A bug has been discovered in the 3.1r0 CD/DVD images: new installs from
these images will have a commented-out entry in /etc/apt/sources.list
for http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates rather than an active
entry for http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates, and thus will
not get security
Ça semble aussi prouver qu'on n'a toujours pas assimilé que le p2p est
un fantastique système de cluster de serveurs de fichiers. Qu'on n'est
Oui, probablement. Le manque d'attention à la maintenance des
logiciels clients de P2P semble le prouver. Et il y a encore un sacré
boulot à faire avant
entièrement d'accord, je viens d'essayer :
debian sarge sur
- la mule : 7 fichiers, 5 complets, 5 sources
- bittorrent : 3 moteurs de recherche, 1 réponse
1 feeder... absent.
donc effectivement, avec un lien bittorrent
directement sur les serveurs d'isos pour cliquer
dessus, ça serait plus
Le mardi 07 juin 2005 à 20:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
entièrement d'accord, je viens d'essayer :
debian sarge sur
- la mule : 7 fichiers, 5 complets, 5 sources
- bittorrent : 3 moteurs de recherche, 1 réponse
1 feeder... absent.
donc effectivement, avec un lien bittorrent
Quoting Julien BLACHE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Eh, to achieve Total World Domination, we need to support every
architecture out of there. Looks like a step in the wrong direction ;)
Well, frankly speaking, Julien, last time I checked most of so-called
third world users mostly just don't care a
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
See nameif(8). Interface names can be chosen by the user.
Hmm, no much point in preparing an interface name list indeed. If some
drivers name where bound to this interface names, it would be quite
complicated anyway.
I'm going to propose
Hi,
I checked heise.de and golem.de for Sarge announcement. I just want to let
you know that both news tickers stress out that Debian runs on 11 architectures
which makes a difference to other distributions. I do not want to heat
another Vancouver flamewar but I hope that the same news tickes
* Loïc Minier:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
See nameif(8). Interface names can be chosen by the user.
Hmm, no much point in preparing an interface name list indeed. If some
drivers name where bound to this interface names, it would be quite
complicated anyway.
I'm
Hah...document a distribution's bugs in a wiki page is one funny idea
that Knoppix used at the time I still used it, about a year ago. And it
was one major reason I didn't wait to switch to Debian. It can be
considered for tracking RC issues, but Roger still has a point that all
bug reports
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cl-utilities
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Peter Scott
* URL : http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-utilities/
* License : public domain
Description : a Common Lisp
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That sounds retarded in an age where a 200GB HD cost less then 100
Euro...
Regarding storage: Fast, cheap and secure; pick any two.
Good Storage have more costs than the price of the cheapest disks on
the market. For a file server, especially
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 03:21, Joey Hess wrote:
Planned, and ground already laid in tasksel (and indeed, it does do it
for some easy things like language tasks). One thing I really want to
see happen is a laptop task. The big missing peice is some simple
program tasksel can call out to, like
Le mardi 07 juin 2005 à 05:10 +0200, Nicolas Schoonbroodt a écrit :
MMmmm these are good news :-),
If you can tell me where you find the tex2im depandancy (README,
INSTALL, ...) It can help me for remove it in the next version.
Well, I've just looked into your files.
I can now said that I've
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 23:50:46 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Owner: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: emile
Description : Early Mac Image LoadEr, a bootloader for m68k macs
Thank you very much for finally deciding to package emile. I will be
expecting eagerly the
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 08:56, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 03:21, Joey Hess wrote:
Planned, and ground already laid in tasksel (and indeed, it does do it
for some easy things like language tasks). One thing I really want to
see happen is a laptop task. The big missing peice is
(Sorry if you got this mail several times, I just CC'ed it to every
affected binary package).
Hi fellow Debian developers!
Three months ago I announced the first alpha versions of the new
architecture of the PostgreSQL packages [1] in experimental. Now, a
few months later, they are mature enough
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 01:03, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Feel free to add some new items or add (hopefully new) information to
the ones I list below:
--
[ Overall improvements ]
- Implement some package
On 2005-06-07 04:57, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-06 at 01:03 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
- Separate runlevels: 2 for multi, no net, 3 for multi no X, 4 for X,
4=5
Do we really need that? I thought I could always
enable/disable/install/remove [xgk]dm. And
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050607 02:01]:
any progress on making libselinux1 a Required package?
the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent
on this one thing happening.
no libselinux1=Required, no debian/selinux [all dependent packages
e.g.
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:47:23AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That sounds retarded in an age where a 200GB HD cost less then 100
Euro...
Regarding storage: Fast, cheap and secure; pick any two.
Good Storage have more costs
* Peter 'p2' De Schrijver ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050607 10:51]:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:47:23AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That sounds retarded in an age where a 200GB HD cost less then 100
Euro...
Regarding storage:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:48:56PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:11:44PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:12:00PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
snip
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:12:00PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Clone yourself and make yourself a slave to the buildds for 7 or 8
architectures, so that the release team doesn't have to. Neither the
Whoah, whoah, whoah, is this actually an
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:47:12AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jun 07, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- _No_ bugs in base packages (well, at least no old bugs). Base system
should be upgraded to latest upstream (forward patches!) this includes
PAM,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:12:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:47:12AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jun 07, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- _No_ bugs in base packages (well, at least no old bugs). Base system
should be upgraded
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I've just been looking at the new Debian Sarge release 3.1, and it looks very
interesting. I'm not 100% happy with my Fedora FC3 system, so am thinking
about loading it here and trying it out. It is quite a learning process
though needing a lot of time ... :-)
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:31:27 +0200, Michelle Konzack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what I not understand, because I have a full /debian-archive
and WOODY mirror (including many CDs) and it use 420 GByte (4x 147
GByte) and now, POTATO is gone on ftp://ftp.debian.org/.
Now I try to add 4-6 new
What about switching from getty to mingetty? Is there any reason to use getty
by default?
Regards,
César
On Monday 06 June 2005 23:02, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:31:27 +0200, Michelle Konzack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what I not understand, because I have a full /debian-archive
and WOODY mirror (including many CDs) and it use 420 GByte (4x 147
GByte) and now, POTATO is gone
Hi Roberto,
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 at 23:52 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I am wondering what the deal is with Luca and his packages,
specifically httperf.
[snip]
Just wondering what, if anything, should be done. Personally, I would
be willing to adopt httperf because I would like to
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 01:10:15 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
Ok, so sarge has been released! We should all thank the Release Team for
their hard work in putting this major release together.
Yes. Thanks to everyone involved for the many, many hours they devoted to
getting sarge
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:10:13 +0200, David Goodenough wrote:
Another item that might be worth considering for laptops is a networking
equivalent of the pmount group. People in these groups would be allowed
to edit the network files (in particular /etc/network/interfaces) and bring
interfaces
Hello, Debian Guys.
I feel honer that I announce you Japan Debian Mini Conf.
In last year, I held Debian BoF in Kansai OpenSource. (http://k-of.jp) in
Japanse
language. Any Debian people enjoyed BoF.
I also joined Asia Debian Mini Conf. I was excited to contact Great
Debian Developers. ADMC
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Someone told me a few weeks ago that he is interested in coming back and
start again working on his packages. I doubt that this will really happen,
and if nobody object the Debian Zope Team will take over his zope packages
in a few days. All in all,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:12:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
- sparc: one buildd which is not consistently able to keep up with the
volume of incoming packages; no backup buildd, no additional porter
machine.
how powerfull would a machine need to be to be of any help here? would
an
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:12:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Oh, you'll also note that the traditional slow architectures (mips,
mipsel, m68k, arm) aren't on this problems list. That's because a *lot*
of effort has been put into providing sufficient parallelization for each
architecture;
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:18:47AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:12:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:47:12AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
2.4.x kernels are already obsolete by now except that for some doorstop
architectures, I do not
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 09:26, Thomas Hood wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:10:13 +0200, David Goodenough wrote:
Another item that might be worth considering for laptops is a networking
equivalent of the pmount group. People in these groups would be allowed
to edit the network files (in
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:04:26PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Obviously. What I meant is, we shouldn't throw out doorstop
architectures (sic) because they still want 2.4.
Which architecture do you refer to? All architectures supported by
debian are supported much better by 2.6 thn by 2.4,
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 09:26, Thomas Hood wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:10:13 +0200, David Goodenough wrote:
Another item that might be worth considering for laptops is a networking
equivalent of the pmount group. People in these groups would be allowed
to edit the network files (in
I've just been reading on the wiki that someone things there should be
a pretesting branch for Debian, (good idea in my opinion), but why
don't we try and stop rouge packages at unstable. Some maintainers
obviously make mistakes every now and then while packaging z,
sometimes (if not all the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I checked heise.de and golem.de for Sarge announcement. I just want to let
you know that both news tickers stress out that Debian runs on 11
architectures
they just quote the release notes/announcement. And I think they only report
it because it is
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Well, frankly speaking, Julien, last time I checked most of so-called
third world users mostly just don't care a shit of non i386
architectures..:-). They just want a functional operating system for
the only architecture which is really available to
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I am wondering what the deal is with Luca and his packages,
specifically httperf.
httperf was uploaded once, 3.5 years ago. It has two important and one
normal bug [0]. He has never responded to any bug on httperf.
#215277: httperf: please update libssl dependency
Miles Bader([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-06-07 10:53:
Stephen Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The question was really this, if Ubuntu created a better bug tracking
program would Debian want to run the new software on the debian
servers thus replacing the current bug tracking programs?
Is it
* Julien BLACHE
| If you're not willing to maintain your packages on the architectures
| supported by the Project (assuming it is possible, ie the packages
| aren't arch-specific), then you're not helping the project, and you'd
| better spend your time on another one.
|
| Last time I checked,
Michelle Konzack([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-06-06 20:22:
Am 2005-06-06 19:22:08, schrieb Peter 'p2' De Schrijver:
That sounds retarded in an age where a 200GB HD cost less then 100 Euro...
Anyway you can always decide to mirror only part of the archive if you
want to, even today.
Using an
On Jun 07, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since (at least) potato, Debian has always supported more than one major
line of kernels. I don't see why we suddenly would need to change that
now.
We did it because of the need to support doorstops, not because it's a
good idea.
2.4 kernels
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Ok, so sarge has been released! We should all thank the Release Team for
their hard work in putting this major release together. But... how about we
start discussing about what major release goals we want to set for Etch?
I'd like to see:
The ability to
Hi,
Is it possible for a user to ensure that a certain app is (always)
started after system start (and stopped before shutdown) without using
root access?
If so, how?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Die, 07 Jun 2005, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
started after system start (and stopped before shutdown) without using
root access?
crontab
@reboot
man 5 crontab
Herzliche Grüße
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert Preining
El mar, 07-06-2005 a las 11:41 +0200, Olaf van der Spek escribi:
Hi,
Is it possible for a user to ensure that a certain app is (always)
started after system start (and stopped before shutdown) without using
root access?
If so, how?
sudo - userslogin command arguments
on call to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: whitelister
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
https://projects.aaege.net/mailtools/wiki/Project.Whitelister
* License : GPL v2
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 11:20, José Luis Tallón wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I've just been looking at the new Debian Sarge release 3.1, and it looks
very interesting. I'm not 100% happy with my Fedora FC3 system, so am
thinking about loading it here and trying it out. It is quite a
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-06 22:08]:
Personally I will not be suprised if some procmail recipe doesn't end up
running somewhere that effectively changes this policy for them.
(Didn't you have one, tbm? :-)
No, I added some patches by hand for a while. I read -bugs-dist and
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:58:13PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:12:00PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Clone yourself and make yourself a slave to the buildds for 7 or 8
architectures, so that the release team doesn't have
* Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-03 11:54]:
personally agree with me, it's their policy and unfortunately it won't
change... however, maybe there's still hope, now that more people are
Has there been any explanation for the policy? I'm having a hard time
thinking of any sensible
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:52:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I am wondering what the deal is with Luca and his packages,
specifically httperf.
Yeah, I'm about to orphan his packages next time I'm orphaning packages
of MIA maintainers. Simply didn't get around to it yet, thanks for
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:56:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:52:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I am wondering what the deal is with Luca and his packages,
specifically httperf.
Yeah, I'm about to orphan his packages next time I'm orphaning
* Joey Hess
| Planned, and ground already laid in tasksel (and indeed, it does do it
| for some easy things like language tasks). One thing I really want to
| see happen is a laptop task. The big missing peice is some simple
| program tasksel can call out to, like
|
| if this_is_a_laptop; then
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- sparc: one buildd which is not consistently able to keep up with the
volume of incoming packages; no backup buildd, no additional porter
machine.
Second faster machine has been down, reportedly with disk problems.
Even faster
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:35:50PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:21:26PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2005 01:11 pm, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Make a version which generates the image on the sending side?
[...]
That would be a *very* nice
* Martin Michlmayr
| In any case, if we're not being treated like proper upstream
| maintainers, maybe we should write some tools to keep better track
| of those patches.
I think equating patches are provided as links rather than as
attachments with we're not being treated like real upstream
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:23:33AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
To begin with we can all go back and review:
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?ReleaseProposals
I reviewed it and it still all falls into two groups:
- Hopelessly unworkable or silly ideas. (Don't release, Release no
matter
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:56:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:52:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I am wondering what the deal is with Luca and his packages,
specifically httperf.
Yeah, I'm about to orphan his packages next time I'm orphaning
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:56:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:52:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I am wondering what the deal is with Luca and his packages,
specifically
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:03:12AM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
- inetd begone! - xinetd (better mechanism to control DoS, privilege
separation, etc.)
xinetd begone. There is no justification for using anything resembling
inetd on a modern system.
- Better OS backup
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:32:53PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:03:12AM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
wrote:
- inetd begone! - xinetd (better mechanism to control DoS, privilege
separation, etc.)
xinetd begone. There is no justification for using
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Which architecture do you refer to? All architectures supported by
debian are supported much better by 2.6 thn by 2.4, in fact none of
them is supported anymore upstream except for important bugfixes.
Be that as it may, my feeling from reading a great many
Frans Pop wrote:
This sounds like a good idea, but will need very careful logic.
For instance, some older (APM-based) Toshiba laptops work well with the
toshiba module and the toshset package where newer (ACPI-based) laptops
need the toshiba-acpi module which does not work with toshset.
I
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:32:53PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:03:12AM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
wrote:
- inetd begone! - xinetd (better mechanism to control DoS, privilege
[Andrew Suffield]
It's supported just fine if you take backups at the appropriate
moment. I can't think of any useful way in which it could be more
supported than that.
You should be careful when using your imagination as the guideline for
what is useful or not. It might not be a very
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 08:03:31AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
This sounds like a good idea, but will need very careful logic.
For instance, some older (APM-based) Toshiba laptops work well with the
toshiba module and the toshset package where newer (ACPI-based) laptops
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 16:25, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:23:33AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
To begin with we can all go back and review:
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?ReleaseProposals
I reviewed it and it still all falls into two groups:
- Hopelessly
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:40:48PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Why? What if I prefer to have something from inetd only when necessary
instead of constantly running daemons everywhere?
Why on earth would you? It's just
Brian Teeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps there is source for a very large game or something that could be
left off??
ia32-libs has 214MB of source and is only shipped on ia64. It's possible
that something could be worked out that way.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
quote who=Miles Bader date=2005-06-07 10:53:17 +0900
Stephen Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The question was really this, if Ubuntu created a better bug tracking
program would Debian want to run the new software on the debian
servers thus replacing the current bug tracking programs?
Is
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Colin Watson wrote:
A bug has been discovered in the 3.1r0 CD/DVD images: new installs from
these images will have a commented-out entry in /etc/apt/sources.list
for http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates rather than an active
entry for http://security.debian.org/
quote who=Petter Reinholdtsen date=2005-06-04 21:24:54 +0200
I'd like to hear about it, because this is certainly not the common
case, and there is an unfortunate amount of myth and rumour on this
subject.
Oh, it is definitely not the common case. My sample set is ~5
packages, and for
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure «the best OS ever» means we have to support everything
from toasters to mainframes. If I spend time tracking down a bug
which affects users on only a single, little-used architecture
(because it's RC there) rather than tracking down bugs
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:32:53PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:03:12AM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
wrote:
- inetd begone! - xinetd (better
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 at 10:16 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I asked a while back (on IRC) about packaging the NX components that are
under the GPL. Someone pointed me to Fabian's packages in Skole Linux.
Anyhow, those
quote who=John Goerzen date=2005-06-01 09:06:50 -0500
That sounds very nice indeed. If that pans out, and you also fix the UI
issues (by which I mean I have to type approximately three times as many
characters to accomplish the same thing that I do in darcs), that would
be very nice.
It
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
quote who=John Goerzen date=2005-06-01 09:06:50 -0500
That sounds very nice indeed. If that pans out, and you also fix the UI
issues (by which I mean I have to type approximately three times as many
characters to accomplish
quote who=Eduard Bloch date=2005-06-03 08:49:31 +0200
And I think it is a fair demand asking all Ubuntu Developers to wear the
Ubuntu hats when Ubuntu specific questions are beeing discussed.
Read: I expect you to specify [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the From:
field, otherwise reading the mail
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:26:43PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
I've just been reading on the wiki that someone things there should be
a pretesting branch for Debian, (good idea in my opinion), but why
don't we try and stop rouge packages at unstable. Some maintainers
obviously make mistakes
On Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:40, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 at 10:16 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I asked a while back (on IRC) about packaging the NX components that
are under the GPL. Someone
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:12:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
- hppa: one buildd, keeps up with package volume, but no backup buildd and
gdb seems to kill its kernel (yay); one porter machine.
The gdb kills sarti issue shouldn't be an issue once it's upgraded
to sarge and running a kernel
Le mardi 07 juin 2005 à 05:10 +0200, Nicolas Schoonbroodt a écrit :
So...(sorry for English)
lot of conversation about my plugin on your mailling list.
And also a bug report on sourceforge, related to your remark.
My message will be not complete (because it's 4.50 am here and that I
must be
It'd be nice if people who move packages from experimental to unstable
used the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage. It has two main advantages:
1. bugs fixed in experimental get closed automatically by the upload
2. people who read d-d-changes like myself get an idea of the history of
the
On Mon 06/06/05 20:22, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2005-06-06 19:22:08, schrieb Peter 'p2' De Schrijver:
I do not know a mirror without Raid-5 so asuming, there are someone
which use 3Ware 3w9500 + four WD360GR (around 100 GByte) and they
pay 1200 Euro for the Controller and four small 36 GByte
quote who=John Goerzen date=2005-06-07 09:48:47 -0500
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
quote who=John Goerzen date=2005-06-01 09:06:50 -0500
That sounds very nice indeed. If that pans out, and you also fix the UI
issues (by which I mean I have to type
quote who=Jeroen van Wolffelaar date=2005-06-05 19:00:57 +0200
If you're going to complain about a cabal, please do try to get the
facts straight: The DPL team consists of only one Canonical
employee, who was even later, after the election, added (Benjamin
Mako Hill)
And for the record, the
quote who=Josselin Mouette date=2005-06-05 18:50:57 +0200
The problem is that the decisions are always taken for the Ubuntu
distribution first. Then, people from Canonical or people wanting to
keep compatibility between the two distributions will always want Debian
to follow the decisions
quote who=Josselin Mouette date=2005-06-05 19:15:49 +0200
Then how did these people end up choosing to support the same set of
architectures as Ubuntu?
It seems quite possible that the groups have come up with similar
criteria independently of each other or separate criteria that arrived
at the
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:40:55AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
The ability to have multiple versions of a package installed at the same
time.
(Sorry Olaf, for getting this twice, my fingers work too fast)
No, dear $DEITY. This feature is the major thing I hate about
rpms. It's so easy to
[This is actually more a question for debian-cd. Cc set appropriately]
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Brian Teeman wrote:
Is there any way that the source can be remastered so that it fits on 2
dvd. Seems kind of daft that it stretches to three dvd for the sake of
212mb.
If it
On 6/6/05, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Julien BLACHE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Eh, to achieve Total World Domination, we need to support every
architecture out of there. Looks like a step in the wrong direction ;)
Well, frankly speaking, Julien, last time I checked most
Joey Hess wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:27:38AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Oh, I forgot to mention that if Ubuntu continues to ignore Ian Murdock's
warnings about breaking compatability with debs, it will end up a fork
in my book even if most of the underlying code is
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:20:34 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#312282: release-notes: --guess?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
1 - 100 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
