meant about extending install-system
capability with adding graphical interface to it :-)
--
Mati ([EMAIL
Because some admins, unlike the rest of us, thinks users want's to have
software in their local language and use local keyboard layout, then we
indeed want's to have our software in english and us keyboard layout
with local as an switchable option, right?
Which means *everbody* needs to
* Mateusz Papiernik
| Is there any plans for the graphical installer?
yes. look at the debian-installer module in debian-boot cvs.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
Greetings,
Just writing to request a second opinion on this bug.
Current dpkg behavior does not allow a package to replace a directory
with a symlink during upgrade. This broke a libc6-dev upgrade when I
made an unstable chroot from a potato tarball on an ARM system a couple
of months ago.
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
Just writing to request a second opinion on this bug.
Current dpkg behavior does not allow a package to replace a directory
with a symlink during upgrade. This broke a libc6-dev upgrade when I
made an unstable chroot from a potato
Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:35, Geert Stappers wrote:
When the cause of the buildproblem is in the package, fix the
problem there. The package maintainer hasn't to do it by
Walter Tautz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I heard that 2Gb is the limit. If so I would have
to create distinct swap partitions if I wanted to
have more than 2Gb swap? Just wondering...
The older blends of kernels only allowed swap partitions up to 128MB.
The newer kernels allow 2GB per swap
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
This proposal would also allow, say bochs, to provide i386 too (although
I think more work might be needed here).
No, it wouldn't.
Say you install bochs on alpha. If bochs provides i386, then this would tell
Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:42:04PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
This does not solve the issue, LFS requires 2.4 or a patched 2.2
Kernel.
http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html
But with a standard 2.2 kernel it should still work for files
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings,
Just writing to request a second opinion on this bug.
Current dpkg behavior does not allow a package to replace a directory
with a symlink during upgrade. This broke a libc6-dev upgrade when I
made an unstable chroot from a potato
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:40:11AM +0200,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Right now, every TLS-enabled package tries to screw it up in new and
never-before-tried ways.
One commonly missing feature is that the certificate should contain a
subjectAltName extension of type dNSName containing
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 06:25:32PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Its not. glibc takes care of it since like forever.
Otherwise ls, dd, cat, tar, all would be broken.
Thanks. That was what I would have expected, but anyway, better be
sure what you are doing.
Greetings
Torsten
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 10:31:23AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
If fraunhofer say that you are allowed to distribute mp3 players for
free (but not for cost), then they must be put in non-free. And since
they have patents all around the world, they can't be put in non-us.
It's my interpretation of
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:15:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
unfortunately treetool is non-free because there is neigther a
license nor any upstream author available.
Uh, if
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:37:50AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On Friday 30 August 2002 08:29, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
Have a look at PGI: http://hackers.progeny.com/pgi/
It's very nice! I like GTK wizard look very much - so why
it isn't integrated with unofficial Sid images? Have
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 10:55, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
I also agree. There was a moment of bah we are not a company but in the
end, I think a little help in giving our users a good looking default would
go a long way. Of course not being a KDE or GNOME user I would also like to
see this
I don't know if this is the place to send this mail, so
sorry if i'm wrong.
I like contribute in some of the following projects :
emelfm (#158150), orphaned 119 days ago
Description: file manager for X/gtk
gadfly (#113080), orphaned 342 days ago
Description: SQL database and parser
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 06:58:00PM +0100, Andrew McDonald wrote:
On a similar subject, there seem to be more than a few applications
that have had SSL/TLS support added, but don't do any hostname
checking against the certificate - leaving you open to
man-in-the-middle attacks.
(speaking as an
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, it was written:
Hello world,
In a couple of days uncompressed Packages files for unstable will cease
to be generated, and bzip2'ed Packages files will be generated in their
place (actually, if you look carefully, they're already being generated).
Sources.bz2 files are
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:34:48PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
This will break apt, as it doesn't look for compressed versions when using
file uris.
Then apt, or debian-cd, needs to be fixed. *shrug*
There's no need to Cc me, even when I bounce things and possibly lose
my M-F-T header.
Cheers,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:36:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
In other words, if you write some free software, it's not your fault if
some company decides 15 minutes or 15 years later that they had a patent
on an algorithm you used, and sent packs of lawyers out to eradicate
your software
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:57:12PM -0700, Neil Spring wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 06:58:00PM +0100, Andrew McDonald wrote:
On a similar subject, there seem to be more than a few applications
that have had SSL/TLS support added, but don't do any hostname
checking against the certificate -
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:34:48PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
This will break apt, as it doesn't look for compressed versions when using
file uris.
Then apt, or debian-cd, needs to be fixed. *shrug*
Huh. debian-cd can just uncompress them, but
Andrew Suffield wrote:
[Obey M-F-T or die]
Here's the basic idea: turn bug-fixing into a game (a counterbalance
to the huge quantities of time which moon-buggy and frozen-bubble have
taken away from Debian development).
People register to play, and each month, all the players are given
three
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:34:48 -0500 (CDT)
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, it was written:
Hello world,
In a couple of days uncompressed Packages files for unstable will
cease to be generated, and bzip2'ed Packages files will be generated
in their place
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello world,
In a couple of days uncompressed Packages files for unstable will cease
to be generated, and bzip2'ed Packages files will be generated in their
That will also break rsyncing them, which saves a lot.
Packages, Sources and Contents files only have
I am trying to get the glibc debian cvs for 2.2.92 to
package (it builds and passes make check fine on debian
ppc sid with the new gcc 3.2.1pre). However the buggy
perl 5.80 in sid has broken install-info. I looked at
a Yellow Dog Linux machine and noticed, however, that they
had a texinfo 4.2
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Jack Howarth wrote:
I am trying to get the glibc debian cvs for 2.2.92 to
package (it builds and passes make check fine on debian
ppc sid with the new gcc 3.2.1pre). However the buggy
perl 5.80 in sid has broken install-info. I looked at
a Yellow Dog Linux machine and
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Glenn McGrath wrote:
If its compressed its all or nothing.
nope. you can append compressed data to the end of a gzip file, and gunzip
will cope.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:09:04PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
I am trying to get the glibc debian cvs for 2.2.92 to
package (it builds and passes make check fine on debian
ppc sid with the new gcc 3.2.1pre). However the buggy
perl 5.80 in sid has broken install-info. I looked at
a Yellow
Heh. What part of There's no need to Cc me is so unclear, I wonder?
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:01:29PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Using http range transfers its possible to only download a portion of the
packages file if its uncompressed, this method could have been used along
with a package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:18:51 -0700
Source: dh-make-perl
Binary: dh-make-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9-0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paolo Molaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ivan Kohler [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:21:08 +0200
Source: zope
Binary: zope
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.5.1-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gregor Hoffleit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 02:22:20 -0400
Source: vegastrike-data
Binary: vegastrike-data
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.9.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mike Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mike Furr [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 05:33:45 -0300
Source: af
Binary: af
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: nobody@nowhere
Changed-By: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
af
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 05:01:00 -0300
Source: cfitsio
Binary: cfitsio-doc cfitsio-dev cfitsio2
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.401-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: nobody@nowhere
Changed-By: Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:09:13 +0200
Source: python2.2
Binary: python-dev python2.2-examples python2.2-dev python-examples python2.2-gdbm
python2.2-mpz python2.2-doc python-gdbm python-doc python2.2-xmlbase python2.2-tk
python-tk python-mpz
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
