Report about packages that need work for Apr 11, 2003
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 63
Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 3
Total number of orphaned packages: 196
Number of packages orphaned this week: 26
The number in parenthesis after each package name is
There are currently about 200 orphaned packages, many of which have been
on WNPP for quite a long time and some with RC bugs. I intend to request
the removal of the following packages in two weeks unless a package has
been adopted by someone until then. If you want to keep one of the
following
Title: FRAGRÂNCIAS FAMOSAS
FRAGRÂNCIAS FAMOSAS?
Azzaro, Dolce Gabbana, Angel,
Pólo, Armani,
Chanel 5, Gabriela Sabatini,
Paco, 212,
CK One,
Bvlgari
entre
outras 62 fragrâncias diferentes.
Preço?
Só R$ 31,00 e você ainda recebe em casa.
(FRETE GRÁTIS)
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, BugScan reporter wrote:
Package: xshipwars-server (debian/main)
Maintainer: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
150411 [P ] xshipwars-server: POSIX shell incompatibilities
173966 [ ] xshipwars-server: won't uninstall unless the server is
running!
This package has
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:06:29AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
This package has is taged patch to one bug and in fact includes another
patch in the text of the other bug which is tagged pending. Moreover
it contains an offer from Colin Watson to sponsor the package from
half a year ago. I
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Mark Brown wrote:
This package has is taged patch to one bug and in fact includes another
patch in the text of the other bug which is tagged pending. Moreover
it contains an offer from Colin Watson to sponsor the package from
half a year ago. I guess someone should
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, BugScan reporter wrote:
Package: xscreensaver (debian/main)
Maintainer: Karl Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
171772 [ ] Alarm clock error
180063 [ ] xscreensaver: exit on X Error after any authentication
attempt
Xscreensaver has a lot of bugs tagged pending, a lot
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 10:56:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi!
I'm just packaging planets (#187988) which is written in ML and
compiled with ocaml. The problem is that the ocaml linker uses the
rpath feature (i. e. hardcoded libary paths).
Yes, it does ...
It seems to be against Debian
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:03:50AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Could you please be so kind to ask the maintainer whether he want to
continue maintaining?
Will do.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:06:29AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, BugScan reporter wrote:
Package: xshipwars-server (debian/main)
Maintainer: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
150411 [P ] xshipwars-server: POSIX shell incompatibilities
173966 [ ]
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:13:01AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Moreover I wonder if I'm correct if suspect that the files
/usr/share/xscreensaver/config
belong to /etc because it might be possible to change these xml files
to influence the behaviour of the hacks so they are
Putz piada essa msg aqui né
This lists isn't for marketing!
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:18:13
Alexandre Venturini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FRAGRÂNCIAS FAMOSAS
FRAGRÂNCIAS FAMOSAS?
Azzaro, Dolce Gabbana, Angel,
Pólo, Armani, Chanel 5, Gabriela Sabatini,
Paco,
* Jeremy Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030410 23:59]:
Can someone point me the message(s) discussing /run (and why not
/etc/run) - I would like to think that adding another directory off /
should be avoided. /etc/run sounds nice, unless you want to support
booting before /etc is mounted...
On
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: exim-mysql
Version : 3.36
Upstream Author : Mark Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian exim upstream)
* URL : http://www.exim.org/
* License : GPL
Description : An MTA (Mail
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
Hold it for a bit, please. I've been talking to the maintainer privately
for the last week. An upload is waiting until the new libjsw is
accepted.
Thanks
Andreas.
--
Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind.
John F.
* Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030410 22:52]:
What's wrong with /lib/ for 64 bits libs and /lib/32/ for the 32 bit
legacy stuff (note the slash).
Ofcourse, they'll get the rpath thing wrong and commercial applications
are going to insist on /lib64, shiver.
Well, it's written
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: common-lisp-devel
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Kevin Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : [ No yet written ]
* License : BSD
Description : Metapackage for Common Lisp
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 06:38:23AM -0300, Rodrigo Tadeu Claro wrote:
Putz piada essa msg aqui n?
This lists isn't for marketing!
1) Please don't reply to spam.
2) If you must reply to spam, please don't quote the whole thing!
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 12:54:34PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I suggest we remove packages which haven't entered testing after more
more then 300 days.
Packages can be stuck out of testing due to their dependencies, so 300 days
of lag only
On Fri Apr 11, 11:47am +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
* Package name: exim-mysql
Version : 3.36
I already packaged with one (exim compiled with mysql and tls support).
I needed it personally, with the provided debian exim package a
recompile is necessary to use a mysql backend.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcommons-dbcp-java
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Jakarta Apache group
* URL : http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbcp/
* License : Apache Software License
Description : Database Connection Pooling
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:08:56PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:32:48AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I was surprised that neither of you contacted me as Xpdf maintainer,
Hmm, well. I've yet to take a closer look at how much gpdf xpdf source
are alike; I only
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:47:23AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
* Package name: exim-mysql
[...]
I already packaged with one (exim compiled with mysql and tls support).
I needed it personally, with the provided debian exim package a
recompile is necessary to use a mysql backend.
[...]
On Fri Apr 11, 02:25pm +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
http://pkg-exim4.alioth.debian.org/
Ack, sorry, I didn't realise you guys were uploading to experimental now
:)
pgp5PKNAFgS4V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:26:38 +, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
What I propose to do is to slightly extend fakeroot to also intercept
open/diropen. If the open call would create a file, redirect it to
/.../debian/tmp or some such location. If the call would open a file,
first check
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Build-Depends: [...] libmysqlclient-dev, libssl-dev
[license snipped]
You cannot distribute this, GPL and OpenSSL licenses are incompatible.
So how you exim4 guyes managed to get around that?
By the use of gnutls? If yes I'll switch to that one IF I continue
exim-mysql
David Pashley told me:
This is wrong. Philip Hazel is the upstream author. Mark Baker is the
maintainer for the exim packages. I suggest you talk to Mark and talk to
people on the exim4 mailing list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CCed).
Ok, but because I didn't know the correct one I wrote debian exim
* David B Harris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030411 13:05]:
On Fri Apr 11, 11:47am +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
* Package name: exim-mysql
Version : 3.36
I already packaged with one (exim compiled with mysql and tls support).
I needed it personally, with the provided debian exim
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 06:23:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 April 2003 16:43, Emile van Bergen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 03:33:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
# echo x86-64 /etc/dpkg/legal-archs
#
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 03:14:37PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Build-Depends: [...] libmysqlclient-dev, libssl-dev
[license snipped]
You cannot distribute this, GPL and OpenSSL licenses are incompatible.
So how you exim4 guyes managed to get around that?
By the use of
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:52:44PM -0300, Rodrigo Tadeu Claro wrote:
Hello!
I'm going to do it with name gtk-fm.
IMHO, gtk-* should be reserved to packages that are part of the GTK
project, or at least closely tied with it.
To me foo-bar implies that this packages is the bar part
I could not convince libpng maintainers to use versioned symbols because
they were apparently not available on AIX and Windows.
AIX is an ancient PoS. And Windows, well... :)
Symbol versioning is something that can be turned on and off where it is
available. Not using it because foo
Hi,
* Package name: exim-mysql
Personally, I do not like all those -mysql, -pgsql, -whatever packages.
Whatever happened to the idea of using a common database access library
like iODBC? It's reasonably small, Not A Burden if you happen to not
require any database lookup features, and it
http://people.debian.org/~dexter/fakeroot/
Have a good fun!
Nice. Very nice. Will you put that into the official fakeroot?
I really don't know. The fakeroot is not my project and I'm afraid my
patches are too experimental for such stable tool. Also there is too much
work with
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 03:30:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
They are in experimental, see
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=exim4searchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Rather than the obscenely ugly URL like that, use the convenient
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:50:20PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I really don't know. The fakeroot is not my project and I'm afraid my
patches are too experimental for such stable tool. Also there is too much
work with cleaning up the code. Should I start new project or join to the
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 03:30:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
[exim4]
At q.bofh.de are still backports to woody that work fine, also under
testing. (And at least the backports are really usable and have a
_very_ nice configuration setup. I can't say anything about
experimental, as I haven't
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:13:48AM -0500, BugScan reporter wrote:
Package: airsnort (debian/main)
Maintainer: Noel Koethe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
167901 [ ] [S] Unfullfilable Depends: prevents the package from
working (and Depends: not properly setup)
That bug only applies to woody, I
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 05:29:56PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:13:48AM -0500, BugScan reporter wrote:
[...]
Package: doc-rfc-std (debian/main)
Maintainer: Kai Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REMOVE]
111218 [ + ] Cannot install/remove
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xmms-speex
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Jens Burkal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://jzb.rapanden.dk/speex
* License : GPL
Description : Speex speech codec -
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:27:06AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:06:29AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, BugScan reporter wrote:
Package: xshipwars-server (debian/main)
Maintainer: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
150411 [P ] xshipwars-server:
Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
I really don't know. The fakeroot is not my project and I'm afraid my
patches are too experimental for such stable tool. Also there is too much
work with cleaning up the code. Should I start new project or join to the
original fakeroot?
Start a fakechroot project :)
I
Will these packages will still be available through archive.d.o or will
they be purged from there as well?
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
There are currently about 200 orphaned packages, many of which have been
on WNPP for quite a long time and some with RC bugs. I intend to
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 03:06:32AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
If you want to keep one of the following packages, please make sure to
- change the title of the bug from O: to ITA: as described on
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp
- make an upload to the archive, change the
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Joe Nahmias wrote:
Will these packages will still be available through archive.d.o or will
they be purged from there as well?
archive.d.o stores stable distros, and is never purged of packages
(although too old releases just might. Depends on the amount of space,
I
* Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-04-11 13:52]:
Will these packages will still be available through archive.d.o or
will they be purged from there as well?
They won't be removed from already released versions of Debian. So if
the packages were in potato or woody, they will be available
The Philadelphia Area Debian Society (PADS)
(http://www.CJFearnley.com/pads/)
Presents
Attempting a Debian Install on a Libretto 100CT
When:
Wednesday 16 April 2003, 8:00 PM - 9:30 PM
Presenter:
Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 April 2003 15:49, Emile van Bergen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 06:23:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2003 16:43, Emile van Bergen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 03:33:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
(I am resending this because the earlier version contained
a few minor errors. I suppose I should put this on the web
somewhere and post the link.)
(I repeat the call for people to look for files that are in
/etc/ but shouldn't be.)
Here are:
* an updated list of wishes filed,
* an updated TODO
I meant debian-devel, not [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;)
- Mensagem Reenviada de [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Data: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:55:40 +0100
De: Bruno David Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: ITP: bashish (retitle from RFP) -- theme-engine using bash and
other
POSIX shells
I am not currently using anything on the wnpp-list, but it
seems to me that not all these packages are better off gotten
rid off.
Does anyone know something about the importance of these
packages? Has/can someone run this against the popularity-contest?
My point is that I could prolly adopt a
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:49:20PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
AFAIK user-mode-linux require root access to set up the network
to have network access under uml.
No, this is only true for the tuntap transport. The slirp transport, for
example, requires no additional privileges, and it is not
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:42:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2003 15:49, Emile van Bergen wrote:
You do want to allow both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of libraries to be
installed, for which you need different package names; you want to avoid
adding fields to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 April 2003 23:17, Emile van Bergen wrote:
What I have in mind is something along the lines of
libfoo 'Provides: libfoo(32bit)'
lib64foo 'Provides: libfoo(64bit)'
bar 'Depends: libfoo($BITSIZE)'
I don't know if it's
On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 13:57, Lars Bahner wrote:
I am not currently using anything on the wnpp-list, but it
seems to me that not all these packages are better off gotten
rid off.
Does anyone know something about the importance of these
packages? Has/can someone run this against the
(sorry, i have easy enthusiasm, especially at 2:30 am ;)
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:39:46PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
TODO for etc/resolv.conf
Overview
* /etc/resolv.conf - /run/resolv.conf
* Networking daemon pidfiles go in /run/
* Resolv.conf-like files go
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 05:23:39PM -0700, Nathan Paul Simons wrote:
|
| [...] Most sound cards these days don't even *come* with wavetable
| synthesis, [...]
|
Er, the SBLive and its Creative brethren do, don't they? At least, I'm
presuming that's what sound fonts are for. Has it been removed
Hola a todos,
hace un par de dias me dispuse a ver la página
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=joduart%40alumni.uv.es
y me sorprendió ver el mensaje gpg key id not found, ya que mi llave
gpg sí está en bastantes servidores de llaves. Buscando información
sobre el tema he visto que
58 matches
Mail list logo
