Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ero un po' stanco ieri sera e ho dimenticato di dire una cosa
importante, cioe`, grazie, Federico, per il lavoro svolto.
Il gio, 2003-05-15 alle 00:16, David N. Welton ha scritto:
Finito il webbit, direi che e` ora di parlare di cosa e` andato
Il gio, 2003-05-15 alle 10:19, David N. Welton ha scritto:
Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*) Altro?
si. ci vorrebbe qualche proposta per l'anno prossimo. a parte la
disorganizazione dello stand dovuta all'overbooking i sembra che
siamo andati bene, ma sicuramente si
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Se siamo in tanti (cosa buona che mi ha fatto molto piacere!), magari
e` il caso di stabilire dei turni, in modo di lasciare un po' piu`
libero lo stand.
era previsto ma, come ho detto, hanno fatto overbooking e la gente del
turno out non aveva nessun posto in cui
ciao a *,
per il webb.it 2002 eravamo senza soldi degli sponsor e decidemmo
(alcuni qui a torino) di far fare noi le magliette e recuperare i soldi
dopo la vendita. con l'andar del tempo quelle magliette le abbiamo
vendute tutte e per questo webb.it le abbiamo rifatte (e vendute tutte)
usando i
Bonjour,
J'ai récemment rencontré un développeur Debian qui vient d'arriver
à Paris et nous avons échangé nos empreintes GPG selon la procédure
habituelle. Ma carte de visite, sur laquelle est incrite mon
empreinte, ne mentionne que mon adresse @debian.org.
Le développeur en question a
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:37:02AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Bonjour,
J'ai récemment rencontré un développeur Debian qui vient d'arriver
à Paris et nous avons échangé nos empreintes GPG selon la procédure
habituelle. Ma carte de visite, sur laquelle est incrite mon
empreinte, ne
En réponse à Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Note qu'en reprenant les arguments que tu as cité, si le mec se fait
virer après que la personne qui veut signer la clé ait sondé l'adresse
email, le problème est le meme :-)
deluid fonctionne bien, autant l'utiliser :p
Donc pour répondre à
Salut,
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:37:02AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Le développeur en question a récupéré ma clé mais ne l'a signée que
pour l'UID @debian.org alors que celle-ci contient d'autres UID, et
ceci pour des raisons de sécurité. Je n'ai pas réussi à obtenir
d'explications
Georges Khaznadar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Arnaud Vandyck a écrit :
| Est-ce quelqu'un saurait expliquer les problèmes et risques ou
| pourrait me diriger vers une documentation claire ?
Imaginons que je sois très méchant, et que j'aie réussi à trouver un
...
ne reçois aucun message,
Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salut,
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:37:02AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Le développeur en question a récupéré ma clé mais ne l'a signée que
pour l'UID @debian.org alors que celle-ci contient d'autres UID, et
ceci pour des raisons de sécurité. Je
On Thu, 15 May 2003 07:17, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hello. My spam protection system is unsure about your message. Since
you're reading this, your email isn't spam ;-) -- please either sign your
emails to me, or send a short confirmation to the address my name-abqux
at domain so that and your
On Thu, 15 May 2003 05:27, Chad Walstrom wrote:
It is a shame that such a simple scuffle on-list has sent you packing.
Someone who gives up so easily would never last.
Everyone gets flamed on occasion, if you can't deal with it you can't survive
on a popular mailing list. The Internet is not
http://www.richful-hk.com
16Alexa
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
There is no shortage of opinions about what we should do, but there is
unlikely to be any action until an I arises who actually does the work.
This has been discussed over and over with the same result each time
(i.e., no action).
Two answers:
(a) Before I do
Hi, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I would. If I ever get a message like that, I would be
grateful -- It'll allow me to add yet another obnoxious auto-reply to
my spam filters.
Well, thanks for the feedback.
Rest assured you shall never get email from me, or any official
posiiton I may
* Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
There is no shortage of opinions about what we should do, but there is
unlikely to be any action until an I arises who actually does the work.
This has been discussed over and over with the same result each time
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long
as I have been aware. See the security team FAQ.
deb http://mirror.pacific.net.au/debian-security/ stable/updates main
Do you honestly think would be a
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman arranged a set of bits
into the following:
There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long
as I have been aware. See the security team FAQ.
FALSE.
There are at least several mirrors. I myself use them as for
Manoj Srivastava wrote :
On Tue, 13 May 2003 09:12:25 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maintainers or developers do not have a say on how translations are
done except for gettext sintax errors. If you do not like how a
translation team works, but you do
Clay Crouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My most humble apologies.
It has become quite clear that the culture that the DD community
shares has evolved in my absence. My absence disallowed me to
evolve with it. The culture you now enjoy is not the one I left.
I truly didn't expect to be attacked
On Thu, 15 May 2003 14:37, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Ahem. Your email wouls have to contain a few highly unlikely phrases to be
classified as uncertain by me. FWIW, yours ends up as
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-42.6 required=5.0
Sorry, if you are only using that when spamassasin records it as a
Joe Buck wrote:
However, the output is redundant in many cases.
Fixed now.
--
Björn
80 20
100M+100M
asp/php/cgi/access 200/
999+++
100/
!
QQ 9651016 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 14 May 2003 16:05, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:24:25PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Usually this is controlled by the Content-Disposition: header.
Content-Disposition: inline should be displayed inline;
Content-Disposition: attachment will often be hidden until
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:57:58PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:14:53AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I'm sorry, I am on a public terminal, and can't quite remember where I
read it - But testing should always be close to a releasable state.
That assumption is both false
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is, after all, more than just a herd of cats.
How on earth did you get that quaint idea?
From looking at Debian. It is far more structured, organised and controlled
than the great majority of free software projects out there.
If you want a universally held firm
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 01:03:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2003 19:17:50 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:18:04AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
As a package developer I hold veto powers over anything shipped
Hi, Stephen Frost wrote:
(a) Before I do something like that, I'd need to be accepted as DD.
False statement.
So non-DDs can get accounts on Debian machines to setup something like
this (install FTP directories, setup autobuilders, etc.)?
If that's so, cool, I'll have free time in two weeks
Keegan Quinn wrote:
Funny how myself and every admin I know have only very minor issues with
running unstable. What, pray tell, makes it such an 'obvious' non-option
for end users?
How about constantly repeated statements to the effect?
So you did not even look at the release announcement,
Hi, Stephen Frost wrote:
honestly, if you care enough about what other people think to not take
any action on your own chances are pretty good whatever you did wouldn't
get very far anyway.
My approach is somewhat different. I freely admit that I'm fairly new to
Debian and probably have some
Hi, Chris Leishman wrote:
- If the build is successful, it's available for apt-getting from
testing-updates; otherwise the maintainer gets a helpful ;-) email.
I'm just curious why the updates couldn't just go straight into testing
itself. It's not as if the testing distribution is frozen
Hello!
I was wondering how to improve mailcap system to become useful.
First step was to able mc use mailcap. Now, I want to make nautilus to
use mailcap. And I have a few questions.
1. Where nautilus (gnome2?) keeps info about mime types?
2. (more complicated) Does run-mailcap differs x and non
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Take the harden package, or create something similar: a package that
conflicts with all versions of packages with known security holes.
Why not just /fix/ the holes? Is
Bob Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all who replied to my recent question on this subject.
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With glibc I'd use
iconv --from=SRC-ENCODING --to=DST-ENCODING//TRANSLIT
if it is acceptable to change the length of strings. This will
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:51:42AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2003 09:14:20 -0400, Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If that's the case, then maybe the testing distribution has outlived
its usefulness. But if people feel otherwise, then it would make
sense to
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:19:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long
as I have been aware. See the security team FAQ.
deb
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
On Wednesday 14 May 2003 04:53 pm, Björn Stenberg wrote:
What's worse, saying testing is not for public use means there is _no_
place to get updates, since unstable is obviously not an option for end
users. This makes Debian the
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:10:35AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:22:27AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:02:27PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is a far cry from ``Do not touch l10n files''.
Hey, this was the subject, I had to get
Hello,
# partimage
Error: volume hedaer size != 512 (520)
This version has been compiled with an uncompatible version of
gcc.
I received this bug report (#193391) today and I cannot reproduce it on
i386. Looks like a problem on powerpc. I'm not very familiar with
powerpc.
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:17:50PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
[...]
As a package developer I hold veto powers over anything
shipped in my package, since it is my signature that goes with it,
and I am responsible for all bugs.
You do hold upstream responsible for
Hi,
I just catched this conversation on the misc OpenBSD mailinglist.
Does this in any way afflict debian?
greets Uwe
--
X-Tec GmbH
Institute for Computer and Network Security
WWW : http://www.x-tec.de/
IPv6: http://www.ipv6.x-tec.de/
---BeginMessage---
I'd like to encourage the OpenBSD
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: latex209
Version : 25.mar.1992
Upstream Author : Leslie Lamport
* URL or Web page :
ftp://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/obsolete/macros/latex209/distribs/latex209.tar.gz
* License : Public Domain
Description : Commands and
Hi,
There is currently no consensus whether translated man pages should
be shipped along with original man pages or within manpages-xx packages.
Unfortunately this leads to conflicts when a translation is first
shipped by the latter, then incorporated into the former (e.g. when
it becomes part of
There must be some mistake :-m
Joey Hess dijo:
Tor Slettnes
mindi
mondo
smail
xcdroast
yard
zmailer
zmailer-ssl
These are Héctor García's and he is not MIA at all.
What happened?
--
I would rather starve than lose your acceptance
80 20
100M+100M
asp/php/cgi/access 200/
999+++
100/
!
QQ 9651016 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:04:39AM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
Hello!
I was wondering how to improve mailcap system to become useful.
First step was to able mc use mailcap. Now, I want to make nautilus to
use mailcap. And I have a few questions.
1. Where nautilus (gnome2?) keeps info about mime
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:24:14AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
Hi,
There is currently no consensus whether translated man pages should
be shipped along with original man pages or within manpages-xx packages.
Unfortunately this leads to conflicts when a translation is first
shipped by the
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:24:14AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
There is currently no consensus whether translated man pages should
be shipped along with original man pages or within manpages-xx packages.
Unfortunately this leads to conflicts when a translation is first
shipped by the latter,
W licie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 11:54, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
If you already parsed mailcap into mc's configuration, you should've
seen this (picking out a random one):
application/vnd.sun.xml.draw; openoffice '%s'; edit=openoffice '%s';
test=test $DISPLAY != ; description=OpenOffice.org
Sorry, my terminal was too small to check all the replies in the thread,
including Hector's himself 0:-)
Glad to see this clarified.
--
I would rather starve than lose your acceptance
.''`.My eyes will always show my empty soul
: :' :- Boy Sets
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030514 15:42]:
organization, though. Tollef, do you know if there'll be wireless base
stations around or, will we be doing ad-hoc mode?)
yes, there will be wlan. not user about the mode of operation.
and there will also be some stationary pcs there.
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Take the harden package, or create something similar: a package that
conflicts with all versions of
* Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-04-27 18:12]:
Martin, while maintaining the archive, contacted me, because he wanted to
remove the orpahaned ipchains-perl module. He noticed, that my fwctl is
depending on it.
So here is my question, is anybody willing to take over
Ok, I've been trying to stay out of this as much as possible, since I think
Denis' original post:
So I would like to ask developers not to edit l10n files (templates,
PO files, etc) themselves; if you believe that something goes wrong,
notify the translator or his translation team (or
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:11:03PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 11:54, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
If you already parsed mailcap into mc's configuration, you should've
seen this (picking out a random one):
application/vnd.sun.xml.draw; openoffice '%s';
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Take the harden package, or create
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Take the harden package, or create
W licie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:00, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
Here's your error: if you do that, it's not the user who can change his
browser, but the system administrator. Those two are not always the
same.
But, does it eliminate my soluton? As you wrote later, user always can
change
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:24:42PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:00, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
Here's your error: if you do that, it's not the user who can change his
browser, but the system administrator. Those two are not always the
same.
But, does it
W licie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:30, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
I really think it would be a bad idea to go the alternatives road here.
But why? Could you give me any reasons? I've said why yes, so you tell
why not ;]
If you must, you could write a front-end that parses /etc/mailcap, and
for
On Thu, 15 May 2003 12:11:03 +0200, mcINEK wrote:
[...]
We see a conflict. It doesn't matter how many browser user installed,
always will be run galeon (it's above so it's first - am I right?).
The best solution, I think, is that galeon (mozilla, etc) shouldn't
provide a /etc/mailcap record,
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:35:22PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:30, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
I really think it would be a bad idea to go the alternatives road here.
But why? Could you give me any reasons? I've said why yes, so you tell
why not ;]
Alternatives
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:13:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM
W licie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:49, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
Alternatives and mailcap are two different worlds. Please keep them
separated.
OK, so leave alternatives.
It won't work, because the aren't any 'standards'. I don't have idea how
make x/non-x choice from mailcap. I REALLY
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:04:14PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
Ok, I've been trying to stay out of this as much as possible, since I think
Denis' original post:
So I would like to ask developers not to edit l10n files (templates,
PO files, etc) themselves; if you believe that something goes
* Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:04:14PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
I'm also quite upset to see off hand insults - I've never claimed to know
what a foreign language should look like, what we've asked is for a
rational explanation as to why when we removed
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:13:32PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
It won't work, because the aren't any 'standards'. I don't have idea how
make x/non-x choice from mailcap. I REALLY think alternatives could be
good.
It's done in there, all over the place! There's a 'test' option, which
is
* Colin Watson
| (I'm not involved with the organization, though. Tollef, do you know
| if there'll be wireless base stations around or, will we be doing
| ad-hoc mode?)
The area is covered with WLANs already, but we'll have a few switches
for people who don't have wireless.
--
Tollef Fog
W licie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 14:30, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
Uh. You can create such a tree in-memory, no? Parsing the file is not
*that* hard.
Of course, I can. But I don't understand why don't improve BAD
mechanism. If sth is bad and doesn't pass our requests we should change
it. Is
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:26:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:13:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM
On Thu, May 15, 2003, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote:
I just catched this conversation on the misc OpenBSD mailinglist.
Does this in any way afflict debian?
This subject has already been discussed forever on debian-legal. The
general consensus is that without fee does not mean you may redistri-
* Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi, Stephen Frost wrote:
(a) Before I do something like that, I'd need to be accepted as DD.
False statement.
So non-DDs can get accounts on Debian machines to setup something like
this (install FTP directories, setup autobuilders, etc.)?
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
Hmm. Funny how myself and every admin I know have only very minor issues
with
running unstable. What, pray tell, makes it such an 'obvious' non-option for
end users? Well-timed unstable snapshots are often more 'stable' than
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:09:08AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I think it is proper to include translated man pages with original man
pages, and to use apt-localepurge (now) or dpkg exclusions (when they're
implemented) if people are worried about space. My gut feeling is that
I believe this
Le jeu 15/05/2003 à 14:49, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
The area is covered with WLANs already, but we'll have a few switches
for people who don't have wireless.
Side question: will there be a few machines for people who can't bring a
laptop ?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:46:34PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 14:30, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
Uh. You can create such a tree in-memory, no? Parsing the file is not
*that* hard.
Of course, I can. But I don't understand why don't improve BAD
mechanism.
I fail to
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:52:26AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi, Stephen Frost wrote:
(a) Before I do something like that, I'd need to be accepted as DD.
False statement.
So non-DDs can get accounts on Debian machines to setup
On Thu, May 15, 2003, someone calling themselves LapTop006 wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman arranged a set of
bits into the following:
There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long
as I have been aware. See the security team FAQ.
W licie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 15:23, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
I fail to see why it would be bad. It's not perfect, but that's far from
the same thing. Moreover, I think your ideas would make things worse,
rather than better.
It's not perfect. Importand bugs are for me:
* doesn't allow to
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 07:32:55AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
The situation is very different from the situation maintainer face with
upstream code because in fact apt should be able to install l10n packages
related to a given program package when it installs the program package.
So
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:27:07PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
so maybe it was actually only filed in my brain (which has no web
interface) ...
We need a bug system for developer's brains.
Agreed...
$ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -s Misplacement of apostrophes
Package: doogie
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:25:56PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
* Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:04:14PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
I'm also quite upset to see off hand insults - I've never claimed to know
what a foreign language should look like, what we've
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:35:33PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 15:23, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
I fail to see why it would be bad. It's not perfect, but that's far from
the same thing. Moreover, I think your ideas would make things worse,
rather than better.
It's
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:19:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Do you honestly think would be a good idea to use testing-security this way
on a continual basis?
Yes, I do. I think we should release DSA's for security
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:53:50PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
Manoj's answer, while witty, is closer to the mark than you may
realize.
Debian will always be for whoever the people contributing to Debian
are willing/want it to be for. No more, no less.
Um, when we all agreed to be Debian
W licie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 15:42, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
Yes it does. Create a ~/.mailcap with the application of your choice for
a given MIME-type at the top.
My suggestion of a front-end was to create some application that would
help $USER to manage ~/.mailcap.
I think it's good
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
Sure, every now and then a badly-broken package makes it in for a
day or two. This seems to be far less harmful than the massive
headache that treating 'testing' as a usable release seems to be
causing.
Something that would make
Hi all
Currently we have both OpenMosix and Mosix in our main archive.
See http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/ and http://www.mosix.com/
for background information. Both software provide the same
features for clustering (but IMHO OpenMosix is more actively developed
and has more prospectives,
On 14 May 2003, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I would recommend this. When I was in Bordeaux in 2000 without my own
Laptop
it was much less fun. :-( The educational effect decreases drastically!
Well, that sould definatly interesting. I just hope I manage to get a
laptop 'till then. Or would
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
You again forget that debian is not x86 only, or do you expect Matthias
to have access to machines of all the supported arches ?
Right.
Besides, I don't want to do this on my own, I want to do this as part of
Debian. I don't yet know enough about the setup of
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:05:28PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
Please point me to where I said we should leave things as they are.
You didn't say that, but you want use *minimal* solution, which aren't
always good.
PS1. Windows are done this way. MS created took w2k and sticked
more,more and more
On Tue 13 May 2003, James Troup wrote:
Of the 191 pings were sent out:
o 34 people's ping bounced[1].
o 28 people replied asking to be retired.
o 29 people replied with various different responses.
o 10 people replied who were active.
o 90 people didn't reply within the 2 month
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q: is content-disposition handled properly, especially for
messag/rfc822 type attachments? (Or if not, are message attachments
displayed inline by default?)
Gnus: yes (since 5.8.0, the first MIME-aware version)
(Yes,
W licie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 16:38, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
What's that supposed to mean? Doing that does have its advantages, too
(such as you don't have to re-integrate everything with the new
system).
Granted, pushing that to extremes will end you up with an unworkable
system with
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:19:08AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
If unstable has a fix for the bug, then it is a waste of time to work on
testing because users can just upgrade. If unstable does not have a fix
for the bug, then it is still a waste of time because unstable needs to
be
Hi, Sergio Rua wrote:
# partimage
Error: volume hedaer size != 512 (520)
This version has been compiled with an uncompatible version of
gcc.
I'll check. Sergio: Which source package from where, please?
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
Sure, every now and then a badly-broken package makes it in for a
day or two. This seems to be far less harmful than the massive
headache that treating 'testing'
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
Sure, every now and then a badly-broken package makes it in for a
day or two. This seems to be far less harmful than the massive
headache that treating 'testing'
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
package to re-install. If you're not a developer, you don't have
access to archives, so your choice is to either go back to the stable
or testing version of the package, or try to find a mirror that still
With the pool system the
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:53:32PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 16:38, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
What's that supposed to mean? Doing that does have its advantages, too
(such as you don't have to re-integrate everything with the new
system).
Granted, pushing that
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
