|| On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:13:28 +0100
|| Christian Surchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cs Il giorno ven, 03/03/2006 alle 13.28 +0100, Marco Presi ha scritto:
Io sono disponibile. Vivo a Pisa, venire a Firenze non mi crea
problemi.
cs Io sono gia' a Firenze, ed
KSP d'organiser pour attirer les boulets comme moi ? ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le vendredi 10 mars 2006 à 16:37 +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Nous avons planifié un repas avec lui le samedi soir. Rendez-vous est
donné à l'école CPE samedi soir vers 18h30 :
http://www.libregraphicsmeeting.org/coming.php
Seront présents :
- Bdale Garbee
- moi-même
- Julien Blache
* Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060313 08:03]:
[Steinar H. Gunderson]
Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
I guess that one
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
Well, that person is currently on the CeBIT and manning the Debian booth
there.
The problem in the sentence above is the singular in that. I know that
Jörg Jaspers does a great job as ftp master assistant but didn't we
talked about the hit by a bus
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, March 13, 2006 01:39, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a
month ago.
Perhaps the ftpmasters
On 3/13/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.13.0752 +0100]:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done
by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone
else.
The mirror split is a
also sprach Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.13.1101 +0100]:
Has that not been announced in any public place?
Not that I know. I got this information in the hallway track
during FOSDEM.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft
[Martin F Krafft]
The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
complete.
Ouch. If that is true, I hope ftpmasters will announce it to the
developers, as a blocked NEW hinders development of Debian and should
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.13.0752 +0100]:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done
by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone
else.
The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
the NEW
Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 12:20:25PM +0100, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, in case stockholm gets elected,
Sorry, where's the Wiki page describing codenames for DPL candidates?
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Dpkg maintainer(s), what do you think is the correct procedure for
additing these things i.e., extra -vendor and -libc fields? I already
have a patch for dpkg package which adds-in uclibc variants...
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing, so my
question to Nathanael: when did you post this question to them directly
and what was their answer?
Is there a reason why the question should be made in private?
I
hi,
* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 11:11]:
* Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060313 08:03]:
[Steinar H. Gunderson]
Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
one of the assistants
Le Lun 13 Mars 2006 10:38, martin f krafft a écrit :
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.13.0752
+0100]:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done
by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone
else.
The mirror split is a
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.13.0752 +0100]:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done
by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone
else.
The mirror split is a complicated
#include hallo.h
* Petter Reinholdtsen [Mon, Mar 13 2006, 11:00:47AM]:
Ouch. If that is true, I hope ftpmasters will announce it to the
developers, as a blocked NEW hinders development of Debian and should
not we a surprise. An announcement would at least give us some idea
on when the NEW
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: goupil
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Dodji Seketeli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://goupil.tuxfamily.org
* License : GPL
Description : Association membership
On Mon, March 13, 2006 11:20, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing, so my
question to Nathanael: when did you post this question to them directly
and what was their answer?
Is there a
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:09:54PM -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
gcc has the -fno-builtin and -fno-builtin-FUNCTION options.
Which does not change the state of a hosted compiler.
Bastian
--
Schshschshchsch.
-- The Gorn, Arena, stardate 3046.2
signature.asc
Description:
Pjotr Kourzanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:49:01PM +0100, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
rather that i386-hurd?
because dpkg-architecture has a line like this:
return $os-$cpu;
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Not being a dpkg maintainer, I find this to be a gratuitous change for
no good reason (other than it looks a bit better). I don't see what
point it would serve.
Maybe the ability to run Debian on embedded
Hello,
I am very interested in your product Surfynol 104
Could it be possible to supply me the price and MSDS for this product !
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Thank you,
G.Grigorescu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Not being a dpkg maintainer, I find this to be a gratuitous change for
no good reason (other than it looks a bit better). I don't see what
point it would serve.
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you are not francois massaquoi's son
Indeed I am not. I see nothing can be hidden from you.
Rather a brilliant display of observation and deduction, actually.
I don't suppose we could interest you in a job at the Yard?
--
Henning Makholm I
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Pjotr Kourzanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:49:01PM +0100, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
rather that i386-hurd?
because
* Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 11:22]:
The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
complete.
and of course such a useless information has been kept silent.
Maybe because it's simply not
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
[snip]
There's also kfreebsd-{i386,amd64}, so why don't you use uclibc-i386?
Actually, I disagree. To me it makes perfect sense the way it
currently is, namely:
kernel-arch-libc
kernel and libc can be empty when
Moving this to -devel, it's off-topic for -vote; Cc to -admin.
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At some place where it can be found even if you don't want to look up a
month-old announcement. What about http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi,
and the developers reference, in the section
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
and of course such a useless information has been kept silent.
Maybe because it's simply not true?
Sow what? If this is not true, what is true and why is it kept
silent (well, IRC logs are not really but effectively silent).
I know, Martin, it
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 11:22]:
The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
complete.
and of course such a useless information has been
[2] http://www.emdebian.org/slind.html
This one looks dead.
I understand we live in a gentoo-driven 0-day bleeding edge culture, but
this is quite spectacular deducment. SLIND was published exactly two
weeks ago in FOSDEM and it is already dead?
...and i386-uclibc[3] alioth project, which
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month
ago.
Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
Different people
Riku Voipio wrote:
[2] http://www.emdebian.org/slind.html
This one looks dead.
I understand we live in a gentoo-driven 0-day bleeding edge culture, but
this is quite spectacular deducment. SLIND was published exactly two
weeks ago in FOSDEM and it is already dead?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:49:18PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 11:22]:
The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
Frank Küster wrote:
Moving this to -devel, it's off-topic for -vote; Cc to -admin.
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At some place where it can be found even if you don't want to look up a
month-old announcement. What about http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi,
and the developers
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
20:38 Ganneff the archive grow too fast too big. so i should not process
NEW so fast to not grow much more in a short term. something like that more.
Well, if that's the reason, are updates to existing source packages
still allowed? I'd really like to fix my RC bugs
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 14:59 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar kirjoitti:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Is there a reason why the question should be made in private?
It seems as if only problems and annoyances end up on mailinglists, and
*not* to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:23:29PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
20:38 Ganneff the archive grow too fast too big. so i should not process
NEW so fast to not grow much more in a short term. something like that
more.
Well, if that's the reason, are updates to
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:49:18PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 11:22]:
The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
the NEW
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Well, if that's the reason, are updates to existing source packages
still allowed? I'd really like to fix my RC bugs and sync with upstream
at the same time but the latter would involve so-version changes.
This is not the reason for any backlog, although it does
Em Seg, 2006-03-13 às 15:04 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu:
Also, looking at
http://cvs.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/?cvsroot=i386-uclibc
I see only binutils and gcc. In the other thread cross-compiling Debian
packages
I already mentioned that binutils and gcc are trivial to
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:24:58PM +0100, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
To continue the ./configure in debian/rules thread...
debian-devel is probably way too large audience, and will attract
people not interested in crosscompiling/embedded on making
unconstructive comments. lets move these threads to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openspacemanager.app
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Sašo Kiselkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://openspace.adlerka.sk/
* License : GNU General Public License, version 2
Description : Workspace Manager for
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2006-03-13 às 15:04 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu:
Also, looking at
http://cvs.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/?cvsroot=i386-uclibc
I see only binutils and gcc. In the other thread cross-compiling Debian
packages
I already mentioned that binutils and gcc
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Dpkg maintainer(s), what do you think is the correct procedure for
additing these things i.e., extra -vendor and -libc fields? I already
have a patch for dpkg package which adds-in uclibc variants...
I hope toolchain-source
Em Seg, 2006-03-13 às 17:30 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu:
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
This is a call for help :). If you want to help, just take over the task
of setting a uclibc-i386 buildd up.
What is the need for buildd?
Basically, what is described in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Janak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: radiusclient-ng
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Maxim Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/radiusclient-ng
* License : (BSD/MIT/X)
On 3/13/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing, so my
question to Nathanael: when did you post this question to them directly
and what was their answer?
Is there
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:39:11PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 3/13/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing, so my
question to Nathanael: when did you post
On 3/13/06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:23:29PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
20:38 Ganneff the archive grow too fast too big. so i should not
process
NEW so fast to not grow much more in a short term. something
On 3/13/06, Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:39:11PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 3/13/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Dpkg maintainer(s), what do you think is the correct procedure for
additing these things i.e., extra -vendor and -libc fields? I already
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 04:13 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
David Mosberger-Tang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 3/11/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ gcc-3.3 -c -g -O -Wall t.c
t.c: In function `foo':
t.c:4: warning: implicit declaration of function `strdup'
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month ago.
Although that doesn't explain the packages listed up top.
DWN permanently lists new packages, have this always been false positives?
Regards,
Joey
--
The only stupid question is the
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 05:23:13PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:15:30AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.15
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to see a /u/s/d/devscripts/examples/dev-best-practices script
which runs things like
#include hallo.h
* Goswin von Brederlow [Sun, Mar 12 2006, 03:35:42PM]:
I think it would be a good idea to have a general dpkg hook to
register a command to be run at the end of dpkg. The syntax would be
something like this:
dpkg-hook /usr/lib/man/update-manpages - run only once in total
On 3/12/06, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month
ago.
Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
I asked Joerg Jaspert about this
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dpkg-hook /usr/lib/man/update-manpages - run only once in total
dpkg-hook --on-depends foobar ldconfig - run once before depends of foobar
What is a depends? Do you mean dependency or dependents?
I think he means dependents: If package foo depends on
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 05:23:13PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:15:30AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.15
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to see a /u/s/d/devscripts/examples/dev-best-practices
Nico Golde wrote:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
I guess that one person got busy or demotivated. I suspect NEW
Well, that person is currently on the CeBIT and manning the
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:20:13PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Matthew R. Dempsky, le Sun 12 Mar 2006 14:09:54 -0600, a écrit :
gcc has the -fno-builtin and -fno-builtin-FUNCTION options.
Or better, -fno-hosted and -fhosted...
What makes those options better in this situation?
--
To
#include hallo.h
* Pierre Habouzit [Mon, Mar 13 2006, 07:16:22PM]:
What is a depends? Do you mean dependency or dependents?
Further, I would not depend on package installation operations but
instead invent something like dpkg-hook --execute ldconfig to run
outstanding tasks noted under
Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
* Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 19:19]:
Nico Golde wrote:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
I guess that one person got busy or
Hi,
* Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 19:19]:
Nico Golde wrote:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
I guess that one person got busy or demotivated. I suspect NEW
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Janak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: rtpproxy
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Maxim Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/ser
* License : BSD
Description : RTP proxy for SER
#include hallo.h
* Frank Küster [Mon, Mar 13 2006, 07:28:42PM]:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dpkg-hook /usr/lib/man/update-manpages - run only once in total
dpkg-hook --on-depends foobar ldconfig - run once before depends of foobar
What is a depends? Do you mean dependency or
On 3/13/06, John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --From: John Gee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mar 13, 2006 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: for those who care about Debian supporting namecallingTo: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-- Forwarded message --From: John
On 3/13/06, John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --From: John Gee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mar 13, 2006 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: for those who care about Debian supporting namecallingTo: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:42:31PM -0700, John Gee wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mar
On 12-Mar-06, 04:22 (CST), Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:43:34AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
function (that would take ints) is perfectly legal.
No, it is not. At least not with a
On 10-Mar-06, 20:47 (CST), David Mosberger-Tang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with gcc-4.0 warnings is that you can't
distinguish between harmless implicit function declarations and ones
that need to be flagged.
Fix them all. There's no excuse for missing prototypes: they're trivial
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Package name: libtest-use-ok-perl
[...]
Description : Alternative to Test::More::use_ok
According to the Test::More documentation, it is recommended to run use_ok()
inside a BEGIN block, so
On 3/13/06, John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --From: John Gee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mar 13, 2006 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: for those who care about Debian supporting
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 12-Mar-06, 04:22 (CST), Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:43:34AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
function (that would take ints) is perfectly
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ehm... all the time I talk about non-critical things! Dealing with
success checking in merged commands would be insane, we cannot assign
the failure to a certain package (except when there is just one, of
course).
[...]
First, if dpkg-hook is
Le Lun 13 Mars 2006 18:38, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
#include hallo.h
* Goswin von Brederlow [Sun, Mar 12 2006, 03:35:42PM]:
I think it would be a good idea to have a general dpkg hook to
register a command to be run at the end of dpkg. The syntax would
be something like this:
dpkg-hook
Matthias Klose wrote:
Richard B. Kreckel writes:
Maybe it would be more productive to calm down a bit and let people play
with that compiler a bit before making it the default.
if you didn't play with it in the past five months, why would you
play with it now?
I didn't play with
On 10592 March 1977, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month ago.
Now thats just wrong.
I have a backlog, yup, but that will clear itself again in a short
timeframe.
--
bye Joerg
[Talking about Social Contract]:
We will not
On 10592 March 1977, Gustavo Franco wrote:
If the ftpmasters are going to stop NEW processing for a while with or
without a special criteria, they should inform us through d-d-a or the
DPL if they think it will generate too much noise, like these threads.
If they did that i'm yet to hear
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:02:18PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Dpkg maintainer(s), what do you think is the correct procedure for
Hello
During the last month I have build my libmysqlclient15 with
shared symbols that looked in objdump -T like:
0013a154 gDO .bss 0004 MYSQL_5.0 my_dont_interrupt
00026d70 gDF .text 02fa MYSQL_5.0 my_strntoll_8bit
00015730 gDF .text 0025 MYSQL_5.0
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:56:29PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:42:31PM -0700, John Gee wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded
On 3/13/06, Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10592 March 1977, Gustavo Franco wrote:
If the ftpmasters are going to stop NEW processing for a while with or
without a special criteria, they should inform us through d-d-a or the
DPL if they think it will generate too much noise,
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 11:00 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Ouch. If that is true, I hope ftpmasters will announce it to the
developers, as a blocked NEW hinders development of Debian and should
not we a surprise. An announcement would at least give us some idea
on when the NEW holding
Petter Reinholdtsen dijo [Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:00:47AM +0100]:
The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
complete.
Ouch. If that is true, I hope ftpmasters will announce it to the
developers, as a
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:49:39PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Petter Reinholdtsen dijo [Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:00:47AM +0100]:
The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
complete.
Ouch. If that is
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:25:21AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
During the last month I have build my libmysqlclient15 with
shared symbols that looked in objdump -T like:
0013a154 gDO .bss 0004 MYSQL_5.0 my_dont_interrupt
00026d70 gDF .text 02fa MYSQL_5.0
[redirecting to -devel where this belongs]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:11:59PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
--
Question to the release and archive people: Is there such a
requirement? Will such architectures indeed be
Dear all!
Now that the GFDL resolution has been done, I have the following
question:
Most (some) documents of the FSF have the following license for the
docs:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:25:21AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
During the last month I have build my libmysqlclient15 with
shared symbols that looked in objdump -T like:
0013a154 gDO .bss 0004 MYSQL_5.0 my_dont_interrupt
00026d70 gDF .text 02fa MYSQL_5.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:24:52 -0800
Source: expect
Binary: expect expectk expect-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.43.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jonathan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:18:14 +
Source: namazu2
Binary: libnmz7-dev namazu2 namazu2-common libnmz7 namazu2-index-tools
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.0.16-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: NOKUBI Takatsugu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:02:26 -0500
Source: lastfmsubmitd
Binary: lastfmsubmitd
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.24-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Decklin Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Decklin Foster [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:00:13 -0800
Source: gdm
Binary: gdm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.13.0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:02:13 +0100
Source: wordnet
Binary: dict-wn wordnet wordnet-dev wordnet-sense-index wordnet-base
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:2.0g-13
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andreas Tille
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:52:25 +0100
Source: nut
Binary: nut nut-usb nut-dev nut-snmp nut-cgi
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Arnaud
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:18:12 +0100
Source: wordnet
Binary: dict-wn wordnet wordnet-dev wordnet-sense-index wordnet-base
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:2.0g-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andreas Tille
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:31:54 +0100
Source: gphoto2
Binary: gphoto2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Frederic Peters [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:07:48 +0100
Source: rpl
Binary: rpl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Göran Weinholt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Göran Weinholt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
