On 2005-01-25 Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24-Jan-05, 03:45 (CST), Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last time I looked, invoke-rc.d was not yet a requirement to be used
by packages. As far as I remember, it is for sarge, but not for woody
and thus unuseable on woody,
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wish more women would join Debian and the lists. My experience is that
usually there's not that much aggressiveness when there are women around.
That usualy only works if you recognise them as females and can lead
to quite the oposite as well
[Norbert Preining]
The last question I have (for now):
- How can I install binaries for non-Debian architectures-os
combinations (win32, i386-solaris, ...) USING the pacakge management
system?
Is there a way at all -- or is there no way for this?
The real problem is *building* these
On 20050124T180205+, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho writes,
A package description is equally visible.
But is it equally machine parsable? If not,
is this unimportant?
Machine-parsability is not useful if the semantics is misused.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Debian
On Die, 25 Jan 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
The last question I have (for now):
- How can I install binaries for non-Debian architectures-os
combinations (win32, i386-solaris, ...) USING the pacakge management
system?
Is there a way at all -- or is there no way for this?
The
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:44:42 +1100, Matthew Palmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:15:52AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
I am not a native speaker, but to me it looks like your message
doesn't fit the questions I asked.
Steve answered your first question. The second question
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Dear DDs, dear all!
First of all, thanks for the many suggestions I will take into account.
Let me sum up what:
- I have to put the arch-independent stuff into /usr/share
Yes
- I can put arch-dependent stuff for the `current' arch into /usr/lib
Hi,
I tried to post a question to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which seemed to have failed because of
File /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Message.py, line 178, in Enqueue
dbfp.close()
IOError: [Errno 28] No space left on device
Any Alioth admins around?
Concerning to the concrete question
[Norbert Preining]
Ok, so the solution is to go for a `double' way:
- Package debian packages the debian way, ignoring other arch/os
combinations.
- Build some `non-standard' debian packages which have to be provided in
a different way (our web server or something else) which put
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:17:32AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I wish more women would join Debian and the lists. My experience is that
usually there's not that much aggressiveness when there are women around.
That usualy only works if you recognise them as females and can lead
to
SR, ESC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while i don't appeciate gunnar's comments - seems to me he's just
trying to lessening the issue i brought up.
Which is what? I didn't read your one or two initial mails that
consistent mainly of f-words; besides that I have not read anything you
brought up.
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How often does it actualy happen that ftp-master rejects the name of a
package? Did anyone have that happen to him/her when adding a new deb
to old source ever?
There have been discussions about library renaming in the last couple of
weeks, and
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And no, it's *not* a good idea to suggest just shipping pre-built
binaries in the source package. (I suppose a few of the firmware in
main people might argue that the Solaris binary is not for your host
CPU anyway so doesn't constitute a problem, but
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 04:51, Sam Watkins wrote:
Dosage / mainline has a feature to download all supported comics, so it
is quite possible for someone (perhaps a child) to stumble across this
one by accident, as I did. Probably nearly everyone who tries dosage
will want to see the range
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I tried to post a question to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which seemed to have failed because of
File /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Message.py, line 178, in Enqueue
dbfp.close()
IOError: [Errno 28] No space left on device
Any
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 01:40 -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 01:06 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 07:39 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 22:28 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 09:48 +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:17:32AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I wish more women would join Debian and the lists. My experience is that
usually there's not that much aggressiveness when there are women around.
That
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:48:04AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:17:32AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I wish more women would join Debian and the lists. My experience is that
usually there's not that much aggressiveness when there are women around.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:14:57AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 04:51, Sam Watkins wrote:
Dosage / mainline has a feature to download all supported comics, so it
is quite possible for someone (perhaps a child) to stumble across this
one by accident, as I did.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package general
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: general
reassign 275388 grub
Bug#275388: mounting at boot time under grub
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `grub'.
retitle 275388 could grub README explain how to append kernel
Bug#275388:
Hi Andreas!
Andreas Tille [2005-01-25 9:43 +0100]:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:27:10PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
some applications do need a changed pg_hba.conf to work as expected.
this raises something i'm wondering... what is the best generalized
method for setting up an application
* Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [050125 07:05]:
Romain Francoise wrote:
And Debian wouldn't be fun without a few enmities, we wouldn't have great
posts like http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01308.html or
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 04:51, Sam Watkins wrote:
Dosage / mainline has a feature to download all supported comics, so it
is quite possible for someone (perhaps a child) to stumble across this
one by accident, as I did. Probably nearly everyone who
* Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050124 13:37]:
[ ITP of a new tuxracer ]
It is based on the GPL version of TuxRacer.
[..]
Oliver, as the current maintainer of tuxracer. Would you like to
comment an my intentions? Any hints or usefull suggestions?
If this is a fork and tuxracer has
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:38:41AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Sadly, those helpful people usually don't make up the reputation of Debian
in public. The aggressive DDs do this, IMHO.
You might be right. Also posts like this don't help:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:00:35 +0100, Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 11:04 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 04:51, Sam Watkins wrote:
Dosage / mainline has a feature to download all supported comics, so it
is quite possible for someone (perhaps a child) to stumble across
ti, 2005-01-25 kello 12:34 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa kirjoitti:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
These parents are free to install whatever traffic blocker they feel
appropriate. Debian
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 11:04 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 04:51, Sam Watkins wrote:
Dosage / mainline has a feature to download all supported comics, so it
is quite possible for
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:34 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
These parents are free to install whatever traffic blocker they feel
appropriate. Debian
* Ron Johnson
| They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
| children's laps right along side the things that the parents *do*
| consider appropriate.
Then they should supervise their child's use of the computer. Relying
on Debian as some sort of filter for not letting a
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
children's laps right along side the things that the parents *do*
consider appropriate.
On Jan 25, 2005 at 11:03, Frank Küster praised the llamas by saying:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
http://slipgate.za.net/dosage/downloads/changelog
I stand corrected. But in this case, the short description dosage --
powerful webcomic downloader / archiver isn't really
You can use :
deb http://www.bootsplash.de/files/debian unstable main
but ther is no development upstream so it cannot be included in
debian.
gensplash is the version produced by the developper that upgraded
bootslpash for each kernel since 2003. This is a better
implementation though ther is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 245545 initscripts
Bug#245545: general: testing upgrade breaks loading of modules at boot time
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `initscripts'.
thank
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
lde is the low level tool you want. But it cannot help if even
the bios do not see the drives.
I don't think that sector 0 matter regarding BIOS detection. I m
not an expert though, but i would check cables , power and such.
Also the title is misleading : apt download files and decompress
them,
Moving to -project, follow up there.
Em Ter, 2005-01-25 s 09:30 +, Steve Kemp escreveu:
That'd be too much, but I'd love to see a photo field in the
db.debian.org database, or some other gallery of developers.
That's been proposed before -- even adding it to the /devel/people page
has
Il giorno mar, 25-01-2005 alle 07:49 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow ha
scritto:
Bluefuture [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The dehs system now is regular running again every two days on alioth
(and so also on the info feed to developer.php on qa).
Looking at no_watch page[1] there are:
Total
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:33:49 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255773: general: GNOME 2.6.1: does not manage themes icons
and doesn't start any applets
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
I use bind mount :
/var/video/doc /usr/share/doc nonebind
0 2
/var/video/games /usr/share/games nonebind
0 2
and have not problem insofar.
Cheers
Alban
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
f this is a rootkit , are on of chkrootkit, rkunter, tiger or other
able to detect it ?
Thanks
Alban
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Ron Johnson
| They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
| children's laps right along side the things that the parents *do*
| consider appropriate.
Then they should supervise their child's use of the
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Ron Johnson
| They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
| children's laps right along side the things that the parents *do*
| consider appropriate.
Then they should supervise their child's use of the
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 05:57 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Ron Johnson
| They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
| children's laps right along side the things that the parents *do*
| consider appropriate.
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:09 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
children's laps right along
David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Jan 25, 2005 at 11:03, Frank Küster praised the llamas by saying:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
http://slipgate.za.net/dosage/downloads/changelog
I stand corrected. But in this case, the short description dosage --
powerful webcomic
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
While I agree, and I started and worked on the pt_BR effort, there's
still a problem with this: we, the people translating the descriptions
do not see the work being used, as no infra-structure code was added to
APT and the FTP.
But at least there
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:43:32AM +, Helen Faulkner wrote:
[snip]
3. If anyone says something to you that is insulting or upsetting or
offensive, you are possibly better off just ignoring it than trying to
argue with them. Remember 1 :)
3.5.
A lot of nuance gets lost when
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 13:06 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
The changelog Ron posted says
,
| * Added comics:
| - MadamAndEve (contributed by Anthony Caetano)
| ...
`
either this means that the comics are in fact _included_ in the dosage
package. Or Ron was talking
|| On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:37:49 +0100
|| Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gvb Then the maintainer gets a bugreport saying they should
gvb Replace/Conflict/Provide the silly name. Also ftp-mster could get an
gvb automatic notice about new debs and a 3 day window to veto it or
gvb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guglielmo Dapavo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: phpauctionGPL
Version : 2.5.0
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.phpauction.org/
* License : (GPL)
Description : PHP based auction site,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25-01-2005 12:14, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Moving to -project, follow up there.
Em Ter, 2005-01-25 às 09:30 +, Steve Kemp escreveu:
That'd be too much, but I'd love to see a photo field in the
db.debian.org database, or some other
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:34 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
These parents are free to install whatever traffic
Op di, 25-01-2005 te 04:30 -0600, schreef Ron Johnson:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 11:04 +0100, Frank Kster wrote:
Good idea. dosage went even a step further: It doesn't include any of
those comics at all.
http://slipgate.za.net/dosage/downloads/changelog
So where's the problem?
The
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
So policy-rc.d needs to be in /usr/local, or we have a FHS violation.
Please request that we enhance invoke-rc.d to look on /usr/local first,
then (through a wishlist bug). Looks like a good idea at first glance.
Additionally, the requirement of going
* Ron Johnson
| On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| * Ron Johnson
|
| | They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
| | children's laps right along side the things that the parents *do*
| | consider appropriate.
|
| Then they should supervise
Op di, 25-01-2005 te 06:00 -0600, schreef Ron Johnson:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Ron Johnson
| They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
| children's laps right along side the things that the parents *do*
| consider appropriate.
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 13:06 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
The changelog Ron posted says
,
| * Added comics:
|- MadamAndEve (contributed by Anthony Caetano)
| ...
`
either this means that the comics are in fact _included_ in
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 14:04 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 13:06 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
The changelog Ron posted says
,
| * Added comics:
| - MadamAndEve (contributed by Anthony Caetano)
| ...
`
On Tuesday, 25 de January de 2005 13:00, Ron Johnson wrote:
I thought like you until my kids grew to an age where supervising
every waking minute of their lives is quite impossible.
What age? 25 years old?
--
Isaac Clerencia[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warp Networks http://www.warp.es
Mara de Luna
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:30:08AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
So where's the problem?
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
children's laps right along side the
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:09 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
They don't want this inappropriate material dumped
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:34:38PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
These parents are free to install whatever traffic blocker they feel
appropriate.
Il giorno mar, 25-01-2005 alle 13:56 +0100, Wouter Verhelst ha scritto:
I'm not convinced having a watch file is always useful.
I agree with you.
I would hope a maintainer would follow the announcements of the software
I agree with this. Dehs/Watch is not a system for bypassing upstream
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Ron Johnson
| They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
| children's laps right along side the things that the parents *do*
| consider appropriate.
Then they should
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 13:46 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:34 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bad hack. I hate to drop my own binaries to /usr/sbin.
You can make /usr/sbin/policy-rc.d a symlink to the file of your choice
under /usr/local. A bit less bad, but wouldn't prevent something
undesirable happening if you install a package shipping
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 14:55 +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:34:38PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Up until a certain age the parents should be responsible for keeping control
on the machine itself, the software it has installed
El Martes 25 Enero 2005 11:30, Ron Johnson escribió:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
children's laps right along side the things that the parents *do*
consider
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 14:04 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Ron Johnson
| On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| * Ron Johnson
[snip]
Then perhaps they should get to see porn if they want to? Or filter
URLs in your gateway or whatever -- I really don't see why
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|| On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:37:49 +0100
|| Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gvb Then the maintainer gets a bugreport saying they should
gvb Replace/Conflict/Provide the silly name. Also ftp-mster could get an
gvb automatic notice about
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 14:05 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 25-01-2005 te 06:00 -0600, schreef Ron Johnson:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:15 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Ron Johnson
| They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
| children's laps right along
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 13:59 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 25-01-2005 te 04:30 -0600, schreef Ron Johnson:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 11:04 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Good idea. dosage went even a step further: It doesn't include any of
those comics at all.
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 14:48 +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:30:08AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
So where's the problem?
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
They don't want this inappropriate
On Tuesday 25 Jan 2005 14:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
You have the option to *not* install them on your machine. John
Ashcroft is not holding a gun to your head making you install it.
I want to have more options than just to do or do not install
dosage. What's wrong with that?
1. File a
|| On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:31:55 +0100
|| Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gvb How often does it actualy happen that ftp-master rejects the name of a
gvb package? Did anyone have that happen to him/her when adding a new deb
gvb to old source ever?
This is not the only problem.
Scripsit Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on comments made to me by a number of women who are interested
in contributing more to Debian, the level of agressiveness on some of
the mailing lists and IRC channels is a problem.
Hmm... after I started wasting time on #debian-devel I have
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:25 +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
El Martes 25 Enero 2005 11:30, Ron Johnson escribió:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
They don't want this inappropriate material dumped into their
children's laps
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:02 +, Will Newton wrote:
On Tuesday 25 Jan 2005 14:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
You have the option to *not* install them on your machine. John
Ashcroft is not holding a gun to your head making you install it.
I want to have more options than just to do or do not
Scripsit Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:44:42 +1100, Matthew Palmer
Steve answered your first question. The second question makes no sense,
since policy-rc.d is supposed to be written by the administrator to fit
their local policy.
So policy-rc.d needs to be in
El Martes 25 Enero 2005 15:42, Ron Johnson escribió:
But if MadamAndEve is not on the list of supported comics that
I've installed for dosage, then there's no need to explain.
Parenting is already busy enough trying to help them understand
why any number of $ACTIONs are wrong, why would I want
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:00 +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I do not believe that being thick-skinned enough to cope with people
who are very agressive or insulting should be a requirement for
involvement in Debian.
I believe that it *should*
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 16:44 +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
El Martes 25 Enero 2005 15:42, Ron Johnson escribió:
But if MadamAndEve is not on the list of supported comics that
I've installed for dosage, then there's no need to explain.
Parenting is already busy enough trying to help them
Scripsit Sam Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a difference between a general tool (web-browser) and a
specific tool (the Sexy Losers script). The script is specifically
designed to download a hard-core pornographic comic.
FWIW, Sexy Losers is not hard-core pornographic. It does contain
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[automatic NEW processing for split or renamed binary packages, and
occasionally a bug report and removal from the archive of a badly named
package]
I could live with that if it means a lot more packages don't get stuck
in NEW. But maybe that is
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds a bit like the gun control debate.
I don't want the sharp hooks removed. I want them put in boxes
(i.e. packages) where they can be easily installed by root, but
aren't just laying around (i.e., in dosage, along with the nice
round scissors
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guglielmo Dapavo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: gtkpizza
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Guglielmo Dapavo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.dapavo.it/
* License : (GPL)
Description : Pizza takeaway
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:32:02AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
So policy-rc.d needs to be in /usr/local, or we have a FHS violation.
Additionally, the requirement of going through the alternatives system
for policy-rc.d selection is somewhat mis-placed, because it suggests
to me that policy-rc.d
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 17:35 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds a bit like the gun control debate.
I don't want the sharp hooks removed. I want them put in boxes
(i.e. packages) where they can be easily installed by root, but
aren't just
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:25:22AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:28:25 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think ftp-master already has a more complex prioritizing than
that. Adding a new kernel images deb tends to be real fast (with
exceptions), adding a
Henning Makholm writes:
I believe that it *should* be a requirement that one has enough calm to
most of the time respond to (percieved or actual) aggression and insults
in a less aggressive and insulting way than the other party
uses. Otherwise the project will surely die (film at 11!) from
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:02:31PM +, Will Newton wrote:
1. File a wishlist big against dosage if one does not already exist.
1a. Submit a patch so that you can be certain you get what you want.
2. Get on with your life.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 17:35 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds a bit like the gun control debate.
I don't want the sharp hooks removed. I want them put in boxes
(i.e. packages) where they can be easily
Gergely Nagy writes:
Indeed. Even if all of us start to behave ourselves and avoid nasty
flamewars (ha! in your dreams! :P), we still have to deal with the
occassional bugreporter of Barbaric Communication School For 1337 People
(the `f**k you, this piece of s***e doesn't work, go fix it or
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:55:19 +0100, Jesus Climent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At no time Debian should be censoring any content for innapropiate. Every
single bit of information has an audience which might feel offended by it.
I'm mostly just a lurker on debian-devel, but as someone who is very
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:02 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Gergely Nagy writes:
Indeed. Even if all of us start to behave ourselves and avoid nasty
flamewars (ha! in your dreams! :P), we still have to deal with the
occassional bugreporter of Barbaric Communication School For 1337 People
(the
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:13:30PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 17:35 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds a bit like the gun control debate.
I don't want the sharp hooks removed. I
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 15:25:14 +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
another thing:
Given A,B where A=parent(B)
if ((A have not installed dosage) (B hasn't root access))
B can't access dosage
Unless you're already restricting internet access, B can just
download it and install/run it from their
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 20:15:29 +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
The OP wants the offensive parts split off in a separate package. He
doesn't want dosage removed from the archive. And splitting does indeed
change something. If his kids are not root they cannot install the
offensive part. They might
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:00:19PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ti, 2005-01-25 kello 12:34 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa kirjoitti:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is things/websites/etc that many parents don't think
are appropriate for their children.
These parents are free
Ron Johnson dijo [Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:24:57AM -0600]:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Up until a certain age the parents should be responsible for keeping control
on the machine itself, the software it has installed and the programs they
can
use/install, including the
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
