On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:57:50PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
Cuba than in US. Really.
Who wouldn't? You got the sun, the beaches and the ocean... what more
could you ask for than a debconf on a beach?
--
Duncan Findlay
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:51:05AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
SuSE don't have a single kernel source either. They have a set of
a few hundred common patches plus some more patches (e.g. 200
for s390) that are used only for one architecture, usually both 32 and
64 bit. Single patches can be
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 06:32:26PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It's not noise at all when it's something that we and others (desperately!)
want to know about.
Then read through the prepatch diffs, everything adding checks to
ioctl methods or similar is likely one them.
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:10:20PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
in task_struct then perhaps so assuming that we care about it enough to do
it in such a way. Otherwise I don't see your point.
Are task_struct and mm_struct exposed to modules?
Yes.
they should need to be, but I am no
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:21:00AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 06:32:26PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It's not noise at all when it's something that we and others (desperately!)
want to know about.
Then read through the prepatch diffs, everything adding checks
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Hi,
[1] = Mono for Debian, ipv6 (is it official or unofficial?),
ddtp, ...
IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
Thanks
Fabio
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD
On Sat, 24 May 2003 08:43:12 +1000 (EST), Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Thu, 22 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:39:02 +1000, Russell Coker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
You mean the iraq war? What's the point?
On Fri, 23 May 2003 20:01:48 -0500, Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Not at all. I know that if your economy suffers, mine suffers doubly
so. Mexico is so heavily dependent on the US economy that if you
enter a mild recession we are in crisis... And it is not nice at
all.
The
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
I think that might be way, way too formal for what it is. I'm not too
fussed what it is called as it was setup
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:24:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
OK, barring any major objections, that's how it will be for 2.4.21.
Is there any possibility of having the various foo-modules-2.4.xx packages
be built concurrently with kernel-image-2.4.xx too?
Something like:
retitle 180188 ITA: Defoma -- Debian Font Manager
N.B. Here follows the description as is in the stable distribution:
Defoma, which stands for DEbian FOnt MAnager, provides a framework of
automatic font configuration. An application whose configuration of
fonts requires users' hand can make the
On Sun, 25 May 2003 15:11, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:21:00AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 06:32:26PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It's not noise at all when it's something that we and others
(desperately!) want to know about.
Then read
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Craig Small wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
I think that might be way, way too formal for what it is. I'm not too
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:11:44AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Then read through the prepatch diffs, everything adding checks to
ioctl methods or similar is likely one them.
This approach does not scale.
Right, you got it. Similarly it doesn't scale to announce all these
bits. Just
On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 02:14, Debian Font Manager wrote:
retitle 180188 ITA: Defoma -- Debian Font Manager
I see defoma has become so complex it now is capable of maintaining
itself :)
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:04:43AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:57:50PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
Cuba than in US. Really.
Who wouldn't? You got the sun, the beaches and the ocean... what more
could you
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Having kernel modules associated with the kernel source package they're
built for makes it a bunch easier to make sure they're deleted from
the archive along with the corresponding kernel images, and makes sure
that when someone uploads a new
On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
living.
Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the consequences.
And what is US trying to do to
On Saturday 24 May 2003 00:43, Matthew Palmer wrote:
* The rest of the world is sick to death of US imperialism;
* The US government ignores world opinion and does it's thing;
* The rest of the world puts pressure on the US people to change things,
since they've at least got half a chance to
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:33:04PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Having kernel modules associated with the kernel source package they're
built for makes it a bunch easier to make sure they're deleted from
the archive along with the corresponding kernel
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
living.
Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt _any_
country, or its economy, they shall have to live with the
On Sun, 25 May 2003 19:33, Herbert Xu wrote:
In the long term, we should have as few binary module packages as
possible. They should either be integrated into our kernel-source
if it is popular enough or made source-only so that the people who
really need them can build them privately. I
I'm not officially orphaning it yet, but if anybody cares about this
please take it, as I'm not using it much.
Package: lft
Priority: optional
Section: net
Version: 2.1-1
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.1-1), libpcap0.7
Size: 33910
Description: display the route packets take to a network host/socket
lft
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 08:20:39PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
What is the status of the pcmcia support anyway?
Seems to work fine. Red Hat uses inkernel pcmcia at least.
There's some pcmcia drivers not (yet?) merged in the kernel but patching
them in is rather easy.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 25 May 2003 06:19, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:51:05AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
As a real-world example, kernel-patch-s390 can provide
the ptrace bug fix from Martin Schwidefsky, while
kernel-patch-debian
About http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=183858
Given the information I previously provided, I do not even understand
how it's possible to think that the bug 183858 is a kernel issue.
I'm not familiar with the kernel neither with coreutils code.
That said, I explicitely said when
I've just compiled coreutils 4.5.3 and still got the bug.
So the bug is maybe really a kernel issue, but informations when
closing bug is still important. And the bug exists, even if it need to
be reassigned.
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english
Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=183858
Given the information I previously provided, I do not even understand
how it's possible to think that the bug 183858 is a kernel issue.
The problem is that the kernel provides no way to
get the
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 09:23:44AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:11:44AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Then read through the prepatch diffs, everything adding checks to
ioctl methods or similar is likely one them.
This approach does not scale.
Right,
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:09:51PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2003 15:11, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
This approach does not scale. I cannot personally review the diffs for
every upstream release of all the software in Debian, nor can any other
individual or even a small group.
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 02:34:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
When building kernel-image-s390, make-kpkg would first apply
the arch specific patches and the the arch independent ones that
have not been superceded by an arch specific one.
Again that's a very bad idea.
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
The problem is that the kernel provides no way to
get the required information.
s/no way/no reasonable way/
It is possible to parse /proc/cpuinfo (that's what the experimental
patch in the debian coreutils-4.5.2-1 did) but that's a
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Also, he seems to have no official status whatsoever; if he's serious
about wanting to maintain stuff, he is welcome to go through the NM
process.
Part of the NM process can be packaging by way of a sponsor. I would guess that
it's common for a person's advocate (required to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:43:13AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:58:35PM +0200, Sebastian Muszynski wrote:
Hello all!
I am getting a lintian error, binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath although i run
configure with --disable-rpath option. It is no automake problem...
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:13:29PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
from time to time, especially while upgrading a lot of packages I notice
debconfig questions for packages I do not know. This is of course quite
likely given the size of debian archive and the fact, that task packages
introduce a
This one time, at band camp, Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
i would hope not, though, in this case, it does not
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
The problem is that the kernel provides no way to
get the required information.
s/no way/no reasonable way/
It is possible to parse /proc/cpuinfo (that's what the experimental
patch
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:00:07PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
That said, removing -p and -i option may be problematic. It should be
done upstream.
I'm tired of people complaining about the unknown entries. They're not
required and they are useless on these systems, so there's no point in
having
On 25 May 2003 12:20:45 +0200, Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
living.
Quite. But if they take delibrate action to hurt
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:16:21AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:59:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Have you seen US developers try to raise common cause here to
boycott French products and conferences in France (because of what
some consider their silly stnace in removing a dictator from power)?
No? How many of you
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:41:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:43:13AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:58:35PM +0200, Sebastian Muszynski wrote:
Hello all!
I am getting a lintian error, binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath although i run
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On 25 May 2003 12:20:45 +0200, Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Sunday 25 May 2003 07:27, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Remember, the rest of the world does *not* owe you and yours a
living.
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is
miserable.
Which part of the US?
Sorry I should have said Northeast US. It's absolutely miserable here.
Surely the weather in Los Angeles
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
Notice that the US governement never said that was their aim,
The aim is Kralizec -- the typhoon struggle.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
Cuba than in US. Really.
So let me get this straight. Instead of a country where people are
occasionally subject to bureaucratic hassles, (assuming Russell and
Geordies' sources amount to
Hello,
I want to package GnuMed which is a Python application accessing
PostgreSQL server.
http://bugs.debian.org/166282
It comes with a Python bootstrap routine. That means the postinst
script would need a working Python and PostgreSQL server installed.
I think I would solve this by a
Graham Wilson wrote:
i would hope not, though, in this case, it does not matter, since aaron
responded before moron did.
Passing a package off is not a race to post first. If I am passing a
package on, I will pick whomever I feel is best suited to maintain it.
And yes, that will generally be
Now that GNOME (via pango) and KDE (via the upcoming Qt 3.2.0) have viable
support, I wonder if there is any interest in a sub-project for increasing
the support for Indian languages within Debian?
The goals of Debian-IN as I see it would be to
1. Package Indic software or write it as
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
I want to package GnuMed which is a Python application accessing
PostgreSQL server.
http://bugs.debian.org/166282
It comes with a Python bootstrap routine. That means the postinst script
would need a working Python and
Hi,
I'm perplexed about the mailing list request about Exim.
On one hand, exim is an important package, and there are already ample
precedents like debian-apache, debian-ssh and debian-tetex-maint;
but on the other hand, there's alioth.debian.org which allows for easier
creation and maintenance
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:03:36PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
but on the other hand, there's alioth.debian.org which allows for easier
creation and maintenance of per-package mailing lists.
we should generally decide to migrate (all) mailinglists, or only create new
project mailinglists and not
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 10:34:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hi,
$Subject. Enjoy.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x86-64/
thanks Josip!
CCing debian-devel as there likely are people interested around.
--
Robert Millan
make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop.
Another world is
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:36:39PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
Cuba than in US. Really.
So let me get this straight. Instead of a country where people are
occasionally subject to
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:36:39PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote:
PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
Cuba than in US. Really.
So let me get this straight. Instead of a country where people are
occasionally subject to
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:50:03PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
I want to package GnuMed which is a Python application accessing
PostgreSQL server.
http://bugs.debian.org/166282
It comes with a Python bootstrap
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:30:08PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:50:03PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
For python, you only need to declare Depends: python to ensure that python
is installed and configured when your postinst runs.
Wouldn't you need predepends?
No.
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:36:23PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
but on the other hand, there's alioth.debian.org which allows for easier
creation and maintenance of per-package mailing lists.
we should generally decide to migrate (all) mailinglists, or only create
new project mailinglists
On Sun, 25 May 2003 23:03:36 +0200, Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm perplexed about the mailing list request about Exim.
On one hand, exim is an important package, and there are already ample
precedents like debian-apache, debian-ssh and debian-tetex-maint;
but on the other hand, there's
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:53:31PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2003 23:03:36 +0200, Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm perplexed about the mailing list request about Exim.
On one hand, exim is an important package, and there are already ample
precedents like debian-apache,
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:53:31PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Please note that the mailing list request was filed months ago - well
before alioth went into service - and that your e-mail is the first
reaction to the bug report filed.
Yes, I know.
We actually discussed on the internal exim
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:19:57PM -0400, John Belmonte wrote:
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Also, he seems to have no official status whatsoever; if he's serious
about wanting to maintain stuff, he is welcome to go through the NM
process.
Part of the NM process can be packaging by way of a sponsor.
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 04:04:50PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
You might have made the effort of filling in the fields; I can't believe
the version is x.y.z, the upstream author is Name [EMAIL PROTECTED],
etc. Especially the license...
Obviously the upstream author is very flexible... ;-).
On Sat, 2003-05-24 at 15:27, Brian May wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
Do we need some method of deciding what constitutes 'the' Debconf?
No, as everyone knows that the only true Debconf are the ones in
Australia, with LCA.
Hehe, preach it brother ;-)
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yavipin
Version : 0.9.6
Upstream Author : Jerome Etienne jme at off.net
* URL : http://yavipin.sf.net/
* License : GPL [1]
Description : daemon for creating secure
This one time, at band camp, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Packages Developers
Looks like a normal distribution curve in gnuplot.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~jaq
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the
U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel
about the U.S. governments acts or positions?
When tourism
69 matches
Mail list logo
