Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r1
=
An up-to-date version is at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r1/.
I am preparing the first revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (woody) and will infrequently send reports so people can
actually comment on
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r1
=
An up-to-date version is at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r1/.
I am preparing the first revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (woody) and will infrequently send reports so people can
actually comment on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 17:25:03 -0600
Source: libunicode-map-perl
Binary: libunicode-map-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.112-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ardo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 17:07:43 -0600
Source: libxml-libxml-perl
Binary: libxml-libxml-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.52-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ardo van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:40:12 +0100
Source: mod-frontpage-mirfak
Binary: libapache-mod-frontpage-mirfak
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.6.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 01:11:02 +0100
Source: python-tarfile
Binary: python2.2-tarfile python2.3-tarfile
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.6.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 14:27:45 +0100
Source: pcsc-lite
Binary: libpcsclite-dev libpcsclite0 pcscd
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.1.2-ubeta3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 02:16:28 -0400
Source: devmapper
Binary: dmsetup libdevmapper0 libdevmapper-dev kernel-patch-device-mapper
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.96.07-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 02:51:02 -0400
Source: lvm2
Binary: lvm2
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.95.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:42:34 +0100
Source: mailx
Binary: mailx
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1:8.1.2-0.20020411cvs-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Luberda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 07:32:05 +0100
Source: tix8.1
Binary: tix8.1 tix8.1-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 8.1.3.93-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:00:51 +0100
Source: ethereal
Binary: ethereal ethereal-dev tethereal ethereal-common
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.9.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:24:52 -0800
Source: pornview
Binary: pornview
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.1.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Brian Nelson [EMAIL
comme j'utilise KDE en général, je pensais developper mon appli pour
KDE
Regarde déjà du côté de KDevelop, c'est un peu son but...
Simplement,
le Moine Fou
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
pgpnBkX9xoGqE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 08 December 2002 20:00, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:03:05PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Which is why I ask for the second option -- a tarball. Let Debian,
Gentoo, BSD, whoever do their own packaging. This includes any of those
groups' users.
Debian
There is no pcmcia-modules-2.2.22-reiserfs, which looks like an
oversight to me.
install kernel-image-2.4.19-i386
remove kernel-image-2.4.16-i386
remove kernel-image-2.4.18-i386
install kernel-source-2.4.19
remove kernel-source-2.4.16
remove kernel-source-2.4.18
Hmm... as always
Title: ??
---
---
http://www.ArtsOfChina.com
10
?
? ?
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 02:09, Nick Phillips wrote:
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 12:03 pm, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I disagree that this is needed, not for any of the usual reasons, but
for the simple reason that this functionality already exists.
In part; it's not visible to the
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Nick Phillips wrote:
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 10:48 am, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
I do not agree with you for different reasons. First of all noone
forces
people to add private archives to their sources.list. If users do that
they should know that things
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
It makes sense for the debian user, dont u think?
I think not. Debian packages from *anywhere* are not under control of BTS
and as a consequence they have no quality assurance. If the software is
interesting for Debian users it should be integrated
Hi
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 04:36:58PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
I have a set of scripts for creating private debian package pools,
available at:
URL:http://www.microcomaustralia.com.au/debian/bin2/.
Interesting.
These scripts will allow you to create and maintain a private archive
with
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Why noone have ever packaged the actual debian set of scritps for
handling archives instead?
Probably because it's too complicated to be of use unless you're
managing something on the scale of the debian archive. It's much
Title: ??
---
---
http://www.ArtsOfChina.com
10
?
? ?
Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 22:16, Steve Greenland wrote:
(re-arranged a little)
Alastair, did you miss the dselect just stop (I have to C-c to
get out) part of Arnaud's message? Because you can't just hang an
installation run because you're
sean finney wrote:
also, the ispell package asks you
which language you use by default. it wouldn't be so hard for these
packages to ask the same things in debconf, or at least respect your
debconf settings, and considering that they ship with stock debian you'd
think that they'd have already
Timshel Knoll wrote:
[Please CC all replies to me]
Hi all,
I'm having issues with getting parted's reiserfs support to work in a
way that complies with Debian policy. The issue is that parted dlopen()s
libreiserfs.so and libdal.so (from the libreiserfs-0.3-{0,dev}
packages) for its reiserfs
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:01:29PM +1100, Andrew Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:02:12AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I don't see why this is a problem, you'd only need to change the
dlopen() code if there's a SONAME change
- Original Message -
From: Mikael Hedin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: linux.debian.devel
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:00 PM
Subject: [Testing] Why isn't a52dec updating
I see that the testing scripts are running again. Now I wonder why
a52dec isn't going in. In
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
| In the end it makes very little sense for a3rd party to provide
| debs. The LSB requires rpm support only. Personally I would be
| happy if they released a rpm for compliance and a tarball (binary or
| source as they wish) for everyone else.
I disagree with this, I
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 06:06:41PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
I'm interested in writing the How Software Producers can distribute
their products directly in .deb format manual, as listed on
http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals. I thought to write the
following, more or less:
[CC to -policy removed, prolly is getting a little OT for them ...]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:06:31PM +0300, Yury Umanets wrote:
2. Make parted dlopen() libreiserfs-0.3.so.0 rather than libreiserfs.so.
This will solve the problem, but is not ideal solution since a minor
version upgrade or
FROM: HON DR John cabor
Dear Sir
A Brief Intreduction of my self, I am hon Dr John
cabora. A diplomant from the republic gabon, also the
owner of trans Atlantic crossing company.
I am contacting in respect of your consignment /fund
that is with me as a diplomat I don`t have problem in
package: dhelp
severity: normal
Due to a high workload in general and other time-consuming Debian packages I
would
like to pass the maintainership for dhelp to another person/group.
There are a lot of bugs for dhelp, several of them probably outdated. Some
parts of dhelp need a complete rewrite
Timshel Knoll wrote:
[CC to -policy removed, prolly is getting a little OT for them ...]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:06:31PM +0300, Yury Umanets wrote:
2. Make parted dlopen() libreiserfs-0.3.so.0 rather than libreiserfs.so.
This will solve the problem, but is not ideal solution since a minor
Because this matter was mentioned in the 26 November Debian
Weekly News, it seems appropriate to post an update.
Susan Kleinmann took the bull by the horns and rewrote
the page from scratch. I have proposed some revisions
and hopefully we'll have a finished product soon. I
append the latest
Am 9.12.02 um 10:30:05 schrieb Agustín Martín Domingo:
That is already done in ispell dicts and wordlists in unstable.
[...]
Hope you like it
Is that the question that is asked again and again for all of the
dictionaries I install? No, I don't particularly like it. The questions
should only
Michael Piefel wrote:
Is that the question that is asked again and again for all of the
dictionaries I install? No, I don't particularly like it. The questions
should only be asked once all dictionaries are there; how to do that is
beyond me.
No, what you mention is the old behavior. If you
Hey everyone,
I just remembered that the WNPP www pages [1] have been stale
for one month and one day now. Their last update was on November 9,
and no one has yet looked into bug #171393: WNPP pages are severely
out of date. Update mechanism broken? which I also filed. Anyone know
what the
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-09
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: codestriker
Version : 1.6.0
Upstream Author : David Sitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://codestriker.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : A web based
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:24:02AM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
I just remembered that the WNPP www pages [1] have been stale
for one month and one day now. Their last update was on November 9,
and no one has yet looked into bug #171393: WNPP pages are severely
out of date. Update mechanism
Thomas Hood wrote:
If a target release has been specified, then APT uses the
following algorithm to set the priorities of the instances
of a package. Assign:
priority 100
to the instance of a package that is already
installed (if
Hello,
Am 03:07 2002-12-06 -0800 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
The response I got to a simple
request for an DOS or Windows
based SETUP.EXE program which
loads Linux onto my hard drive,
I have a vbs Virus taken from 'I-love-You.vbs'
It do nothing, until it is 01:00 CET. Then it will
Hello Josselin,
Am 10:00 2002-12-05 +0100 hat Josselin Mouette geschrieben:
right, but isn't that what Pre-Depends is for?
The configure script is usually launched before the Pre-Depends are even
installed. There is currently no way to ensure a package is installed at
configuration time.
This is
After using debarchiver, for the first time, yesterday, I noticed 5
deb's didn't
get placed in the archive. I unpacked the deb's and found they didn't
have a
section or priority field in the control file. My question is, is this
a bug? I
looked in the bts and didn't find anything listed. If
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think not. Debian packages from *anywhere* are not under control of BTS
and as a consequence they have no quality assurance.
An offhand observation: In my experience, merely having bugs handled
by the BTS is no assurance of quality.
Are there any plans to package the new GNU Aspell (0.50.x) for Debian?
* Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-12-09 17:22]:
Looking at the code, wnpp.pl is supposed to avoid printing those
messages to stderr when the host is klecker.debian.org, but this
fails for some reason.
Because $host is not initialized. I wonder where it should come from.
--
Martin
I am getting link errors on compiling SE Linux programs on IA64 with the
following:
cc -I../include
-I/home/etbe/selinux-small-2002102211/debian/lsm/security/selinux/include -O2
-g -L../src avc_enforcing.c -lsecure -o avc_enforcing
../src/libsecure.a(security.o): In function `security':
Hi,
I'm am trying to debug a memory corruption problem
using ElectricFence 2.1 on Linux (2.4.2-2#1 i686) and
gcc version 2.96 2731. The program terminates with
the following error message after the it runs for
sometime. Any clues how I can get around this?
ElectricFence Exiting: mmap()
(In reply to Travis Crump)
Hello, and thanks for the feedback.
I think that the original is right. It speaks of the
priority assigned to an instance of a package (i.e.,
a particular version of that package coming from a
particular source). So although coreutils (the package)
is assigned three
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:47:07AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:22:04PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
My preferred option is 3. However, by itself it is still not sufficient
as it kernel-image-2.4.19-386 fails to install when making the initrd
image (which ironically
Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are there any plans to package the new GNU Aspell (0.50.x) for Debian?
Yes. In fact, you can find packages here if you wish to test it out and
see how it breaks gtkspell :) :
http://bignachos.com/~nelson/debian/
The main thing holding it back is I'm
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:34:27PM -0600, J.E. Starr wrote:
After using debarchiver, for the first time, yesterday, I noticed 5
deb's didn't get placed in the archive. I unpacked the deb's and
found they didn't have a section or priority field in the control
file. My question is, is this a
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:38:49PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Because $host is not initialized. I wonder where it should come from.
IIRC, it was set in the script. I don't recall the particular reason
why those messages weren't printed when ran on klecker, though.
--
Marcelo
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:42:43AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think not. Debian packages from *anywhere* are not under control of BTS
and as a consequence they have no quality assurance.
An offhand observation: In my experience, merely
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: geramik
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Craig Drummond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=3952
* License : GPL
Description
* Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-12-09 21:37]:
IIRC, it was set in the script. I don't recall the particular reason
why those messages weren't printed when ran on klecker, though.
Err, cause those messages break the build.
[Ravindra Sunkad]
I'm am trying to debug a memory corruption problem using
ElectricFence 2.1 on Linux
I believe valgrind is better for this. Check out
URL:http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/.
Sorry, but I do not know anything about your mmap problem.
Steve Dunham wrote:
The rebuilt package is likely to have the wrong md5sum. I believe
apt will reject it after download.
That's true but apt seems to allow Packages files without any MD5sum: info
without complaining.
Cheers,
--
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is no record of the [EMAIL
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:21:09AM +, James Troup wrote:
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I looked at katie; it seemed to be a complicated and undocumented
mess that was a total overkill for my purpose (eg. I don't need a
database).
That complicated and undocumented mess has
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:03:07PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I disagree that this is needed, not for any of the usual reasons, but
for the simple reason that this functionality already exists.
The namespace of an apt repository is its URL, and any information
available in a Release
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:09:44PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
Which is inadequate; how do you tell whether the following lines access
the same
distribution?
deb http://debian.lemon-computing.com/debian/ stable main contrib
non-free
deb http://debian.otago.ac.nz/debian/ stable main
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:57:55PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
If there were a reliable and complete source of changelog data
programmatically available over the network, and a means by which
apt-listchanges could be launched by apt before any packages are downloaded,
it would be easy to
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:26:14AM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
1. Put the .so symlinks in the libreiserfs-0.3-0 package. This breaks
policy (section 9.0 says that the associated development package
should contain the shared library without a version number). This is
also a really bad
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:18:35AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Often I want to know Should I install the unstable version or will the
stable version be sufficient?
Currently there is no way to tell, you can't see the Changelog until after
you have downloaded it.
It should be possible to use
Won't removing kernel-source-2.4.18 create a problem for other arches?
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:37:53PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Because $host is not initialized. I wonder where it should come from.
IIRC, it was set in the script.
It must have gone down the drain when I removed another chunk of code that
relied on the hostname without any need.
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I looked at katie; it seemed to be a complicated and undocumented
mess that was a total overkill for my purpose (eg. I don't need a
database).
That complicated and undocumented mess has been running the Debian
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:08:16AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
1. For package installations, DAK will inform both the uploader and the
maintainer. For private archives should it inform the maintainer?
Maybe a message Your package has been installed in the private
archive at http://.../
Title: new page 1
""
iworksfaxb/iworksoaoacrmhrmerp
iworksfax
()
1234-56781234-5678"1234-5678""123"123""
()
()
()
office
()
()
()
()
""
()
()
""
()
()
()
iworksfax
()
officecad
()
x-tree
() i-works
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:29:38PM +0100, Aaron Isotton wrote:
Hi,
(sorry for the overlong subject).
I originally sent this to debian-doc but I got no answers, so I
thought I'd post it here too.
Because debian-doc was busy discussing other things and your proposed
document had not much
Title: ??
---
---
http://www.ArtsOfChina.com
10
?
? ?
Dear friends , welcome to china!www.acweb.com
have you ever heard of China?
have you ever been to China?
have you some Chinese friends?
do you want to work in China?
do you want to teach Chinese students learning English?
you know? foreign friends are extremly respected in China and they can
VCDVCD50
1VCD001 ?2
VCD002 ?1
,,!!!
!!
2VCD003 ()2
VCD004
,,,!!!
3VCD005 ()2
,,!!!
4VCD006 ??2
VCD007 ??2
2008
5VCD008 ?T?,2
3800
2000
6VCD009 3
2/3500,
31!
7CD001 ?
Hi,
Is it possible to configure email forwading in https://db.debian.org/
such that emails are sent to two addresses?
I tried separating two addresses with a space and also with a comma, but
it didn't seem to work.
Thanks!
Peter
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:08, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: geramik
Description : A GTK theme which imitates the KDE 3.1 look
This package should follow the naming scheme for GTK+ 2 theme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 16:57:20 +0900
Source: mozilla-locale-ko
Binary: mozilla-locale-ko
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: A Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: A Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 23:56:03 -0800
Source: libsndfile
Binary: libsndfile1 libsndfile1-dev sndfile-programs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 09:38:51 +0100
Source: t-prot
Binary: t-prot
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 02:51:02 -0400
Source: lvm2
Binary: lvm2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.95.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 02:16:28 -0400
Source: devmapper
Binary: dmsetup libdevmapper0 libdevmapper-dev kernel-patch-device-mapper
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.96.07-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andres Salomon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 23:59:17 -0400
Source: keepalived
Binary: keepalived
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andres Salomon [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:42:34 +0100
Source: mailx
Binary: mailx
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:8.1.2-0.20020411cvs-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 23:19:56 +0100
Source: smb2www
Binary: smb2www
Architecture: source all
Version: 980804-17.pre18.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Luberda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:24:52 -0800
Source: pornview
Binary: pornview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:56:00 +0100
Source: selinux-small
Binary: selinux-policy-default selinux libselinux-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2002102211-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:51:26 +0100
Source: sane-backends
Binary: libsane-dev sane-utils libsane
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.9-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:06:45 +
Source: gkrellmms
Binary: gkrellmms
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.8-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Søren Boll Overgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Søren Boll Overgaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2002 11:30:00 +0100
Source: galrey
Binary: galrey
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gaetano Paolone (bigpaul) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gaetano Paolone (bigpaul)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:40:00 +0100
Source: awesfx
Binary: awesfx
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Noel Koethe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Noel Koethe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:25:42 +0100
Source: fnord
Binary: fnord
Architecture: source
Version: 1.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:49:33 +0100
Source: openmotif
Binary: libmotif3 motif-clients libmotif-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerd Knorr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:50:46 +0100
Source: gtkmathview
Binary: libgtkmathview-dev libgtkmathview0 libgtkmathview-bin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:45:23 +0100
Source: brltty
Binary: brltty-udeb brltty
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mario Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mario Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:38:04 +0100
Source: vnc
Binary: libvncauth0 xvncviewer libvncauth-dev vnc-common vncserver
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.3.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:05:52 -0700
Source: cl-uffi
Binary: cl-uffi
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.6
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2002 19:05:34 -0100
Source: dnsmasq
Binary: dnsmasq
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
dnsmasq- A caching DNS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 09:11:45 -0700
Source: cl-pdf
Binary: cl-pdf
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.46-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:21:40 -0500
Source: bogofilter
Binary: bogofilter
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 21:35:20 -0600
Source: hesiod
Binary: libhesiod0 hesiod libhesiod-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.0.2-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
