On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:34:10 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 11:11, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
That is but one optimization: we already are suffering from archive
bloat, what about the disk and bandwidth cost of carrying around
the sigs? And since one
ÉîÛÚ½ò¸êֽƷ°ü×°Ó¡Ë¢³§
רס´ÓÊÂÓÚÊýÂëIT²úÆ·µÄ°ü×°ÖÆ×÷£¬ÐÎÏóÉè¼Æ£¬Æ·ÅÆÍƹ㣬¹ÒÀú¡¢Ì¨Àú¡¢Çë¼í¡¢ºØ¿¨¡¢MP3¡¢UÅÌ¡¢Ö÷°å¡¢ÏÔ¿¨¡¢ÊýÂëÏà»ú¡¢ÊÖ»ú¡¢ÉãÏñ
Í·¡¢²»¸É½º¡¢º£±¨¡¢Ðû´«µ¥¡¢µÄÓ¡Ë¢¡¢ÖÆ×÷¡£
MP3¡¢UÅÌ¡¢ÉãÏñÍ·¡¢ÀñÆ·ºÐ¡¢ÖÆ×÷·Ñ2.2ÔªÆ𣡼۸ñ¾ø¶ÔÓŻݣ¬ÉîÛÚÔÙÒ²ÕÒ²»µ½µÚ¶þ¼Ò£¡£¡£¡£¡
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 18:12, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 04:37, Jakob Lell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe Adamantix is what you are wanting to do. It is based on Debian
woody
Adamantix in now what we want to do, what we want to do is to improve
Debian.
I meant
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:50:19 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Well, there are not really sides here. But again:
- I want md5sums to be stored in the local filesystem, I don't
really care
if they are inside the debs or not, as long as it's standard
procedure
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 22:22:07 +0100, Tore Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Marc Haber
Splitting up the config file in small files was necessary to do
debconf support, which is a Debian requirement.
Debconf support is now required? I'm flabbergasted. Could you
please point me to this
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:36:16 +0100, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Before we make such a push, we should at least ensure that it is
something we really want to do. I think locally generated checksums
are a better solution.
To me, the main use of md5sums
Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:57:53PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Some or all of: twm, pdmenu, blackbox, afterstep, fluxbox, gtk-menu,
wmaker, fvwm2, enlightenment, etc, consult /etc/menu-methods for more.
There are dozens of programs that use the debian
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:30:12 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Why do we have to make each of our users find a solution to generate
this from a _local_ mirror (or the system's .deb archive which
shoulnd't be trusted in the event of an intrusion) when we could do
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 02:45:41 -0800, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Let me start by saying I basically understand your last point: it's
not worth it because it won't work.
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:01:42AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
who follow secire processes. Blowing 40k collectively is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 21:02, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:53:11PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
The nearest I have seen is fink, but I know little about it.
Am I missing something?
apt-src, apparently.
take a look at apt-build
- --
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:09:56 -0600, Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:08:41AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
... It only stands to reason that if both the KDE and Gnome
desktop camps wish to formalize on the format that we should
adopt it as well, if only as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 16:36, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 03:20:45AM -0600, cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
_ideally_ there are no changes. In practice there will be.
Why?
because it takes time to change things in Debian, example:
as
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:35, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:08:53PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
I presume I can lower the dependencies on things like modutils and
whatnot down to the versions that are in stable with no ill-effects?
It only depends on
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:48:28 -0500, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[I whole heartedly agree with Joey here. I am just adding a few
remarks]
No, you're going about this backwards. Get the code written. Get the
policy for Debian menu layout using .desktop files written. Make
sure that
* Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [031206 08:10]:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:46:30PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:43:39 +1000, Anthony Towns
aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
The one that gets installed later, Pre-Deps the one that gets installed
earlier. exim4-daemon
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 05:11:50PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:35, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:08:53PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
I presume I can lower the dependencies on things like modutils and
whatnot down to the versions
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 04:37, Jakob Lell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe Adamantix is what you are wanting to do. It is based on Debian woody
Adamantix in now what we want to do, what we want to do is to improve Debian.
create installation CDs yourselve. For more information about Adamantix,
see
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:46:30PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:43:39 +1000, Anthony Towns
aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
The one that gets installed later, Pre-Deps the one that gets installed
earlier. exim4-daemon Pre-Depends: exim4-config; exim4-config Depends:
exim4-base,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 13:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
On 2003-12-05 11:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
their fine work. I really love what they do and SkoleLinux is one of
the most impressive derivatives of Debian, but it just
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 10:52:19AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
autoconf_2.58-9_i386.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
Removing autoconf_2.58-9_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for
now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
This problem should be fixed.
After that,
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:05:57AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
| Sure. However, I use WindowMaker since several years now, and apart
| from bug fixes, I did not notice real changes over years (the
| changelog does not speak otherwise, it's almost only about bugs and
| i18n updates).
|
| About
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 17:10, Tom wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:36:20AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Then that discussion needs to be resolved so that a solution can be made
that is in Debian main.
It's useful to try to clarify the terms so people
Cameron Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:05:57AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
| Sure. However, I use WindowMaker since several years now, and apart
| from bug fixes, I did not notice real changes over years (the
| changelog does not speak otherwise, it's almost only
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:51:23AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Drop the imperatives, and we shall get along a lot better.
Better still, roll up your sleeves and make it happen, and
you'll earn my respect, and my support.
How about fuck up again and watch your good thing go away
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 11:25:31AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
| What's your point? The window managers don't /need/ to be changed - or
| at least they shouldn't. They don't natively support Debian's menu
| system, they don't natively support .desktop files, and are unlikely to
| ever do
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:07:14AM -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote:
I've just learnt of Cubit from South Africa: http://www.cubit.co.za/
Is it free software? They don't seem to provide a link to the full text of
their license, it sounds free according to their license summary but I also
see
Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a package is compromised we can proof that the DD of the package
either is malicious or incompetent.
Say, we just had a major compromise on certain Debian machines. Pray
tell, who do you think this proves is malicious or incompetent? We'd
* Tore Anderson
| * Marc Haber
|
| The way -config does the configuration is something that is questioned
| by a lot of people. Most conservative eximists hate the configuration
| being split out in several files,
|
| Absolutely, this is a slight convenience for the packagers which
* Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031206 05:12]:
But false negatives cause work. Why do you want to cause false
negatives?
Its not causing it. Its not preventing them anymore than the current
list.
Huh? I gave multiple examples where the current solution works
correctly, but your
Hi,
we had a discussion about signed deb-files. One major drawback was the
incompatibility between apt-utils and debsigs. I updated debsigs to
create a compatible version; this is apt-able at
deb http://debsign.turmzimmer.net/ ./
deb-src http://debsign.turmzimmer.net/ ./
(and of course also sent
* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031206 13:25]:
Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a package is compromised we can proof that the DD of the package
either is malicious or incompetent.
Say, we just had a major compromise on certain Debian machines. Pray
tell, who do
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:00:05PM +0100, cobaco wrote:
- if you don't allow temporary solutions while low priority debconf
question get included, than there currently are no CDD's as
custom configuration is necessary to support a CDD's target group
out-of-the-box.
This
Hi aj, hi all others,
On 2003-12-01 14:45 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Another possibility is to just drop packages that aren't maintained well
enough. While this is somewhat attractive, it doesn't really serve our
users any better than saying Why don't we just lower our standards?
Basically I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fnfx
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Timo Hoenig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://fnfx.sf.net
* License : GPL
Description : daemon to use the special keys of Toshiba laptop keyboard
It enables owners of
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:48:21PM -0800, Eric Wong wrote:
apt-fu src-dist-upgrade
Excellent work! *This* is what I have been searching for. Plus, it
seems to actually work! :-)
I have one feature request: I'd like to have an option so that I can ask
it to rebuild arch-indep packages just
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:01:20PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
On 2003-12-01 14:45 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Another possibility is to just drop packages that aren't maintained well
enough. While this is somewhat attractive, it doesn't really serve our
users any better than saying Why don't
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:34:45AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Seriously, I think you need to reconsider having the configuration in
a separate package.
What're you trying to achieve exactly?
Allowing for different configuration mechanismn. And I (as a user of
exim4) like that very much.
Hi,
I'm having trouble verifying release.gpg for Unstable. Has the release key
been changed to 30B34DD5, am I doing something wrong or what's up?
After apt-secure failed to apt-get update today...
Err http://ftp.fi.debian.org unstable Release
The following signatures couldn't be verified
I'm having trouble verifying release.gpg for Unstable. Has the release key
been changed to 30B34DD5
Ah, so it has. I just found the announcement which had been filtered to a
wrong mail folder by accident. Sorry.
- Jarno
http://www.cnqt.net
http://www.cnqt.net
First: There is now a version of debsigs that creats debs that the
apt-utils could cope with, see http://debsigs.turmzimmer.net/ (I tried
it with the unmodified apt-utils of woody).
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031202 04:55]:
I agree with you that every instance along the way to
Cameron Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
A standard like .desktop or the Debian menu system we have now /is/ a
good thing; we also need a way to make those menu hierarchies available
to applications which cannot and will not read them directly (hence the
weird formats that I
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
apt-fu installs binary packages of build-depends first to avoid circular
build-dependencies, and then builds and installs the build-depends from
source if -R is specified. It's a nasty problem but you can't have the
chicken without the egg, nor the egg
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 02:35:16 -0800, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:51:23AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Drop the imperatives, and we shall get along a lot better. Better
still, roll up your sleeves and make it happen, and you'll earn my
respect, and my support.
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 11:13:05AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
And then again I question your judgement. What, pray, is this
good thing that is going to go away?
Hey hey I saved the world today
Everybody*s happy now
The bad things gone away
And everybody*s happy now
The good thing*s
ObPrivate
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 17:22, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Matt Flax ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031206 17:30]:
I have now completed a rough song outline for Debain 2003.
is there a reason for this to be *private*?
It's probably very rude or something, I'm all for it :-)
Scott
--
Have
On 20031206T085705-0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Yeah, I have found some of those circular build-deps. I believe they
should be considered serious bugs if they aren't already. That's just
wrong.
There are several good reasons for circular build-time dependencies.
For example, every self-hosting
Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031206 05:12]:
But false negatives cause work. Why do you want to cause false
negatives?
Its not causing it. Its not preventing them anymore than the current
list.
Huh? I gave multiple examples
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
apt-fu installs binary packages of build-depends first to avoid circular
build-dependencies, and then builds and installs the build-depends from
source if -R is specified. It's a nasty problem but you can't
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First: There is now a version of debsigs that creats debs that the
apt-utils could cope with, see http://debsigs.turmzimmer.net/ (I tried
it with the unmodified apt-utils of woody).
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031202 04:55]:
I agree
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a package is compromised we can proof that the DD of the package
either is malicious or incompetent.
Say, we just had a major compromise on certain Debian machines. Pray
tell, who do you think
Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 10:52:19AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
autoconf_2.58-9_i386.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
Removing autoconf_2.58-9_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for
now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031206 13:25]:
Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a package is compromised we can proof that the DD of the package
either is malicious or incompetent.
Say, we just had a major compromise
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Roger Leigh wrote:
In late 2001, I spent several weekends hand-building quite a large
chunk of woody (over 200 source packages). I found quite a number of
serious bug in several packages, including missing Build-Deps, and, in
the case of (IIRC) Tcl 8.x, it wouldn't build
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 09:31:54PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
For example, every self-hosting compiler build-depends on itself
(many of them can be bootstrapped, but I'm not sure we want to require
bootstrapping on every build - and some require manual bootstrapping
work).
Obviously
Moin,
what are the license problems causing the removal of aspell in the
update to 3.0r2 ?
do these problems exist in debian unstable ?
if not: why was aspell _removed_ from stable and not replaced by a
backport of the version in unstable ?
--
c u
henning
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:02:16PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
I remember about a message from a guy from RedHat saying more or less
that he see no point in supporting an environment/wm that do not
follow the new standards decided at freedesktop.org...
Just as a data point, you do realize that
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:17:25PM +0100, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
James Troup wrote:
As part of the recovery process, db.debian.org has migrated, both to a
new host (because the old box was on it's last legs and HP kindly
donated a shiny new one to replace it), and to a newer version of
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 08:41, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:02:16PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
I remember about a message from a guy from RedHat saying more or less
that he see no point in supporting an environment/wm that do not
follow the new standards decided at
Henning Glawe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moin,
what are the license problems causing the removal of aspell in the
update to 3.0r2 ?
IMO, there are no license problems. See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200312/msg00870.html
do these problems exist in debian
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 16:41, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:02:16PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
I remember about a message from a guy from RedHat saying more or less
that he see no point in supporting an environment/wm that do not
follow the new standards decided at
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Roger Leigh wrote:
In late 2001, I spent several weekends hand-building quite a large
chunk of woody (over 200 source packages). I found quite a number of
serious bug in several packages, including missing Build-Deps, and, in
the
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
apt-fu installs binary packages of build-depends first to avoid circular
build-dependencies, and then builds and installs the build-depends from
source if -R is
Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henning Glawe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moin,
what are the license problems causing the removal of aspell in the
update to 3.0r2 ?
IMO, there are no license problems. See:
Actually, I take that back. There was a serious bug in that
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:40:58AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
-- until there exists a mechanism to convert .desktop entries into
things that the back-end WM's can grok, we are stymied
Agreed.
(since we have a system that works, however imperfectly, and dropping
support for these window
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 05:11:50PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
What is needed for initrd-tools? I've given up on using initrd's for
kernels I compile.
That's sad. initrd saved my bacon more than once. ;-) If you like to
compile vanilla kernels, either find the Debian cramfs-initrd patch or
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:24:58AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:34:10 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 11:11, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
That is but one optimization: we already are suffering from archive
bloat, what about
alberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Intel has a powerful f90 compiler, the only one freely available on
the market, as far as I know, which runs under Linux. It is an
extremely important tool for those who run numerical simulations for
scientific purposes.
Your message dated Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:20:20 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#223114: fixed in ksensors 0.7.2-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:02, Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's sad. initrd saved my bacon more than once. ;-) If you like to
Initrd broke my systems more than once.
The recent versions of the package have significant problems if you want to
convert to or from devfs. The Debian
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:48:21PM -0800, Eric Wong wrote:
apt-fu src-dist-upgrade
Excellent work! *This* is what I have been searching for. Plus, it
seems to actually work! :-)
Cool, probably the best compliment I've received so far :)
I have one
Hi, Lukas Geyer wrote:
As an
aside, I don't quite understand why Fortran is still so popular in the
numerical mathematics community... :)
There still are a lot of Fortran libraries which people are used to,
and they have been heavily optimized over the years.
The sad trutz is also that
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 18:36, Scott James Remnant wrote:
ObPrivate
Total apologies here, especially to Matt Flax and Andreas Schuldei who
I've written to in separate mails.
I had no intention of mailing this to -devel (as you could probably
guess from the ObPrivate at the top).
I routinely
David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:24:58AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:34:10 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 11:11, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
That is but one optimization: we already
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This sort of automated source building is a very good idea--it will
root out a lot of build bugs, and will improve the quality of Debian.
Thats whats
Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, Lukas Geyer wrote:
As an
aside, I don't quite understand why Fortran is still so popular in the
numerical mathematics community... :)
There still are a lot of Fortran libraries which people are used to,
and they have been heavily
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 22:16:09 +1100
Source: kernel-source-2.4.21
Binary: kernel-tree-2.4.21 kernel-doc-2.4.21 kernel-source-2.4.21
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.21
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.4.21-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:45:30 +1100
Source: netkit-telnet
Binary: telnetd telnet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.17-22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 20:55:55 +1100
Source: kernel-source-2.4.22
Binary: kernel-doc-2.4.22 kernel-tree-2.4.22 kernel-patch-debian-2.4.22
kernel-source-2.4.22
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.4.22-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:47:45 +1100
Source: kernel-source-2.4.20
Binary: kernel-source-2.4.20 kernel-doc-2.4.20
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.4.20-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:21:07 +0100
Source: vte
Binary: python-vte libvte4 libvte-common libvte-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.11.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:10:51 +0100
Source: libassetml
Binary: libassetml0 libassetml-dev libassetml-tools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Yann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 00:28:22 -0600
Source: vm
Binary: mime-codecs vm
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 7.18-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:42:27 -0700
Source: kernel-patch-2.4.20-ia64
Binary: nic-modules-2.4.20-ia64-udeb ide-modules-2.4.20-ia64-udeb
kernel-image-2.4.20-itanium-smp kernel-image-2.4.20-mckinley
kernel-headers-2.4.20-ia64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 12:19:50 +0100
Source: ssl-cert
Binary: ssl-cert
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Apache Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Fabio M. Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:30:27 +0100
Source: gcompris
Binary: gcompris-data gcompris-sound-de gcompris-sound-es gcompris-sound-fr
gcompris-sound-pt gcompris gcompris-sound-en
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 11:18:58 +0100
Source: libgnomeprint
Binary: libgnomeprint2.2-0 libgnomeprint2.2-doc libgnomeprint2.2-data
libgnomeprint2.2-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 11:22:21 +0100
Source: libgnomeprintui
Binary: libgnomeprintui2.2-doc libgnomeprintui2.2-dev libgnomeprintui2.2-0
libgnomeprintui2.2-common
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:41:30 +0100
Source: librep
Binary: librep9 rep-doc librep-dev rep
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:10:00 +0100
Source: tcpreplay
Binary: tcpreplay
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:12:01 +0100
Source: scrollkeeper
Binary: scrollkeeper libscrollkeeper0 libscrollkeeper-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Marillat [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:09:30 +0100
Source: gcc-defaults
Binary: gobjc gij g++ gcc g77 gpc chill gpc-doc gcj gcc-doc cpp-doc cpp g77-doc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GCC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:51:16 +0100
Source: shorewall
Binary: shorewall shorewall-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.8.stable-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lorenzo Martignoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:38:00 +0100
Source: wget
Binary: wget
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.9.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:09:11 +0100
Source: gnome-desktop
Binary: libgnome-desktop-dev gnome-desktop-data gnome-about libgnome-desktop-2
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.4.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:52:57 +0100
Source: gtm
Binary: gtm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.12+cvs20031024-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Marillat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:00:49 +
Source: powertweak
Binary: powertweak lspowertweak powertweak-extra powertweakd powertweak-gtk
Architecture: source i386 all powerpc
Version: 0.99.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:19:11 +0100
Source: gkrellmwireless
Binary: gkrellmwireless
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sjoerd Simons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:42:26 +0200
Source: lodju
Binary: lodju
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 09:51:07 -0500
Source: eterm
Binary: eterm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Laurence J. Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Laurence J. Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
