Hi all,
Since upgrading to the latest unstable I have discovered that after my
startup reaches Setting up X socket server directory ... that I get no
further output at the terminal. I have confirmed this on two different
computers.
Neither the computers nor keyboards are locked up. I am able to
I wrote:
The bug is most likely caused by initscripts, sysvinit or sysv-rc. If
you have upgraded you may wish to downgrade/wait for a fix before
rebooting, especially if your computer doesn't automatically boot into
X.
I have confirmed that downgrading to initscripts_2.85-4.1_all.deb
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 06:14:01PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:
I wrote:
The bug is most likely caused by initscripts, sysvinit or sysv-rc. If
you have upgraded you may wish to downgrade/wait for a fix before
rebooting, especially if your computer doesn't automatically boot into
X.
I
Hi Geordie Birch,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 06:14:01PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:
I wrote:
The bug is most likely caused by initscripts, sysvinit or sysv-rc. If
you have upgraded you may wish to downgrade/wait for a fix before
rebooting, especially if your computer doesn't automatically
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 10:57:51PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| An NM can do little more if he sees a problem in the Debian way of
| doing things.
You can't change a system from the outside.
Actually that's not true. The mere observation of a system will change
it. Jamie, by just
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:28:15PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Why does a non-DD need to find
a DD to sign and forward the mail to dda? Why cant he sign it himself
and post it to the list? The message has to be approved by the moderator
anyway.
Mail to debian-devel-announce is
Hi Geordie Birch,
The bug is most likely caused by initscripts, sysvinit or sysv-rc. If
you have upgraded you may wish to downgrade/wait for a fix before
rebooting, especially if your computer doesn't automatically boot into
X.
I have confirmed that downgrading to
Hi Geordie Birch,
FWIW, I have version 2.85-5 of initscripts, sysvinit, and sysv-rc
installed and am not having any problems re. terminal output.
Upon standard bootup into a terminal it appears that output ceases before
the INIT: Entering Runlevel : 2 message but will start up again if the
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 06:45:26PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:
Hi Geordie Birch,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 06:14:01PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:
I wrote:
I have confirmed that downgrading to initscripts_2.85-4.1_all.deb
sysv-rc_2.85-4.1_all.deb and sysvinit_2.85-4.1_i386.deb will resolve
* Jamin W. Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-07-21 18:52]:
Because the DAM hadn't had a chance to evaluate their application yet?
He hasn't had a chance to review an application that's been waiting on
him (not an AM or other, but DAM) for over a year? I find that
extremely laughable.
Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Request for help are usually very ineffective; examples: apt's
maintainer asked for help and didn't get any (with the exception that
mdz has started more apt work, but he worked on apt before so
effectively there are no new
Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader (2003-07-22 09:07:27 +0100) :
[...]
At the same time I observe that this thread has generated much hot
air, but I didn't see any proposal of who could act as DPL.
I know some Branden guy who's repeatedly volunteered to do that over
the years :-)
IMHO, the DAM wait is only one part of the problem. A lot of would-be
developers are already pleased to find a mentor/uploader. To my personal
experience, RFS in debian-mentors gives only a limited response and even
if you manage to get somebody interested, some mentors seem to disappear
from the
http://www.infrastructures.org/papers/bootstrap/bootstrap.html
--
Karl M. Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:17:50PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:
Hi Geordie Birch,
FWIW, I have version 2.85-5 of initscripts, sysvinit, and sysv-rc
installed and am not having any problems re. terminal output.
Upon standard bootup into a terminal it appears that output ceases before
the
Is there a list of developer accessible machines anywhere ?
A mirror of http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi would have been handy
Glenn
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Is there a list of developer accessible machines anywhere ?
A mirror of http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi would have been handy
I don't have a mirror, but http://zoy.org/~sam/machines.txt has a
list of machines I could log into and their $(ARCH).
* Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-07-22 10:53]:
Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader (2003-07-22 09:07:27 +0100) :
At the same time I observe that this thread has generated much hot
air, but I didn't see any proposal of who could act as DPL.
I know some Branden guy who's repeatedly
---
,
800
2000910
600
1230
20
350/
--,
hi
I just want to say that some time ago Dariush Pietrzak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I decided to package mplayer
when we uploaded for the first time, the ftp-installer had some (good)
reasons not to accept it
so we went into it and tried to clear all possible problems
w.r.t. DFSG: we sent e-mails
On mar, jui 22 09:17
Adam Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
[...]
This could explain how you were still able to see the login. I suspect if
you look harder at your terminal output you will see some of it is
missing. You could be fortunate that a kernel message restarted the
terminal output.
Hello
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:07:28PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
*SNIP*
( last time I tried, it looked as if there was some automatic filter that
drops mplayer from the incoming queue: indeed, I never received
the e-mail reply 'mplayer is new, please wait' that is
sent on upload of a new
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:56:18PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
You can place in the description field of debian/control something
like: Homepage: .. to provide the original package homepage.
What do you mean? Adding an unexpected field to
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:52:13AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 10:39:20AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
From a user's point of view it doesn't matter whether the lack of
security updates is due to technical problems
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:37:30PM -0800, Britton wrote:
How hard or unreasonable would it be to make it easy for users to sign up
for some sort of automated notification system which would keep them
informed about the status of packages they use? If I were a completely
pragmatic user, I
Hi A Mennucc1,
I just want to say that some time ago Dariush Pietrzak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I decided to package mplayer
when we uploaded for the first time, the ftp-installer had some (good)
reasons not to accept it
so we went into it and tried to clear all possible problems w.r.t.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adam Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since upgrading to the latest unstable I have discovered that after my
startup reaches Setting up X socket server directory ... that I get no
further output at the terminal. I have confirmed this on two different
computers.
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I agree on the Homepage field. Many times I've been asked by
not-so-expert debian users on how to find the homepage of a package
shipped with debian. Passing through copyright file is not so easy and
probably even not so appropriate.
A Homepage: field would then be okay?
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:42:51PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It may be difficult to get 3D acceleration for the gamer-card-of-the-week,
but by no means is it difficult to find a new graphics card which is
well-supported by XFree86 in woody.
a) You often do not have choice
Then you
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:09:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:52:13AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I assume you mean the software currently in testing, and I do. I also see
many more problems with sofware in unstable. RC bugs could be worried
about in a freeze.
Package: wnpp
Version: 0.16 ; reported 2003-07-22
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: camorama
Version : 0.16
Upstream Author : Greg Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://camorama.fixedgear.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Gnome2 tool for viewing,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:07:28PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
( last time I tried, it looked as if there was some automatic filter that
drops mplayer from the incoming queue: indeed, I never received
the e-mail reply 'mplayer is new, please wait' that is
sent on upload of a new package)
If
Hi Lucas Moulin,
I've upgraded my system yesterday, and I've seen the problem you're
talking about. Actually, I don't see any boot messages after Setting up
ICE socket..., but I see wdm starting, and I got the login prompt right
after. That makes me think this is bootlogd related.
It is. And
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:52:20AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
IMHO, the DAM wait is only one part of the problem. A lot of would-be
developers are already pleased to find a mentor/uploader. To my personal
experience, RFS in debian-mentors gives only a limited response and even
I can't speak
I am currently maintaining a number of astronomy related packages. I
am no longer working in astronomy though so I do not use any of these
packages any more, I thus have no way of really testing them. I also
do not really have the time to deal with them as I have taken on
several more packages
--[Martin Godisch]--[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Due to problems communicating with micq's upstream maintainer
Don't expect me to respond to a mail basically just reading say something.
If you have a question not already answered 100times, then ask it, but don't
come up with a contentless question.
are
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:50:49PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:42:51PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It may be difficult to get 3D acceleration for the
gamer-card-of-the-week,
but by no means is it difficult to find a new graphics card which is
I can't speak for other developers but personally I'd be reluctant to
sponsor a package I had no personal interest in.
I can understand this, but this creates a problem for a number of
packages. One of my packages is 'yepp', which loads mp3's on a Samsung
Yepp player. If it weren't for my
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:31:41PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The What, Debian 3.1 ships 10 CDs but this common program I need for my
work that was in Debian 3.0 is not included? would do much harm to the
reputation of Debian.
Have you actually looked at the list of buggy packages? I do
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:12:53AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
(Note that for example that while adding DAMs has been suggested nobody
has yet posted a list of prospective and capable candidates.)
You're breaking my balls, stop that, you're breaking my balls /cartman
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 04:07:44PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
Enrico Zini (2003-07-22 14:56:08 +0200) :
My talks archive is at:
http://people.debian.org/~enrico/talks/
I would like to suggest to anybody interested that we conform to this
sort of naming scheme. There are lots of
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:18:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:31:41PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The What, Debian 3.1 ships 10 CDs but this common program I need for my
work that was in Debian 3.0 is not included? would do much harm to the
reputation of Debian.
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
My point was that a good hardware vendor will give you a choice of graphics
cards, and if you don't need a fancy 3D card, you can get a high-quality 2D
card for the same price or less. I don't play 3D games on my workstations,
so I always go for these options.
You're
Steve Greenland wrote:
Don't these cards all support normal VESA modes? Are you saying that I
can't run a X on these cards, or that I can't run HW accelerated 3D on
these cards? Remember, there's a large population out here who simply
don't care about games.
Though unaccelerated 3D may not be an
Enrico Zini (2003-07-22 14:56:08 +0200) :
My talks archive is at:
http://people.debian.org/~enrico/talks/
I would like to suggest to anybody interested that we conform to this
sort of naming scheme. There are lots of Debian developers doing
talks here and there, and quite often we like
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 10:17:25PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What's the alternative?
A more responsive DAM, one that has time for the tasks that the job
requires. This would reduce the wait time for DAM approval and remove
the need for special treatment.
Yes, yes,
In my experience, James has been very responsive, albeit not
verbose, to reasonable questions/requests that don't start out saying
James is a bum - throw him out.
Regards,
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_Robert D. Hilliard[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 10:51:56PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Someone who enters Debian is in a position to upload a package that
could backdoor a very large number of machines. Attention to detail at
the DAM stage is *more* important than pretty much any other
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 04:20:07PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
The problem is, I've not had time to organise all of them in a proper way
so that they can be available from some common place (obviously that would
be w.d.o/events/talks which does have some slides atm) So I would
Roland Mas:
There are lots of Debian developers doing talks here and there, and
quite often we like to borrow from each other's slides.
URL:http://www.debian.org/events/talks
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.
Karl M. Hegbloom said on Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:01:19AM -0700:
http://www.infrastructures.org/papers/bootstrap/bootstrap.html
While this is a good paper, and there are lots of interesting ideas contained
within it that map well to Debian (I've got 50 or so Debian boxes in a
configuration
* (Nathanael Nerode)
| I'm sure no DDs want to volunteer *while* there's someone officially
| in the job and the DPL is satisfied with them, as it might be
| perceived as an attack, and wouldn't have any effect anyway! If the
| DPL *asked* for volunteers, that might be different.
But would the
debian-devel:!
13189176226
!
jackyhuang
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-07-22
Enrico Zini (2003-07-22 14:56:08 +0200) :
My talks archive is at:
http://people.debian.org/~enrico/talks/
Thanks, very interesting.
Regarding:
http://people.debian.org/~enrico/talks/debconf3/html/img7.html
Never, ever discuss about critical things in a public mailing list
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 09:18, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* (Nathanael Nerode)
| I'm sure no DDs want to volunteer *while* there's someone officially
| in the job and the DPL is satisfied with them, as it might be
| perceived as an attack, and wouldn't have any effect anyway! If the
| DPL
hello
I had actually asked for help on debian-legal, in
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200301/msg00173.html
In our packaging of mplayer there is a file debian/README.Debian.2
that explain our study on the source of mplayer;
and indeed in the e-mail [1] I clearly
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:49:46PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:07:28PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
( last time I tried, it looked as if there was some automatic filter that
drops mplayer from the incoming queue: indeed, I never received
the e-mail reply
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 01:42, Denis Barbier wrote:
Forget all about it; if you are unable to answer to this simple question,
I prefer seeing Colin's suggestion implemented. I do not know whether it
solves all autotools issue, but it is sufficient for my needs.
This reminds me...I managed to
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:21:02 +1000, Herbert Xu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/foo'. Of course, dpkg will
handle this correctly for conffiles; you only need to do this for
Unfortunately dpkg does not handle the case where a
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:05:02PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
...
high-quality 2D (Matrox have gone over to the dark side - the Perhalia
and G550 have closed drivers, and you need closed drivers to get
reasonable functionality out of the G450)
I use have a G550 that works fine with the
http://www.nttz.com
*
--
--
,
3D
http://www.nttz.com
1 2 3
http://www.nttz.com
45006500
1,2IC
,
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0513-586365055101935867806,5516349
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, A Mennucc1 wrote:
In our packaging of mplayer there is a file debian/README.Debian.2
that explain our study on the source of mplayer; and indeed in the
e-mail [1] I clearly ask:
debian-legal: please read debian/README.Debian.2 in the source; do
you think that it
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:31:51AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Most device driver issues relate solely to the kernel, which at present is
very easy to upgrade from source in woody. The most prominent exception is
XFree86, which is not so easy to upgrade.
gphoto2 and SANE are other examples
On ti, 2003-07-22 at 16:52, Marc Leeman wrote:
Obviously not having gone through the entire Debian Maintainer process,
I wonder how much effort it takes for an experienced developer to check
such a trivial package (if you will, compare it with the Pro-Deo system
barristers have). Let's face
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:48:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:31:51AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Most device driver issues relate solely to the kernel, which at present is
very easy to upgrade from source in woody. The most prominent exception is
XFree86,
Hi,
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 05:53 PM, I wrote:
I strongly believe that this is an overreaction. Christian is willing
to work with us to bring the package up to date, so there is no reason
not to accept this. I suggest that someone (I could do it) sets up an
Alioth project for surfraw,
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 01:15, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Currently, when a source package is unpacked, all the files that have
modifications in diff.gz are given somewhat random timestamps. This is
because patch updates their timestamps as it processes the diff file.
Because of this, there are
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:08:42PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 09:18, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* (Nathanael Nerode)
| I'm sure no DDs want to volunteer *while* there's someone officially
| in the job and the DPL is satisfied with them, as it might be
|
Hello
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 06:16:53PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Enrico Zini (2003-07-22 14:56:08 +0200) :
My talks archive is at:
http://people.debian.org/~enrico/talks/
Thanks, very interesting.
Regarding:
[NB: I'm subscribed to -devel, no need to Cc: me.]
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, A Mennucc1 wrote:
actually: the issue of J.U. is more about packaging than legal;
This is true.
on the issue about mpeg2dec... from
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200301/msg00231.html
I
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:48:01PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
...
- you want a graphics cards with DVI output
I don't have a display which needs one, and neither does anyone that I know
at this point. This is not yet common hardware.
...
I bought a 17 TFT display with DVI input some
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:45:29AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, A Mennucc1 wrote:
Junichi Uekawa asked for the contents of README.Debian.2 to go in
debian/copyright, where it belongs.
I asked about the mpeg2dec issue, as it wasn't included in the list of
files with
Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
--[Martin Godisch]--[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Due to problems communicating with micq's upstream maintainer
[...]
And I was about to ask for an example because I would have expected that 3
months are enough to get back to a more decent level of communication.
Maybe it should be
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:36:34PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Instead in continuing this discussion, let's agree on some points:
- you can find hardware that works with Debian 3.0
- much new hardware doesn't work with Debian 3.0
- it would be good if Debian would release more frequent (e.g.
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Most device driver issues relate solely to the kernel, which at present is
very easy to upgrade from source in woody. The most prominent exception is
XFree86, which is not so easy to upgrade.
In addition, the X framebuffer driver allows reduction of that to a kernel
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is my suggestion for how purge should be handled. Purge
would delete #1 through #4 _and_ everything in /var/lib/pckg/.
User data created using the package must then not be stored in
/var/lib/pckg/ but somewhere else, e.g., in someone's home
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
One initial idea is to arrange it from Monday 2003-10-27 to Friday
2003-10-31 at URL:http://www.einschlingen.de/. To get this location
we need to make a quick decision, but I guess we need to give everyone
some days to get back from
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
...
Sorry about that. I'll learn it someday (or use a smarter news client if I can't
be a smarter user).
Cheers
T.
pgpGWG6FkDWLr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:51:51PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:36:34PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Instead in continuing this discussion, let's agree on some points:
- you can find hardware that works with Debian 3.0
- much new hardware doesn't work with Debian
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:15:51PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Never, ever discuss about critical things in a public mailing list
(you will start a Godwin flame war)
In the context of a project such as Debian, what alternative do you
propose?
Well based on the other
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-22
Severity: wishlist
I'm working on this package now, I'll upload within the next few days,
followed by an updated aewm++ (1.0.24), which I cannot upload yet since
it will declare Suggests on aewm++-goodies (which doesn't exist yet).
I was thinking that to have a valid debian system, all required
packages must be installed.
That's true for essential package, but required != essential.
/usr/share/doc/debian/FAQ/debian-faq.en.txt.gz:
6.7. What is a _Required_, _Important_, _Standard_, _Optional_, or _Extra_
package?
Dan Jacobson wrote:
I was thinking that to have a valid debian system, all required
packages must be installed.
That's true for essential package, but required != essential.
/usr/share/doc/debian/FAQ/debian-faq.en.txt.gz:
6.7. What is a _Required_, _Important_, _Standard_, _Optional_, or
Hello,
first of all I would like to excuse if my question/problem might be
wrong on the devel list and should better have been mailed to a
debian-user-ML. I thought the DDs here are experienced reportbug users.
Well, I know how to make bug reports with reportbug's internal mailer
but actually I
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:45:59AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
I was thinking that to have a valid debian system, all required
packages must be installed.
That's true for essential package, but required != essential.
/usr/share/doc/debian/FAQ/debian-faq.en.txt.gz:
6.7. What is a
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone else is having the same problems I am with debian
keeping the vmlinuz symlink in /.
I have several systems where /boot is the only filesystem accessable by the
boot loader because of software raid, or possibly lvm (haven't done this
yet, but thinking about it).
I
I am wondering if anyone else is having the same problems I am with debian
keeping the vmlinuz symlink in /.
I have several systems where /boot is the only filesystem accessable by the
boot loader because of software raid, or possibly lvm (haven't done this
yet, but thinking about it).
I
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:48:33PM -0400, Morgon Kanter wrote:
I am wondering if anyone else is having the same problems I am with debian
keeping the vmlinuz symlink in /.
I have several systems where /boot is the only filesystem accessable by the
boot loader because of software raid,
Hi A Mennucc1,
I had actually asked for help on debian-legal, in
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200301/msg00173.html
This and the follow-ups you have now received are great. It must be very
frustrating when so much time goes by that someone like myself misses
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Thomas Smith wrote:
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 05:53 PM, I wrote:
I strongly believe that this is an overreaction. Christian is willing
to work with us to bring the package up to date, so there is no reason
not to accept this. I suggest that someone (I could do
Marcus Frings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Symbol's function definition is void: gnus-agent-possibly-save-gcc
Confirmed; FWIW, I have reportbug 2.20, emacs21 21.3-1, and gnus 5.10.2-3.
Okay, I read man reportbug, I read /usr/share/doc/reportbug/ and I looked
in /usr/share/reportbug/ where
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:52:36PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
I can understand this, but this creates a problem for a number of
packages. One of my packages is 'yepp', which loads mp3's on a Samsung
Yepp player. If it weren't for my current sponsor, who started
sponsering me for another
426
12-420-3020050
2vcd
,70-80VCD2200
3200
4200
5200
(6300440600600,30
750
(8)
1001010
123456
123456
71011
11223344A
1521
1223A
13B 21
32 43
5
1 21
3241A
5263A
1122
3341
5263
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:09:06 +0200
Source: udpkg
Binary: udpkg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.014
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 02:10:41 -0300
Source: prozilla
Binary: prozilla
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.3.6-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Guilherme de S.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 08:48:33 +0200
Source: gnustep-base
Binary: gnustep-base-doc gnustep-base1-dbg gnustep-base1 gnustep-base-examples
gnustep-base1-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.7.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:44:47 +0200
Source: calltree
Binary: valgrind-calltree
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Philipp Frauenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Philipp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 10:27:54 +
Source: gnump3d
Binary: gnump3d
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 14:37:26 +0200
Source: ccdoc
Binary: ccdoc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.40-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Magnus Ekdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Magnus Ekdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:48:24 +0200
Source: libgd-graph-perl
Binary: libgd-graph-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.43-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jonas
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
