On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
The Christian concept of a demon is a corruption (as it were) of the Greek
concept of daemon
Basically, no arguments with what you said, except I find inconsistent
the fact that the original guys said it's a daemon, explicitly not a
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Joel Baker wrote:
Besides, using Tolkien names is a long geek tradition.
And that's what's wrong with it. The association of geeks and Tolkien is
such a cliche[1] Same goes for Pratchett (not to mention he is rather
overrated in my opinion.)
No if you're going to go
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
And, pray tell, why is that? Hindu mythology had demons far
longer than Christianity (indeed, probably longer than any of the
faiths of the descendents of Abraham).
If you are refering to Asuras, demon isn't quite the right word. They are
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ttf-tamil-fonts
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : The Tamil Linux Project
* URL : http://www.tamilinux.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Free TrueType
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
I made a package called ttf-indic as part of my (rather neglected)
Debian-IN project. It contains a couple of Tamil fonts. Is there an
overlap with your package?
If you would like to help get Debian-IN off the ground it would great.
Oops,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:26:10AM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, just for the record, i personnally would prefer we don't use
demon name for keyword if possible.
Forgive me for the gratuitous Harry Potter reference, but fear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am
16.12.2003 19:15:43:
now it is getting clearer. we are talking about different things.
I'm talking about the md5sums files in the directory
/var/lib/dpkg/info. You talk about the md5 sum of the whole package
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, just for the record, i personnally would prefer we don't use
demon name for keyword if possible.
Forgive me for the gratuitous Harry Potter reference, but fear of a
name increases fear for the thing itself. ;-p
IOW, lighten up,
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 12:26, Chad Walstrom wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, just for the record, i personnally would prefer we don't use
demon name for keyword if possible.
Forgive me for the gratuitous Harry Potter reference, but fear of a
name
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
schrieb am 16.12.2003 19:15:43:
now it is getting clearer. we are talking about different
things.
I'm talking about the md5sums files in the directory
/var/lib/dpkg/info. You talk about the md5 sum of the whole package (MD5sum).
so what I like to say is,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:09:37AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:54:15AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:00:21PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Even so, I'm amenable to anyone who can come up with names which
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:21:24AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
The Christian concept of a demon is a corruption (as it were) of the Greek
concept of daemon
Basically, no arguments with what you said, except I find inconsistent
the
Nathan Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you wanted Greek names, there are plenty of obscure nymphs, satyrs,
centaurs, etc. to choose from. Since the Greeks classified them as
neither evil spirits nor deities, many of them would qualify as daemons
in the classical sense.
We could also go
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:54:28PM -0500, Stephen Depooter wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 12:26, Chad Walstrom wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, just for the record, i personnally would prefer we don't use
demon name for keyword if possible.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:04:03PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
the fact that the original guys said it's a daemon, explicitly not a
Christian demon and here's you're saying yes it is. :-)
Er, no. I'm not. I'm saying that Christian demons are derived from Greek
daemons; that isn't the same
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:13:03PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
If we're really worried about this, we can always use the names of the
Dwarves in the Hobbit. Most (all?) of those names are from Icelandic
sags, IIRC. So is Gandalf.
All of them. I suppose they even have enough of the right
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:26:10AM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, just for the record, i personnally would prefer we don't use
demon name for keyword if possible.
Forgive me for the gratuitous Harry Potter reference, but fear
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:22:07PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:04:03PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
the fact that the original guys said it's a daemon, explicitly not a
Christian demon and here's you're saying yes it is. :-)
Er, no. I'm not. I'm saying that Christian
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:56:30AM +0100, Toens Bueker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hamish Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question is, after what the missile was named ...
If I remember
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:42:27AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
IOW, lighten up, people. Otherwise, we'll be referring to Debian
GNU/That Which Shall Not Be Named...
Nah, bullshit. I've heard enough racists use that kind of reasoning.
It's no big deal. Face it, you have to respect people.
And
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:02:03PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
And way out from Right Field...
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-ridicule.html
go back and count the # of christians are stupid statements
substitute any racial or ethnic group for christians
see how the statements
My package Debian Reference is large source files and it uses many
TeX and SGML tools. Can anyone tell me which machine I should use to
build and upload package.
Since SSH upload has been disabled, it looks very slow and unreliable to
upload. (Does dupload uses -C ? Somehow, I felt faster.)
Nunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:12:56PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Because Christians are the people who primarily take offense at this
sort of thing in the context that we were discussing in this portion of
the thread.
That's another opinion expressed as a
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:21:40PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:02:03PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
And way out from Right Field...
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-ridicule.html
go back and count the # of christians are stupid statements
substitute
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:00:41PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:21:40PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:02:03PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
And way out from Right Field...
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-ridicule.html
go back
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:19:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I believe that if you cared to do the research on Usenet and mailing list
debates of this kind, my statement above is defensible as fact on rigorous
statistical grounds. But I don't care enough to do the work to prove that
to
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:56:21 +0100, GCS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:56:30AM +0100, Toens Bueker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hamish Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question
Alejandro Arrieta Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dday
Version : 4.1.0
Upstream Author : ViperSoft Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.planetquake.com/dday/
* License : (GPL)
Description : D-Day
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:16, Nunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:00:41PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
I wasn't thinking of you, but let's take a quote of yours and see which
of these statements is most applicable:
All,
I'm trying to find a distribution that would be
willing to add Lustre file system support (it requires
a kernel patch). If this group is interested, then I
may be able to gather some resources to help add the
support. It has recently reached production
status(1.0), and would be a valuable
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:59:38PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
He did not say that all Christians are religious fanatics.
Godwin.
Copout.
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Dec 17, 2003, at 10:20, Branden Robinson wrote:
Given that we're going to be saddled with with a comprehension problem
anyway, I say we abandon the effort to be descriptive in the product
name. I proposed having a correlation between the first letter of the
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:16:18PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
I wasn't thinking of you, but let's take a quote of yours and see which
of these statements is most applicable:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200312/msg01512.html:
(religious fanatics - the one group that
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 00:21, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:02:03PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
And way out from Right Field...
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-ridicule.html
go back and count the # of christians are stupid statements
substitute any racial or
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 01:16, Nunya wrote:
Face it. You're practicing hate speech. You're not better than what
you hate.
Ya know, I've always wondered something when people say things like
this...
If I say I hate Adolf Hitler and his cabinet, is that practising hate
speech?
Scott
--
Have
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:56:41PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
For the record, however, if you consider saying that the lifestyle or
beliefs of someone you don't agree with are sufficient to condemn them to
an eternity of suffering as hate speech (and I generally do), I'm on the
catching end of
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:49:06AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
| | I don't believe in magical beings. I *do* believe some humans
| | intentionally set out to hurt other humans. Branden's beliefs and
| | sneering disdain for some of his fellow humans is quite clear.
|
| ... and in some cases
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:25:11PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:56:41PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
For the record, however, if you consider saying that the lifestyle or
beliefs of someone you don't agree with are sufficient to condemn them to
an eternity of suffering as hate
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:39:07PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Fair treatment is exactly what I'm claiming is being denied me, by the
large religious voting block formed by adherents of the above-listed
religions, which form a significantly more than majority share of the
population of the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:35:54AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
| You are totally rationalizing.
*sigh* From Branden's original post where he mentioned the names:
We might use names from Christian demonology (since the BSD mascot
is the cute and devilish daemon), with the first letter
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:32:41AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
| On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 01:16, Nunya wrote:
|
| Face it. You're practicing hate speech. You're not better than what
| you hate.
|
| Ya know, I've always wondered something when people say things like
| this...
|
| If I
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:44:58PM -0800, Nunya Who wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:59:38PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
He did not say that all Christians are religious fanatics.
Godwin.
Copout.
Yes, it is too bad he is copping (sp) out on discussing all sorts of
things immediately
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:43, Nunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:39:07PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Fair treatment is exactly what I'm claiming is being denied me, by the
large religious voting block formed by adherents of the above-listed
religions, which form a
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:39, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagining it? I suppose it's possible that I've hallucinated the
stated positions of the Catholic, Luthern, Episopalian, Baptist, and
Mormon authorities (the latter not technically being considered a sect
[...]
Since you have no
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:03:00PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:44:58PM -0800, Nunya Who wrote:
Oh, its our good friend Tom Ballard. Maybe you could get back to working
on Debian and stop trolling now?
--
gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:05:46PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:39, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagining it? I suppose it's possible that I've hallucinated the
stated positions of the Catholic, Luthern, Episopalian, Baptist, and
Mormon authorities (the latter
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:07:44PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:03:00PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:44:58PM -0800, Nunya Who wrote:
Oh, its our good friend Tom Ballard. Maybe you could get back to working
on Debian and stop trolling now?
Nick, *,
Nick Pavlica, on 2003-12-17, 16:28, you wrote:
I'm trying to find a distribution that would be
willing to add Lustre file system support (it requires
a kernel patch). If this group is interested, then I
may be able to gather some resources to help add the
support. It has
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:59:33AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:15:59PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yahoo2mbox
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : Vadim Zeitlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:28:57 -0800 (PST), Nick Pavlica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
All,
I'm trying to find a distribution that would be
willing to add Lustre file system support (it requires
a kernel patch). If this group is interested, then I
may be able to gather some resources to help add the
Scripsit Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:12:21AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
I think you trimmed away content that was crucial for understanding the
parts you did quote, but whatever. If you need reptition or
elaboration, I'll provide it.
Please do. I found
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:08:17PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ttf-tamil-fonts
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : The Tamil Linux Project
* URL :
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:19:58PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:03, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be unacceptable about it, and why is it only a borderline
case? What would push it over the borderline?
Demons are evil, and the BSD mascot is a
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:17:50 -0600, John Goerzen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, NNTP is better-suited for it, and BTW is already available at
www.gmane.org.
If we start referring people to GMANE, we should drop them a load of
older list archives for import. They only started in mid-2002.
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
I originally sent the message below to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but it seems he's
not responding to my mails. Ron is the maintainter of the wxWindows
packages for Debian. I was hoping that sending it to this mailinglist
would be more fruitful. Please
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:49:29PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, this points to a problem with the bug list as seen by the testing
scripts. update_excuses for gjdoc says
gjdoc (source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
s390, sparc) is buggy! (1 0)
which is
10(10)
13305245548 13951246713 13305241895
0527-3553418 0527-3558461 0527-8380396 8380360 8388218
0527-3558461
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1010%1001010100*10%
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought, but naming
something after a missile seems odd.
Hamish
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 06:32:01PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:22:57PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Fixed now.
earlier today i submitted a bug against an orphaned package in wnpp,
and haven't yet recieved a reply. normally the replies come back pretty
quick (like 5
debian-devel:!
Office2000
Office2000()
http://www.onlinedown.net/soft/5959.htm
Office2000
Office2000,
Office2000
http://www.newhua.com/soft/4952.htm
Office2000
http://www.onlinedown.net/soft/15683.htm
!
2003-12-17
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:06:47AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
[snip]
I think this is what my momma meant when she told me to avoid 3 subjects
in general conversation: politics, sex, religion.
Yeah, let's avoid conversation altogether, or only talk about the weather...
[snip]
/David
--
/) David
Hamish Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question is, after what the missile was named ...
by
Töns
--
There is no safe distance.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:24:49AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:06:47AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
[snip]
I think this is what my momma meant when she told me to avoid 3 subjects
in general conversation: politics, sex, religion.
Yeah, let's avoid conversation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
goswin,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subject: general: no md5sums for many packages (e.g. bc)
Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2003-12-12
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Every package has a md5sum in the Package file.
the answer is not
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 11:56, Toens Bueker wrote:
Hamish Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question is, after what the missile was named ...
Extract from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scud:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:10:32AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:24:49AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:06:47AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
[snip]
I think this is what my momma meant when she told me to avoid 3 subjects
in general conversation:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yahoo2mbox
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : Vadim Zeitlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~zeitlin/yahoo2mbox.html
* License : Public Domain
Description : retrieve and store Yahoo!
Am 16.12.03 um 17:34:45 schrieb Will Newton:
It is worth noting that any project name may also be used for associated
domain names, file names etc., so ASCII is nice.
Irrelevant with the advent of domain names containing arbitrary Unicode
characters. Besides, as was said, there are easily
Vincent Renardias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question is, after what the missile was named ...
Extract from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scud:
Scud is the NATO reporting name (not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: clientcookie
Version : 0.4.9
Upstream Author : Noah Spurrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pexpect
* License : Python Software Foundation License
Description : Python module for
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:49:39PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:03:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:21:30PM +0100, Roland Mas
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:00:56PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:11:20AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Unfortunately, my experience with the topic tends to indicate that the
same folks who care are very likely to consider there mere
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:03:00PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[I am not subscribed to debian -bsd.]
What would be unacceptable about it, and why is it only a borderline
case? What would push it over the borderline?
Demons are evil,
Demons
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:59:57AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Or read Stephen Brust's _To Reign in Hell_, which posits an alternative
explanation of the creation of the world, the nature and causes of the
conflict between the angels under Yahweh and those under Satan, and the
origin of
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:20:32AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
[...] a comic which by the way is being made into a movie with Keanu
Reeves (it's being filmed as we speak).
http://www.insanerantings.com/hell/movie/ [Heaven is oppressive,
right-wingers are malevolent, world saved by the paganists/hell.]
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:19:47PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:29:15PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
And, pray tell, why is that? Hindu mythology had demons far
longer than Christianity (indeed, probably longer than any of the
faiths of the descendents of
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:42:47PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
I hope I'm attributing correctly.
My philosophy of good and evil is private and irrelevant -- but this
conversation has made me uncomfortable. I'm killfiling it but -- I'm
uncomfortable. Could you take it elsewhere?
If you've
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
[We're back off-topic for -legal.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:33:17PM -0500, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have little patience for superstitious beliefs, and less still for
people who claim to be defending the
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:23:39PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:12:56PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Because Christians are the people who primarily take offense at this sort
of thing in the context that we were discussing in this portion of the
thread.
That's another
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:37:44PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:53:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I doubt you'd have known they were names from Christian demonology if I
hadn't told you. I didn't propse that we use better
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:54:15AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:00:21PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Even so, I'm amenable to anyone who can come up with names which are less
loaded to random fundamentalists, if possible; of
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
Catholics compared to their Protestant brethren. I should think if
anyone were taught demonology these days, it would be kids in Catholic
I knew all about demons around that age, and I'm not even a religious
person.
Doom taught me everything I
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:00:21PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Even so, I'm amenable to anyone who can come up with names which are less
loaded to random fundamentalists, if possible; of course, most of the
sources on daemons say that they are, as a rule,
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:41:50AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
I consider myself educated, and I've never heard of any demons in school
where we had 13 years of religious (catholic) education. I can
definitely say that I'm not offended, and I doubt that
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Paul Baker wrote:
On Dec 13, 2003, at 3:27 PM, Branden Robinson wrote:
Thus:
Debian FreeBSD - Debian Forneus (BSD)
Debian NetBSD - Debian Naberius (BSD)
Debian OpenBSD - Debian Orobos
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:10:24AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:15:04AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Actually, given that I'm a long-time and deep-seated Tolkien geek, I rather
like the notion of using the Valar - they're
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:06:47AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:42:48AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:02:44 -0500, Nathan Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Your proposal would change that. I oppose it, and I would oppose it
just the same if
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:31:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:23:39PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:12:56PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Because Christians are the people who primarily take offense at this sort
of thing in the context that we
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:15:04AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Actually, given that I'm a long-time and deep-seated Tolkien geek, I rather
like the notion of using the Valar - they're fictional, and Tolkien's work
isn't yet out from under copyright, but they
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:12:21AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you didn't bother to read any of the parts of my message that
you didn't quote.
I did. But I trimmed away those that were not necessary for the reader
to be reminded of the
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:15:59PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yahoo2mbox
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : Vadim Zeitlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~zeitlin/yahoo2mbox.html
*
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:24:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
| Demons are evil,
|
| Demons don't exist. Consequently, their moral value is undefinable.
I claim that their moral value /is/ definable in the context of a
particular mythology even if they don't exist. In the case of the
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:31:17AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Somehow, I don't think Branden will mind being told his dislike of
parochial religious fundamentalists is showing. I suspect he'd be proud
of it. But you'll see for yourself, soon enough.
I don't believe in magical beings. I *do*
Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sun, 14 Dec 2003 00:31:24 +0100):
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Patch for this (stupid) bug
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 70144 patch
thanks
This is a bug that has been open for over 3 and a half years, easy to
fix (patch attached) and deserves a 0-NMU. I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dday
Version : 4.1.0
Upstream Author : ViperSoft Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.planetquake.com/dday/
* License : (GPL)
Description : D-Day Normandy, the original Quake2 WWII modification of
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:01:49AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
Branden's second proposal of using something from Pratchett did have a
nice ring to it, [...]
That wasn't my proposal; it was made by Roland Mas in Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
--
G.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:33:48PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:24:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
| Demons are evil,
|
| Demons don't exist. Consequently, their moral value is undefinable.
I claim that their moral value /is/ definable in the context of
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:08:44AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:54:09AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
No, it's probably antipathy for the Free Software Foundation driving
this more than anything else.
Maybe they'd prefer Debian
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 03:58:21PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:37:34AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
- As http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png shows, there
are some archs already have a working wanna-build access since
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 20:15, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
--cut--
i don't understand your comment above. why is the md5sums file useless
and space wasting especially in terms of security? until now, I was of
the opinion, that the md5sum gives me the guarantee that a debian package
is
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
